logo
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran

The war between Israel and Iran has raised concerns that Iran could retaliate by trying to close the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil chokepoint due to the large volumes of crude that pass through it every day.
The U.S. military's strike on three sites in Iran over the weekend has raised questions about how its military might respond.
The Strait of Hormuz is between Oman and Iran, which boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines as well as missiles that it could use to make the strait impassable, at least for a time.
Iran's main naval base at Bandar Abbas is on the north coast of the strait. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea.
About 20 million barrels of oil per day, or around 20% of the world's oil consumption, passed through the strait in 2024. Most of that oil goes to Asia.
Here is a look at the waterway and its impact on the global economy:
An energy highway in a volatile region
The strait connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It's only 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide at its narrowest point, but deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers.
Oil that passes through the strait comes from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, and Bahrain, while major supplies of liquefied natural gas come from Qatar. At its narrowest point, the sea lanes for tankers lie in Omani waters, and before and after that cross into Iranian territory.
While some global oil chokepoints can be circumvented by taking longer routes that simply add costs, that's not an option for most of the oil moving through the strait.
That's because the pipelines that could be used to carry the oil on land, such as Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, they don't have nearly enough capacity. 'Most volumes that transit the strait have no alternative means of exiting the region,' according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Closing the Strait of Hormuz would send oil prices massively higher — at least at first
If Iran blocked the strait, oil prices could shoot as high as $120-$130 per barrel, at least temporarily, said Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil analyst at Kpler, in an online webinar Sunday.
That would deal an inflationary shock to the global economy — if it lasted. Analysts think it wouldn't.
Asia would be directly impacted because 84% of the oil moving through the strait is headed for Asia; top destinations are China, India, Japan and South Korea. China gets 47% of its seaborne oil from the Gulf. China, however, has an oil inventory of 1.1 billion barrels, or 2 1/2 months of supply.
U.S. oil customers would feel the impact of the higher prices but would not lose much supply. The U.S. imported only about 7% of its oil from Persian Gulf countries through the strait in 2024, according to the USEIA. That was the lowest level in nearly 40 years.
Iran has good reasons not to block the strait
Closing the strait would cut off Iran's own oil exports. While Iran does have a new terminal under construction at Jask, just outside the strait, the new facility has loaded oil only once and isn't in a position to replace the strait, according to Kpler analysts.
Closure would hit China, Iran's largest trading partner and only remaining oil customer, and harm its oil-exporting Arab neighbors, who are at least officially supporting it in its war with Israel.
And it would mean blocking Oman's territorial waters, offending a country that has served as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran.
The US would likely intervene to reopen the strait
Any price spike would probably not last. One big reason: Analysts expect that the U.S. Navy would intervene to keep the strait open. In the 1980s, U.S. warships escorted Kuwaiti oil tankers through the strait to protect them against Iranian attacks during the Iran-Iraq war.
A price spike 'wouldn't last very long' and the strait would likely be reopened 'very fast,' said Kpler's Falakshahi.
U.S. use of force to reopen the strait would likely be supported by Europe and 'even unofficially by China,' he said. 'Iran's navy would probably get destroyed in a matter of hours or days.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dow rises nearly 375 points, oil sinks
Dow rises nearly 375 points, oil sinks

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dow rises nearly 375 points, oil sinks

The muted response to the US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities led to a bit of a relief rally in the markets. All three of the major averages (^DJI, ^GSPC, ^IXIC) closed higher, and oil prices (CL=F) fell by more than 7%. Yahoo Finance Reporters Jared Blikre and Julie Hyman, along with Great Hill Capital chairman and managing member Thomas Hayes recap the action at the close. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Jared, what's the sector action like today? Well, let's check that out. It's been uh quite the reversal. And uh I'll pull up the YFi interactive before me, and we can see in the indices we are having the best day in a couple weeks. Did not that expect that when the morning began here. Uh we intended to be in the red for most of these sectors. Here's energy down two and a half percent still. That's on a crude oil reversal, but everything else in the green here. XL Y, that's consumer discretionary, that's up almost 2%, and you can thank impart Tesla for that in the robo taxi announcement. Uh real estate, industrials, communication services, utilities, financial, staples, tech, materials, all of those up over 1%. And if we take a look at the Nasdaq 100, we can see just a couple red squares, Amazon and Alphabet down. Here's Tesla up 8.23%. Just circled it up there. Meta up two and uh almost a half percent. Microsoft up nearly two. And uh we can see a similar dynamic playing out in the Dow here. Just a few red spots. Amgen kind of taking notice to the downside almost down about 6%. Chevron also down nearly 2%, not surprising as that's part of the energy trade. Uh but besides that, we're looking at a lot of green here. These are the Dow Industrials, and I just want to leave us real quickly on the transports. Everything you see on the screen here, solidly in the green led by Uber, the largest of 1.68%. And then percentage-wise, we're seeing a car, that's Avis, up about 9%, United Airlines up three and a half percent. List goes on. Back to you guys. Thank you, Jared. Julie, on the floor of the Nicee, get us up to speed. Yeah, it it was really an interesting session as we talked a lot about, right, the to see what we have seen happen in terms of the US strikes on Iran over the weekend, and then Iran hitting cutter today, even if that attack was telegraphed. To then see stocks close out of the highs of the session is a pretty remarkable turn of events here. As we've been talking about, not just today, but really since Israel's attacks on Iran began. This all has to do with what's going on with the price of oil, and the fact that oil flows have not been meaningfully disrupted from Iran that has seen the price will come down has really been what is one of the main driving factors that has allowed stocks to rise. So we continue to watch oil here. Um almost five million barrels a day of oil that goes through the straight of moves, both from Iran and from the other countries in that region, it goes to China. And so there have been a lot of market participants have also been closely monitoring China's reaction to everything that's been going on, and there has been some rhetoric coming from that nation. But again, nothing to cause a lot of alarm in the markets, and we clearly saw um that lack of alarm, to say the least, play out today, Josh. Thank you, Julie. Thank you. Tom Hayes, Great Hill Capital Chairman and Managing Member still with me. Thoughts on today's moves. What do you make of Tom? Well, uh you said selectively constructive. I'll tell you what's really interesting today, small caps outperform tech, outperform the S&P 500. I make it, it's risk on. People are playing the catchup trade. You got some short covering today. Record short interest in small caps right now. I think that's going to be a meaningful trade for the second half of this year as people realize wait, they short, they sold in the whole record one trillion dollars of equity sold at the beginning of April. They continued to have to been forced in, forced in, forced in. Now they're like, the market's gotten away from me. How am I going to catch up on performance? The only way you can catch up is to buy the laggards. So you're you want to be buying small caps. Uh certainly some exposure to international, even though we internationals outperformed. And we're seeing that type of thing on these risk on days. We're seeing the short covering, the shorts become the first buyers, and then you get this positive constructive cycle. And if you want some uh valuation relief, small caps is the place to find it. And mid caps. You started to see flows come into mid caps. So it's really interesting to see that today. I'm paying close attention to that. Uh Jared, I want to bring you in here. So and and Tom does bring a good point. Just looking at the small caps here tacked on about 9/10 of a percent. What what do you make of that? Yeah, let's check that out. The Russell 2000 and also the S&P 600, another measure of small caps, that was leading over the last few weeks, and that was mainly to the upside. Then we took a little tumble, and Russell 2000 was leading to the downside. It operates at a multiple of uh the typical movements that you see in the S&P 500. So it is definitely risk on today, and I'll tell you another thing. I just want to pull up crude oil real quickly because I got an interesting stat for you. This is a price action from Sunday evening when the market opened. We are up 4%, and then we closed the day down 8%. The last time we had a swing that big up four down eight, you'd have to go back to May of 2020, and that was just after crude oil, WTI crude oil, turned negative and traded all the way down to negative 40. That was a crazy time. So it just kind of illustrates the incredible move that we've seen today. All right, thank you to Julie and Jared. I appreciate it. P Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Oil sells off as traders calmly look beyond the bombs in the Middle East
Oil sells off as traders calmly look beyond the bombs in the Middle East

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil sells off as traders calmly look beyond the bombs in the Middle East

NEW YORK (AP) — If oil prices are any measure, Iran just flinched. The price of oil tumbled Monday afternoon in an historical move as traders bet that Iran's decision to bomb a U.S. base in Qatar signals it is not planning to do the one thing that could really hurt America: Shut down the flow of oil by attacking crude shipments. 'When the response comes and it is muted, oil drops,' said Tom Kloza, chief market strategist at consultancy Turner Mason & Co, calling the limited Iran response far short of what many traders feared. 'This rivals some of the historic selloffs.' There's still plenty Iran could do to push prices back up, and the markets could be getting it all wrong, But oil analysts say there are plenty of reasons fear has receded. Scary then calm The price of West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, fell 7.2% to $68.51 per barrel on Monday after Iran announced a missile attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which the U.S. military uses. Traders were relieved because Iran said it had matched the number of bombs dropped by the U.S. on Iranian nuclear sites this weekend, a possible sign of a desire to deescalate the conflict. Markets were initially nervous as oil futures opened for trading Sunday. The price of Brent crude jumped 4% as traders anxiously watched the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway on Iran's southern border that legislators in Tehran were demanding be closed in retaliation. That would have walloped the global economy because much of world's crude and liquified gas passes through it. The drop in oil Monday brings the price back to where it was before fighting between Iran and Israel began over a week ago, when a barrel of U.S. crude was just above $68. That's good news for President Donald Trump who wants the Federal Reserve to stop worrying about inflation and start cutting interest rates. It's also good for motorists this summer if the trend holds. Drivers were already paying higher prices at the pump before the U.S. attack. The average price nationwide is $3.18 per gallon, according to GasBuddy surveys, about 10 cents more than two weeks ago. 'It would be suicidal' The question now is will Tehran continue to keep oil flowing. Some traders were doubtful Iran would try to close the Strait of Hormuz even before its limited attack Monday. They noted that much of country's own crude passes through the waterway — 1.5 million barrels a day — and oil is a big revenue generator for the country that they would be loath to disrupt. 'It's a silly notion that the Iranians would look to do that,' said Kloza. 'I've been covering oil for 50 years and we've never seen the Strait of Hormuz compromised.' Asked about the prospect of a shutdown on NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday, Vice President J.D. Vance put it more simply: 'I think that would be suicidal.' At current oil prices, Tehran receives roughly $40 billion in revenue annually from oil transiting the same waters. That is a tenth of what the entire of country produces in goods and services. Yes, but Andy Lipow, an Houston based oil analyst, says history suggests Iran won't disrupt its own flow of oil, but that countries, like people, don't always act in their economic interests. 'The question for the oil markets is, 'Is his time different?',' he said. 'You might have an emotional decision.' He notes also that Iran has other ways to push oil higher without completely closing off the waterway. Iran could jam navigational devices, slowing transit, or drop mines in the water, forcing the U.S. Navy to do more escorts. Or it could bomb a tanker, he said, sending the premiums that shippers need to pay insurers sky high. Big gamble If traders are wrong and oil shoots back up, the impact could be widely felt. A surge in oil prices would come at a bad time. Trump insists that the inflation scare is largely over, but many economists think higher prices are still coming because the full impact of his tariffs are only now beginning to show up on everyday goods. Trump is clearly aware things could change fast. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' he wrote on Truth Social Monday, adding. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING!' Sign in to access your portfolio

A weakened Tehran lashes out performatively against US airbases to save face
A weakened Tehran lashes out performatively against US airbases to save face

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A weakened Tehran lashes out performatively against US airbases to save face

An empty base as a target, with many hours warning, and a limited number of missiles fired at some of the best air defense systems in the world. Iran's retaliation for the US's weekend strikes on three of its nuclear facilities can only have been designed to deescalate. The US-run Al Udeid airbase in Qatar had been evacuated days earlier, with satellite images showing the departure of planes and personnel widely publicised in the media. It is the most important US military airbase in the region, the home of Central Command. It even launched the drone that killed Iran's top military personality, General Qasem Soleimani, in 2020, Iranian state media said in the hours after 'Operation Glad Tidings of Victory.' The Monday strike against Al-Udeid had close to zero chance of American casualties – and provided the perfect moment of quasi-absurd face-saving for Iran. The first hint of a possible strike came when the US Embassy in Doha, Qatar, issued an emergency 'shelter in place' order for US citizens. As if to remove any doubt, Qatar closed its airspace about an hour prior to the launch of what appears to have been close to a dozen missiles by Iran. Adding to the favourable conditions of the launch for Iran's dwindling arsenal, Qatar is close enough to permit the use of shorter-range missiles, stocks of which have not been as depleted as the medium-range missiles used to hit Israel over the past week. To pour water on anything resembling a flame, Iran's National Security Council said moments after the attack the number of missiles fired had been 'as many as the number of bombs used in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.' Packaging the barrage as the definition of a proportionate response, the Iranian statement went on to insist the attack posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.' Tehran's method of retaliation-without-fangs has been successfully tried and tested. After Soleimani was killed, Iran's retaliatory missile attack against the US's Al Asad airbase in Iraq was reportedly telegraphed to Baghdad beforehand, possibly helping reduce the level of US injury suffered to mostly concussions. Iran's response to Israel's assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in July 2024 in the heart of Tehran heavily telegraphed in advance. 'We knew they'd retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani,' a senior White House official said Monday night. A playbook appears to be forming. But it is one that compounds Iran's military weakness each time it is employed. In 2020, the Islamic Republic lost its pre-eminent military personality – an Iranian hardline hero. In 2024, it showed that valuable allies were not safe in central Tehran. This year, the regime has lost control of its own airspace to the point of previously unthinkable strikes on their prized nuclear facilities by both Israel and the US. This is stark testament to the differing powers on display. Iran has to feign its strength in a managed presentation of restrained and muted anger. The US and Israel get to break taboos daily, shattering Iran's long-held position as a regional power in under ten days, and perhaps ending its ambitions to be a nuclear power. There is now only one real red line left for the United States or Israel to cross, and that is to directly target Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But that may seem ill-advised, given the likelihood this octogenarian theocrat would be replaced by a younger hardliner who is keener to flex Iran's muscles of deterrence. Better to accept toothless retaliations amid Tehran's slow decline. Each expression of Iran's anger has confirmed its slow erosion of power. An angry fledging nuclear power would have accelerated its race to an atomic bomb. That may still happen. But it looks more likely that Iran is desperately hoping its performative lashing out can sate what remains of its hardliners, decimated by Israeli strikes. It may even hope to shuffle back to diplomacy, with talks to contain a nuclear program and ballistic missile stockpile likely severely depleted to shadows of what they were merely ten days ago.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store