&w=3840&q=100)
Why two Chinese ships' collision has become a flashpoint in South China Sea
The incident occurred as the ships were intercepting Philippine Coast Guard vessels escorting the fishing carrier MV Pamamalakaya and 35 other boats delivering fuel and supplies. The clash has further strained relations between China and the Philippines.
In video footage released by the Philippine government, both vessels appeared to have sustained significant damage. While the CCG 3104's bow was heavily shattered, the navy ship sustained deep dents on its hull.
China and Philippines trade blame
The incident has sparked a series of exchanges and mutual accusations between the two countries. While China is focused on driving Philippine ships away from Scarborough Shoal, the Philippine military has squarely placed the blame on Beijing.
On the other hand, General Romeo Brawner Jr, chief of staff of the armed forces of the Philippines, said that China's aggressive actions were very clear, the Associated Press reported.
Brawner said the Chinese navy ship maneuvered to ram the Philippine vessel, which had to move to avoid being hit. As a result, the navy ship instead hit the coast guard ship, which was also closely chasing the Philippine ship, he said.
Brawner further added that China was at fault because of its aggressive maneuvers whereas the Philippine was just trying to protect its fishermen.
Questions over Chinese operational coordination
The collision has raised fresh concerns over how well the Chinese vessels coordinate their operations in the disputed waters.
According to the South China Morning Post report, other navies have also faced similar challenges in the past, including the US Navy, which suffered three separate collisions with commercial ships in just four months in 2017, of which, two were fatal.
The disputed waters
The contested Scarborough Shoal has long been a standing flashpoint in the South China Sea dispute.
The South China Sea is of strategic importance as it is rich in fish stocks and potential oil and gas reserves, and is one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.
Multiple countries, including China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan, have overlapping territorial and maritime claims.
Claims nearly the entire sea through its 'nine-dash line', which is not recognised under international law.
In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled in favor of the Philippines, rejecting China's expansive claims. The ruling was rejected by Beijing.
Scarborough Shoal is a prime flashpoint as it has been the traditional fishing ground for the Philippines, however, it has been controlled by China since 2012, leading to frequent standoffs.
Where does India stand
India's Ministry of External Affairs has reiterated that the South China Sea is part of the global commons and stressed New Delhi's 'abiding interest' in peace and stability in the region.
India and the Philippines recently conducted a bilateral naval exercise off the Philippine coast, reportedly in parts of the South China Sea. In response, China increased its naval and coast guard presence, with the PLA Southern Theatre Command accusing the drills of undermining regional stability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Zelensky says Putin is bluffing, wants sanctions on Russia, Israel's new Gaza plan
In this edition of World Today, the focus is on the upcoming meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15. Global leaders, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, held a virtual call with President Trump ahead of the summit. President Zelensky conveyed that Russia is not negotiating in good faith and is seeking to occupy all of Ukraine, stating, "Putin is bluffing. He's trying to put pressure before the meeting in Alaska." President Trump warned there would be "very severe consequences" if Russia does not agree to end the war. The programme also covers Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's push for a comprehensive hostage release deal, the delisting of Chinese property giant Evergrande, and a series of hate-fueled attacks against Indians in Ireland.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Africa is challenging China's mining hegemony
Over the past two decades, China has entrenched itself as a dominant actor in Africa's mining sector. But signs are mounting that the tide is beginning to turn. A new wave of resistance, driven by increased scrutiny from African governments as well as civil society activism, is starting to challenge China's long-standing dominance in Africa's mining industry. Chinese firms have often failed to deliver promised skills transfer or infrastructure. Consequently, African nations are growingly asserting their rights to value-added development. The old model of raw resource extraction in exchange for infrastructure or investments is no longer tenable in a region demanding agency, accountability, and economic sovereignty. No longer passive partners Africa is home to some of the world's richest reserves of critical minerals. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) alone produces 80% of the world's cobalt, a mineral indispensable for rechargeable batteries. China controls around 80% of that output through long-standing agreements such as the Sino Congolaise des Mines (Sicomines) deal, which granted Chinese firms mining rights in exchange for infrastructure projects. However, the benefits to local Congolese have been disproportionate to the mineral wealth extracted. Congo's cobalt ban: Impact on global market explained According to the civil society coalition Congo Is Not for Sale (CNPAV), tax exemptions granted to Chinese companies cost the DRC approximately $132 million in 2024 alone. These losses have spurred public outrage, and citizens have called for a full review of the Sicomines deal. Further, since the payments are tied to market prices, there is a real risk that the country could receive little or no infrastructure investment during downturns. Faced with mounting criticism, the Congolese government was forced to renegotiate the existing contracts with China, especially in light of fluctuating copper prices. The DRC reportedly plans to increase its stake in a joint venture with Chinese firms Sinohydro and China Railway Group, raising its ownership from 32% to 70%. Last year, after Congo's state-owned miner, Gecamines, voiced its opposition, the sale of Trafigura-backed miner Chemaf Resources to China's Norin Mining was cancelled. In Namibia, China's Xinfeng Investments has been accused of acquiring its lithium mine through a bribe of N$ 50 million. Over the years, Xinfeng has exported thousands of tonnes of raw lithium ore to China but has not constructed the promised processing facilities. Workers at the company have also reported hazardous working conditions and substandard housing. In 2023, China's Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt invested $300 million to construct a lithium processing plant in Zimbabwe. Most benefits will likely flow back to China unless robust regulatory frameworks and local capacity-building initiatives are implemented. China's dominance has also triggered environmental and social concerns. In Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe, Chinese firm Sunny Yi Feng's application for coal mining permits has been blocked by environmental authorities. In Zambia, a catastrophic acid spill from a Chinese-owned copper mine contaminated a significant tributary of the Kafue River, one of the country's most critical water sources. In Cameroon, resistance is growing against the massive Lobé-Kribi Iron Ore Project led by Sinosteel Cam S.A., a subsidiary of China's Sinosteel Corporation. Local NGOs have warned that the project threatens ecosystems, public health, and cultural heritage. Many community members see the project as a fait accompli, pushed through without adequate consultation or benefit-sharing. Across Africa, Beijing's once-unquestioned mining dominance is now being scrutinised more closely, with a growing demand for fairer, more transparent partnerships. This signals a newfound assertiveness by African governments, who are no longer content to act as passive partners in resource exploitation. Policy changes Meanwhile, strategic policy changes are also occurring. In 2022, Zimbabwe banned the export of unprocessed lithium to force investors to build local processing plants. In 2023, Namibia implemented a similar export ban on unprocessed lithium and other critical minerals. These countries aim to retain more value from their mineral wealth by requiring local beneficiation. Similar stories are unfolding across the continent. Still, policy alone is not enough. These export bans must match broader economic strategies to ensure local participation in processing and transformation. Otherwise, they risk simply shifting exploitation from one form to another. African leaders must ensure that domestic processing leads to fundamental economic transformation, not just a new phase of elite capture. China may still be Africa's largest mining partner, but the future of its dominance is no longer guaranteed. Moreover, a clear shift is underway, where African nations are reasserting sovereignty over their natural resources. By challenging opaque contracts, enforcing environmental standards, and demanding value addition, they are redrawing the terms of engagement. If these trends continue, African countries are poised to reshape the global supply chain for minerals and their role within it, moving from exporters of raw materials to integral partners in the emerging green economy. This change would come at the expense of China's long-standing dominance in the African mining sector. Samir Bhattacharya, Associate Fellow, Observer Research Foundation
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Nvidia, AMD China revenue deal could be model for others, says Bessent
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the recent deal to allow Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to resume lower-end AI chip sales to China, on the condition they give the US government a 15 per cent cut of the related revenue, could serve as a model for others. 'I think we could see it in other industries over time,' Bessent said Wednesday in a television interview on Bloomberg Surveillance. 'Right now, this is unique, but now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it?' Bessent credited President Donald Trump with the 'very unique solution' of allowing Nvidia to expand in China and become a bellwether for Chinese technology, with the US taxpayer getting 'a share of' the reward. The revenue the Treasury receives from the arrangement will go to pay down debt, he said. 'If we could make a substantial debt' repayment, that would then allow for discussions about a program of sending money to taxpayers, he also said. Asked about reporting that China is urging its companies to avoid the Nvidia H20 processors now allowed for its market, Bessent said 'sure, we can discuss that' with the Chinese. 'But it also tells me that they are worried about the Nvidia chips becoming the standard in China.' China Talks On Tuesday, Bessent said that he'd be meeting again with his Chinese counterparts 'within the next two or three months,' speaking on Fox Business. He dismissed the possibility of China emulating other US trading partners in winning tariff relief in return for boosting investments in the US. When asked if China could make pledges worth billions of dollars like Japan, South Korea and the EU have as part of their trade agreements, Bessent said 'my sense is no because a lot of the buyout or the funds from the buyout are going to go to critical industries that we need to reshore and a lot of those need to be reshored away from China.' Whether the industry was semiconductors, rare-earth magnets, pharmaceuticals or steel, 'my sense is that isn't what will happen,' Bessent said in an interview with Fox Business on Tuesday. Tech and AI have been among the most high profile of areas of competition between the world's two biggest economies. President Donald Trump has extended a pause of higher tariffs on Chinese goods for another 90 days into early November, a move that stabilized trade ties between the world's two largest economies while they try to forge an agreement. Chinese companies in sectors such as electric vehicles have opened factories abroad to access new markets, a move that could also help them skirt US tariffs. He also indicated that Washington wanted to see measures from China over an extended period to stem the flow of chemicals used to make fentanyl before lowering duties Trump put in place over the issue. 'We will need to see months, if not quarters, if not a year, of progress on that before I could imagine those tariffs coming down,' he said.
