logo
Malaysia's food supply not impacted by confict in Iran, says Mat Sabu

Malaysia's food supply not impacted by confict in Iran, says Mat Sabu

The Star15-06-2025
BERUAS: Malaysia is not heavily dependent on food imports from Iran, and as such, the situation does not impact the country's food supply, says Agriculture and Food Security Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Sabu.
He explained that Malaysia's food import requirements from Iran are limited to dates and legume products, which are not among the country's primary food commodities.
"Most of our food imports from Iran are not high. Most of our imports are from India, Pakistan, the Middle East, China and Asean countries," he told a press conference after visiting the Perak State Farmers' Organisation (PPN) cattle rearing project at PPN Perak Kampung Tengah here on Sunday (June 15).
Meanwhile, when asked about the impact of the current hot weather on padi crops, Mohamad said that so far, 60% of the country's padi production remains unaffected.
However, he said, adjustments to the padi planting schedule may be necessary based on discussions with the Muda Agricultural Development Authority (MADA) and the Kemubu Agricultural Development Authority (Kada).
"Sometimes we need to change the (planting) schedule a little and so on, depending on weather conditions and suitability," he said.
Regarding Sunday's visit, Mohamad said the ministry would assist the livestock farm, which currently houses about 500 animals, in building a slaughterhouse to help increase the farm's productivity.
"We have set a target to achieve a meat self-sufficiency level (SSL) of more than 30 per cent by 2030, compared to 20 per cent currently. With the developments we are seeing now, we are confident of reaching the goal," he said. - Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Malaysia to continue coordinating Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire efforts, says Anwar
Malaysia to continue coordinating Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire efforts, says Anwar

The Star

time11 minutes ago

  • The Star

Malaysia to continue coordinating Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire efforts, says Anwar

PUTRAJAYA: Malaysia will continue to play its coordinating role in the ceasefire efforts between Thailand and Cambodia, without a need for a full-scale Asean intervention, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The Prime Minister said he had met with both Defence Ministers of Thailand and Cambodia to discuss the details of the protocols that must be observed at the contested borders. "Thankfully, as of now, both countries have expressed their desire for Malaysia to continue playing a coordinating role. 'They have committed to upholding the conditions necessary to ensure the ceasefire is fully respected. "In light of this, Malaysia will continue its role in facilitating the process," said Anwar after attending the 2026 Budget Consultation Council at the Finance Ministry here on Thursday (Aug 7). "At this point, we do not see the need for full Asean intervention. "Both sides support this initiative and it is sufficient for Malaysia to facilitate the cooperation between Thailand and Cambodia," he said The United States and China will not be involved to monitor the contested border area, he added. "They, however, have offered full cooperation in terms of logistical assistance or support should the need arise," said Anwar. Asked to reveal the challenges faced to reach a consensus, Anwar said at the moment both sides have agreed to a ceasefire. "This is an important milestone. "It's important to recognise that border issues between the two countries have persisted for hundreds of years. "Although there are some differences in opinion, it should not lead to conflict," he said. Thailand and Cambodia agreed to implement a ceasefire effective midnight on July 28 through a special meeting in Malaysia chaired by Anwar, that brought both South-East Asian neighbours to the negotiating table following heightened tensions. Tensions between the two countries peaked on May 28 when fighting broke out in the disputed Preah Vihear area, resulting in the death of a Cambodian soldier.

Asean needs emergency override mechanisms to address regional crises
Asean needs emergency override mechanisms to address regional crises

New Straits Times

time11 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Asean needs emergency override mechanisms to address regional crises

WHAT happens when a neighbourhood's long-standing "mind your own business" rule becomes a dangerous barrier during a life-threatening crisis? This question perfectly captures Asean's current dilemma with Myanmar's political upheaval. Imagine living in a community where houses are built close together, and when one catches fire, the flames quickly spread to others. Yet the neighbourhood association has a strict rule: never interfere in your neighbour's problems. On Feb 1, 2021, the elected Myanmar government was overthrown, halting a decade of democratic progress. The military arrested key leaders, including Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, dissolved its Parliament, and declared a state of emergency. What followed was a systematic assault on Myanmar's civil society that launched the country into chaos and violence. The coup's aftermath has been devastating, with the military launching brutal crackdowns on peaceful protesters, using live ammunition against civilians, and conducting mass arrests. The numbers confirm an alarming humanitarian crisis because of the large number of casualties. The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners reports that over 4,000 civilians lost their lives while 25,000 people were arbitrarily detained, and 1.2 million people were forced to abandon their homes. The military purposefully attacked hospitals and healthcare staff leading to the destruction of public health infrastructure, according to Physicians for Human Rights. Schools remain closed while teachers encounter persecution as a result. Military operations actively target educational institutions to weaken civilian resistance while they consolidate their control over the country. Myanmar's situation extends beyond domestic political issues because it threatens to disrupt the stability of the whole region for Asean. Due to military actions, there are large refugee movements into Thailand, Bangladesh and India, and border areas have turned into centres for drug trafficking and arms smuggling. Asean members must decide how to handle situations where internal member state crises evolve into security threats that demand collective action. Myanmar's problems have become everyone's problems. The military's control extends beyond politics through massive business conglomerates that control jade mining, telecommunications, banking, and real estate — generating billions annually. This economic power makes them resistant to external pressure. Economically, Myanmar has suffered severe decline with the kyat currency depreciating sharply, and foreign investors withdrawing. The World Bank last year reported Myanmar's economy contracted by 18 per cent in 2021, with continued deterioration affecting vulnerable populations. Asean's response came through the Five-Point Consensus, adopted during an emergency summit in Jakarta in April 2021. For an organisation historically committed to non-interference, this represented a significant departure — like a quiet neighbour finally calling the police when the house next door becomes too dangerous. The consensus established five commitments: immediate violence cessation, constructive dialogue among all parties, appointment of a Special Envoy, humanitarian assistance provision, and unrestricted envoy access. However, implementation has proven catastrophically ineffective. Myanmar's military has systematically violated each point. Violence has intensified rather than ceased. Dialogue has been rejected outright, with the junta refusing to engage meaningfully with opposition groups or Asean representatives. Humanitarian aid has been blocked. Special Envoys have been denied meaningful access, often shown only what the military wants them to see. Myanmar's ability to obstruct collective action demonstrates how the "everyone must agree" rule paralyses response mechanisms when decisive action is needed. Subhadra, [7/8/2025 1:08 PM] The non-interference principle, once Asean's strength in preventing inter-state conflicts, has become a shield for authoritarian behaviour and protects member states from accountability for actions threatening regional stability. Asean also lacks early warning systems and rapid response capabilities, typically reacting to crises after they have escalated. Myanmar's crisis has created a domino effect across Southeast Asia. Thailand, sharing a 2,400-kilometre border with Myanmar, faces enormous pressure from refugee flows and cross-border criminal activities. Bangladesh, already struggling with over a million Rohingya refugees, now faces additional refugee burdens. India's northeastern border areas deal with refugee influx, straining local resources. Criminal networks have exploited Myanmar's governance vacuum, using the country as a base for transnational crime. The crisis has severely damaged Asean's international credibility. Despite these challenges, Malaysia's Asean chairmanship in 2025 presents a crucial opportunity for institutional renewal. Malaysia has historically played a constructive role in regional diplomacy and has the experience to lead meaningful change. The organisation urgently needs emergency override mechanisms allowing decisive action during humanitarian crises, even without unanimous consent. This doesn't mean abandoning consensus entirely, but creating exceptions for situations threatening regional peace and security. Asean must develop early warning systems and rapid response capabilities to prevent future crises from escalating. A reformed approach should combine traditional diplomatic engagement with targeted economic measures and broader stakeholder inclusion — engaging civil society organisations, the National Unity Government, and ethnic groups alongside state actors. International partnerships with the United Nations and major powers can provide additional leverage and resources. Success in resolving the Myanmar crisis will determine whether Asean can maintain its role as Southeast Asia's primary security architecture. The path forward requires balancing sovereignty respect with responsibility to protect regional peace and human rights. Asean must upgrade institutional capabilities while preserving the cooperative spirit that has made Southeast Asia peaceful.

ASEAN As A Forum Conveniens
ASEAN As A Forum Conveniens

BusinessToday

time15 minutes ago

  • BusinessToday

ASEAN As A Forum Conveniens

By Redza Zakaria After several days of airstrikes launched by Thailand against Cambodian military targets along their long-disputed border, tensions reached their worst point in recent weeks. The conflict, rooted in historical territorial disagreements, escalated rapidly and resulted in significant casualties and displacement. However, the situation took a positive turn as both Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire following five days of intense fighting. The clashes reportedly killed dozens of people and forced tens of thousands to flee their homes. Malaysian Prime Minister, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, welcomed the ceasefire, stating, 'This is a vital first step towards de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security.' He further announced that the hostilities would officially cease at midnight, marking a hopeful milestone in efforts to stabilize the region and rebuild trust between the two neighbouring countries. As Malaysia holds the ASEAN Chairmanship, this presents an excellent opportunity for the Prime Minister and the Government to showcase Malaysia's diplomatic and negotiation capabilities. It positions Malaysia not only at the centre of regional attention but also reinforces the message that ASEAN is more than just a platform for visibility, it is a credible and effective forum for negotiation and conflict resolution. From a legal standpoint, this strengthens the notion that Malaysia could serve as a forum conveniens , a suitable and convenient venue, for peaceful negotiations, whether among ASEAN member states or even involving non-member countries seeking neutral ground for dialogue. Thus, this would provide a good focal point for raising concerns without taking sides. In English law, forum conveniens refers to the appropriate forum in which a case should be tried, based on what is most suitable for all parties and in the interest of justice. In the context of negotiations or dispute resolution, however, a forum conveniens can also be understood more broadly as a neutral and practical setting where parties can engage in constructive dialogue to reach a mutually beneficial, win-win agreement. Within just one month, Malaysia has witnessed two high-level diplomatic engagements with significant regional and global implications. The most recent was the agreement between Thailand and Cambodia to implement an immediate and unconditional ceasefire after days of escalating conflict along their shared border, an event facilitated under the ASEAN framework. The second notable event was the bilateral meeting between U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, which took place on the 11th of July 2025, on the sidelines of the 58th ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Kuala Lumpur. Described by Rubio as 'positive and constructive,' the meeting marked a key moment in the U.S.'s renewed strategic focus on the Indo-Pacific region, aiming to re-engage with Southeast Asia and rebalance its foreign policy attention beyond ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Europe that had previously dominated the Trump administration's agenda. These developments highlight Malaysia's growing role not only as a regional host but also as a proactive and respected player in international diplomacy, further validating its chairmanship and reinforcing ASEAN's relevance in global affairs. Confidence in the current Malaysian Government is needed, particularly in how it emphasizes the value of negotiation and positions ASEAN as a key platform for dialogue, not just due to geographically, but as a vital regional hub for resolving critical issues. The meetings between Cambodia and Thailand showcased the importance of skilled negotiators. While U.S. President Donald Trump played a central role in initiating the process, the decision to hold the talks in Putrajaya underscores Malaysia's strategic value as a neutral and trusted venue for high-stakes diplomacy. By hosting these negotiations, Malaysia affirms its credibility as a mediator in Southeast Asia and enhances ASEAN's capacity for peaceful dialogue and conflict resolution. The author is a Deputy Head of Unit, Maritime Law, Policy and Governance at the Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences (IOES), and Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store