logo
Bombshell report reveals key factors behind Black Hawk collision with jet that killed 67

Bombshell report reveals key factors behind Black Hawk collision with jet that killed 67

Daily Mirror28-04-2025

The disaster near Washington DC's Ronald Reagan International Airport killed 64 people on board American Airlines Flight 5342 and three Army personnel on the Black Hawk helicopter
A bombshell new report has revealed the fatal mistakes that caused the catastrophic collision between a US Army helicopter and a passenger plane.
The disaster over the Potomach river near Washington DC's Ronald Reagan International Airport on January 29 killed 64 people on board American Airlines Flight 5342, and three Army personnel on the helicopter. The mid-air crash was deadliest incident involving an aircraft in the US since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, and sparked a new wave of concern over pressures on air traffic control in the country. Now, an investigative report has found made two critical errors made by the helicopter's pilot in the moments leading up to the collision.


Before the crash, air traffic control had issued Army Black Hawk pilot Capt. Rebecca Lobach and her co-pilot Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves with a warning about the close proximity of the regional passenger jet, which the crew acknowledged.
They then requested to perform "visual separation," a common aviation procedure where pilots use their sight to navigate and keep their distance from other aircraft.
Recordings from the incident uncovered by the New York Times reveal that the controller responded with "Visual separation approved," meaning the request was granted.
However, Cpt. Lobach failed to visually separate from the incoming passenger jet.
It is believed that the captain - who was on her annual Black Hawk flight evaluation with her instructor and co-pilot Mr Eaves - either did not spot the plane, or was unable to navigate the helicopter to a safer position.

Then, 15 seconds before the crash, co-pilot then relayed order from the air control tower to turn left "toward the east river bank" but Capt Lobach did not follow this instruction.
It remains unclear why the visual separation or the instruction to move left was not followed, and there remains "no indication" that the captain had suffered a medical event, the report found.

Investigators suspect that a malfunctioning microphone may have prevented crucial information from reaching the cockpit of the US Army helicopter.
This could have involved human error if the both the pilot and co-pilot simultaneously pressed the talk button, as this would have cut off incoming audio.
Jennifer Homendy, chair of the US National Transportation Safety Board, this mistake may have led to the crew recieving an incomplete message, leaving them unaware of where to manoeuvre their helicopter.

She told reporters: "At 8:47:42 - or 17 seconds before impact - a radio transmission from the tower was audible on both CVRs directing the Black Hawk to pass behind the CRJ.
"CVR data from the Black Hawk indicated that the portion of the transmission that stated 'pass behind the' may not have been received by the Black Hawk crew."
Among the victims on board the American Airlines flight were 28 members of the US figure skating community.
It included former figure skating world champions Evgenia Shishkova and Vadim Naumov, as well as promising teenage skaters Jinna Han and Spencer Lane.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Abandoned wartime village frozen in time where empty terrace houses rot
Abandoned wartime village frozen in time where empty terrace houses rot

Daily Mirror

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Abandoned wartime village frozen in time where empty terrace houses rot

The whole village of Tyneham in Dorset was evacuated during the World War II, but today the abandoned village still remains and visitors can explore its deserted street and the memories left behind Tucked away on the Dorset coast lies a village where time stopped in 1943 and never restarted. Tyneham in Dorset was evacuated during World War II in December 1943, when the War Office took over the land to make space for Army training. Around 225 people were told to pack up and leave their homes within days. The residents believed it would only be temporary and they would return one day. ‌ Residents left a note on the church door reading - "Please treat the church and houses with care; we have given up our homes where many of us lived for generations to help win the war to keep men free. We shall return one day and thank you for treating the village kindly.' ‌ Despite the war ending in 1945, the residents were never allowed to reclaim their homes, and Tyneham remained under Army control - and it still is. The village became part of a British Army training site, used to test tanks and weapons. To this day, it's owned by the Ministry of Defence and forms part of the Armoured Fighting Vehicles Gunnery School. However Tyneham isn't the only local village absorbed into a Army training ground; Worbarrow Bay and Lulworth ranges are grounds that remain active to this day. The land is still used for the Armoured Fighting Vehicles Gunnery School, a live fire training school - which is why the area is only open to the public on selected weekends and bank holidays. When they allow visitors to explore what remains of the village, it's like stepping back in time. ‌ Although many of the buildings have crumbled, there are still preserved fragments of Tyneham's past. ‌ The old schoolhouse and church have been carefully restored and today holds exhibitions about the people who once lived there with photos and letters. A row of terraced cottages, known as The Row, still stands near the church. Some buildings have crumbled, but others remain hauntingly still - like they're waiting for their owners to come home. ‌ There's also a restored farm area with picnic benches, surrounded by broken walls and fading signs of village life. Tyneham is often called 'Dorset's lost village', and it's easy to see why. It's quiet, eerie, and frozen in the past - a snapshot of a community that vanished almost overnight. ‌ Tyneham is more than a village lost to war. It's a time capsule - a stark reminder of the sacrifices of war and what's left behind when history moves on without you. For those planning a visit, it's best to check the opening times online. The village, nearby Worbarrow Bay and the Lulworth Ranges are all part of a live military zone. The exact dates are listed on the Government website. ‌ If you're after a day out that's a little different and don't mind a few goosebumps - Tyneham offers a rare glimpse into wartime Britain, frozen in time. Although visitors often say it gives them goosebumps, especially when reading notes left behind by children or seeing the school's original blackboard.

EXCLUSIVE Powerful White House insider's illuminating view of President Trump and Elon Musk... as the titans go head-to-head in explosive feud
EXCLUSIVE Powerful White House insider's illuminating view of President Trump and Elon Musk... as the titans go head-to-head in explosive feud

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Powerful White House insider's illuminating view of President Trump and Elon Musk... as the titans go head-to-head in explosive feud

On the morning of September 11, 2001, I was a young political aide working in the West Wing of the White House. Suddenly, I had a choice to make. The terrible events of that day were already unfolding. Two aircraft had crashed into the World Trade Center North and South towers in New York City. Two other planes would soon crash into the Pentagon and a field in Western Pennsylvania. Secret Service agents came into my small office – moments after the second plane hit the South Tower. They were evacuating the buildings. I was given an ultimatum: Evacuate or stay, however if I stayed, they could not guarantee my safety. I immediately stood up and walked towards the exit, but something inside me made be stop. I was overcome with the feeling that I was standing at a crossroads, and I pivoted. I turned on my heels and walked straight back into the White House. That pivot changed the course of my career. I became employee number one in the newly formed White House Office of Homeland Security. That pivot that day led to years of learning and working at the highest level of national security in the United States. Only years later did I realize that my White House 'pivot' wasn't the only one that I'd made in my life. Some of my 'pivots' were intentional. Others were done on a whim. Some were successful and others not as much. Altogether, each one has determined my professional journey from rural Pennsylvania to Washington, DC, to today – an adviser to American's most influential business and political leaders. With untold amounts of appreciation and gratitude to many mentors and friends for teaching me how to manage life's inevitable decision-points, I've set out to guide others by developing the 'Power Pivot' model. I've now taught this system to Fortune 500 CEOs, young professionals and even middle-aged moms and dads, who've decided that it's time for change. Now, I'll teach it to you, by sharing case studies of three of the world's most famous 'Pivoters'. Slow Pivot One of the most impressive career transformations in modern American history, without a doubt, belongs to President Donald J. Trump. As we all know, Trump followed in the footsteps of his father, the successful developer Fred Trump. Donald J. Trump built the family business into a billion-dollar real estate empire in New York City and beyond. His not-so-secret secrets to success have been documented in multiple best-selling books about entrepreneurship and wealth building. Less well-known, however, is how Trump steadily and deliberately pivoted to politics. As early as the 1980s, he was vocal about his interest in government, even though he was seldom considered a serious candidate for any public office. Trump outlined his views on various political issues, from critiquing consensus views on 'free trade' with CNN's Larry King in 1987 to arguing against unfettered illegal immigration on NBC's 'Meet the Press' in 1999. In 2004, Trump added 'reality TV star' to his resume with the hit NBC show 'The Apprentice.' The program, which also featured his daughter Ivanka Trump, gave us his iconic tag line, 'You're fired!' Trump's foray into media followed the example of another famous Republican politician, who honed his communication skills in the entertainment industry: Ronald Reagan. Over his adult lifetime, Trump has demonstrated an interest in politics, articulated a set for principles on which to campaign, and developed the skills to communicate his ideas to the masses. In my Power Pivot model, I layout the tools of how to implement a strategy over time to achieve your goal – and how intentional planning and intentional purpose lead to intentional change. At 40 years old, I decided I wanted to sit on corporate boards. To accomplice this objective, I put in place an intentional plan that took nearly three years and included enrolling in business school and networking with purpose. The plan led to success. But not every 'pivot,' however, will be successful. Nor will one land you the gig as leader of the free world. Learning from failures is invaluable and the key is when and how to pivot. The Backtrack Elon Musk is another world-renown entrepreneur, who has attempted a pivot into politics. Of course, Elon is in a category of his own when it comes to innovation and business success. He has created and managed global industrial corporations that have become iconic brands from X, Tesla, and SpaceX, a venture that will likely put humans on Mars. Though after President Trump gave him the top job at the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon was unable to capture the hearts and minds of Democrats, independents and even some Republicans. Furthermore, his businesses have suffered to varying degrees from the negative blowback. Indeed, while polls in March showed that one-third of voters believed that DOGE's work was necessary, nearly three in ten thought that it needed to be done more methodically. Another one-third said that it had been reckless. Last Friday, President Trump graciously received Elon in the Oval Office, marking the end of his day-to-day oversight of DOGE and to thank him for his involvement to date. Elon, who was a special designated employee, which enabled him to stay in the top role at DOGE for 130 days, will now return to his day jobs, if you will. I'm all too familiar with the predicament Elon faced. He saw an opportunity to apply his unique skills to a major problem that needed solving – the reform of a bloated federal government. But there's wisdom in knowing when not to pivot or pivot back if something is not playing out as you envisioned it. Elon realized he couldn't effectively lead DOGE, while also leading his global businesses, in part because of the damage the political backlash was causing him. I knew I always wanted to be a CEO or be my own boss. After the White House, I joined a law firm, where I spent nearly 13 years growing and ultimately leading their Government Relations arm. I'm daily thankful for the trust, opportunity, and experiences they gave me (especially as someone who is not a lawyer). I appreciate how I grew professional while I was there. But at year 10, I was getting antsy and wanted to explore new opportunities. I would say I had a chip on my shoulder that I could do anything. I start putting a plan in place to branch off, but it was a little too early. I quickly realized that I didn't yet have the credibility necessary for my own venture. So, I identified other areas I needed to strengthen and over the following three years, I sought out opportunities to grow professionally. I was also simultaneously laying the groundwork to eventually achieve my goal. Resilience – the ability to rebound from setback to success – is key to a 'Power Pivot.' Time will tell if Elon has a future in the political arena. He has demonstrated one notable and necessary political strength: the ability to backtrack. And that is perhaps something that others can learn from... at the very least, politics is a dog-eat-dog world no matter what the intentions. Directionless Pivot On February 18, 2021, Buckingham Palace announced that 'The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have confirmed to Her Majesty The Queen that they will not be returning as working members of The Royal Family.' Regardless of your opinion of Meghan and Prince Harry's decision to leave the Royal Family, more than four years after their 'pivot,' they have fallen short of what they had hoped would result. Of note with some of Meghan's endeavors, Spotify canceled her podcast 'Archetypes' after one season. A second similar venture, 'Confessions of a Female Founder,' which debuted this year, appears to be struggling to gain traction with audiences. 'With Love, Meghan' - the Netflix series centered around Meghan's homemaking and lifestyle tips, is seen by some as being unrelatable and out of touch. The future of her food brand 'As Ever,' is also uncertain as the Duchess said she's unlikely to restock some of her signature products. I give full credit and laud both Meghan and Prince Harry for taking such big chances after deciding that they had to make a change. They knew they had to pivot and did so boldly. They unfortunately failed to recognize a key element of the 'Power Pivot', intentional purpose. Before a pivot, it's necessary to do market analysis to determine what you can offer that will differentiate yourself from the competition is essential. They may have benefited from a deeper look into their intentions and the impact that their pivot would have on their family, their businesses and their reputations. If they applied my Power Pivot model to these efforts, Meghan would have had better insight into the need to be more certain of her audience. Who would and would not follow her and buy her products. No one, including me, should pretend to imagine the pressure Meghan and Prince Harry faced as working Royals. But I look at this from a business perspective, a more intentional plan was needed. All of these hard learned lessons and more are contained in the 'Power Pivot,' and I can't wait to educate others about them. Ashley Davis is a partner at S-3 Group, a founder partner of West Front Strategies LLC and former special assistant to the Director of Homeland Security

Republican senators question cost of Army's parade spectacle set for Trump's birthday
Republican senators question cost of Army's parade spectacle set for Trump's birthday

The Independent

time2 days ago

  • The Independent

Republican senators question cost of Army's parade spectacle set for Trump's birthday

Several Republican senators have questioned the cost of an upcoming military parade set to take place on President Donald Trump 's birthday. The parade is expected to be held in Washington, D.C., on June 14 to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday, which also happens to fall on Trump's 79th birthday. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican, voiced his concern about the spectacle after he learned it would cost an estimated $25 million to $40 million, per Politico. According to the publication, Wicker heard about the hefty cost from Army Secretary Dan Driscoll in an Army budget hearing. Driscoll said he could not provide an exact price for the parade because the Army will also need to pay for the road damage that its tanks will do, Politico reported. NBC News reported, citing military officials, that it may cost as much as $16 million to repair the streets of Washington, D.C. after the parade. 'I would have recommended against the parade,' Wicker told Politico on Thursday. Wicker did mention a positive possible outcome of the planned spectacle: 'The secretary feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force, that it will be a recruiting tool.' 'So, we'll see,' he added. The Army has already met its recruiting goals for the 2025 fiscal year. In a press release issued Tuesday, the Army announced it signed contracts with more than 61,000 future soldiers, four months before the end of the fiscal year. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, also critiqued the military parade. 'I'm glad that we're honoring the Army. I think that's really important to recognize such a significant anniversary,' she said in a recent interview with Politico. But 'the cost does seem a bit steep,' the Republican added. Senator Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, went a step further to tell Politico, 'If it costs money, I won't go.' The parade will feature roughly 6,600 Army troops who will wear uniforms from every military conflict the U.S. was involved in since the Revolutionary War. It will feature military equipment such as a WWII-vintage B-25 bomber, a P-1 fighter and Huey helicopters used in the Vietnam War, according to Politico. Reuters reported that, according to the Army, there will also be 25 M1 Abrams tanks, 28 Stryker armored vehicles, and four Paladin self-propelled artillery vehicles. In a May 4 interview on Meet the Press with NBC News' Kristen Welker, Trump said the cost of the parade is 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store