1000lb Sisters star Tammy Slaton reveals she's ENGAGED just two months after going public with girlfriend Andrea Dalton
1000lb Sisters star Tammy Slaton has revealed she's engaged to Andrea Dalton just two months after the couple went public.
Tammy, 38 - whose sister Amy, 37, announced she was engaged only last month - let the news slip during an appearance the Creative Chaos podcast on Tuesday.
Speaking about how her and Andrea like to spend time together, Tammy explained: 'Me and my fiancée, we just kind of chill at home.'
The revelation prompted a shocked response from host Hunter Ezell: 'Hold on, you said fiancée?', before the television star showed off her shiny new engagement ring.
Tammy was also proudly sporting an 'Andrea' necklace, later revealing that her and her love interest have been together for 'around three years'.
It comes just a couple of months after Tammy - who has lost a staggering 500 pounds - made public her relationship with a woman.
Admitting that she hadn't broken the news to her family because 'they'd have something to say about it', the 38-year-old revealed: 'Amy's not the only one that's seeing somebody new. So have I....
'I have been seeing someone for the past couple months and it's going pretty well.'
She added: 'The person I'm dating is a woman. So I haven't told my family because my family's gonna have something to say about it.'
'I think my family probably has more opinions than the world has a**holes because they be farting so much.'
After hearing the news during an episode of 1000-Lb Sisters however, Tammy's mother voiced her support for her daughter, saying: 'If Andrea genuinely cares for Tammy and makes her happy, then I'll be happy with her.'
Tammy and Andrea, who both live in Kentucky, met on a dating app and have 'talked every day since'.
2025 has indeed proved to have been a happy year for the Slaton family thus far, after Tammy's sister Amy announced her engagement to Brian Lovvorn just a couple of months ago.
Amy spoke about her fiancée's proposal during a recent episode of their show, saying: 'Originally, he slipped a green apple Ring Pop on my finger while I was asleep, about two weeks into our relationship.
'I was shocked at first, and I said yes but only if the real proposal was in a haunted house on Halloween.'
Just five months after they began dating, Brian made that proposal a reality as he got down on one knee with a gothic ring.
Amy recalled the proposal: 'He said something about, "my love for you is crazy, it's scary how compatible we are".
'Just like our matching tattoos say, "scary love".'
News of her sister Tammy's engagement comes two years after her husband Caleb Willingham died of an unknown cause at the age of 40.
Tammy revealed in an interview following his passing that she no longer had an interest in dating men.
'A few years ago I came out as pansexual but after Caleb passing,' she explained,' I just don't want to be with men anymore.
'I don't know how my family's going to react when I tell them I'm seeing a woman.'
Last year Tammy opened up about the moment she found out that Caleb had passed away.
During an interview with People, Tammy revealed a friend of Caleb's told her over text message that her husband wasn't doing well - before he informed her just 20 minutes later that he had died.
At the time, Tammy was at her home in Kentucky and Caleb was at the Ohio rehab facility she had previously been at with him.
'I was sitting in the fetal position,' she told the publication.
'I got a text message from his friend up there and the text said, 'Caleb's not doing good. They're in there working on him.' 20 minutes later he texted me back and said he was gone.
The TLC star also said she had been 'doing fairly well' getting through the tragedy, and had even made a ring and musical note-shaped necklace with the ashes of her late husband.
She had grown attached to the jewelry and finds comfort knowing a piece of him remains with her.
'He's going to live on now forever because his memory is encapsulated,' Tammy said.
'Knowing that he's with me, it's helping me pass the day. I find myself grabbing my necklace and holding it a lot. When I take off my jewelry, I feel like it's weird, separation anxiety. I start panicking.'
Watching Caleb on their show has also provided her with some joy: 'Every time I miss him, I can always look back at the show and watch it and see what made me happy again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
Furious Love Island fans ‘complaining to Ofcom' over boy's ‘disgusting, gross and disrespectful' bedroom behaviour
LOVE Island fans have vowed to complain to Ofcom in their droves in a bid to get a "gross" Islander axed from the show. Viewers of the ITV2 dating show were left disgusted by 23-year-old Ben Holborough after he laid into his villa partner Yasmin and claimed that none of the guys in the villa fancied her and he never had any intentions of pursuing anything with her. 3 3 The pair came to blows with Ben brutally going after Yasmin and delivered one shock comment after another. Ben told Yasmin that he had never been interested in pursuing a connection with her and that he had never "rated her". This came just one day after he got very close with her in the bedroom. The couple confirmed they enjoyed kisses during some steamy bedroom action in which Yasmin seductively whispered to him: "You don't get this with a nice girl." Now, fans have been left horrified by Ben's sudden switch and his bedroom antics with Yasmin before claiming he never was into her. Demanding that he be pulled from the villa, one fan said on Reddit: "No problem him not being into her but he basically just used her for whatever needs he needed seeing to that night in the bedroom, so gross and disrespectful." Another agreed as they echoed: "I found Bens behaviour to be very triggering. "Nothing wrong with not being into Yasmin but why did he go in on her and get aggressive. "He's incredibly toxic with his mentality and words. Nobody should be spoken to like this it was completely overreacted." A third went on to write: "Honestly I don't think I've ever heard a man speak worse to a woman on this show!!!" Love Island fans convinced couple secretly had sex after steamy bed scenes at night As a fourth penned: "We all need to complain to ofcom via their online form about Ben. "Call me sensitive but it was really uncomfortable watching Ben speak to Yasmin in that way especially since she did absolutely nothing to deserve that?" Ben sparked outrage on last night's show as he rowed with Yasmin Pettet, 24, and cruelly slammed her. In a brutal put down, he told her: "You're lucky Shea even picked you. To be fair, I think you're lucky you're even in here now to be fair. "No one rated you when you were in here let's say. You've only come out your shell because you're in a couple with me." As she walked away, Ben shouted to the rest of the villa: "Eh, she's made content for the next three weeks lads." Love Island 2025 full lineup Harry Cooksley: A 30-year-old footballer with charm to spare. Shakira Khan: A 22-year-old Manchester-based model, ready to turn heads. Megan Moore: A payroll specialist from Southampton, looking for someone tall and stylish. Alima Gagigo: International business graduate with brains and ambition. Tommy Bradley: A gym enthusiast with a big heart. Helena Ford: A Londoner with celebrity connections, aiming to find someone funny or Northern. Ben Holbrough: A model ready to make waves. Megan Clarke: An Irish actress already drawing comparisons to Maura Higgins. Dejon Noel-Williams: A personal trainer and semi-pro footballer, following in his footballer father's footsteps. Aaron Buckett: A towering 6'5' personal trainer. Conor Phillips: A 25-year-old Irish rugby pro. Antonia Laites: Love Island's first bombshell revealed as sexy Las Vegas pool party waitress. Yasmin Pettet: The 24-year-old bombshell hails from London and works as a commercial banking executive. Emily Moran: Bombshell Welsh brunette from the same town as Love Island 2024 alumni Nicole Samuel. Remell Mullins: Boasts over 18million likes and 500k followers on TikTok thanks to his sizzling body transformation videos. Harrison Solomon: Pro footballer and model entering Love Island 2025 as a bombshell. Giorgio Russo: The 30-year-old will be spending his summer in the sun, potentially his sister Alessia's successful tournament at the Euros in Switzerland. Departures: Kyle Ashman: Axed after an arrest over a machete attack emerged. He was released with no further action taken and denies any wrongdoing. Sophie Lee: A model and motivational speaker who has overcome adversity after suffering life-changing burns in an accident. Blu Chegini: A boxer with striking model looks, seeking love in the villa. Malisha Jordan: A teaching assistant from Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, who entered Love Island 2025 as a bombshell. Shea Mannings: Works as a scaffolder day-to-day and plays semi-pro football on the side. Caprice Alexandra: The 26-year-old bombshell owns a nursery in Romford. Poppy Harrison: The bombshell broke up with her boyfriend after finding out she would be in the villa Will Means: The fourth fittest farmer in the UK according to Farmers' Weekly in 2023 entered the villa as a bombshell 3
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Did The Simpsons really just kill off a major character?
The Simpsons is getting experimental in its old age. With 36 seasons complete and a renewal through a 40th secured, the show has entered territory previously occupied mostly by non-prime-time stalwarts like Saturday Night Live and Meet the Press – television institutions that run for much longer than the typical sitcom or drama. Perhaps conscious that the animated comedy has now lasted five to 10 times longer than a normal sitcom, the 36th season has repeatedly toyed with the idea of what a series finale might look like, even though no such thing is anywhere in sight. For the season's premiere back in the fall, it created a fake series finale, hosted by Conan O'Brien, that featured forever-10-year-old Bart turning 11 and reacting badly to a number of finale-style abrupt changes to the status quo. And in the last episode of season 36, Estranger Things, the show flashed forward to a future where family matriarch Marge has passed away and a gradual estrangement has developed between now-adult Bart and Lisa. (Homer remains alive, with the show repeatedly underlining how unlikely it seems that he would outlive his patient, cautious and seemingly healthy spouse.) As fans caught up with the season on streaming, the finale has created a mild headline-generating controversy over whether Marge is 'really' dead, most likely among less consistent viewers who might dip back in occasionally (or get their news about the show from the internet, rather than watching it). Of course, she's not; Estranger Things is one of many flash-forward episodes the show has done over the years, generally understood to be alternate versions of the future, not pieces of a vast and interconnected timeline. The show's flashbacks are similarly intentionally contradictory; early on, Marge and Homer were young parents in the 1980s; as the show got older and they stayed the same age, subsequent flashbacks were brought further and further into the timeline. None of this makes headline news, even on a slow entertainment day. But one reason 'Marge is dead' has seemingly caught fire as an internet curiosity may have to do with the unexpectedly mortality creeping in around the edge of the show. Anyone who has watched The Simpsons in recent years, especially if they've seen a new episode juxtaposed with an older one, would have to take note of how different the characters sound. Animation may be able to preserve a character's basic look and inure them from ageing (apart from the shifts in animation technique that present subtle changes in design or movement). Animation still can't defeat, however, what the show once called the ravages of time. The Simpsons has employed a core of voice actors for nearly four decades, and who among us sound precisely the same as we did 40 years ago, if we're so lucky to have that comparison point? Marge is the character where this is most noticeable – more so than characters whose voices have been replaced by new actors for reasons of racial sensitivity. (This just means that Black actors now play Black characters, and so on.) Those newer performers bring their own style to the character, however subtle the change. But Julie Kavner, the distinctive actor who has given one of the great long-term voiceover performances of TV history, turns 75 this year, while Marge is forever on the cusp of 40. Certain line readings will sound very close to the 'original' Marge voice. More often, though, we're getting a raspier, scratchier version that sounds more like Marge's occasionally seen mother (also voiced by Kavner in a more whispery register). Harry Shearer, who voices more than a dozen major supporting characters including Mr Burns, Principal Skinner and Ned Flanders, also sounds deeper and older in recent years. That's all on top of the show's creative changes – some of which have been quite good. Under showrunner Matt Selman, the show has upped its game in recent years, actively pursuing more ambitious, format-challenging and emotionally resonant stories. Not all of them are golden-years-level funny. (Few episodes of anything are.) But the creators feel engaged with their institution, and sometimes they've even taken advantage of the modified vocals; in one recent holiday episode, Ned Flanders sounded genuinely grief-stricken in part due to Shearer's inability to hit the higher range of his usual tone. Even when the actors' changes do sound jarring, obviously it's not anyone's fault. People age – and IP, at least lately, seems to insist on defying that process, creating a difficult-to-resolve conflict. The show obviously isn't ever going to permanently kill off any of the family members, but at some point, they may be in the position of hiring someone new to voice Marge, or augmenting the performance with AI. The finale already introduced a new voice for Bart's best friend Milhouse, following the retirement of longtime voice artist Pamela Hayden. She reasonably concluded that continuing to play a 10-year-old boy well into her 70s wouldn't make much sense. Maybe that's why the most poignant element of Estranger Things isn't the death of Marge, which is handled lightly, avoiding the immediate devastation of grief with just a brief cursory shot of her funeral, and ending the episode with a short scene of her happily looking down upon her family from heaven, where she clinches with longtime crush Ringo Starr. Rather, the emotional core of the episode is the sequence in which Bart and Lisa abruptly grow out of their beloved Itchy and Scratchy cartoons after realizing the show is now also marketed toward babies, with cutesy versions of the characters adorning little sister Maggie's pyjamas. In true Simpsons fashion, this is also the funniest passage of the episode, with spot-on observations about marketing, kids' shifting tastes in popular culture and defensiveness about liking stuff that's for 'babies', complete with a spoof of a memorably emotional scene from Toy Story 2. Despite the show's jokes, the idea of the Bart/Lisa bond breaking over Itchy and Scratchy, and Marge's distress over it, is a potent one, maybe because it's precisely the kind of uncharacteristic change alluded to in the season premiere. The Simpsons has been lampshading its ability to reset its characters for decades at this point; that's the connective tissue between its heritage as a sitcom from another age, and as a cartoon across the ages. In Estranger Things, it's depicting a natural process less seismic but no less constant than death: letting go of once-beloved media and the real-world habits that accompany it. Plenty of fans will have the opportunity to let go of The Simpsons, whether by chance or by choice. The show itself, good as it sometimes is, can only play at that farewell process, experimenting with what-ifs typically subsumed into the status quo. I'm not personally eager for the show to end; my daughter still eagerly watches it, and that brought me back into the newer episodes. But there does seem to be a denial of impermanence, maybe even some frustration with that, under the show's surface. The real question isn't whether Marge Simpson will live on, but how long the show will keep contemplating endings it can't have.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
There will never be another Anna Wintour at Vogue. She's made sure of it
Anna Wintour's departure from American Vogue, the citadel she turned into a nation state, complete with its own Manolo wearing Praetorian Guard and increasingly partisan politics, has been predicted ever since I've been writing about fashion. More than 30 years. The difference is that had she swept off a decade or so ago – to become US ambassador to the UK under President Obama, as she was reported to have very much wanted – her reign at Vogue would have been viewed as an incontrovertible success. Like her or loathe her, worship her every move or find many of her choices and causes questionable, US Vogue under her watch, was for many years, both financially and creatively, a masterwork. She has been a brilliant Vogue editor. The stampede to replace her would have made the rush for the BA lounge in T5 look passive. In the end however, the news comes as a slightly damp squib and, true to current Condé Nast form, a fudge. Yes, the 75-year-old is stepping down from her role as editor-in-chief, but she remains chief content office for Condé Nast and global editorial director for Vogue. Her successor at the magazine will, like all the other Condé Nast 'editorial content directors' report into her. The rumoured $2 million a year salary (plus unlimited expenses, accounts at The Ritz in Paris, the town cars purring outside the Condé Nast office at all hours, first class flights, clothing allowance, favourable mortgages etc) that came with her job, will be as distant a memory as Marie Antoinette's infamous diamond necklace. There are no more editor-in-chiefs at Condé Nast. The fun, the glory, the glamour and the heady creative independence of those jobs has gone, along with the characters who once inhabited them – the nonchalantly stylish Carine Roitfeld and then Emmanuelle Alt, who successively edited French Vogue; the ultra elegant and wily Franca Sozzani who ran Italian Vogue for three decades, the shrewd, intelligent Alexandra Shulman who edited British Vogue for 25 years – Wintour saw them all off, as well as Edward Enniful, who at one time it was supposed, would ultimately succeed her. They've been replaced by far less expensive Wintour acolytes, plucked from the world of influencers or lower down the masthead. Nothing wrong with that in theory – at least it reflects the economic realities of Condé Nast, which despite the many 'innovative' announcements of its chief executive officer Roger Lynch, continues to lose money. In practice, the results are frequently lacklustre. The people who always made Vogue count – not the readers silly, but the players in the fashion, film, theatre and other industries who would have killed to be in its pages, can now go directly to their followers on social media. Vogue's most active presence is on Instagram, where its tone veers between preachy 'activism' and crude popularism. Meanwhile Condé Nast itself appears to be suffering from one long existential crisis. Is it even still a publishing house (the one that brought us Vanity Fair, Glamour, GQ, World of Interiors, House & Garden, Tatler and numerous international editions of Vogue), or, as it lately suggests, an events company that makes money from rubber-neck red carpet products such as Vogue World? In the midst of Condé Nast's descent into the banal, the most frequently asked question asked about Wintour's embattled tenure has been 'why is she still bothering?' One theory is that she wanted to surpass Edna Woolly Chase's 37 year tenure as US editor-in-chief. In the event she has only equalled it. Or perhaps she felt she had some 'reputational' issues to finesse. In 2020, at the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, demonstrators with placards massed outside Wintour's picturesque red brick downtown townhouse to protest against what they saw as Condé Nast's (and her) long history of elitism and racism. The case for the prosecution against Wintour has been going on since she was first appointed editor of the then genteel and cosy British Vogue in 1988. Her brusque manner, Stakhanovite work ethic and immunity to the cold (she wore micro minis throughout her two pregnancies there) inspired the moniker 'Nuclear Wintour'. Many of the ideals, values and people she has championed in her magazine – fur, P Diddy, Mike Tyson, more fur, Kanye West, Harvey Weinstein, John Galliano and Asma al-Assad – seem tone deaf, especially viewed with hindsight. There are numerous witnesses to her rudeness. You don't inspire a culture defining book and a film (The Devil Wears Prada) by being bland. Equally there are plenty who testify to her kindness, whilst her ability to fundraise – delicately arm twisting the rich to hand over $300,000 a table for her Met Ball whilst elegantly kneeing them in the accounts department for a donation to the Democratic party – is spectacular. She's an operator of the highest order, drawn, since she was a London teenager, sniffing out the most expensive labels and most beautiful folk, to power. The late André Leon Talley, once an editor at large at US Vogue and her personal dresser and advisor until they fell out, wrote 'Anna has mercilessly made her best friends people who are the highest in their chosen fields'. Wintour publicly apologised for her alleged sins after the BLM debacle, vowing to right the wrongs. Condé Nast is now more inclusive of skin colour and (a little more) inclusive of body type. On an unforgivable downside, in its general confusion about what it's meant to be (you'd have thought the clue was in the name), Vogue, particularly online and on social media, has become a fetid hotbed of blatantly uninformed, anti-Israel propaganda, identity politics and keffiyehs. I know of at least one Jewish digital content editor who left a job she initially loved under Wintour because the perceived attitude of her team, which she felt powerless to challenge, became unbearable. Other Jewish editors still in the company are deeply unhappy – feeling unheard and unsupported by the powers that be. What does this have to do with Wintour? It's happening under her watch. For the past decade, she has been ever more promoted within the company until her purview reaches just about every nook and cranny. 'Anna knows what's on every page,' one European director of editorial content told me. She authorises every editor's foreign trips and keeps an eye on their public exposure, which perhaps explains why, unlike in the days of Roitfeld or Alt, no one in that company has anywhere near the profile she does. Her successor at American Vogue is unlikely ever to be another Wintour – the new structure there simply won't allow it. Names in the running include Chioma Nnandi, the charming, self-effacing British journalist and long time Wintour protege, currently editorial content director of British Vogue. Sarah Moonves, who edits W Magazine, to industry acclaim (and who, in 2019, helped organise its buyout from Condé Nast where it was floundering) is another. Laura Brown, the popular, ebullient Australian former editor of US In Style, now a social media personality, or Eva Chen, another Wintour mentee, who has a huge job at Instagram, would both be quite the catch too, in the unlikely event Condé Nast could match their current earnings. But will any of them want it? 'Après moi, le deluge,' is one description of Wintour's legacy strategy that keeps repeating itself over the past decade. In 'stepping back' from her editorship, yet simultaneously maintaining a vice-like grip on all the others, it seems one prophecy about her that may come true.
