Trump's judge pick: US President's ex-defence lawyer approved for court of appeal; whistleblower claims denied
In one of the narrowest votes of recent times, the Senate approved Bove's appointment to the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit by 50 votes to 49 on Tuesday evening. Every Democrat opposed the nomination, joined by two Republican senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, according to BBC.
Bove, 44, has been described as Trump's most divisive judicial nominee to date. During confirmation hearings, he pushed back against criticism, saying he was not Trump's 'henchman', and denied whistleblower accusations that he had urged staff to ignore legal limits or misled members of the Senate.
Since Trump returned to office in January, Bove has been working as principal associate deputy attorney general at the US Department of Justice. His time in that role has attracted fresh scrutiny, with Democrats accusing him of overseeing widespread dismissals of prosecutors viewed as insufficiently loyal to the president.
Two whistleblowers claimed Bove told his team that court rulings blocking Trump's deportation policies might need to be disregarded.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You
Mobility Scooter | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
A third alleged he had not been truthful when speaking to senators about his involvement in dropping corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams. Democrats have linked that case to a political deal, suggesting Adams agreed to support Trump's immigration agenda in return for the case being dropped.
Bove has denied all wrongdoing, BBC reported.
Despite the controversy, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, chair of the judiciary committee, backed the nomination.
'He has a strong legal background and has served his country honourably. I believe he will be diligent, capable and a fair jurist,' he said before the vote.
But Democrats were unconvinced. 'Mr Bove's primary qualification appears to be his blind loyalty to this president,' said Senator Dick Durbin, the committee's top Democrat.
More than 900 former employees of the Justice Department signed an open letter urging the Senate to reject the nomination.
A separate letter from over 75 retired state and federal judges described the move as 'deeply inappropriate', arguing that no president should appoint their own criminal defence lawyer to the judiciary.
Bove's confirmation marks yet another Trump legal ally elevated to a powerful role. Alina Habba, who also defended Trump, now serves as the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey. Todd Blanche, another member of Trump's legal team, has been named deputy attorney general.
Bove will now join the bench of the 3rd Circuit, which handles cases from Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
'We'll see what happens': Trump dodges question on extending August 12 China tariff deadline
US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens' read more US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens,' while praising China for its cooperation in ongoing trade talks with the US. 'We've been dealing very nicely with China. As you have probably heard, they have tremendous tariffs that they're paying to the United States of America,' Reuters quoted Trump as saying at a news conference at the White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'They've been dealing quite nicely,' he said, adding that he had a good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. A tariff truce between the US and China is set to expire on August 12, though the Trump administration has signaled the deadline could be extended. More from World PM Modi to visit China: Why the trip matters amid Trump's steep tariffs on India Without an extension, US tariffs on Chinese goods are expected to surge to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on American products could reach 125%. The two countries agreed to a 90-day pause in their trade dispute during talks in Geneva this May, allowing time for further negotiations. A follow-up meeting in Stockholm in late July ended without any announcement on extending the truce. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington is making progress and expressed optimism about reaching a deal with Beijing. With the clock ticking, Trump on Sunday night called on China to quadruple its purchases of American soybeans and noted that doing so would help reduce America's trade deficit with China. 'China is worried about its shortage of soybeans,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in a message directed to Xi Jinping, China's leader. 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans,' he added. With inputs from agencies
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage
Curated By : Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 00:39 IST It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case (Pexels/Representative Image) The US Supreme Court legalised same-sex marriage in 2015 following its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Now, nearly a decade after that historic decision, the nation's highest court is being urged to revisit the ruling. Kim Davis, a former county clerk from Kentucky, has submitted a petition asking the Court to consider granting her protection from personal liability under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, reported ABC . Davis made national headlines in 2015 when she was jailed for six days after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, citing her religious beliefs. At the time, she was the only official authorised under Kentucky law to issue marriage licenses in Rowan County. When she denied a marriage certificate to David Ermold and David Moore, a lower court ordered her to pay $100,000 in damages for infringing on their constitutional rights. Recommended Stories In her recent appeal to the Supreme Court, Davis is contesting the $100,000 jury verdict and is also seeking $260,000 in emotional damages and attorneys' fees. Her claims had previously been dismissed by lower courts. A federal appeals court panel earlier this year ruled against her, stating that the former clerk 'cannot raise the First Amendment as a defence because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect." It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case. The justices are expected to consider if they will take the matter during a private conference at the end of September. Should the Court agree to hear the case, oral arguments would likely take place in the spring of 2026, with a final decision anticipated by the end of June. 'I'm hoping that we'll obviously get justice in this case for Kim Davis but that the religious accommodation that she obtained for all clerks," said Matt Staver, Davis' legal representative, in a statement to Scripps News . View All "Dragging Out War" Zelensky Eyes "Stronger Global Pressure" on Russia Ahead of Trump-Putin Meet Donald Trump Will Try To Get Back Territory For Ukraine In "Feel-out Meeting" With Putin In Alaska North Korea Slams US-South Korea Drills; Lukashenko Admits Kim's Troops Took Part in Ukraine War |4K Air India Crash Victims' Families Demand Immediate Release Of Flight Recorders, Hire Us based Lawyer "Road To Misery" IRGC Slams Trump-Backed Zangezur corridor, Iran to Hold Meet with Armenia | 4K View all Meanwhile, William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, expressed confidence in the current legal outcome. In a statement to ABC , he noted, 'Not a single judge on the US Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis' rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that her arguments do not merit further attention." In her petition, Davis further argues that the Court should treat the issue of same-sex marriage similarly to how it addressed abortion in its 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade. This is the first time that someone has challenged the same-sex marriage ruling after it was announced in 2015. News world US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage Read More
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump signs order extending China tariff deadline for 90 days, official says
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order extending a pause in sharply higher US tariffs on Chinese imports for another 90 days, a White House official said. A tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been set to expire on August 12 at 00:01 (04:01 GMT), but the Trump administration had hinted the deadline could be extended.
