
Gen Z baffled over ‘strange' hotel feature — as older generations set the record straight
It seems the idea of a landline phone is a thing of the past, as the Zoomer appeared clueless about a 'strange' wall socket in their French hotel.
Advertisement
The Brit shared a photo of the wall plate with a small rectangular opening in it and asked, 'What is this thing?' on Reddit.
5 It seems the idea of a landline phone is a thing of the past, as the Zoomer appeared clueless about a 'strange' wall socket in their French hotel.
Lukasz Czajkowski – stock.adobe.com
Including a coin in the photo for scale, the confused traveler pointed out, 'It almost looks like the sort of thing that you slide a security chain into – but it's nowhere near the door or windows.'
They mentioned that they travel 'fairly extensively' but have 'never seen one of these before.'
Advertisement
Older generations set the record straight
5 The Brit shared a photo of the wall plate with a small rectangular opening in it and asked, 'What is this thing?' on Reddit.
To those from the pre-smartphone era, it was immediately recognized as a landline telephone socket.
Australians may not be so familiar with the sight, but the 'prise en T' socket is similar to Australia's RJ11 ports, designed for landline phones before mobiles took over.
Advertisement
Once a common fixture in nearly every home, hotel room or office worldwide, it's now a relic unrecognizable to younger generations.
5 To those from the pre-smartphone era, it was immediately recognized as a landline telephone socket.
jummie – stock.adobe.com
'That's a phone socket for landline phones,' one commenter pointed out.
'Damn, that's hitting the getting old target really hard,' said another.
Advertisement
Someone else joked, 'I'm feeling older every day … that was the socket used to plug landline telephones into.'
'Welcome to the 20th century,' quipped another.
The death of the home phone
5 'Damn, that's hitting the getting old target really hard,' one replied.
Landlines were once a staple of everyday communication, but now they have gradually declined in use over the past 20 years as mobile phones became more affordable and widespread.
In Australia, this shift really took off in the mid-2000s.
By 2010, mobile phones had already replaced landlines as the primary means of communication.
According to a report from the Australian Communications and Media Authority in 2022, 63% of Australians had only a mobile for phone calls at home and no landline, with younger Aussies aged 24 to 35 most likely to only have a mobile phone (82%).
Advertisement
Gen Z bring back land lines
5 By 2010, mobile phones had already replaced landlines as the primary means of communication.
Scott Habermann – stock.adobe.com
It comes as Gen Z have been buying retro home phones as a form of 'vintage' decor, using kitschy landlines from shops like Urban Outfitters to decorate their homes.
As the younger generation has an affinity for making old things new again, such as bringing back the flip phone and digital cameras, the corded land line has also been making a come back, according to a report from The New York Post last year.
Advertisement
A 24-year-old New Yorker said she'd always 'fantasized' about having one in her room.
'It really bridges that gap between reality and my childhood fantasy. I feel like the main character in my favorite TV shows — One Tree Hill, The OC, Gilmore Girls — when I use it,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Reddit (RDDT) Shares Soar 128% Over Last Quarter
Reddit achieved a remarkable turnaround with its share price soaring 128% over the last quarter, buoyed by unexpected positive earnings where sales surged to $499 million, marking a sharp contrast to prior-year losses. This upswing occurred during a period of broader market gains—the market was up 17% year-over-year—with Reddit also having been added to multiple indices, potentially enhancing its market visibility. Despite facing a class action lawsuit over alleged misleading statements on Google's AI impacts, the company maintained robust earnings guidance, suggesting potential resilience amidst market volatility. Buy, Hold or Sell Reddit? View our complete analysis and fair value estimate and you decide. We've found 19 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. The recent news about Reddit's impressive quarterly share price increase of 128% is a significant factor in their broader narrative of international expansion and user-generated content. This price rise suggests strong investor confidence, despite ongoing legal challenges. Over the past year, Reddit's total return was very large at 348.83%, showcasing a robust performance compared to the US Interactive Media and Services industry's 34.5% return over the same period. This indicates Reddit's outperformance relative to both its industry and the broader market, which returned 17% in the last year. This context underscores Reddit's potential to remain competitive and capture further market share through increasing engagement and ad revenue growth. Looking at revenue and earnings forecasts, Reddit's latest earnings surge to US$499 million suggests potential upward revisions in analyst forecasts could materialize if the company continues to leverage its global user base. However, moderation risks and digital ad dependency may remain pressures on sustained growth. With Reddit's current share price at US$246.50, the analyst consensus price target is US$195.96, reflecting a 20.5% expected decline, indicating potential volatility and market skepticism regarding future valuation at the present PE ratio. Nonetheless, Reddit's profitability and revenue trajectory provide foundational support for evaluating long-term growth considerations. Take a closer look at Reddit's potential here in our financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include RDDT. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Boomers Got $50K Homes, Gen Z Gets $100K Bitcoin—Why This Crypto Evangelist Believes Digital Assets Are the New American Dream
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A viral Reddit discussion has reignited the debate over generational wealth-building strategies, with younger investors increasingly viewing Bitcoin as their answer to the housing crisis that has priced many out of homeownership. The central thesis gaining traction among millennials and Gen Z investors is straightforward: while Baby Boomers benefited from purchasing homes at dramatically lower prices decades ago, today's younger generations face a different opportunity in the form of digital assets. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The Generational Wealth Divide The numbers tell a stark story. According to Federal Reserve data, the median home price in 1980 was approximately $47,200, while median household income was $17,710. Today, that same home costs over $400,000, while median income has grown to roughly $70,000—creating a far less favorable price-to-income ratio. 'You can't live in a Bitcoin,' critics often argue, highlighting the fundamental difference between a home as shelter and cryptocurrency as a speculative investment. However, Bitcoin advocates counter that traditional real estate comes with hidden costs: property taxes, maintenance, insurance, and what they call 'entropic decay'—the inevitable deterioration of physical assets. Bitcoin as Digital Real Estate Proponents argue Bitcoin offers several advantages over traditional real estate investment: Global Accessibility: Unlike real estate, Bitcoin can be purchased and held anywhere in the world without geographical constraints or minimum investment thresholds. No Maintenance Costs: Digital assets don't require property management, repairs, or dealing with tenants. Liquidity: Bitcoin can be sold instantly, unlike real estate transactions that can take months. Portability: Cryptocurrency holdings can move with the owner, unaffected by local market conditions or political instability. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? The Reality Check Despite Bitcoin's recent surge past $100,000, skeptics question whether the cryptocurrency is still 'cheap' relative to its risk profile. The asset's notorious volatility means investors must stomach potential 50-80% drawdowns during bear markets—a psychological challenge that many underestimate. Financial advisor perspectives vary widely. Some view Bitcoin as portfolio diversification, recommending allocations of 1-5% of total assets. Others warn against treating cryptocurrency as a primary wealth-building strategy, emphasizing the importance of emergency funds, retirement savings, and traditional investments. Systemic Issues vs. Generational Blame The discussion reveals deeper frustrations with monetary policy and economic systems. Many participants blame Federal Reserve policies and fractional reserve banking for inflating asset prices beyond the reach of average earners, rather than targeting specific generations. 'The real enemy isn't Boomers—it's the system that debases currency and inflates assets,' one commenter noted, highlighting how monetary expansion benefits asset holders while disadvantaging new entrants to the Considerations For those considering Bitcoin as a wealth-building strategy, experts recommend: Only investing what you can afford to lose Understanding the technology and market dynamics Using secure storage methods like hardware wallets Viewing Bitcoin as part of a diversified portfolio, not a complete strategy Preparing for significant volatility and extended bear markets The fundamental question remains: Is Bitcoin the great equalizer for younger generations, or simply another speculative bubble that could leave investors worse off than when they started? As traditional pathways to wealth become increasingly difficult to access, the answer may determine the financial future of an entire generation. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Boomers Got $50K Homes, Gen Z Gets $100K Bitcoin—Why This Crypto Evangelist Believes Digital Assets Are the New American Dream originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Wall Street Journal
10 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The New AI Data Trade: Web Publishers and Startups Look to Cash In
AI companies need large quantities of data to fuel their large language models. Content and data from internet publishers and videos are important sources for them. But publishers and content creators want credit and compensation for their work. Companies like Reddit have responded by filing lawsuits against AI companies. Big publishers like the New York Times have struck content deals to license their data to AI companies for millions of dollars. This has opened the door for a new stream of revenue. But what about smaller players?