logo
The Wheel contestant loses out on huge jackpot over tricky geography question – but did you know it?

The Wheel contestant loses out on huge jackpot over tricky geography question – but did you know it?

The Sun2 days ago
A CONTESTANT on Michael McIntyre's The Wheel saw a massive jackpot slip through their fingers after stumbling on a devilishly tricky geography question.
The unlucky player had been cruising towards a life-changing win before the final question threw them completely off track.
4
4
Michael McIntyre kept the laughs coming as celebrity guests Motsi Mabuse, Jon Richardson, Tom Skinner, Carol Vorderman, Joe Marler, Rav Wilding and Joanne McNally spun into action, each hoping to guide the contestants to glory.
But with the pressure cranked up and the questions getting tougher, even this star-studded line-up couldn't stop the night's biggest prize from slipping away.
With the cash pot hanging in the balance, they were faced with a head-scratcher that left the studio gasping — and viewers at home shouting the answer at their TVs.
Michael couldn't hide his shock as the contestant locked in their choice, only to watch the correct answer light up on the board seconds later.
The heartbreaking miss meant walking away with nothing, despite being just one question from the jackpot.
Contestant Mark opted for the highest jackpot question for a chance to win a massive £96,000.
But the high-risk failed to pay off as he got a Geography question massively wrong.
Could you get it right under the time pressure?
The question read: "Of these New Zealand towns and cities, which one is on the South Island? Auckland, Rotorua, Wellington or Queenstown?"
Contestant Mark admitted: "I don't really know exactly, but my feeling is Wellington."
Tricky Oscars question wipes out The Wheel finalist - would you have won?
The Apprentice star Tom Skinner couldn't help Mark, as he confessed: "I've got no idea. You've got one in four chance here. Sorry."
As the question lit up red, Michael revealed the right answer was Queenstown, before adding: "What a tough question!"
However, Mark got another chance at the Wheel, for a chance to win a smaller jackpot of £48,000, with help from Strictly judge Motsi Mabuse.
Hardest Quiz Show Questions
Would you know the answers to some of quizzing TV's hardest questions
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire - Earlier this year, fans were left outraged after what they described as the "worst" question in the show's history. Host Jeremy Clarkson asked: 'From the 2000 awards ceremony onwards, the Best Actress Oscar has never been won by a woman whose surname begins with which one of these letters?' The multiple choice answers were between G, K, M and W. In the end, and with the £32,000 safe, player Glen had to make a guess and went for G. It turned out to be correct as Nicole Kidman, Frances McDormand and Kate Winslet are among the stars who have won the Best Actress gong since 2000.
The 1% Club - Viewers of Lee Mack's popular ITV show were left dumbfounded by a question that also left the players perplexed. The query went as follows: "Edna's birthday is on the 6th of April and Jen's birthday falls on the 15th of October, therefore Amir's birthday must be the 'X' of January." It turns out the conundrum links the numbers with its position in the sentence, so 6th is the sixth word and 15th is the fifteenth word. Therefore, Amir's birthday is January 24th, corresponding to the 24th word in the sentence.
The Chase - The ITV daytime favourite left fans scratching their heads when it threw up one of the most bizarre questions to ever grace the programme. One of the questions asked the player: "Someone with a nightshade intolerance should avoid eating what?" The options were - sweetcorn, potatoes, carrots - with Steve selecting sweetcorn but the correct answer was potatoes.
Mark said: "My feeling is Cherish."
Motsi agreed: "My feeling is also Cherish."
Feeling confident, Mark swiftly locked it in... and he was thrilled when it lit up gold, meaning it was the correct answer.
Mark cheered and punched the air as Michael and the celebrities applauded and celebrated with him.
He walked away with £48,000, and Motsi was left in tears.
Mark concluded: "Nothing like this has ever happened to me in my life. It's pretty unbelievable."
The Wheel is available to watch on BBC iPlayer.
4
4
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Great British Bake Off future of hosts and judges confirmed as Prue Leith is missing from the new trailer
Great British Bake Off future of hosts and judges confirmed as Prue Leith is missing from the new trailer

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Great British Bake Off future of hosts and judges confirmed as Prue Leith is missing from the new trailer

Great British Bake Off is gearing up for its return - but one familiar face is noticeably absent from its brand-new trailer. The much-loved baking competition has become an autumn TV tradition, drawing in millions each year for a mix of spectacular showstoppers and kitchen disasters. With the next series just weeks from hitting screens, Channel 4 has dropped a first look at the action inside the famous white tent, unveiling the official host and judge line-up. However, Prue Leith, a long-standing member of the judging panel, is nowhere to be seen in the teaser. In the latest Great British Bake Off's trailer, Joe Wilkinson takes on the role of the narrator, which features a space-themed twist. The clip shows baking ingredients floating through space before hosts Noel Fielding and Alison Hammond appear as animated characters. joe can be heard joking: 'From it grew life, intelligent life, adorned in knitwear and leopard print.' Inspired by the Big Bang, the trailer replaces dust and gas with an explosion of flour, sugar and cakes, ending with the image of judge Paul Hollywood's blue eye. While Prue does not feature in the trailer, though Channel 4 has confirmed she will be part of the new series. They said: 'As the ovens fire up and a new batch of bakers steps into the iconic tent to face Paul and Prue, audiences can expect all the classic ingredients - warmth, humour, creativity, and just the right amount of competition. 'This autumn, let the universe of Bake Off pull you in once again. Because, as the trail says, once there was nothing, and then there was Bake Off.' This year's series doesn't yet have a confirmed release date, but it has been teased as 'soon'. Prue's absence from the trailer comes weeks after speculation from fans about her future on the show. She's been at the helm of Great British Bake Off since 2017, but earlier this year, she said this year's series could be her last. The 85-year-old told The Mail on Sunday she was 'very keen' to step away from the popular Channel 4 show before she was pushed, and 'might stop next year'. The filming schedule, which involves long hours under the summer sun at Welford Park in Berkshire, is taking its toll on the television chef. She said: 'I'm doing this year's Bake Off, and I don't know if this will be my last. I've got to stop some time, so I might stop next year. 'I thought I'd just see how I go this year, because I definitely feel a bit older this year than I did last year. 'Things like getting out of a chair takes me longer than it used to. I don't like big steps without a handrail. None of these things worried me two years ago – I could run upstairs – and so I'm very keen to leave Bake Off before I'm asked to leave. 'But on the other hand, I really enjoy it.' Prue is also a co-host of US spin-off The Great American Baking Show, and is weighing up leaving that programme too. She took over the role of judge on the competition in 2017, when Dame Mary Berry, 89, stood down. The star has also outlasted the programme's hosts Sandi Toksvig, 66, who co-presented the show from 2017 to 2019, and Matt Lucas, 50, who served from 2020 to 2022.

Word ‘Jewish' ripped from comedian's posters at the Edinburgh Fringe
Word ‘Jewish' ripped from comedian's posters at the Edinburgh Fringe

Telegraph

time3 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Word ‘Jewish' ripped from comedian's posters at the Edinburgh Fringe

A comedian has claimed the word 'Jewish' was burned from posters advertising her Edinburgh Fringe show. Earlier in the festival Rachel Creeger had one show cancelled over alleged staff concerns about potential security risks. Ms Creeger was offered the chance to perform at another venue, Hoots, and posters were put out advertising her show, Ultimate Jewish Mother. The word 'Jewish' appears to have been deliberately burned on outdoor posters, rendering the 'Jew' illegible. She posted on Instagram: 'Overnight, vandals burned out the word Jew out of the signage outside my lovely venue. I am not going to let this break me, but I am not going to lie, it's a tough day.' The vandalism marks the latest in a string of controversies at the Fringe, amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. In July, Ms Creeger and Philip Simon were set to perform at the Whistlebinkies venue in Edinburgh. However, they claimed they were informed that their gigs would be cancelled after bar staff at the venue expressed fears of feeling 'unsafe'. It was claimed that the concerns were raised after an announcement that the venue would receive extra police supervision amid continued worries over the safety of Jewish acts. Days later, having found an alternative venue, Mr Simon was cancelled again, barred from the Banshee Labyrinth pub because of alleged 'rhetoric and symbology' linked to Israel. One reason cited by the venue for cancelling his show, Shall I Compere Thee in a Funny Way?, was his attendance at a vigil for people killed in the 2023 Hamas terror attacks. He said of the incident: 'I am still processing the concept that in 2025 I can be cancelled just for being Jewish. In the meantime, I will still be at the Fringe for my one remaining children's show and continue to investigate possible alternative venues for both of my cancelled shows.' It is understood that the alleged vandalism has been reported to Police Scotland.

JOHN MACLEOD: Sturgeon clawed her way to power but it's the whine of a victim that drips from Frankly's tawdry pages
JOHN MACLEOD: Sturgeon clawed her way to power but it's the whine of a victim that drips from Frankly's tawdry pages

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

JOHN MACLEOD: Sturgeon clawed her way to power but it's the whine of a victim that drips from Frankly's tawdry pages

Had I eagerly shelled out £28 in advance for a copy of Nicola Sturgeon 's memoirs, I'd now be inclined to cut up rough. Frankly's juiciest bits have been sprayed with abandon everywhere this week – interviews graciously granted; studios regally toured – to the point that today, on official publication, must feel like hurtling joyously downstairs of that cold and frosty morning to find someone has opened all your Christmas presents. And such chunks; and such gobbets. As if the sometime First Minister had rolled onto The Jeremy Kyle Show and told all. Like those magazines of the TV ChitChat order you glimpse in passing at the shops. Shrieking headlines like 'My Dad left my Mum – for my boyfriend!!!' Before even the silky dustjacket is in your hands, even before said autobiography falls open with that exquisite whiff of printers' inks, you already know Sturgeon thinks she may be non-binary. Who does not rule out, some day, a relationship with another woman. That, as a quivering Scottish Parliament newbie, some rank man kept sidling up to her to snigger about a coarse – and, indeed, apocryphal – nickname. Yet Sturgeon, heedless of the no-smoke-without-fire brigade, throws it out there again, amidst much other titillation. She has, no doubt, decades ahead of her to look back and wonder why none of her Pan Macmillan editors – eagerly egging her on – raised a hand gently to breathe, 'Whoa…' And thus Nicola Sturgeon is left sprawled out there on the reputational beach. Not in the thoughtful, statesmanlike company of, say, Thatcher or Mitterand, Garret Fitzgerald or Charles de Gaulle. Much more in the tawdry, brackish he-bwoke-my-necklace waters of Harry and Meghan. And even the late Queen, come to think of it, is betrayed by Sturgeon. There is an unwritten rule that conversations with the Sovereign are not repeated. Especially her exchanges with ministers. All in Elizabeth II's circle knew that she only welcomed tittle-tattle from her closest personal servants – pages, her dresser and that; those she saw every day. Yet Ms Sturgeon quotes the Queen at some length, declares – improbably - that Her Majesty 'loved a bit of a gossip' and wanted details of the racked Alex Salmond. Some, too, have wondered aloud why, given the fraught state of Scottish publishing, Sturgeon rolled all the way down to London town to spill such beans. Surely money was not a consideration for our sometime National Mammy? And there are oddities. Sturgeon, it seems, cares far more about the rights of trans-identifying men in her deathless prose - she devotes pages and pages to it - than about the cause to which she has supposedly devoted her life. Scotland's independence, meriting nothing like as many paragraphs and barely a tenth of the passion. The pages of Frankly, too, are strewn with factual errors: silly mistakes, easily checked. One instance will suffice. Recalling when Covid-19 rolled in like a tsunami, Sturgeon hyperventilates, 'We moved more quickly than the other governments to ban mass gatherings and close schools.' Actually, Sturgeon's general approach was slyly to ascertain what ministers in Whitehall were about to do – and then announce it first. And Scotland's schools closed their doors on Friday 20 March 2020 – the same day as every other school across the United Kingdom. Almost the saddest aspect of Sturgeon's autobiography is her obsession with Alex Salmond – longtime friend, a colleague through decades, a mentor at critical moments. Until they fell so spectacularly out, from 2017, like jostling barons at a Shakespearean court. Bloated and bitter, Salmond died last October at some conference in the Balkans. That recent demise – and broken hearts left behind – might, you think, have signalled some Sturgeon caution. On top of three incontestable facts: Salmond in 2019 won a civil court case, with costs and damages, against the Scottish Government. M'luds concluded that it had treated Salmond 'unlawfully,' in a manner 'tainted with apparent bias.' A year later he was acquitted of all charges – by a majority in each instance – of criminal offences against womn, this by a majority-women jury under a presiding female judge, Lady Dorian. And, a year after that, the relevant Holyrood committee concluded that Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister, had in the course of this tacky episode misled the Scottish Parliament. Indeed, giving evidence to that committee, there were extraordinary lapses in the Sturgeon memory: one can but congratulate her, half a decade on, how much her grasp of events has improved. In Frankly, she now goes after her late patron like a studs-up Emily Maitlis. As early as 1989, Sturgeon confides of some internal party episode, she had 'doubts.' During the independence referendum, she now and then questioned Salmond's judgement – though privately, of course; always 'privately.' Which did not prevent Sturgeon's 2004 plot with him to trick Roseanna Cunningham out of the SNP's deputy leadership, joyously leading the Nationalist charge at Holyrood (Salmond then was marooned in the Commons), holding high office under him for seven years and great prominence in that independence campaign. Salmond was buried on October 29 yet she is yet fixated on him, even after his two-nil triumph in the courts, her own censure by her Holyrood peers and when, as a woman far more important once murmured, some recollections may vary. Like Holmes and Moriarty, and as far as Nicola Sturgeon is concerned, she and Salmond must be roped together for always, tumbling down the Reichenbach Falls of history. The sometime First Minister gives little thought to the other women, Roseanna Cunningham apart, slighted or brutalised as Sturgeon surged through the decades to become great. She has always howled down the obvious comparisons with Margaret Thatcher, apt as they are. As to what her surrogates did to, for instance, Johanna Cherry and J K Rowling – well, silence is golden. Or, perhaps, just yellow. And then, working the phones in 2023, briefing her useful idiots in the Scottish media, watching complacently as the Scottish Greens joined the pile-on against Kate Forbes. Twisting her faith and background – a Free Church launched, you know, in a radical stand against despotic landlordism – till leadership-candidate Forbes was suitably painted as the sort of crazy Pentecostal from the Appalachians who dances with snakes. But saddest of all is how self-demeaningly, Nicola Sturgeon does down herself. This was our most cultured and best-read First Minister since Donald Dewar. A girl without advantage or contacts from an Ayrshire new town who spurned the most obvious (and the laziest) vehicle for ambition – the Labour Party – and who refused to sit at the back of the bus and shut up. By hard, hard work and against daunting odds – it took her four draining bids to win Glasgow Govan – Sturgeon clawed her way to power. Was not ashamed to reinvent her image. Impressed civil servants in every brief she held. A fearsome debater; a tough political operator. Swept to the SNP leadership, at the last, unopposed. A woman with a delicious sense of humour, at her peak beset everywhere for selfies. Who sold out the SECC Hydro faster than Beyoncé and would win eight national elections on the trot. Yet all, inexplicably, that drips through the pages of Frankly is the whine of a victim.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store