Pride rainbows taken off police cars after court ruling
Northumbria Police has also told its officers and staff they cannot attend a Gay Pride march in uniform this weekend, in a move that could set a precedent for other forces.
Chief Constable Vanessa Jardine ordered the removal of all diversity-based symbols from police cars and vans after a judge rebuked her force over its lack of impartiality.
Northumbria was taken to court by a gender-critical lesbian who said it was wrong for officers to take part in events that promoted gender ideology.
Now, in a letter seen by the Telegraph, the force has confirmed it is withdrawing all visible support for this year's Northern Pride.
Going even further, Ms Jardine, who is LGBT+ communities lead for the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), said all of Northumbria's police vehicles would have Pride livery removed.
The letter stated: 'This work has commenced but may take a short amount of time. No vehicle carrying Pride, Progress and/or transgender colours and/or insignia will be deployed at the Northern Pride march and there are currently no vehicles with this livery deployed operationally.'
The letter made clear that officers and staff would not be allowed to attend the march wearing uniform or anything else that identifies them as being associated with Northumbria Police.
In addition the letter stated that while there would be a police stall at the event, there would be 'no Pride, Progress or transgender colours/insignia on display'.
It is not clear whether Ms Jardine's approach will now be mirrored by other forces, but her role in the NPCC means her position is likely to carry some weight.
The move comes after Linzi Smith, 34, a gender-critical lesbian from Newcastle, brought a case against Northumbria Constabulary, arguing that it had been wrong to allow uniformed officers to actively participate in an event that promoted gender ideology and was supported by transgender activists.
In his ruling, the judge, Mr Justice Linden, said it was important that police forces were not perceived as taking sides in contentious social debates.
He said: 'The fact that the officers had publicly stated their support for transgender rights by taking part in the 2024 march would be likely to give the impression that they may not deal with the matter fairly and impartially.'
The judge was clear that his comments were only a reflection on the force's conduct during last year's march and it was unclear what Northumbria Police's approach would be for this year's event, which is due to take place in Newcastle on Saturday.
The founder of Fair Cop, an organisation which was set up to remove politics from policing and supported the legal challenge, welcomed the move and said hopefully other forces would now follow.
Harry Miller said: 'There was never any place for contested livery on a police van, and we are relieved that the Chief Constable has finally seen sense.
'The message it gave was stark, brutal and overtly political: comply, shut up, or risk facing the consequences.
'A healthy democracy requires rigorous debate, and a police force which remains unstintingly vanilla. Our hope is that chief officers throughout the UK will take note of the positive action by Vanessa Jardine and follow suit.'
Following the High Court ruling, Gavin Stephens, chairman of the NPCC, said forces were working through the details of this judgment.
He added: 'We are also working with the College of Policing on broader guidance which will help local forces make decisions around participation in events to maintain their impartiality.
'Policing values all our communities and will continue to police in a way that aims to build trust and confidence, including among those who have less confidence in our service.
'This is the cornerstone of good policing and especially neighbourhood policing. Our desire to ensure we recognise and provide good policing for all communities will remain unchanged.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hong Kong judge rules in favor of transgender bathroom access
A Hong Kong judge on Wednesday ruled to strike down regulations criminalizing the use of bathrooms designated for the opposite sex, ruling in favor of transgender individuals' rights to access public toilets matching their identity. Judge Russell Coleman approved the judicial review of K, who was born a woman and identifies as a man, saying the regulations contravene an article of the city's mini-constitution that stipulates all residents should be equal before the law. But he suspended the declaration to strike down the regulations for a year to allow the government 'to consider whether it wishes to implement a way to deal with the contravention.' He said in the judgement that the regulations and 'drawing the line of a person's biological sex at birth create a disproportionate and unnecessary intrusion into the privacy and equality rights." The ruling marks another step forward in recognizing the rights of LGBTQ+ people in the Chinese financial hub. In recent years, the government has revised policies following activists' wins in legal challenges. Currently, only children under 5 years old accompanied by an opposite sex adult can enter a public washroom designated for the opposite sex. Those violating the rule face a fine of up to 2,000 Hong Kong dollars (about $255). K launched a legal challenge in 2022, seeking to expand the exemption to pre-operative transgender people who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria and have a medical need to undergo the process of living in their identified gender. He argued that his constitutional rights were infringed by the prohibition against him using public toilets allocated for men, the court heard. In 2023, Hong Kong's top court ruled that full sex reassignment surgery should not be a prerequisite for transgender people to have their gender changed on their official identity cards. The next year, the government revised its policy to allow people who have not completed full gender-affirmation surgery to change their genders on ID cards as long as they fulfill certain conditions. The conditions include the removal of breasts for transgender men, the removal of the penis and testes for transgender women, and having undergone continuous hormonal treatment for at least two years before applying. Applicants also have to continue their hormonal treatment and submit blood test reports for random checks upon the government's request. In April, activist Henry Tse, who won the legal battle in 2023 and received his new ID card reflecting his gender change last year, lodged a fresh legal challenge over the new requirements.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
From the archive: how two BBC journalists risked their jobs to reveal the truth about Jimmy Savile
We are raiding the Guardian long read archives to bring you some classic pieces from years past, with new introductions from the authors. This week, from 2021: listening to the women who alleged abuse, and fighting to get their stories heard, helped change the treatment of victims by the media and the justice system By Poppy Sebag-Montefiore. Read by Caroline Wildi
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer urged to honour pledge to embed speaking skills in England's schools
The children's writer Michael Rosen, one-time political strategist Alastair Campbell and former education secretaries Charles Clarke and Estelle Morris have urged the prime minister to honour his pre-election pledge to embed speaking skills in England's schools. They are among 60 signatories to an open letter to Keir Starmer, calling on him to establish oracy as a core part of Labour's revised national curriculum and make it the fourth 'R' in education, alongside reading, writing and arithmetic. Supporters were delighted when Labour announced in 2023 that teaching oracy – often defined as developing skill in using spoken language – would be a central part of Labour's educational priorities if it won the next election. However, campaigners say it was not mentioned in the interim report of the government's curriculum and assessment review earlier this year, leading to fears oracy may have slipped down the educational agenda. The full report is due later this year. The letter, organised by Voice 21, the UK's leading oracy education charity, said: 'Two years ago you pledged that under your Labour government, every child would be supported to develop essential oracy skills – as part of the mission to ensure all young people are prepared for work and ready for life. 'We urge you to turn that promise into lasting change. In a world shaped by rapid advances in artificial intelligence, deepening social divides and persistent inequality, the skills of speaking, listening and communication have never been more urgently needed.' Rosen, who is a professor of children's literature at Goldsmiths, University of London, said: 'The backbone of language is our talk. It's the everyday way we make and change relationships, share the events of our lives, hear about other people's lives. 'It's where we forge our identities and culture, it's where and how we get a good deal of our understanding of what matters. We can learn and develop how to be better talkers and listeners. 'School is a perfect time for us to do that. This needs time and space and sensitive help from teachers. I hope this government backs an oracy programme in education.' Campbell, now a mental health campaigner and author, added: 'It's time every child had the chance to develop their oracy skills – it's key not just to confidence and deeper thinking but also for countering the rise in polarisation. Labour should make sure its curriculum review has a proper commitment to oracy.' Other signatories to the letter include author and educator Jeffrey Boakye, Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, which champions social mobility, and Rupert Knight, associate professor in education at the University of Nottingham. Kate Paradine, Voice 21's chief executive, said: 'Sir Keir Starmer has acknowledged the importance of oracy and the need to embed it in the national curriculum. We are now urging the government to deliver on its manifesto commitment so that every child can benefit from a high-quality oracy education.' A Department for Education spokesperson said the government's plan for change would ensure every young person, irrespective of background, develops the skills needed to succeed in work and life, including in speaking and listening. 'We're already investing in evidence-based language interventions in the early years, including Nuffield Early Language Intervention, to support children's speech and language development and have strengthened our teacher training framework to place greater emphasis on high quality oral language. 'We will also consider how best to ensure pupils can communicate fluently and confidently as part of a cutting-edge curriculum, with final recommendations from the independent review due to be published in the autumn.'
