6 men who abducted Palestinian get 5 years' jail
KUALA LUMPUR : Six men, who previously faced charges of kidnapping a Palestinian man, have been sentenced to five years in prison by the High Court here for abducting and wrongfully confining the victim in a chalet three years ago.
Justice K Muniandy handed down the sentence to Norakmal Hassan, 46; Azwan Jamaludin, 42; Dody Junaidi, 47; Sufian Saly, 28; Tengku Hazarul Ismail Tengku Hamid, 54; and Al Hatim Auzi, 28, after they pleaded guilty to the alternative charge of abducting and confining the Palestinian man.
The court ordered all of them to begin their prison sentence from the respective dates of their arrests.
All six of them were jointly accused of forcibly abducting the 31-year-old Palestinian man with intent to secretly and wrongfully confine him in Jalan Mayang, Dang Wangi, here, at 10.40pm on Sept 28, 2022.
According to the facts of the case, the Palestinian was rescued by police who raided the location and found the victim with his hands and feet tied with cable ties.
Earlier, deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Badius Zaman Ahmad requested a minimum prison sentence of five years for all the accused, considering the adverse impact their actions had on the country.
'Previously, all the accused were charged with kidnapping, but their representations were accepted. They should be grateful that an alternative charge was offered to them.
'The accused have been remanded for two to three years. Therefore, we request a minimum prison sentence of five years,' he said, appearing alongside DPP Sabri Othman.
Lawyer Norma Goh, representing Norakmal, Azwan, Dody, Sufian, and Tengku Hazarul, sought a minimum prison sentence, saying her clients were remorseful and had families to care for.
'In this case, our clients did not benefit or gain from the actions committed. They also have no prior criminal records and have always cooperated well with the authorities,' she added.
Lawyer Adi Zulkarnain Zulkafli, representing Al Hatim, also requested a minimum prison sentence as his client expressed regret and apologised, in addition to having no prior criminal record.
Meanwhile, the kidnapping case involving the same victim, faced by eight other accused – Tengku Arif Bongsu Tengku Hamid, 44; Naziree Mustapha, 44; Faizull Hardey Isa, 45; Iqmal Abdul Rahis, 30; Zaidi Zain, 59; Nidarahayu Zainal, 39; Raibafie Amdan, 44; and Edy Ko'im Said, 45 – will proceed to trial.
According to the charge, all eight accused, with common intent, detained the victim at the same location and time to obtain a reward, specifically secret information on how to create and deactivate computer software used for hacking mobile phones.
Tengku Arif Bongsu and the married couple, Nidarahayu and Raibafie, face 19 more charges related to money laundering involving a total of over RM250,000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
30 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
12 HK activists appeal convictions in landmark '47 democrats' case
A crackdown on dissent under a national security law has resulted in scores of arrests in Hong Kong. (AP pic) HONG KONG : Twelve Hong Kong pro-democracy activists appealed their subversion convictions and jail terms today in a national security case that has spotlighted Beijing's ongoing crackdown on dissent and drawn international criticism. The appeal stems from the '47 democrats' case, named for the number of activists who were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021. The court eventually found 45 of the defendants guilty of organising and holding an unofficial primary election in July 2020 soon after Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law in response to pro-democracy protests the year before. Two defendants were acquitted. Prosecutors considered the action to be a plot to undermine the Hong Kong government. Security was tight around the West Kowloon law courts as scores of police officers, some with police dogs, patrolled the area and occasionally searched passers-by. 'They're not criminals,' said an elderly man surnamed Wong who was among around 100 people queuing to get a public ticket for the hearing. Foreign diplomats from over half a dozen countries were in attendance for this latest stage of the legal saga that began with dawn police raids on the homes of high-profile democrats in early 2021. Some rights groups and countries have condemned the case as politically motivated and called for the release of the democrats who were sentenced last November to prison terms of between four and 10 years. 'This appeal hearing is a chance for the courts to start righting the wrongs of this unprecedented mass prosecution,' said Sarah Brooks, Amnesty International's China director. Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have defended the independence of the judiciary, saying no one is above the law and the defendants have received a fair trial. The defendants were accused of attempting to establish unified pro-democracy candidates through the unofficial primary election to boost their chances of securing an unprecedented parliamentary majority. Prosecutors have said they intended to disrupt the government and even force Hong Kong's leader to resign by 'indiscriminately vetoing' budget proposals. Of the 16 democrats who pleaded not guilty during the trial, 11 have appealed their convictions, including Gordon Ng, Gwyneth Ho and Owen Chow, who were all jailed for over seven years. Prince Wong, who pleaded guilty, is appealing her sentence. The appeals are expected to take around 10 days, and also include a government request to overturn the acquittal of barrister Lawrence Lau. Erik Shum, a lawyer for two of the defendants, argued the democrats' actions were legal as lawmakers were free to vote against any bills and such votes 'could not possibly be an abuse of power'. A years-long crackdown under a China-imposed national security law has resulted in scores of arrests and the closures of liberal media outlets and civil society groups.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Religious minister: Jais to call two new witnesses in eHati probe tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR, July 14 — The Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) will summon two new witnesses tomorrow to record their statements as part of the investigation into the eHati marriage programme, which is alleged to involve immoral activities and the dissemination of questionable beliefs. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs), Datuk Dr Mohd Na'im Mokhtar, said that the case is being investigated under Section 7 of the Syariah Criminal Offences (Selangor) Enactment 1995. 'So far, I can confirm that the investigation has begun, and we hope that the witnesses will be present tomorrow,' he said after officiating the pre-launch ceremony of the 65th International Quran Recitation and Memorisation Assembly (MTHQA), at the World Trade Centre Kuala Lumpur (WTCKL), today. Mohd Na'im said that two women, who were the initial witnesses, had previously lodged a complaint with the Jais Research Division. 'However, I was informed by the Enforcement Division that both complainants appeared somewhat hesitant to come forward and provide further information to Jais. I hope this issue can be clarified, so that everyone understands the situation and the truth can be revealed,' he said. 'It is crucial for witnesses to come forward and assist the Jais Enforcement Division in carrying out a professional investigation, to ensure that no party is unfairly treated,' he said. He added that the Jais Enforcement Division is also working closely with the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM), which will investigate the case from the standpoint of potential civil law offences. In this regard, he urged all parties with relevant information to step forward and fully cooperate with the authorities. 'I sincerely urge all parties involved, or with relevant information, to come forward and assist the Jais Enforcement Division by providing truthful details, so that the matter can be resolved fairly and transparently,' he said. The public was recently taken aback by revelations on social media alleging that the eHati motivational programme, reportedly organised by a married couple, involved immoral activities and the propagation of dubious beliefs. In a recent post on the user's Facebook page, it was claimed that two women had performed a nude dance during a session, held at a convention centre in Shah Alam. It was further alleged that participants were given a liquid of unknown contents that induced emotional changes in a short time and were instructed to undergo 'holy cleansing baths' and 'rebirth' rituals resembling practices from other religions. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Twelve Hong Kong activists appeal convictions in landmark ‘47 democrats' case
HONG KONG, July 14 — Twelve Hong Kong pro-democracy activists appealed their subversion convictions and jail terms today in a national security case that has spotlighted Beijing's ongoing crackdown on dissent and drawn international criticism. The appeal stems from the '47 democrats' case, named for the number of activists who were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021. The court eventually found 45 of the defendants guilty of organising and holding an unofficial primary election in July 2020 soon after Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law in response to pro-democracy protests the year before. Two defendants were acquitted. Prosecutors considered the action to be a plot to undermine the Hong Kong government. Security was tight around the West Kowloon law courts as scores of police officers, some with police dogs, patrolled the area and occasionally searched passers-by. 'They're not criminals,' said an elderly man surnamed Wong who was among around 100 people queuing to get a public ticket for the hearing. Foreign diplomats from over half a dozen countries were in attendance for this latest stage of the legal saga that began with dawn police raids on the homes of high-profile democrats in early 2021. Some rights groups and countries have condemned the case as politically motivated and called for the release of the democrats who were sentenced last November to prison terms of between four and 10 years. 'This appeal hearing is a chance for the courts to start righting the wrongs of this unprecedented mass prosecution,' said Sarah Brooks, Amnesty International's China director. Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have defended the independence of the judiciary, saying no one is above the law and the defendants have received a fair trial. The defendants were accused of attempting to establish unified pro-democracy candidates through the unofficial primary election to boost their chances of securing an unprecedented parliamentary majority. Prosecutors have said they intended to disrupt the government and even force Hong Kong's leader to resign by 'indiscriminately vetoing' budget proposals. Of the 16 democrats who pleaded not guilty during the trial, 11 have appealed their convictions, including Gordon Ng, Gwyneth Ho and Owen Chow, who were all jailed for over seven years. Prince Wong, who pleaded guilty, is appealing her sentence. The appeals are expected to take around 10 days, and also include a government request to overturn the acquittal of barrister Lawrence Lau. Erik Shum, a lawyer for two of the defendants, argued the democrats' actions were legal as lawmakers were free to vote against any bills and such votes 'could not possibly be an abuse of power'. A years-long crackdown under a China-imposed national security law has resulted in scores of arrests and the closures of liberal media outlets and civil society groups. — Reuters
