logo
As US tariffs kick in, Trump may have won many battles but lost the war

As US tariffs kick in, Trump may have won many battles but lost the war

Scroll.in4 hours ago
Last week, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order updating the 'reciprocal' tariff rates that had been paused since April.
Nearly all US trading partners are now staring down tariffs of between 10% and 50%.
After a range of baseline and sector-specific tariffs came into effect earlier this year, many economists had predicted economic chaos. So far, the inflationary impact has been less than many predicted.
However, there are worrying signs that could all soon change, as economic pain flows through to the US consumer.
Decoding the deals
Trump's latest adjustments weren't random acts of economic warfare. They revealed a hierarchy, and a pattern has emerged.
Countries running goods trade deficits with the US (that is, buying more than they sell to the US), which also have security relationships with the US, get 10%. This includes Australia.
Japan and South Korea, which both have security relationships with the US, were hit with 15% tariffs, likely due to their large trade surpluses with the US.
But the rest of Asia? That's where Trump is really turning the screws. Asian nations now face average tariffs of 22.1%.
Countries that negotiated with Trump, such as Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines, all got 19%, the 'discount rate' for Asian countries willing to make concessions.
India faces a 25% rate, plus potential penalties for trading with Russia.
Is Trump winning the trade war?
In the current trade war, it is unsurprising that despite threats to do so, no countries have actually imposed retaliatory tariffs on US products, with the exception of China and Canada. Doing so would drive up their consumer prices, reduce economic activity, and invite Trump to escalate, possibly limiting access to the lucrative US market.
Instead, nations that negotiated 'deals' with the Trump administration have essentially accepted elevated reciprocal tariff rates to maintain a measure of access to the US market.
For many of these countries, this was despite making major concessions, such as dropping their own tariffs on US exports, promising to reform certain domestic regulations, and purchasing various US goods.
Protests over the weekend, including in India and South Korea, suggested many of these tariff negotiations were not popular.
Even the European Union has struck a deal accepting US tariff rates that once would have seemed unthinkable – 15%. Trump's confusing Russia-Ukraine war strategy has worried European leaders. Rather than risk US strategic withdrawal, they appear to have simply folded on tariffs.
Some deals are still pending. Notably, Taiwan, which received a higher reciprocal tariff (20%) than Japan and South Korea, claims it is still negotiating.
Through the narrow prism of deal making, it is hard not to escape the conclusion that Trump has gotten his way with everyone – except China and Canada. He has imposed elevated US tariffs on many countries, but also negotiated to secure increased export market access for US firms and promised purchases of planes, agriculture and energy.
Why economic chaos hasn't arrived – yet
Imposing tariffs on goods coming into the US effectively creates a tax on US consumers and manufacturers. It drives up the prices of both finished goods (products) and intermediate goods (components) used in manufacturing.
Yet the Yale Budget Lab estimates the tariffs will cause consumer prices to rise by 1.8% this year.
This muted inflationary impact is likely a result of exports to the US being 'front-loaded' before the tariffs took effect. Many US importers rushed to stockpile goods in the country ahead of the deadline.
It may also reflect some companies choosing to ' eat the tariffs ' by not passing the full cost to their customers, hoping they can ride things out until Trump ' chickens out ' and the tariffs are removed or reduced.
Who really pays
Despite Trump's repeated claims that tariffs are a tax paid by foreign countries, research consistently shows that US companies and consumers bear the tariff burden.
Already this year, General Motors reported that tariffs cost it US$1.1 billion in the second quarter of 2025.
A new 50% tariff on semi-finished copper products took effect on August 1. That announcement in July sent copper prices soaring by 13% in a single day. This affects everything from electrical wiring to plumbing, with costs ultimately passed to US consumers.
The average US tariff rate now sits at 18.3%, the highest level since 1934. This represents a staggering increase from just 2.4% when Trump took office in January.
This trade-weighted average means that, on typical imported goods, Americans will pay nearly one-fifth more in taxes.
Alarm bells
The US Federal Reserve is concerned about these potential price impacts, and last week opted to maintain interest rates at their current levels, despite Trump's pressure on Chairman Jerome Powell.
And on August 1, economic data released in the US showed significant slowing in job creation, some worrying signs in economic growth, and early signs of business investment paralysis due to the economic uncertainty unleashed by Trump's ever-changing tariff rates.
Trump responded to the report by firing the US Bureau of Labour Statistics commissioner, a shock move that led to widespread concerns official US data could soon become politicised.
But the worst economic impacts could still be yet to come. The domestic consequences of Trump's tariff policies are likely to amount to a massive economic own goal.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did Donald Trump own ‘slaves' in Dubai? Here's the truth about viral claim
Did Donald Trump own ‘slaves' in Dubai? Here's the truth about viral claim

Hindustan Times

timea minute ago

  • Hindustan Times

Did Donald Trump own ‘slaves' in Dubai? Here's the truth about viral claim

A claim about President Donald Trump 'owning slaves' in Dubai is going viral on social media. An X user, who goes by @MrsButters, posted about a documentary to make the bombshell claim. She cited a documentary titled 'Trump in Dubai & China in Africa'. Her post has been retweeted over 1000 times at the time of writing this story. Donald Trump reacts next to Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev outside the White House in Washington, D.C.(REUTERS) 'Trump owned slaves. In case you missed it and didn't know, Trump owned slaves. I used to work for Vice Documentary and HBO, and Vice did a documentary on Trump owning slaves in Dubai. The documentary is called Trump in Dubai and Africa, and China. The journalist is Ben Anderson, and you can find it for free on YouTube right now,' she said, further sharing the link to the documentary. 'And I think that documentary is extremely relevant right now as we just heard Trump say that, you know, maybe for immigrants, what can happen is that their owners can take responsibility for them if they work on farms or in hotels or just in different industries. I already made a TikTok about this, and it got taken down at like five or six million views because TikTok is a coward,' she further added. What the documentary actually shows The episode 'Trump in Dubai & China in Africa' (2016, HBO) reports on the harsh conditions faced by migrant laborers building projects tied to Trump's name in Dubai. They worked grueling hours, often had their passports held by employers, earned meager wages, and were trapped by debt. Journalist Ben Anderson investigates these labor abuses but does not allege that President Trump personally owned enslaved individuals in Dubai. The reality vs the rumor The claim that Trump 'owned slaves in Dubai' is inaccurate. The documentary reflects systemic labor exploitation in parts of the Gulf, not individual ownership by Trump. Vice's reporting describes forced labor conditions but stops short of labeling them as slavery under the law. While labor rights abuses are serious, conflating exploitative conditions with outright ownership is misleading. There is no credible evidence behind the viral claim.

DC facing $20 million security funding cut despite Trump complaints of US capital crime
DC facing $20 million security funding cut despite Trump complaints of US capital crime

Mint

timea minute ago

  • Mint

DC facing $20 million security funding cut despite Trump complaints of US capital crime

Aug 8 - The Trump administration plans to slash security funding for Washington, D.C., according to a grant notice, even as President Donald Trump asserts crime in the U.S. capital is 'totally out of control.' The Federal Emergency Management Agency said in a notice posted last week that D.C. and surrounding areas would receive $20 million less this year from its urban security fund, reducing the funding to $25.2 million and amounting to a 44% year-on-year cut. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, said on Friday it cut funds to D.C. and other cities to align with the 'current threat landscape.' The agency has "observed a shift from large-scale, coordinated attacks like 9/11 to simpler, small-scale assaults, heightening the vulnerability of soft targets and crowded spaces in urban areas,' it said. FEMA also cut security money for Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, Jersey City and San Francisco, but the reduction in D.C. was the largest for any urban area that received funding from the program last fiscal year. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's office did not immediately respond to a Reuters email requesting comment on the funding cuts. The federal security funding covers needs in the National Capital Region, an area that includes D.C. and nearby cities in Maryland and Virginia. Regional officials in the past have used the money to pay for hazmat training, hiring officers and replacing fiber in the emergency communications network, according to a 2016 report from D.C.'s Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency. FEMA has $553.5 million to spend to help cities across the U.S. shore up their security. Reuters could not immediately verify how much of the National Capital Region's total security budget comes from that program. Trump directed federal police on Thursday to step up their presence in the capital, days after staffer Edward Coristine was attacked in D.C. It was the president's latest step toward taking over running the city that is the seat of the U.S. government. Violent crime in D.C. dropped 35% between 2023 and 2024, according to a December report from the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Trump Wants UCLA to Pay $1 Billion to Unfreeze Research Funds
Trump Wants UCLA to Pay $1 Billion to Unfreeze Research Funds

Mint

timea minute ago

  • Mint

Trump Wants UCLA to Pay $1 Billion to Unfreeze Research Funds

The Trump administration is seeking more than $1 billion from the University of California at Los Angeles in exchange for releasing $584 million in federal research funding that the US froze last week. A spokesperson for the University of California system confirmed the proposal and the amount in an email. UC President James Milliken wrote in a statement on Friday that system officials were reviewing the offer. The university said this week it's entered talks with government officials to restore the grants. 'As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system,' Millken wrote, adding that the university had offered to engage in 'good-faith' dialogue with the federal government. The $1 billion proposal dwarfs the settlements agreed to by Columbia and Brown, two private universities that have inked deals with Trump, and is higher than the administration's reported $500 million floor for a settlement with Harvard University. UCLA is the first public university to enter talks with the administration over frozen funds. CNN reported that the draft agreement sent to UCLA would also require the university to set aside an additional $172 million for victims of a civil-rights law that bars employment discrimination based on race, color or national origin. According to CNN, the sweeping settlement proposal would force UCLA to install a resolution monitor to enforce the terms and hire a senior administrator to oversee anti-discrimination compliance, both measures that Columbia agreed to last month. It would also require the university ban overnight campus protests, end race-based scholarships, revise its protest policies and share admissions data broken down by race with the federal government. In addition, it would mandate single-sex housing for women, equal athletic recognition for female athletes, and bar the university's hospital and medical school from providing gender-affirming care, all provisions that Brown agreed to in its deal last week. The US Justice Department said last week that UCLA acted with 'deliberate indifference' to alleged targeting of Jewish and Israeli students after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack and Israel's subsequent invasion of Gaza. It had threatened to file a complaint in federal district court by Sept. 2 unless the school agreed to enter into talks. UCLA became a flashpoint in spring 2024 as campus protests escalated nationwide over Israel's war against Hamas, which is designated as a terrorist group by the US and the European Union. In addition to widespread allegations of anti-Jewish behavior at the California school, at least 15 people were injured on campus in April of last year when pro-Israel counter-demonstrators attacked a pro-Palestinian encampment. The opening salvo in the Trump administration's negotiations with UCLA came less than 24 hours after California Governor Gavin Newsom said the university shouldn't 'bend on their knees' to the White House as he alleged other universities that settled had. 'We're not Brown, we're not Columbia,' Newsom said. 'I will fight like hell to make sure that doesn't happen.' With assistance from Janet Lorin. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store