1 Reason to Buy Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) Stock
CEO Warren Buffett has helped make Berkshire Hathaway one of the world's most successful companies.
Berkshire Hathaway has actually significantly underperformed the S&P 500 index this year, but the stock looks like a smart long-term play.
Berkshire's massive cash pile and proven team of leaders and analysts makes the stock a worthwhile investment.
10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway ›
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) is one of the world's largest and most successful companies. Led by visionary investor and CEO Warren Buffett since 1965, the investment conglomerate has a market capitalization of roughly $995 billion -- and it ranks as the 11th-largest overall business in the world.
Buffett has been an incredible leader for the company and helped it to crush the broader market over the last half century, but he's poised to step down as the company's CEO at the end of this year. Board chairman Greg Abel will be succeeding Buffett in the CEO role -- a passing of the torch that will mark one of the most high-profile leadership transitions in finance history.
While Buffett's move out of the CEO role could create some uncertainty for the stock heading into next year, the company has a great team of analysts and seems to have a strong succession plan in place. Even with a key management transition on the near horizon, there's a great reason to buy Berkshire Hathaway stock right now.
Berkshire Hathaway stock looks like a smart defensive investment
Berkshire stock has gained roughly 2% year to date as of this writing -- a performance that lags significantly behind the S&P 500 index's gain of roughly 8%. Some of the reasoning for the relative underperformance is relatively clear.
Berkshire has been a substantial net seller of stocks over the last year and opted to stay on the sidelines as some growth-dependent plays have seen huge valuation gains and helped push major indexes to new record levels. While this has meant that Buffett's company has missed out on some of the effects of the market's recent rally, it also makes the investment conglomerate's stock more appealing as a defensive play right now.
Berkshire has a fantastic team of stock pickers, and the company has amassed a $344 billion cash pile that it will deploy when the team thinks bargains are available. For long-term investors, Berkshire continues to have the makings of a portfolio anchor with market-beating potential.
Should you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway right now?
Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025
Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
1 Reason to Buy Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) Stock was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
22 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
This trending deal at Best Buy gets you a MacBook for under $700
Whether you're going back to college or just need a new MacBook, now seems to be the time to buy. Rare Apple deals are popping up everywhere as the school bells start to ring and shoppers are making tariff-affected decisions. Let's look at just one of these deals today, and a darn good one at that. Presently, you can get a 13-inch MacBook Air Laptop with an M2 chip for just $699. That's a new MacBook for under $700, and a savings of $100 off the usual $799. Tap the button below to see it yourself, or keep reading to remind yourself of the capabilities of the M2 chip, as well as see more about what the laptop is capable of in full. Why you should buy the MacBook Air M2 Despite what Apple may want you to think, it's the numbers that make up a laptop. This 13-inch MacBook Air M2 Laptop has 16GB of RAM, 256GB of SSD storage, and a battery life that goes up to 18 hours. All for less than $700 while this deal is on. Then there's the 2560 x 1664 resolution screen (which will look great on 13-inches), Thunderbolt ports, and even a (rare for Apple) headphone jack. Great, great, and great. Clearly, this laptop has good stats. One thing that may worry you, however, is the fact that it has an M2 chip. The latest MacBooks have an M4 chip, after all. But is 2 really half of 4? Not necessarily. Beyond our Apple M2 chip explainer, which explains that the chip supports up to 24GB of RAM (among other stats), there's an incredibly great resource that compares the M2 vs the M3 chip. While there's a lot of nitty gritty, the key line is this: 'There's much less of a difference between the M3 MacBook Air and the M2 MacBook Air than in the previous generation jump.' You're still getting incredibly quality from the MacBook Air M2, beyond what numbers may suggest. The 13-inch MacBook Air with an M2 chip at $699 is undoubtedly a good deal. And, it's yours (along with the $100 in savings off of the usual $799 price) if you tap the button below. Alternatively, check out these other amazing laptop deals if you want to scout for something outside of the Apple ecosystem.
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Northwestern, UChicago named in lawsuit claiming university early decision agreements are anticompetitve
The University of Chicago and Northwestern University are both named in a lawsuit accusing top U.S. colleges of using the popular early admissions process to inflate tuition costs. The class-action lawsuit accuses 32 elite U.S. schools of violating antitrust laws. Five of the eight Ivy League universities are also named, among several others. The universities named in the lawsuit all use the Common app and/or Scoir/the Coalition app, the lawsuit said. All the universities also are or were members of the Consortium on Financing Higher Education. The plaintiffs claim students who commit to a school early are prevented from receiving competitive offers from other schools, and are locked into tuition and financial aid agreements. This is despite the fact that a prospective student's early decision agreement with a university is not legally binding — with universities describing it as an "honor-bound agreement" with "ethical" obligations, but without legal standing, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit said the universities benefit from early decision agreements not being legally binding — as they allow universities to revoke acceptance for students who do not finish their senior years of high school with grades commensurate with their interim transcripts, and also allow schools to change their programs of study and other terms of service without students having legal recourse. "Without binding contracts, participating colleges are also not contractually bound to any price terms vis-à-vis admitted students and can charge the tuition they deem appropriate, or offer any student financial aid packages they deem appropriate without facing legal claims that implied financial terms were violated," the lawsuit said. Nevertheless, students who enter early decision agreements are essentially bound to the schools that offered them, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit called early decision agreements anticompetitive. "A school has no legal, moral, academic, or self-interest-based reason not to compete for students offered admission at other schools through Early Decision, any more than it does to refrain from competing for students offered admission by other schools through the regular admissions process," the lawsuit said. "Yet the Defendant Schools have mutually agreed not to compete for students accepted through Early Decision, which both raises prices for tuition and other services and entrenches a system widely acknowledged to be unfair and harmful." The suit seeks to end the early admissions practice. CBS News Chicago has reached out to both Northwestern and UChicago for comment.
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Sonoma properties being sold off after alleged Ponzi scheme falls apart
A Sonoma man is suspected of running a real estate Ponzi scheme in the North Bay, and the properties he allegedly bought with other people's money are now going on the bankruptcy auction block. In about 2021, people began noticing that a real estate investment company was buying all kinds of properties in the town of Sonoma, often leaving them vacant. It turns out the company was a house of cards, and now that it's collapsed and the bankruptcy sales have begun, it's leaving both the city and the investors wondering what the future holds for them. His name is Ken Mattson, and the U.S. Attorney's Office said he was arrested in May on suspicion of defrauding hundreds of investors. He and his business partner Tim LeFever began buying up dozens and dozens of homes and commercial properties in and around the town of Sonoma. "His plan was to tear it down and rebuild something, promising that everyone could come back after it was rebuilt," said Sonoma resident David Eichar, as he flipped through pictures of small houses. "But it's just been sitting vacant." And he said Mattson didn't seem to mind paying above market rate for a lot of them. Eicher and friend Lisa Storment said they got suspicious and started a group called "Wake Up Sonoma" to investigate the matter. "So, he's buying property over value," said Eichar. "Then, we're like, how can you be making money off these things when he's paying so much for them?" It turns out he wasn't. His investors, many who were elderly and recruited through churches, were sending LeFever and Mattson money that they may never get back. When the company collapsed, Maria Crane lost virtually everything she and her husband had saved for their retirement. "We got statements saying our increases, and he was making up that information. But we thought we were safe, we're getting statements," she said. "They were our financial advisors, and we thought we were planning well. And now, we are scrambling to make ends meet." Now, at 65, Crane has gone back to teaching and her husband, at age 70, will have to keep working, as well. The town has also paid a price. Many of the properties sit empty, their fates tied up in the courts. One familiar business, the Sonoma Cheese Factory has since reopened under a new buyer. But when it was owned by Mattson, the once-popular specialty deli was hit with a boycott from the community. "Looks more like the beloved Cheese Factory that we used to know and love," said Storment, as she walked through the store. "I mean, if the right person takes ownership of some of these beloved historic buildings, they can, they'll get a lot of community support." Mattson was arrested after his own partner accused him of defrauding investors. He faces nine counts of wire fraud, money laundering and obstruction of justice and is currently free on $4 million bail. Crane said she actually prayed for him to be arrested, but now that the prayer has been answered, there is also a bitter irony. Because Mattson, too, is a co-investor in some of the properties, he stands to get a portion of whatever is generated through the bankruptcy property sales. "Whatever Ken uses for his own legal defense comes out of whatever pot is left. That could go back to investors and creditors," said Crane. "So, of course, we don't want to pay for the defense of the man that has committed a crime against us and stolen our livelihood." So far, six LeFever-Mattson properties have now been sold out of bankruptcy with dozens more to follow. And just as their initial purchases artificially raised the price of real estate in town, now their deflated sales prices are likely to bring down the value of their neighbors' homes.
