logo
Trump to change controversial Biden-era restrictions on AI chip exports

Trump to change controversial Biden-era restrictions on AI chip exports

Yahoo08-05-2025
President Donald Trump will rescind a set of Biden-era curbs meant to keep advanced technology out of the hands of foreign adversaries but that has been panned by tech giants.
The move could have sweeping impacts on the global distribution of critical AI chips, as well as which companies profit from the new technology and America's position as a world leader in artificial intelligence.
'I vocally opposed this rule for months, and indeed, the ranking member and I together urge the Biden administration not to adopt it, and I'm very pleased that President Trump has now confirmed he plans to rescind it,' US Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said during a Senate committee hearing to discuss AI regulation on Thursday.
Cruz said he will soon introduce a new bill that 'creates a regulatory AI sandbox,' adding that he wants to model new regulation after the approach former President Bill Clinton took at the 'dawn of the internet.' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, AMD CEO Lisa Su, Microsoft vice chair and president Brad Smith and CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator testified during the hearing.
Altman, whose company collaborates with Apple by integrating its ChatGPT technology into Siri's voice assistant, said he visited an Apple facility in Texas where they're building 'what will be the largest AI training facility in the world.' Apple said in February that its investing $500 billion in expanding its US footprint, which includes building a facility in Houston to produce servers for its Apple Intelligence AI features.
'We need a lot more of that,' Altman said.
The curbs, which were set to take effect on May 15 and were introduced during the final days of former President Joe Biden's administration, sorted countries into three tiers subject to specific AI-related trade regulation.
Those in the top tier, which include the United Kingdom, Spain, Japan, Germany and Ireland among other countries, face the least restrictions, while countries like China and Russia are in the tier with the strictest constraints. It's the countries that fall in between that have raised concern among critics like Microsoft.
Microsoft's Smith wrote in February that countries that fall into this second bucket may look elsewhere for AI, potentially China.
'The unintended consequence of this approach is to encourage Tier Two countries to look elsewhere for AI infrastructure and services,' he wrote. 'And it's obvious where they will be forced to turn.'
AI chip giant Nvidia has also publicly pushed back against the curbs.
The tech executives called for more innovation and faster AI adoption in their prepared remarks. Smith also discussed the importance of using AI to boost job growth in America, a key tenet of Trump's push to bring tech manufacturing to the US despite the challenges of shifting away from vast supply chains and cheaper labor in China and elsewhere abroad.
'Are we trying to build machines that will outperform people in all the jobs that they do today, or are we trying to build machines that will help people pursue better jobs and even more interesting careers in the future?' said Smith. 'Indisputably, it needs to be the second, not the first.'
Much of the hearing focused on the challenge of balancing the ability to move quickly while adopting necessary standards and export controls to prevent technology from being diverted to China. But the tech executives were also grilled on ethical issues related to AI, such as the trustworthiness of the information chatbots produce, copyright concerns and how to protect children from potential harm.
Nonprofit media watchdog Common Sense Media recently published a report saying AI apps pose 'unacceptable risks' to children and teens, coming after a lawsuit was filed last year over the suicide death of a 14-year-old boy whose last conversation was with a chatbot.
'This idea of AI and social relationships, I think this is a new thing that we need to pay a lot of attention to,' Altman said, after saying his company would be willing collaborate on a framework to help protect young users.
The Trump administration has previously pushed for less regulation around AI, with Vice President JD Vance saying that 'excessive regulation of the AI sector' could 'kill a transformative industry just as it's taking off' during remarks at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris. Trump is also pushing for the US to be a leader in both the AI industry and in technology manufacturing, frequently touting vows from TSMC and Apple to expand their US infrastructure as victories.
The hearing also comes as tariffs on semiconductors are expected to arrive imminently. Last month, after saying smartphones and other select electronics would be exempt from reciprocal tariffs, Trump said in a Truth Social post that those products would be moved to a 'different tariff bucket' as the administration examines the 'whole electronics supply chain.'
The AI race between the US and China escalated earlier this year with the arrival of Chinese tech startup DeepSeek's supposedly cheap yet sophisticated AI model, which shook both Wall Street and Silicon Valley. It grabbed headlines in January for the company's claims that its R1 model could roughly match OpenAI's o1 model for a fraction of the price, challenging the notion that powerful performance required costly investments.
'The number one factor that will define whether the United States or China wins this race is whose technology is most broadly adopted in the rest of the world,' Smith said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting

Chicago Tribune

time27 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting

KYIV, Ukraine — European nations have rallied behind Ukraine, saying peace in the war-torn nation can't be resolved without Kyiv, ahead of an upcoming meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Trump said next Friday's meeting with his Russian counterpart on U.S. soil would focus on ending the war, now in its fourth year. In response, Zelenskyy thanked European allies in a post on X, writing Sunday: 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.' Saturday's statement by top European leaders came after the White House confirmed the U.S president was willing to grant Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Trump that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories.' That raised fears that Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty. A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they aren't allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Putin. Meanwhile, U.S. Vice President JD Vance met Saturday with top European and Ukrainian officials at the British Foreign Secretary's weekend residence to discuss how to end the war. Trump previously said he would meet with Putin regardless of whether the Russian leader agreed to meet with Zelenskyy. The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbor and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there's no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Saturday's statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the UK, stressed the need for a 'just and lasting peace' for Kyiv, including 'robust and credible' security guarantees. 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,' the statement said. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' the Europeans added. U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that a good deal would mean preventing an emboldened Russia, and aggressors elsewhere, from trying to once again redraw borders by force. A Trump ally and Russia hawk, Graham nevertheless said that 'you can't end a war without talking.' 'I do hope that Zelenskyy can be part of the process. I have every confidence in the world that (President Trump) is going to go to meet Putin from a position of strength, that he's going to look out for Europe and Ukrainian needs to end this war honorably,' he said. He argued that 'Ukraine is not going to evict every Russian' soldier, but said the West should give Kyiv robust security guarantees, keep some of its forces on the ground 'as trip wires,' and keep arming Ukraine 'so that Russia will be deterred by the most lethal army on the continent of Europe.' A monthlong U.S.-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking. Trump also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions Saturday about possible sanctions. The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine give up territory, abandon its bid to join NATO, and accept limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country. Particularly galling for Kyiv is Moscow's insistence that it cede pockets of eastern and southern Ukraine the Kremlin claims to have annexed, despite lacking full military control. Mark Galeotti, a British expert in Russian politics who heads the Mayak Intelligence consultancy, says Moscow's tactic of encircling towns in eastern Ukraine has brought a string of territorial gains for Russia, and Putin 'does not appear to feel under pressure.' For the Kremlin, 'further delaying any more serious U.S. action and the optics of a meeting with the U.S. president will already be wins,' Galeotti argued in an analysis published Sunday by the UK's Sunday Times newspaper. Zelenskyy said Saturday that Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognize Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Zelenskyy on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question. Galeotti argued that any deal that involves Ukraine abandoning territory would be 'agonising' and politically dangerous for Zelenskyy. Andriy Yermak, a top aide to Zelenskyy, noted on Sunday that Kyiv will strive to boost its position ahead of the planned Trump-Putin meeting. 'Ahead lies an important week of diplomacy,' he said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Sunday that European leaders are 'intensively preparing' ahead of the Alaska summit, while they 'hope and expect' that Zelenskyy will be invited. Merz told Germany's public broadcaster ARD that he has for weeks been encouraging Washington to toughen sanctions against Russia, adding that 'Putin only acts under pressure.' Mikhail Kasyanov, Putin's first prime minister and later a political opponent, similarly told the BBC Sunday that the Kremlin would be more willing to negotiate seriously and make some concessions when sanctions have further strained Russia's economy. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Sunday praised Washington for taking steps such as allowing more military equipment to flow to Ukraine and imposing secondary sanctions on India for purchasing Russian oil, saying Trump 'clearly is putting pressure on Putin.' 'Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin — how serious he is — on bringing this terrible war to an end,' Rutte said in an interview with ABC's 'This Week.'

The Sorry Sugar Status Quo
The Sorry Sugar Status Quo

Wall Street Journal

time28 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

The Sorry Sugar Status Quo

Regarding 'Trump, Coke and the Sugar Cartel' (Opinion, July 24): In 1988, while working at the Commerce Department as an entry-level economist, I co-authored the study 'United States Sugar Policy: An Analysis.' It demonstrated the detrimental effect on U.S. consumers of an unholy alliance between the high fructose corn industry and a small group of sugar growers, primarily in Florida, who received an average subsidy of roughly $260,000 per farm. Nearly 40 years later, nothing appears to have changed. If the president wants to demonstrate true courage, he would abolish the sugar tariff-quota regime and let the free market reign. My guess is that we'll sooner see pigs fly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store