Trump-backed World Liberty proposes $1.5 billion crypto holder, Bloomberg News reports
The structure of the deal is yet to be finalised, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter, adding that large investors in the crypto and tech space had been approached for the venture.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report. World Liberty did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
World Liberty, a "decentralised platform" which counts Donald Trump and his sons as co-founders according to its website, has earned the family $500 million since its launch, according to Reuters' calculations.
World Liberty tokens, known as $WLFI, are not classified as securities by the Securities and Exchange Commission and are hence not subject to the same level of scrutiny as investments like stocks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
a few seconds ago
- Los Angeles Times
Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that
On May 1, 2003, George W. Bush announced, 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.' He was standing below a giant banner that read, 'Mission Accomplished.' At the risk of inviting charges of understatement, subsequent events didn't cooperate. But it took a while for that to be widely accepted. We're in a similar place when it comes to President Trump's experiment with a new global trading order. 'Tariffs are making our country Strong and Rich!!!' proclaims Trump, making him not only the first Republican president in living memory to brag about raising taxes on Americans, but also the first to insist that raising taxes on Americans makes us richer. MAGA's mission-accomplished groupthink relies primarily on three arguments. The first is that Trump has successfully concluded a slew of beneficial trade deals. The truth is that some of those deals are simply 'frameworks' that will take a long time to be ironed out. But Trump got the headlines he wanted. The second argument is a kind of populism-infused sleight of hand. The 'experts' — their scare quotes, not mine — are wrong once again. The White House social media account crows, 'In April, 'experts' called tariffs 'the biggest policy mistake in 95 years.' By July, they generated OVER $100 BILLION in revenue. Facts expose the haters: tariffs WORK. Trust in Trump.' But the high-fivers are leaving things out. The most-dire predictions of economic catastrophe were based on the scheme Trump announced on April 2, a.k.a. 'Liberation Day.' Trump quickly backed off that plan ('chickened out' in Wall Street parlance) in response to a bond and stock market implosion. Saying the experts were wrong under those circumstances is like saying experts opposed to defenestration were wrong when they successfully convinced a man not to jump out a window. The third argument, made by the White House and many others — that tariffs are working because they're raising money — is a response to a claim no one made. To my knowledge, no expert claimed tariffs wouldn't raise money. The estimates of these revenues from Trump world are stratospheric. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expects somewhere between $700 billion and $1 trillion per year. Last month, the government collected $29 billion. It's likely this number will significantly increase as more tariffs come online and businesses run down the inventory they stockpiled earlier this year in anticipation of more tariffs to come. Normally, Republicans don't exult over massive revenues from tax hikes. But Trump's defenders get around this problem by insisting that money is 'pouring' and 'flowing' into America from someplace else. It's true that tariff revenue is pouring into the Treasury, but that money is coming out of American bank accounts, because American importers pay the tariff. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot deny this when pressed. So yes, tariffs are 'working' the way they're supposed to; the problem is Trump thinks tariffs work differently than they do. It's possible some foreign exporters might lower prices to maintain market share, and some American businesses might absorb the costs — for now — to avoid sticker shock for inflation-beleaguered consumers, but what revenue is generated still comes from Americans. Ultimately it means higher prices paid here, reduced profits for businesses here or reduced U.S. trade overall. Sometimes, when pressed, defenders of the administration will concede the true source of the revenues, but then they say the pain is necessary to force manufacturers and other businesses to build and produce in the United States. It's backdoor industrial policy masquerading as trade policy. That, too, might 'work.' But all of this will take time, no matter what. And, if it works, that will have costs, too. Manufacturing in America is more expensive — that's why we manufacture so much stuff abroad in the first place. If this 'reshoring' happens, our goods will be more expensive, and less money will 'pour in' from tariffs. It's difficult to exaggerate how well-understood all of this was on the American right until very recently. But the need to grab any argument available to declare Trump's experiment a success has a lot of people not only abandoning their previous dogma but leaping to the conclusion that the dogma was wrong all along. Maybe it was, though I don't think so. The evidence so far suggests that problems are looming. The dollar is weakening. Prices continue to rise. The job market is reeling. The stock market (an unreliable metric, according to MAGA, when it plummeted after Liberation Day) is holding on, thanks to tech stocks. The truth is we won't have real evidence for a while. It's worth remembering that Americans don't live by headlines and press releases and they don't live in the macro economy either. Declaring 'Mission Accomplished' for the macro economy won't convince people they're better off in their own micro-economies when they're not. @JonahDispatch
Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Ether, the number two crypto, closes on bitcoin
Ether, which powers the Ethereum blockchain, has in recent weeks abruptly caught up to bitcoin's rally, driven by digital asset treasury companies accruing over 2 million ether since June. Why it matters: In past bull markets, the prices of the world's two biggest cryptocurrencies have made very similar moves, but that correlation broke down quite a bit over the last year. That break was notable. Prior to last year it had looked like all of crypto largely marched in lockstep with bitcoin, raising questions about whether any other project could differentiate itself from the original. But then bitcoin went on a tear with the launch of ETFs in 2024, and also since President Trump began to promise to make the U.S. a leader in crypto. Ether also got an ETF and it also benefits from Trump's policies, but that wasn't showing up in its price. Between the lines: Bitcoin and ether are very different assets: Bitcoin is just money. Ethereum is basically a giant tech company, except it doesn't have a CEO, office or a board. The Ethereum blockchain was built as a platform for decentralized applications, and any and all activity on the blockchain requires some kind of payment in ether. "Several of the biggest narratives that drove Ethereum's 2021 performance had decayed significantly in 2024, such as NFTs, web3, and metaverse," Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, says. The intrigue: Over the past month, however, ether has benefited from some of the same factors that have been fueling bitcoin. Driving the news: Ether decisively broke the $4,000 price barrier last week, a level it had only touched twice before — briefly — in the past three-plus years. Tuesday morning it was trading at over $4,400. There's been a lot of buying going on. Monday, more than a billion dollars worth of exchange-traded ether products were purchased, according to CoinShares. A record. Such purchases this year have already nearly doubled from last year. What's happening: Certain companies pursuing a cryptocurrency accumulation strategy have started buying piles of ether, led by Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) and Sharplink Gaming (SBET). The theory of these companies is that they can accrue more cryptocurrency per share over time using financial engineering, without diluting investors. Which means that, hopefully, one purchase of stock will grow its holdings of an underlying cryptocurrency over time. Collectively, these companies are approaching 2% of the total supply under management, with a giant new purchase of 317,000 ether (ETH) announced by Bitmine on Monday. A friendlier SEC also looks likely to approve ether ETFs, earning a small yield for token holders on-chain, which should make the products a bit more attractive to investors. What they're saying: "For years, Ethereum has lived in the shadow of its elder sibling, Bitcoin," Houston Morgan, from multichain investing platform ShapeShift, says. "But that era is ending. ETH is on the cusp of stepping into its own spotlight. Ethereum price action is increasingly driven by its own fundamentals." By the numbers: Bitcoin and ether have seen roughly similar gains since the start of the year, despite ether lagging for most of that period. However, ether has a ways to go to truly catch up. Bitcoin is closing in on 300% in appreciation since the beginning of 2024. Ether is close to doubling its price over the same period. What we're watching: The market has begun to differentiate between the major cryptocurrencies, and despite ether's recent rise, that's expected to continue. In the meantime, ether remains 9% away from setting a new all-time high, but it's risen that much in the last few days.
Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Inside Senate Dems' summer warpath against Trump
Senate Democrats held more than 100 events railing against Republican policies in the first week of their summer recess, part of a coordinated push to drive down GOP approval ahead of the 2026 midterms. Why it matters: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) deployed similar tactics on the campaign trail last year, when his Democrats significantly outperformed the rest of the party in the general election. Schumer wants his caucus to localize the impact of policies Trump and the Republican Congress have embraced in Washington — specifically cuts to health care, tariffs, rising energy costs and tax cuts for the wealthy. The events have included town halls, hospital visits and huddles with small business owners, along with visits to food banks and to local businesses. Schumer blitzed upstate New York last week to start the recess and is continuing to travel the state this week. The big picture: Democrats want to capitalize on the unpopularity of Trump's massive tax and spending cut bill, which is underwater with voters, according to polling. On Mediciad, Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) said following an event in Door County last week that she is "taking this fight to every corner of our state." Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) said last week following a roundtable in his state that Trump's tariff policies were "pulverizing" small businesses. Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) warned that Trump's marquee tax cut bill is creating a "perfect storm" that will lead to higher electricity bills. Between the lines: Democrats' chances in the 2026 midterms rest largely on whether they can effectively frame Trump and GOP policies as harmful, as they work to rebuild following significant losses in 2024. The hyper-local focus also gives Senate Democrats an opportunity to build a brand and reputation that is independent of the national Democratic Party, which remains deeply unpopular in recent polling. Party insiders attribute that strategy to the success last year of lawmakers like Baldwin and Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), who won seats for Democrats in states that Trump carried.
