Let the great water clean-up begin
All the same, Sir Jon Cunliffe has done us a favour. Maybe no one really needed such a lengthy treatise to spot that when it comes to water regulation the nation has long been up the creek without a paddle — or that scrapping Ofwat is overdue.
Yet it's useful to see it spelt out so forensically. And with no truck, either, for the old Labour politics of environment secretary Steve Reed: a chap far too focused on sideshow stuff, such as bans on directors' bonuses, rather than a systemic fix for the problem. Cunliffe, a former Bank of England deputy governor, was clear that, given the job ahead, bills will have to rise and companies be able to pay for 'the best people'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Oil tycoon Shvidler loses appeal over UK's Russian sanctions
LONDON, July 29 (Reuters) - Billionaire oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler on Tuesday lost his appeal against British sanctions imposed on him over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine at the UK's Supreme Court, a ruling lawyers said makes it difficult for similar challenges to succeed. Russian-born Shvidler, who is a British and U.S. citizen, was sanctioned over his association with former Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich, plus his former position as a director of London-listed Russian steel producer Evraz (EVRE.L), opens new tab. Shvidler – whose net worth is estimated by Forbes magazine at $1.6 billion – appealed to the Supreme Court, with his lawyers arguing that others with greater involvement in business of importance to Russia were not sanctioned, citing BP's (BP.L), opens new tab previous joint venture with Rosneft ( opens new tab. The Supreme Court rejected Shvidler's appeal by a four-to-one majority in a ruling that Shvidler said "brings me back to the USSR". The ruling also maintains Britain's 100% record of defending its Russian sanctions in court. Shvidler said in a statement that no British companies or business people with ties to Russian state-owned companies have been sanctioned, adding that Britain's sanctions were "more about cheap virtue-signalling for purely political purposes". "There may be little public sympathy for me, as a wealthy US/UK businessman, but this judgment applies to all who face state power," he added. Britain's Foreign Office, which has overseen the sanctioning of more than 1,700 individuals or entities since Russia's invasion, welcomed the ruling "and the message it sends about the strength of the UK sanctions regime". Shvidler had said British sanctions have destroyed his business and disrupted his and his family's lives. His lawyers previously said he has no involvement in or influence over Russian politics and had not even been to Russia since attending the late Russian President Boris Yeltsin's funeral in 2007. But the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that the sanctions struck a fair balance between Shvidler's rights and the aims of the sanctions regime. In the majority's judgment, Judges Philip Sales and Vivien Rose said sanctioning Shvidler "sends a clear signal to people in Mr Shvidler's position that they would be wise to distance themselves from Russian business now". But Judge George Leggatt, in a strident dissenting ruling, said Britain's "flimsy reasons" for sanctioning Shvidler did not justify the "serious invasion of liberty" sanctions entailed. He noted BP's profitable joint venture with Rosneft, having two members on its board, and said it was irrational to only sanction Shvidler if "sanctioning an individual for working as a director of a company which had invested in the Russian extractives sector was thought likely to contribute to achieving the purposes" of British sanctions. BP declined to comment. Maia Cohen-Lask, a partner at Corker Binning, said the Supreme Court's ruling was "a huge blow not just for Mr Shvidler but for any person who has been sanctioned despite their lack of any links to the Putin regime". The Supreme Court also dismissed a separate appeal brought by Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko, whose 44 million euro ($51 million) superyacht was detained in London.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump meets John Swinney for private talks before star-studded golf match on final day of Scotland trip
The US President is welcoming a host of A-listers for a star-studded golf match to open his new Aberdeenshire course DON THE COURSE Donald Trump meets John Swinney for private talks before star-studded golf match on final day of Scotland trip Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump has officially opened his new Scottish golf course - his final stop in Scotland before Air Force One departs later today. Last night he flew from Turnberry to the North East and hosted a private dinner with dignitaries including the Prime Minister, First Minister, and high profile business people. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Donald Trump has officially opened his new course in Aberdeenshire Credit: AFP 3 The US President and Sir Keir Starmer after their crunch talks at Turnberry on Monday Credit: Reuters 3 Donald Trump and Keir Starmer wave as they board Air Force One at Prestwick Airport ahead of a flight to north-east Scotland Mr Trump and Sir Keir landed at Menie aboard Marine One, the president's helicopter, which was seen circling the new course before it touched down on Monday evening. Before teeing off at Trump International, the US President met with John Swinney for a private one-to-one. It was the first time the pair have met since they clashed in November last year when the SNP leader called on US voters to back his Democratic rival Kamala Harris in the US Presidential election - leading his UK-based business to slam the endorsement as an 'insult'. The President opened the 'new course' at Trump International in Menie, just north of Aberdeen, at a 'grand opening' ceremony shortly before 11am. He thanked his son Eric, who he said had "worked so hard" on creating the New Course at the resort. Trump International's 'new course' is the second at the venue since the newly named 'old course' opened in 2012. The new 18 holes measures 7,589 yards - with Trump International now self-styled as the 'greatest 36 holes in golf'. Mr Trump made a short speech on the first tee of the course before playing a round. It comes after Mr Trump yesterday hosted an 80-minute televised press conference with the Prime Minister after meeting with Sir Keir Starmer at his other golf course at Turnberry, Ayrshire. In it, he blasted wind power - slamming wind turbines as 'ugly monsters' - and urged more drilling in the North Sea. Furious Trump says he'll CUT Putin's 50-day peace deadline and says he's 'disappointed' after latest ruthless Kyiv blitz And he poured cold water on the possibility of a second independence referendum within the next '50 or 75 years'. He also spoke of his love for Scotland due to his late mother's birthplace being in the Isle of Lewis and said: 'My mother loved Scotland. This is a part of the world I want to see thrive.' The second course at Trump International is expected to be dedicated to the president's mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, who was born on the Isle of Lewis.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Analysis: Is Scottish independence the politics of yesteryear?
Earlier in the day First Minister had set out what he argued would be a mechanism for holding indyref2, stating in a column in the Daily Record that the SNP must return a majority of MSPs in next year's Holyrood election to be able to 'secure' a new vote on independence. Pointing to the [[Holyrood]] majority the [[SNP]] won, under Alex Salmond in 2011, which paved the way for the 2024 referendum, Mr Swinney said that was the 'only mechanism that has been proved to deliver such a vote'. READ MORE: It was a shift away from the approach taken by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon that a [[SNP]] led Scottish Government could start discussions about a new vote if independence supporting parties won a majority in [[Holyrood]]. Asked for a response to this news, the PM said the current 'volatility' on the global stage proved the importance of the United Kingdom. He said: 'At a time like this, when it's quite clear that there's uncertainty and volatility around the world, the strength of the United Kingdom together is very important for all four nations, very important for Scotland, and that should be our priority, that should be our focus – not on the politics which feels like the politics of yesteryear now, at a time like this." Mr Swinney's strategy does certainly, as he himself openly admits, hark back to previous (and better days) for the SNP. And for Sir Keir Starmer it would of course be highly convenient if he was correct that independence is the politics of yesteryear. He wouldn't face regular reminders that as things stand a majority of Scots want Scotland to become independent, and he wouldn't have to face awkward questions about that situation in front of world leaders, such as Mr Trump. But while the Prime Minister is right to suggest that many voters have other priorities on their mind - recent polling suggest the NHS, the cost of living and the state of public services are uppermost concerns - it does not mean that independence is a concern of the past. The same Ipsos poll published earlier this month which set out voters' priorities, put support for independence at 52%, while previous surveys have found that younger voters are more likely to support independence. However, the challenge for Mr Swinney is now to win that majority and at the moment that task while not impossible looks very difficult. When the SNP won its Holyrood majority under Mr Salmond the party took 69 seats, winning 45% of the vote in the constituency seats and 44% in the regional seats. The latest polling suggests the party is on course to win 34% of the vote in the constituencies and 26% on the list with analysis suggesting the figures point to 59 seats for the SNP, six short of a majority. If Mr Swinney's achieves his goal, it will certainly heap the pressure on Sir Keir Starmer to agree to a second independence vote, but if he doesn't it will raise questions over his leadership, and strengthen the arguments for the pro-UK parties that demands for indyref2 must be set aside in the next Parliament.
