
A bad wrap: Trump blasts 'TACO Theory'
US President Donald Trump made no pretence at hiding his irritation this week when he was asked by a reporter about "TACO" - an acronym that has been gaining traction among Wall Street traders who believe that "Trump Always Chickens Out."
The so-called "TACO Theory" was coined by Robert Armstrong, a Financial Times writer seeking to underline the president's tendency to backtrack on policies when they start to roil the markets.
Investors have come to realise that the US administration "does not have a very high tolerance for market and economic pressure and will be quick to back off when tariffs cause pain," Mr Armstrong concluded.
"This is the TACO Theory: Trump Always Chickens Out."
Mr Armstrong was writing earlier this month, after stocks had just rebounded sharply on Mr Trump's announcement of a pause in massive tariffs imposed on the rest of the world by the Republican leader.
Worsening the whiplash, Mr Trump announced last week that tariffs of 50% on imports from the European Union would come into force on 1 June - but two days later declared a pause until 9 July.
'It's called negotiation'
At the heart of Mr Trump's flip-flops is an acute sensitivity for the ups and downs of market trading that he honed as a property developer and business magnate in the 1980s.
During his first term in office, a sharp reaction on Wall Street could sometimes be the only way to change the billionaire's mind.
Beyond the columns of the Financial Times, the "TACO Theory" is having a viral moment, and has entered the lexicon of investors who see it as more than just a snarky in-joke, according to analysts.
"TACO trading strategy gets attention again," blared the headline on a podcast released on Monday by John Hardy, head of macroeconomic strategy at Danish investment bank Saxo.
The phrase eventually found its way back to the 78-year-old president, who furiously denied on Wednesday that he was backing down in the face of stock market turmoil.
"I chicken out? I've never heard that... don't ever say what you said, that's a nasty question," he said, rounding in the journalist who had asked for his take on the expression.
Far from caving, Mr Trump said he was merely engaging in the high-stakes cut and thrust of international deal making, he said - adding, "it's called negotiation."
For Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers, the 'TACO Theory' is a "nonpolitical way of the markets calling the administration's bluff."
Reaction
Sam Burns, an analyst at Mill Street Research, said he has noticed a new equanimity in Wall Street's reaction to each new tariff announcement, with traders' responses initially "much larger and more direct."
Where they once convulsed markets, Trump's tariff talk now tends to be viewed as "easily reversible or not reliable," said Burns, and investors are accordingly more willing to ignore the instinct to act rashly.
This new calm was evident among traders at the New York Stock Exchange who held steady in the face of Mr Trump's EU tariff threats, and again when they did not overreact to successive court rulings blocking and then temporarily reinstating most of the tariffs.
But Mr Hardy warns that the vagaries of Mr Trump's day-to-day announcements should not distract from the protectionist bent of his broader political outlook.
"Trump might 'chicken out' at times," Mr Hardy wrote in a recent commentary on Saxo's website.
"But the underlying policy moves are for real, and a deadly serious shift in US economic statecraft and industrial policy that is a response to massive instabilities that have been growing for years."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
37 minutes ago
- The Journal
Hungary's infamous ban on LGBTQ+ content deemed to be violation of EU law
A HUNGARIAN LAW that harshly restricts access to LGBTQ-related content is a violation of European Union law, according to the Advocate General of the EU's Court of Justice. By banning content about LGBTQ+ sexualities and gender identities from being available to under-18s, Hungary is infringing on the treaty that sets out the EU's fundamental principles, the Advocate General's formal legal opinion stated. The Treaty of the European Union outlines that the EU is 'founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities'. By calling into question the equality of LGBTQ+ people, Hungary has 'negated' several of the EU's fundamental values, Advocate General Tamara Ćapeta said. It has also 'significantly deviated from the model of a constitutional democracy'. In 2021, Hungary's parliament passed a bill that effectively banned communicating with children and teenagers about sexual orientations and gender identities . The impacts affected education programmes, meaning students could not be educated about LGBTQ+ identities, and media like books and movies, including movies that depict LGBTQ+ being classified as 18+. The European Commission brought an infringement action before the Court of Justice against Hungary over the law and Ćapeta has now set out her legal opinion that the Court rule the action is well-founded. She said the legislation infringed on the freedom enshrined in EU law to provide and receive services. Advertisement It also interferes with fundamental rights protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, namely the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex and sexual orientation; respect for private and family life; freedom of expression and information; and the right to human dignity. Capéta said these interferences cannot be justified by the reasons put forward by Hungary, which tried to argue for the law on the basis of protection of the 'healthy development of minors' and the 'right of parents to raise their children according to their personal convictions'. The Advocate General said the Hungarian legislation is not limited to shielding minors from pornographic content, which was already prohibited by the law in Hungary prior to the 2021 legislation, and goes as far as prohibiting the portrayal of ordinary lives of LGBTQ+ people. She said that Hungary has not offered any proof of a potential risk of harm of content that portrays ordinary lives of LGBTQ+ people to the healthy development of minors and that consequently, its legislation is 'based on a value judgment that homosexual and non-cisgender life is not of equal value or status as heterosexual and cisgender life'. The EU legal system recognises that there can be different visions among member states about how common values should be implemented in practice, and that disagreements about fundamental rights should not result in a finding of an infringement of the Treaty of the European Union. However, Hungary's actions in this case are not a matter of a 'disagreement', Capéta said. She said that LGBTQ+ people being deserving of equal respect in member states is 'not open to contestation through dialogue'. She said: Disrespect and marginalisation of a group in a society are the 'red lines' imposed by the values of equality, human dignity and respect for human rights. As such, 'by calling into question the equality of LGBTI persons, Hungary is not demonstrating a disagreement or a divergence about the content of the values of the European Union'. 'Instead, that Member State has negated several of those fundamental values and, thus, has significantly deviated from the model of a constitutional democracy, reflected in Article 2 of the Treaty of the European Union.' An Advocate General's opinion is not binding on the Court of Justice but gives the Court a proposed legal solution to cases it is responsible for. Related Reads 'Weeping for this country': Struggle continues in Hungary as Ireland joins Europe in stance against anti-LGBT+ bill The judges of the court are now beginning deliberations on the case. If the Court of Justice finds a member state has failed to fulfil obligations of EU law, the the country must comply with the Court's judgment 'without delay' or face further action like financial penalties. 'No place in the EU' Dávid Vig, director of Amnesty International Hungary, said the Advocate General's opinion 'made it clear the [anti-LGBTQ+] law has no place in Hungary and the European Union'. 'The discriminatory law violates several human rights and promotes the idea that the life of LGBTI people is not of equal value,' Vig said. In March of this year, the Hungarian parliament passed legislation that restricts freedom of assembly and consequently prohibited LGBTQ+ Pride marches . LGBTQ+ rights organisation ILGA-Europe said the today's opinion from the Advocate General should mean the anti-Pride legislation is also considered to be violating EU law. 'The AG's opinion is very clear in that Hungary breaches EU law and the Treaties by enacting the anti-LGBTI legislation from 2021,' said ILGA-Europe's advocacy director Katrin Hugendubel. 'The new package of amendments adopted this year to criminalise Pride marches and their organisers builds directly on that unlawful legislation and must therefore also be considered a violation of EU law.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Trump agrees to visit China after ‘very good' Xi call fuelling hopes bitter superpower trade war could come to an end
DONALD Trump has agreed to visit China after a "very good" phone call with his Beijing counterpart Xi Jinping. The calls comes amid weeks of escalating trade tensions after Trump announced especially bruising tariffs on China. Advertisement 1 Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump during his first term Credit: AFP or licensors Trump took to Truth Social to share his reaction to the one and a half hour long call between the two leaders. He said the conversation led to a "very positive conclusion" for both the US and China. "During the conversation, President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated," Trump wrote. "As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing." Advertisement More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos . Like us on Facebook at


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
China and US agree to more tariff talks amid trade stand-off
China and the US have agreed to more tariff talks amid a trade stand-off and concerns over rare earths, President Donald Trump said after a call with China's leader. Mr Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke on Thursday at a time when stalled tariff negotiations between their two countries have impacted global trade. The conversation was confirmed by the Chinese foreign ministry, which said Mr Trump initiated the call. The White House did not immediately comment. Mr Trump had declared one day earlier that it was difficult to reach a deal with Mr Xi. Chinese President Xi Jinping (Pavel Bednyakov/AP) 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' Mr Trump posted on Wednesday on his social media site. Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a May 12 agreement between the two countries to reduce their tariff rates while talks played out. Behind the gridlock has been the continued competition for an economic edge. The US accuses China of not exporting critical minerals, and the Chinese government objects to America restricting its sale of advanced chips and its access to student visas for college and graduate students. Mr Trump has lowered his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks. China also reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%. The back and forth has caused sharp swings in global markets and threatens to hamper trade between the two countries. Treasury Sscretary Scott Bessent had suggested that only a conversation between Mr Trump and Mr Xi could resolve these differences so that talks could restart in earnest. The underlying tension between the two countries may still persist, though. President Donald Trump (Alex Brandon/AP) Even if negotiations resume, Mr Trump wants to lessen America's reliance on Chinese factories and reindustrialise the US, whereas China wants the ability to continue its push into technologies such as electric vehicles and artificial intelligence that could be crucial to securing its economic future. The United States ran a trade imbalance of 295 billion dollars with China in 2024, according to the Census Bureau. While the Chinese government's focus on manufacturing has turned it into a major economic and geopolitical power, China has been muddling through a slowing economy after a real estate crisis and coronavirus pandemic lockdowns weakened consumer spending. Mr Trump and Mr Xi had last spoken in January, three days before Inauguration Day. The pair discussed trade then, as well as Mr Trump's demands that China do more to prevent the synthetic opioid fentanyl from entering the United States. Mr Trump had long expressed optimism about the prospects for a major deal, before his post suggesting Xi was making that difficult. Last week, Mr Trump went further, posting: 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.' 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!'