Families criticise leaders at Our Lady's Abingdon after closure
Announcing its closure the school said it had been "under financial pressure for some time" and it had been left with "no viable way forward". It added an increase in fees had become "unaffordable" for some parents and had led to a decline in pupil numbers. At the time of its closure, the school had 368 pupils, despite a capacity of 540.In its last accounts filed in August 2023, the school said it faced "challenges" and predicted budget deficits for the years ending August 2024 and 2025. It said the school's governors acknowledged its circumstances represented a "material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on [its] ability to continue as a going concern".
Mr Devlin has one child at the school and another who was due to begin in September. He said there had been high levels of staff turnover in recent years, but no indication from the school that its immediate future was at risk.At the time of the closure the school's board of governors said it would be "supporting families in securing alternative school places in Oxfordshire". But Mr Devlin told the BBC: "When the notice was issued, we had no offer of help from the school. "There's been no communication from the governors... it seems like the people responsible for running the school have dropped off the face of the earth".He added that he had attempted to enter his daughters into local state schools, but was told they were full. They will begin at a new private school in September.
'No viable way forward'
A woman with grandchildren at the school, who did not want to be named, told the BBC the lack of prior notice was "a betrayal of trust and confused children when [the] school was seen as a predictable, trusted, nurturing environment".Debbie Watson, regional organiser at teachers' union NASUWT, criticised the school's leadership for giving no warning of its closure. "Our members had only recently been forced to have a reduced pension benefit with the governors citing that it was one of the measures they were taking to protect the future of the school," she said."At no point in our discussions with them did they highlight just how perilous the state their finances were in."Ms Watson added: "We are very disappointed that the school has not been transparent and open with us."
Teachers at the school went on strike in January in response to the governors' proposal to cap the school's financial contribution to a pension scheme.At the time, the school said it was considering withdrawing from the scheme due to "unsustainable cost increases" but were "committed to resolving the dispute and maintaining the well-being and education of [its] students".
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
Premier League sets summer transfer record 11 days before window shuts
The Premier League 's total expenditure during the summer transfer window has reached a record £2.37bn after Leeds completed the £18m signing of Noah Okafor from AC Milan. Data from shows that top-flight clubs have already surpassed the previous record of £2.36bn – which was set in 2023 – and have already spent over 12 per cent more than last summer, when the total was 'just' £1.97bn. And with 11 days until the window closes and some potentially huge deals still to be signed, the league is on course to surpass the £2.5bn mark after deadline day on 1 September. Premier League spending dwarves that of Europe's other leagues, with the league's clubs spending more on transfers this summer than all of Serie A, Bundesliga, Ligue 1 and La Liga teams combined, according to the BBC. Serie A has the second-highest spend at the time of writing, with a total of £783m as of 18 August. Champions Liverpool have headlined Premier League spending, with the Reds completing over £200m worth of deals including spending £69m on Hugo Ekitike and a move for Florian Wirtz that could become a British record of £116m if all add-ons are met. In addition, the Reds saw a bid worth £110m for Alexander Isak turned down earlier this month. Elsewhere, Manchester United paid up to £73.7m for Benjamin Sesko and up to £71m for Bryan Mbeumo, while Arsenal are on the verge of a £67.5m deal for Eberechi Eze. Six clubs have broken their own transfer records this summer, with Nottingham Forest, Bournemouth, Brentford, Burnley and Sunderland joining Liverpool in paying a record sum for a player. Plenty of Europe's top clubs have been active in the market too, with Atletico Madrid having spent over £150m and clubs including Juventus and bayer Leverkusen surpassing the £100m mark. The biggest signing outside of the Premier League was Bayern Munich's capture of Luis Diaz from Liverpool, in a deal worth £65.5m.
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
WH Smith's US adventure is now stuck in an accounting hole
This is how, in retail-land, to shatter your credibility with investors in one short statement: confess to a significant overstatement of profits related to the recognition of payments from suppliers. This stuff is sensitive – witness the upheaval after an episode at Tesco a decade ago – and basic. While it is normal for retailers to receive payments from suppliers related to the volume of goods sold, or promotional activity, accounting rules are strict. The sums must be booked as they are earned. In a multi-year agreement, payments cannot all be taken upfront. WH Smith's last annual report was also clear that the principle should be straightforward to put into practice: 'The level of complexity and judgment is low in relation to establishing the accounting entries and estimates, and the timing of recognition.' Thus a £30m profits overstatement in WH Smith's North American division – 'largely due to the accelerated recognition of supplier income' – is enormous in the context of the size of the operation. The estimate of headline trading profits in the unit this year has been slashed from £55m to £25m. Group-wide profits should still arrive at £110m this year because the UK operation – think shiny shops in airports and railway stations, rather than the now-sold dusty high street stores – is still bigger. But the 42% fall in the group's share price on Thursday, equating to almost £600m in terms of stock-market value, still looks more than justified. North America was meant to be the gleaming growth opportunity for WH Smith. The promise, after the sale of its UK high street shops, was for a pure 'global travel' retailer with a single-minded focus on expanding its presence. Its US business takes in a tech and gadget format, InMotion, plus stores for other retailers. About 40 shops were opened in US airports last year on the way to making the division 'an increasingly significant part of the group', as Carl Cowling, the chief executive, put it. At least for now, the expansion plans are intact and it's just a question of correcting the accounting errors and waiting for Deloitte, a freshly appointed independent reviewer, to run a forensic check on all the supplier contracts. Well, let's see. These types of accounting cock-ups rarely become smaller on closer inspection and the affair raises questions that Cowling, chair Annette Court and the board haven't begun to address. For starters, WH Smith investors will want a comprehensive account of how the financial controls could have failed so badly that more than half this year's promised profits from the US could evaporate in one swoop. Then they will want to know the degree to which the US operation is dependent on supplier payments. What would returns look like without them? As Peel Hunt's analyst said: 'Bigger questions remain about the margin structure of the US businesses.' Come back in November for WH Smith's full-year numbers and its complete version of what went wrong. Until then, the shares – now at the lowest in a decade – look like dead money. The US rollout plan requires projections shareholders can believe.
Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
HMRC mounts clampdown on pensions tax relief claims
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is increasing scrutiny of higher earners' pension tax relief claims in order to collect more revenue. The tax office announced on Thursday that from 1 September it will no longer be accepting requests for pension tax relief over the phone as part of a crackdown on incorrect claims. Instead, individuals will have to submit requests online or by letter. The change could also mean some individuals are 'asked to provide evidence where it would not previously have been required'. HMRC said this was to 'protect taxpayers' money' after an internal review found some workers were making incorrect claims for pension tax relief. You can save a maximum of £60,000 a year into your pension and benefit from tax relief. Basic-rate taxpayers automatically get 20pc relief added to their pot but higher earners paying 40pc or 45pc tax may need to claim the extra tax relief via self-assessment. The tax office undertook a review into claims for up to £10,000 of relief and found that around one third of requests were for an incorrect amount. HMRC said that common mistakes included individuals claiming relief who were not higher-rate taxpayers getting their pension contributions wrong, and claiming relief for pensions that were under a 'net pay' arrangement so the worker had already received the full relief. In most cases, higher earners do not need to request extra tax relief because workplace pension schemes generally use a 'net pay' system. Under this arrangement, the employee receives tax relief via the payroll at their highest marginal rate so there is usually no need to claim extra relief. Higher earners should claim tax relief if their pension provider uses a 'relief at source' arrangement, so only 20pc is claimed. Personal pensions generally use 'relief at source' arrangements. About 80,000 claims for Personal Pension Relief (PPR) are submitted to HMRC every year. The announcement comes amid speculation that Rachel Reeves could cut the tax-free pension lump sum to raise more than £2bn a year. The Telegraph understands the idea is to feature on an extensive list of money-raising proposals that civil servants will present to the Chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget, as she battles a hole in the public finances of up to £50bn. Helen Morrissey, of stockbroker Hargreaves Lansdown, told the Financial Times that preventing savers from claiming tax relief over the phone could 'present an issue for people who don't have online access and doing it by letter may well be quite a lengthy process'. An HMRC spokesman said: 'We're lowering the threshold to ensure that people claim the right amount of relief and protect taxpayers' money. This comes after we conducted a review which revealed that many claims below the current evidence threshold were incorrect.
