&w=3840&q=100)
Immigration cuts, higher visa fees: What Australian parties promise in 2025
Australians are preparing to cast their votes on May 3, 2025, with immigration emerging as a central issue shaping the final days of campaigning. From permanent migration caps to international student visa fees, major parties have laid out markedly different plans for how they would manage Australia's borders and labour needs.
Labor maintains migration targets and focuses on skilled workers
The incumbent Labor Party has kept the permanent migration program at 185,000 places for 2024–25, splitting it 70:30 between skilled and family streams. However, places in the Skilled Independent visa category have been sharply reduced from 30,375 to 16,900.
In a major move, Labor has also abolished the Business Innovation and Investment Program, redirecting efforts towards skilled migration instead. In December 2023, it unveiled a ten-year migration strategy with the target of bringing annual net migration down to 250,000 by June 2025.
If re-elected, Labor plans to increase student visa application fees to A$2,000.
Also Read
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has promised to cut the permanent migration intake to 140,000 for 2025–26, with a gradual rise to 160,000 in following years. The Coalition has pledged to cut net overseas migration by 100,000, focusing on reductions to skilled independent visas and international student intakes, while keeping working holiday and family visas unaffected.
It has also proposed reintroducing a specialist agriculture visa to tackle farm labour shortages, although critics have warned of potential exploitation risks.
The Coalition has announced a fast-tracked review of the Temporary Graduate Visa (subclass 485), citing concerns that post-study work rights are being used as an unintended pathway to jobs and permanent residency.
Dutton also proposed capping new international student arrivals at 240,000 per year, alongside a steep A\$5,000 visa fee for applicants targeting Australia's top-ranked universities.
Minor and micro parties outline tougher and softer approaches
Several smaller parties are offering different immigration visions:
Greens: propose expanding the humanitarian intake and oppose new fossil fuel developments
One Nation: calls for reducing net migration to around 70,000 a year, a travel ban on certain countries, and withdrawing from the UN Refugee Convention
Sustainable Australia Party: supports reducing migration to 70,000 people per year but keeping refugee intake between 14,000 and 20,000
People First: proposes limiting immigration to under 100,000 work visas, with incentives for settling in regional areas
Post-study work rights spark controversy
The 485 visa allows international students to stay and work in Australia after completing their studies. Recent numbers show a mismatch between student origins and 485 visa holders: while China is the largest source of international students, it ranks third in 485 visa holders. By contrast, students from South Asia, particularly India, make up 60% of all 485 visa holders but only 37% of students.
Phil Honeywood, chief executive of the International Education Association of Australia, said, 'Everything that the Federal Opposition has announced during this protracted campaign has been anti-international students and directed against the 250,000 Australians who work in our beleaguered sector.'
He added, 'If the past is anything to go by, then the outcomes of this review will have been pre-determined: namely reductions in visa applicability, further duration limitations and even potential limitations on partners being able to participate.'
In a post on X, Honeywood commented, "So now we know exactly what the alternative Aus Govt think of our international ed sector! Harsher enrolment caps than Labor, a A$5,000 non-refundable student visa fee (A$2,500 for non-Group of 8 unis). No rent causation link! Sends the wrong signals about multicultural Australia!"
Andrew Norton, higher education commentator and professor at Monash Business School, pointed out that policy swings can create unfair situations for international students.
'Policy swings are also unfair for international students. They respond to the incentives created by Australian governments, only for the rules to change when it comes time for the Australian government to uphold its side of the bargain,' Norton wrote in a blog post.
He argued that Australia's international student industry should honour its commitments, and changes should be gradual, not abrupt.
Norton observed that with high numbers of commencing students in 2023 and 2024, the total number of students will 'remain high by historical standards'. He added, 'As they complete their courses they will form a large pool of potential temporary graduate visa applicants.'
'As of late February this year, I estimate that there were around 1 million people in Australia on student-related visas. I doubt this will fall significantly anytime soon and this may create political pressure for more restrictive policies,' he explained.
Recent changes to the 485 visa
Visa settings for international graduates have already been tightened for 2024–25:
1. Longer visas for skills shortage fields abolished after only one year
2. Masters degree post-study work rights cut back from three years to two, except for Indian students protected under the India-Australia free trade agreement
3. Minimum English language requirement increased from IELTS 6 to 6.5
4. Maximum age for 485 visa eligibility reduced from 50 to 35 years, except for research degree holders
Australia remains top choice for Indian students despite costs
The upcoming elections as very important for Indians as Australia continues to attract strong interest from Indian students. According to IDP Education's March 2025 survey, Australia now accounts for 28% of Indian students' first-choice preferences, ahead of the United States at 22% and the United Kingdom at 21%. Canada's popularity has fallen sharply to 13%, down six percentage points compared with March 2024.
'Despite the rise in visa and tuition fees, Australia continues to see strong interest from Indian students. Many families approach it as a long-term investment, weighing factors like academic quality, post-study work rights, safety, and the overall student experience,' said Piyush Kumar, Regional Director - South Asia, Canada and Latin America at IDP Education.
Opinion polls suggest Labor edging ahead
With the federal election just a say away, opinion polls suggest the Labor Party is on course to retain power, either with a slim majority or by forming a minority government.
A RedBridge-Accent poll for News Corp published on May 1, 2025, showed Labor leading 53%-47% against the Coalition under Australia's preferential voting system. The same survey reported that Millennials and Generation Z voters—who together make up 43% of the electorate—have been pivotal in the late swing towards Labor.
A separate YouGov poll predicted Labor could win up to 85 seats in the 150-seat lower house, marking the Coalition's worst performance since 1946.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


First Post
a day ago
- First Post
Netanyahu Under Pressure as Right-Wing Ally Threatens to Quit Coalition Firstpost America
Netanyahu Under Pressure as Right-Wing Ally Threatens to Quit Coalition | Firstpost America | N18G Netanyahu Under Pressure as Right-Wing Ally Threatens to Quit Coalition | Firstpost America | N18G Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu faces a major political crisis as a key right-wing ally threatens to quit his coalition unless a law is passed to exempt ultra-orthodox men from compulsory army service. This comes as the largest opposition party, led by former PM Yair Lapid, has filed a motion to dissolve parliament, triggering the threat of early elections. Ultra-Orthodox Jewish seminary students have been exempting from compulsory army service since Israel's founding over seven decades ago. In 2024, Israel's top court ruled that such exemptions are unconstitutional. With public anger rising over the Gaza war and hostages still in captivity, Netanyahu is under pressure from all sides — and polls show he may struggle to win if elections are held now. Watch to know more. See More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
India thanks Australia for backing fight against cross-border terrorism
India and Australia on Wednesday resolved to further boost their strategic ties with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh hailing Canberra's unequivocal support to New Delhi's resolute response to the barbaric Pahalgam terror attack. Singh held wide-ranging talks with his visiting Australian counterpart Richard Marles focusing on various aspects of bilateral defence cooperation as well as New Delhi's "extreme challenges" along its border with Pakistan. Marles is the first senior Australian minister to visit India after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese retained power for a second term following victory of his Labor party in the parliamentary elections last month. His visit to New Delhi coincides with the fifth anniversary of the firming up of India Australia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership that facilitated deeper defence ties between the two sides, especially in the maritime domain. Following the meeting, Singh thanked Australia for its unequivocal support to India's "resolute response against the barbaric act of terror in Pahalgam." The defence minister said he and Marles reviewed the "full range of the India- Australia defence partnership during the extremely fruitful". "His personal commitment and leadership in strengthening bilateral defence cooperation has emerged as an important pillar of our comprehensive strategic partnership," Singh said in a social media post. Marles, also Australia's deputy prime minister, is in India as part of his four-nation trip to South and Southeast Asia. It is learnt that one of the priority areas of the talks was to bolster bilateral defence ties in the Indo-Pacific -- a region that has witnessed increasing Chinese military muscle-flexing. In his televised opening remarks, Singh made a mention of achieving "significant milestones" in the bilateral defence ties and hoped to work with "renewed momentum" to ensure further growth. Singh also talked about India facing "extreme challenges" at its western border, apparently referring to Pakistan-backed cross-border terrorism. In his remarks, Marles said, Australia's relationship with India is that of the "highest priority". He also conveyed Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's message of solidarity with India over the Pahalgam attack. We want to make clear that Australia stands with India and all countries in combating terrorism, he said. The Australian deputy prime minister also welcomed cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. We welcome the stoppage in military activities, he said, adding Canberra will continue to work with India to deal with the challenge of terrorism in all its forms. "We feel we have never had a more strategic alignment with India than we do now. This is a time to make common cause with friends, and we certainly see India in that light," he said. "We want to be ambitious about the joint declaration of defence and security. We want to be ambitious regarding the maritime security and cooperation roadmap," Marles added. "We see both as two critical steps in elevating our defence relationship further." The Australian leader said a "broader bilateral relationship" with India is profoundly significant to Australia's national interest.


Indian Express
4 days ago
- Indian Express
Dutch government collapses after Geert Wilders pulls his anti-Islam party out of coalition
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof has stepped down following the decision by far-right leader Geert Wilders to pull his anti-Islam Freedom Party (PVV) out of the ruling coalition. The move has effectively collapsed the Netherlands' 11-month-old government and is expected to lead to snap elections. The ruling coalition – made up of Wilders' PVV, the populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), the centrist New Social Contract (NSC), and the liberal-conservative People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) – has been fragile since it was formed after the last elections. The four-party alliance struggled to find common ground, especially on the contentious issue of asylum and immigration policy. On Tuesday morning, following a brief meeting of party leaders, Wilders announced that all PVV ministers would leave the government. 'I signed up for the toughest asylum policy, not the downfall of the Netherlands,' he told reporters, as per The Guardian. He also wrote on social media that 'since there had been no signoff on our asylum plans,' the PVV was 'leaving the coalition.' Wilders had been pushing for the government to adopt a strict 10-point plan aimed at significantly reducing immigration. As per a report by The Guardian, experts had warned that many of these proposals were in direct conflict with European human rights law and the UN Refugee Convention. In response, Prime Minister Schoof called an emergency cabinet meeting. With the PVV's departure, the three remaining parties could theoretically continue as a minority government, but analysts and opposition figures believe new elections are the only realistic outcome. Frans Timmermans, leader of the opposition Labour/Green alliance and a former European Commission vice-president, said: 'I see no other way to form a stable government.' Recent polling as per The Guardian, indicates that support for Geert Wilders' Freedom Party (PVV) has dropped significantly since its surprise election victory in November 2023. The party is now polling at around 20 per cent, roughly on par with the Labour/Green alliance, currently the second-largest bloc in the Dutch parliament. This isn't the first time Wilders, has walked away from political power. After years on the opposition benches, he only managed to strike a coalition deal in 2023 by giving up his bid to become prime minister. Back in 2010, Wilders also played a pivotal role in Dutch politics when he backed a minority government led by then-prime minister Mark Rutte. However, that support collapsed less than two years later following a row over austerity policies, leading him to withdraw from the arrangement. The now-defunct coalition, which took nearly six months to negotiate, marked the first time the far-right PVV had entered government.