Ottawa's GST rebate on new homes would save typical 1st-time buyer $27K: PBO
OTTAWA — The parliamentary budget officer says Ottawa's plan to slash the sales tax on housing would save an eligible first-time homebuyer an average of roughly $27,000 off the price of a newly built home.
The federal government's fiscal watchdog predicts in a new analysis that a little over 71,000 new builds will quality for GST relief over the lifetime of the program.
The proposal would see the federal portion of the sales tax eliminated on a new home worth up to $1 million if it's bought by a qualifying first-time homebuyer.
The GST rebate would be phased down as the price of the home approaches $1.5 million.
The PBO forecasts the program will cost $1.9 billion over six years, while the federal government has pegged the price tag closer to $3.9 billion.
The GST rebate, which is not yet law, was included in the Liberals' spring election platform as a way to help Canadians break into the housing market.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025.
Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Former top general says reviewing medals for Afghan vets a ‘no-brainer' for Carney
OTTAWA — A former top general who led the military during the Afghanistan conflict is urging Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to revisit the files of soldiers who served there to see if any of their awards should be upgraded to the Victoria Cross. Rick Hillier said that despite the failure of recent attempts to trigger such an independent review, he thinks the odds are better now that Ottawa is bent on revitalizing the Canadian Armed Forces. 'I am more optimistic right now. I think for the government, this should be a no-brainer,' Hillier, chief of the defence staff from 2005-2008, told The Canadian Press. Hillier is part of the civil society group Valour in the Presence of the Enemy, which has been pressing Ottawa to consider awarding veterans of the 2001 to 2014 Afghanistan campaign the country's highest military honour. He said commendations awarded to Afghanistan veterans should be examined in light of new information to see whether any of them qualify for the Victoria Cross. 'Let's do an independent review, not committing to anything, which is right and appropriate,' he said. 'And if we should find that one or two or more individuals are deserving of the Victoria Cross, what a shot in the arm that would be for our soldiers and aviators and sailors.' In 2022, former Conservative leader Erin O'Toole pushed to have a the House of Commons endorse the creation of a review panel that would take a second look at military decorations. Hillier said it may have been a strategic error to have the former leader of the opposition bring that proposal forward, since it 'almost guaranteed' that the governing Liberal party would oppose it. The issue is being brought to the fore again through a parliamentary petition sponsored and endorsed by Liberal MP Pauline Rochefort which also calls for a review panel. Twenty Stars of Military Valour — Canada's second-highest military award — and 89 Medals of Military Valour were awarded to soldiers who served in Afghanistan. No serving Canadian soldier or veteran has been awarded the Victoria Cross since the Second World War. The Government of Canada says just 81 Canadians have ever been awarded the Victoria Cross — 4 from the Boer War, 64 from the First World War and 13 from the Second World War. Gen. Walter Natynczyk, chief of the defence staff from 2008 to 2012, ordered a review in 2012 of the 20 Stars of Military Valour awarded for the Afghanistan conflict. Ottawa has resisted calls in recent years for another review. Department of National Defence spokesperson Andrée-Anne Poulin said in an emailed statement the awards process is designed to be insulated from political influence and public pressure. 'All honours for the Afghanistan mission have been processed and the time limits for such nominations (two years between the action and the nomination for Military Valour and Bravery Decorations) have now elapsed,' she said. 'These time limits ensure events are judged by the standards and values of the time, are compared with other contemporary examples, past decisions are not second-guessed and history is not reinterpreted.' Many have cited the case of Jess Larochelle of North Bay, Ont., as one that deserves a closer look. The late army private's supporters maintain he should be awarded the Victoria Cross for his heroic actions in holding off a 2006 Taliban attack on an observation post after sustaining serious injuries. Hillier, who chaired the committee that awarded Larochelle his Star of Military Valour, said details of his story that came to light in the years since make his case worth a fresh look. 'I don't think we made a mistake, but having done something doesn't mean that it's cast in stone forever and ever,' he said. Hillier said new details about 'how badly injured' Larochelle was during the battle, and the fact that he volunteered to take the position, should merit a reappraisal of his case. Retired lieutenant-general Omer Lavoie suggested the Department of National Defence may be reluctant to reopen awards files because it would be a complex project that would stir up grim memories of the conflict — and because it could quickly give rise to claims of unfair treatment if veterans of other wars aren't also honoured. Hillier also observed that Canadians tend to be hesitant about lavishing praise on individual acts of greatness. 'We in Canada have forever been loath, reluctant, slow to recognize the very top acts of courage and valour,' he said. 'Throughout our history, we seem to have this sort of group-thought process sometimes, where it keeps people all in one level.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
Bad cell service, with dropped calls and garble, continues to frustrate many P.E.I. residents
Social Sharing "Absolutely terrible" is how Darlene Jurkowski describes cell service in her community of Chelton, just west of Borden-Carleton on the southern shore of Prince Edward Island. "You cannot call a person without getting cut off, you sound like a robot half the time, you can't understand what they're saying," Jurkowski told CBC News. Like many P.E.I. residents and tourists, she is living with dropped calls, unsent texts, or just no service at all. Jurkowski helps run a family construction and excavation concern, so she needs a reliable way of making business calls. "We're paying high prices for cell phone services that we can't use," she said, estimating her Bell contract costs her about $400 a month. Gary Smith owns a cottage nearby and has a rust-proofing shop. He had hoped to spend time at his cottage while still booking appointments and dealing with customers, but the poor cell service is getting in the way. "It's just impossible up here," he said. "I can hear them, they can't hear me, or vice versa." 'If there's ever an emergency...' People in the community say it's a safety issue too. They worry about elderly relatives being unable to reach them, and wonder what will happen if they ever need to call 911 for help. "We have kids. We have elderly people who live near us. Are we going to be able to make that call?" said Chelton resident Sam McKendrick. McKendrick has young children and also works from home some days. She worries about not being able to do her job properly, and not being able to get calls from her daycare. "If there's ever an emergency, can they get a hold of me while I'm here?" she said. Just west of Charlottetown, the Town of Cornwall has problem spots too. "We need to be able to communicate in times of emergency," said Coun. Cory Stevenson, who said bad cellphone service has been a dominant issue among constituents. The town is working on changing its bylaws to make it easier for companies to construct cellphone towers, but they don't have a new one yet. Stevenson said the approval process falls under federal jurisdiction but the town wants to reduce "red tape" on the municipal side. Minister says she 'can relate' Belfast-Murray River MLA Darlene Compton is the provincial minister of economic development, innovation and trade, the department dealing with P.E.I.'s cellphone service issues. Compton lives in one of the areas of eastern P.E.I. that also has bad service. "I understand and can relate to the frustration of all Islanders," she said. "We're very well aware and concerned." We need to have the buy-in from the companies. My understanding is that there really isn't a business model there for them to improve service... — Darlene Compton Compton said the province set aside $2.5 million late last year to help build more towers, and officials are talking to service providers. Initially there wasn't much interest from them, she said, but she hopes that will change. "We need to have the buy-in from the companies. My understanding is that there really isn't a business model there for them to improve service, so we as a province — and through the federal government — are going to have to find a way forward," said Compton. A study has been done to identify the worst areas for reception, and the provincial government plans to meet with cellphone service providers again in the fall. Compton said details of who exactly would use any new infrastructure and how it would be paid for still have to be worked out. In the meantime, she encourages people with bad service to complain to their cellphone companies and the CRTC, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. In the end, she said the federal government might have to step in because lacking cell service is a safety issue. Cell companies respond CBC News reached out to a number of cellphone companies about the problems people are reporting. In a statement, Eastlink wrote: "We have no reports of broad mobile service issues across the Island and remain committed to continuous improvements."
Globe and Mail
43 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Billionaires Buy a Brilliant Growth Stock That Has Partnered With Amazon
Key Points Most Wall Street analysts view Roku as undervalued; the median target price of $105 per share implies 28% upside from its current share price of $82. Roku is the leading streaming platform in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, and The Roku Channel is the fifth-most popular streaming service in the U.S. Roku recently formed an exclusive partnership with Amazon, giving media buyers that use Amazon's ad buying platform more precise targeting capabilities. 10 stocks we like better than Roku › A handful of billionaire hedge fund managers purchased shares of Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) in the first quarter. Here's a look: Cliff Asness at AQR Capital Management added 467,005 shares of Roku, increasing his stake sixfold though it remains a small position. Stanley Druckenmiller at Duquesne Family Office bought 493,600 shares of Roku, starting a modest position that ranks among his 30 largest holdings. Chris Rokos at Rokos Capital Management bought 54,690 shares of Roku, starting a new and relatively small position. Steven Schonfeld at Schonfeld Strategic Advisors bought 68,886 shares of Roku, starting a new and relatively small position. Wall Street analysts generally agree Roku is undervalued. The median target price is $105 per share, which implies 28% upside from its current share price of $82. Here's what investors should know. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Roku is the most popular streaming platform in North America Roku is the leading streaming platform in North America as measured by hours streamed, and Roku OS is the best-selling TV operating system in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In addition, The Roku Channel is the fifth most popular streaming service in the U.S., behind only Alphabet 's YouTube, Netflix, Walt Disney, and Amazon Prime Video. Put simply, Roku is ideally positioned to benefit as advertisers spend more on connected TV (CTV). Some readers may be surprised to learn traditional TV advertising is still a larger market than CTV advertising, and it's expected to be the larger market until 2028. But CTV ad spending is forecast to grow at 12% annually through 2029, according to eMarketer. Jeremy Deal, portfolio manager at JDP Capital Management, writes, "The Roku operating system and The Roku Channel are valuable assets that are highly under-monetized today." Deal says The Roku Channel alone is probably worth more than the entire company's current market value, implying Roku is materially undervalued today. Roku's recent partnership with Amazon could be a meaningful growth driver Roku in June announced an exclusive partnership with Amazon. While Amazon's demand-side platform (DSP) is not the only media buying platform with access to Roku inventory, it is the only one that can use a custom identity solution to recognize logged-in viewers across the Roku platform in the United States. A press release from Roku explains, "This exclusive capability enables advertisers to reach the same viewer deterministically across different streaming channels and devices." The upshot for investors is brands on Amazon DSP can now target and measure ad campaigns with greater accuracy. In other words, Roku is now a more compelling place for marketers using Amazon DSP to spend their advertising dollars. Roku highlighted the benefits following an early test of the integration, "Advertisers using this new solution reached 40% more unique viewers with the same budget and reduced how often the same person saw an ad by nearly 30%, enabling advertisers to benefit from three times more value from their ad spend." Roku stock trades at a reasonable valuation Roku currently trades at 2.7 times sales, a discount to the two-year average of 2.8 times sales. That valuation looks quite reasonable for a company whose revenue is forecast to increase at 12% annually through 2027, especially when that consensus estimate leaves room for upside. As mentioned, CTV ad spending is forecast to grow at 12% annually through 2029, and Roku is well positioned to benefit given its status as the most popular streaming platform in North America. To that end, its revenue could certainly grow faster than 12% annually with help from its Amazon partnership. Long-term investors should feel comfortable buying a small position in this growth stock today. Should you invest $1,000 in Roku right now? Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025
