Ukraine is using this company's ground robots in ways it didn't quite expect
Kuldar Väärsi, the founder and CEO of Estonian company Milrem Robotics, told Business Insider that "Ukrainian troops are really creative, and they really find very simple ways how to get even more out of the equipment," including adding and attaching things to Milrem's robots.
The company makes autonomous ground robots that can gather intelligence, evacuate wounded soldiers, dispose of explosive devices, and fire weaponry like machine guns.
He said that it makes sense that Ukraine's soldiers are finding ways to adapt. "If you give a tool to a soldier, then he will use it as it seems most appropriate," Väärsi said. For the Ukrainian troops, "it is literally a question of life and death," so they are motivated to use the equipment "in the best possible manner."
He could not give many details due to security concerns, "but the creativity of Ukrainian troops is really admirable," he said.
The company's THeMIS model is being used in Ukraine as part of the fight against Russia's invasion. The robotic vehicle can carry a payload of up to 2,645.5 pounds and travel at up to 12 miles per hour. It can be fitted with a variety of weapons and used to clear mines, carry cargo, and move out injured troops.
The remotely controlled robots can use AI for navigation, carry much more equipment than humans can, and get a lot closer to Russian positions than many soldiers would want to.
Ground robots are becoming increasingly prolific.Oleksandr Yabchanka, head of the robotic systems for Ukraine's Da Vinci Wolves Battalion, told Business Insider that his unit also uses robots to lay mines, collect bodies, and explode near Russian targets.
Robots are being made both inside and outside Ukraine and come with a lot of flexibility in how they're used. Most models are designed to be used in different configurations or with different weaponry, like using machine guns or grenade launchers, up top.
"The ground robotized systems are Lego sets," Yabchanka said, explaining that his unit does not have different robots available for different mission sets. "We all remember Lego. We were growing up together with those kits," he said.
Innovation in battle
Throughout the war, the Ukrainians have repeatedly modified and tweaked Western and Soviet-era weaponry, as well as invented new types, and used them in unexpected ways throughout Russia's invasion.
They've mounted old guns on trucks to stop Russian attacks, turned trucks into makeshift rocket artillery, transformed small, cheap commercial drones into strike weapons and surveillance tools, built cages for tanks to protect them from attacks, adapted Western missiles to make them suitable for Soviet-designed jets, adapted anti-ship cruise missiles for land-attack missions, and worked with the US to make "Frankenstein"-style air defense weapons out Western surface-to-air missiles and Soviet-designed launchers.
It has also pioneered new weapon types with its growing defense industry, like drone boats and AI-enabled gun turrets.
Milrem Robotics is just one of the companies making the robots that are being used in Ukraine. In Ukraine, companies in the space include Roboneers and FRDM, while companies like Germany's ARX Robotics and Czechia's Isolit-Bravo are also working with Ukraine to build robotic systems.
It's a technology that Russia is also embracing.
Väärsi said the war in Ukraine has justified the company's bet on the technology. Milrem Robotics was founded in 2013, but Väärsi said that before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, there were doubts about the tech even as people recognized that there were opportunities in defense.
This war "has demonstrated that unmanned ground vehicles have a really important place on the battlefield," he said.
Robots have been used by the West in previous conflicts, but not at this scale. The intensity of this war has pushed new innovation and investments.
It is something that is far from being used by every unit in Ukraine, but it's largely seen as something that's worth pushing for a Ukrainian military that's fighting against a Russian military that has a lot more troops and more weapons.
Väärsi said that, at least for now, the goal for his company's robots is supporting Ukraine's soldiers and keeping them safe rather than replacing them altogether. He said that soldiers can "use the unmanned systems as a first line of defense or offense" and don't need to push troops to the front.
An Estonian, Väärsi said he is motivated to help Ukraine. Estonia is beside Russia and was part of the Soviet Union until 1991. The country is one of Ukraine's biggest partners, is part of the EU and NATO, and is one of the countries warning loudly that Russia could attack elsewhere in Europe.
"It's our mission to support Ukraine as much as we can, to help them win this war. And even if it's as little as sending our vehicles, then we should certainly do it," Väärsi said.
Väärsi said Europe needs to adapt based on what it's seeing in Ukraine to be ready if necessary.
"What I consider very important is that in Europe we need to learn and very seriously learn what is ongoing in Ukraine: what works, what doesn't work, what mindsets need to be shifted to be better equipped if — hopefully that never happens — but if Russia decides to expand their activities in the warfare."
He said it is important for Western defense companies to have their technology in Ukraine to learn how it performs on the battlefield. His company has made changes to its products as a result of lessons learned.
The company regularly visits Ukraine and works directly with operators and is now taking that a step further with plans for a new team based in Ukraine to "be closer to Ukrainian forces and to support them even better," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
27 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk called on corporations to leave Delaware. Delaware says it's doing just fine.
Elon Musk has a Rolodex of feuds: US President Donald Trump, "212" rapper Azealia Banks, and even a British diver who helped save a Thai soccer team stuck in a flooded cave. In 2024, he set his sights on Delaware. Although Delaware is generally considered a business-friendly state with a robust corporate legal system, Musk tried to shatter that reputation after a judge at Delaware's Court of Chancery denied his multi-billion-dollar pay package, which was approved by Tesla's board. In typical Musk fashion, he used his X account as a megaphone to blast the court and urged others to incorporate their business elsewhere. "Companies should get the hell out of Delaware," Musk wrote last August. Musk moved SpaceX and Tesla from Delaware to Texas in 2024. Some prominent companies have since followed Musk out of the state. VC firm Andreessen Horowitz is the most recent high-profile company to exit Delaware because, the company said in a blog post, recent rulings by the Court of Chancery had undermined its "reputation for unbiased expertise." Companies like Roblox, Dropbox, and Trump Media have also left the state. Texas, Nevada, Florida, and Wyoming have become preferred destinations for some business leaders in a shift that some have dubbed "Dexit," a reference to the UK's withdrawal from the European Union, known as Brexit. The state's historical dominance as a destination for companies to incorporate is rooted in the Delaware General Corporation Law, a business-friendly statute that acts as the bedrock of its corporate law. Companies leaving Delaware might do so for various reasons, including privacy or tax preferences, but for Musk, it's about finding greener legal pastures. For its part, Delaware isn't overly worried. Dexit? Not according to Delaware. Attorneys and state officials still consider Delaware the premier destination for corporations, despite Musk's criticism. "Yes, there has been some political rhetoric about leaving Delaware," Delaware Secretary of State Charuni Patibanda-Sanchez told Business Insider. "What our data is showing is that Delaware is still the preeminent place to incorporate your business." Patibanda-Sanchez's office oversees the Division of Corporations, which says the state was home to over 2.1 million corporations and two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies in 2024. Still, the number of business entities formed in Delaware has slowed slightly, falling from about 313,000 in 2022 to about 289,000 in 2024. Joshua Margolin, a partner at Selendy Gay who is familiar with corporate governance in Delaware, told Business Insider that the state's decadeslong experience navigating corporate disputes is a big reason the state remains a top destination. "You've got judges who sit on the Court of Chancery who have spent their entire careers litigating corporate disputes," Margolin said. "That is invaluable to have that experience on the bench when you're bringing a dispute, whether you're the plaintiff or the defendant." Margolin added that Delaware has a "breadth and depth of case law and precedent that I don't think other states can rival." "I think if you went back over time, you'd see various states creating business courts that are in one way or another meant to try to mirror the expertise of the Court of Chancery," he said. Lindsey Mignano, founding partner of SSM Law PC, which represents emerging tech companies, said Delaware remains the "simplest, most cost-effective choice" for business founders. Mignano said many of the documents related to governing financing for startups are based on Delaware corporate law, meaning attorneys would need to adopt those templates to fit the requirements of other states. "This is an expensive lift from a practical perspective," Mignano said. Patibanda-Sanchez said, for now, the state isn't sweating. "We don't believe that Delaware's position as the corporate leader and corporate capital of the world is being threatened in any significant way," Patibanda-Sanchez said. "We always come under threat, though, because states are always trying to get a piece of the action." In February, Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer told Business Insider that things may "need to change" as companies considered leaving the state. Meyers approved changes to Delaware's corporate law in March. This month, Delaware's Court of Chancery said it would automate its process for case assignment, which could address concerns of bias.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump could end the Ukraine war, but a larger threat still looms
President Donald Trump wants a Ukraine ceasefire. Even if Putin agrees, America won't be safer. For the Ukraine war has also turned the China-Russia alliance into the greatest military danger America faces. The China-Russia alliance has grown by leaps and bounds since Trump last met with Putin in 2019 on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Osaka, Japan. China gave Russia the greenlight to try to take over all of Ukraine in 2022. China and Russia engage in high-stakes military exercises and tech deals. Both are sprinting ahead on new nuclear weapons and missiles. Don't forget Iran and North Korea, junior partners whose drones and troops have added to the bloodshed. So while Trump looks Putin in the eye at Joint Base Elmendorf, he will also weigh how close Putin really is to China's Xi Jinping. It's a scary scenario. China counts on Russia as a partner in global confrontation. "Grynch," NATO's new commander Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, United States Air Force, is widely known by his callsign from his days as an F-16 and F-22 pilot. He recently said he worries that China could synchronize an invasion of Taiwan with a new Russian attack on the Baltics or another part of Europe. This is the big one – a potential two-front crisis with Russia and China, and allies around the world cowering at the implications. Make no mistake. On the economic front, Russia is pretty much a vassal state to China. Everybody knows China buys 47% of Russia's oil. But Russia's war machine is also dependent on China. During the last four years of war, Putin's Russia has "refashioned its military, economic, and social structures to sustain what it describes as a long-term confrontation with the West," noted outgoing SACEUR Gen. Christopher Cavoli. Putin can't afford to slow down the massive rearmament that is keeping Russia's economy afloat. Russia spends 40% of its federal budget on weapons and is on track to replace all the tanks, artillery, and equipment lost in Ukraine. Close ties with China are essential to keeping the factories running and preserving Putin's hold on power. China sells DJI drones for "civilian uses" to Russia. Russia also gets vital rare earth strategic minerals germanium and gallium from China. Worse, Russian imports of Chinese nitrocellulose, an explosives precursor, have soared from zero to 1300 tons in 2023. Beyond supporting the Russians in the Ukraine war, China's military partners with Russia to expand its reach and master new tactics for global military operations. China has no recent combat experience (fortunately) so they are making up for it with a surging tempo of military exercises. Here, Russia is often the teacher. China-Russia joint military exercises went from just two in 2012 to 14 in 2024. From Aug.1-Aug. 5, Russia's navy ran submarine drills with China in the Sea of Japan. This time last summer, two Russian Tu-95 Tupolev bombers were patrolling off Alaska along with two Chinese H-6 nuclear-capable bombers. A recent report from Defense News suggests Russia was tutoring China's bomber force in nuclear triad operations. Washington, DC has been slow to accept the full dangers wrought by Putin and Xi. Biden's distracted approach to foreign policy didn't help, but it all started to go wrong in the Obama administration. Remember when Obama took then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev out for cheeseburgers in Arlington, Virginia in 2010? Yes, the same Medvedev whose recent threatening remarks about nuclear "dead-hand" strikes prompted Trump to move two nuclear submarines to "appropriate positions" on Aug 1. The vaunted Russia "re-set" took place between Moscow and Beijing instead. Coordinated U.S. military and economic power is essential to face down this pair. Bring on those secondary sanctions! Alaska is a strategic bastion filled with U.S. F-22s and F-35 stealth fighters, the Ground-Based Missile Defense interceptors at Fort Greeley, and more. Hence the summit is also an opportunity for Trump to remind Putin that the U.S. military won't be pushed around, even by the ugly duo of China and Russia. Trump may bring the killing to an end in Ukraine. But his biggest challenge in making America safer still lies ahead.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
AI in education's potential privacy nightmare
AI is now firmly entrenched in classrooms, but student privacy rules haven't caught up. Why it matters: Chatbots can expose troves of personal data in ways few parents, students or teachers fully understand. The big picture: The 2025-26 school year is shaping up to be one where educators feel that they must embrace AI to keep students competitive. Here are three top concerns with classroom AI, according to privacy advocates and AI companies Axios spoke to. 1. Student work could be used to train AI models AI firms are constantly seeking data to train their models. They're not required to say exactly where they get it, but they do have to say how they're using customer data, especially when they're dealing with students. Guidelines like The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) don't guarantee meaningful protections for students. FERPA was signed into law under President Ford in 1974 and has not been significantly updated since. "Penalty for violating FERPA is that your federal funding is withheld," Elizabeth Laird, director at the Center for Democracy and Technology, told Axios. "And that has been enforced exactly zero times. Literally never." Most educational AI firms say they're not training models on classroom work. Content submitted by teachers and students is not used to train the foundational AI models that underlie Khan Academy's AI tutor, Khanmigo, the company's chief learning officer, Kristen DiCerbo, told Axios. But training on a diverse set of student data would make the models less biased, DiCerbo said: "There's no easy answer to these things, and it's all trade-offs between different priorities." Institutions technically could allow student work to be used for AI training, though they're unlikely to do so, several educators told Axios. Yes, but: Data that's "publicly available" on the web is a different story. Business Insider recently reported on what it described as a list of sites that Anthropic contractors were allowed to scrape — including domains from Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Northwestern and other universities. Funding mandates often require universities to post student research online, meaning more of it is considered freely available data for training AI. An Anthropic spokesperson told Axios that it could not validate the list of sites found by Business Insider because it was created by a third-party vendor without Anthropic's involvement. 2. Off-the-shelf AI tools could expose student data Many teachers are experimenting with free chatbot tools. Some are from well-known players like OpenAI, Google, Perplexity and Anthropic. Others are from lesser-known startups with questionable privacy policies. In many cases, educators use these apps without district approval or formal guidance. Accelerating pushes from both big tech and President Trump for school and student adoption of AI have changed the vibe around AI heading into the new academic year, ed tech experts told Axios. "Where in the 2024-2025 school year most schools had the LLM on lockdown through their filter, this year all flowers will bloom," Tammy Wincup, CEO of Securly, a software company that builds safety tools for K-12 schools, told Axios. Products designed for educational use, like ChatGPT Edu, do not train on student data, but some of the consumer-facing free and paid versions of ChatGPT and other chatbotshave different policies. "That's where things get tricky," says Melissa Loble, chief academic officer at Instructure, the company behind the learning management system known as Canvas. "If AI tools are used outside our system, the data may not be protected under the school's policies." Yes but: Teachers are often the best judges of AI tools for their students. Ed tech is "a bottom-up adoption industry. It grows and thrives on teachers finding tools they like for teaching and learning and then getting districts to adopt," Wincup says. 3. Hacks are an increasing threat Earlier this year, a breach at PowerSchool — a widely used student information system — exposed sensitive personal data of tens of thousands of students and parents. "When you introduce any new tool, when you collect any new piece of information, you are necessarily introducing increased risk," Laird says. That makes thoughtful planning critical, she added. If AI tools store or process student data, a breach could expose not just grades and attendance records but also behavioral data, writing samples, and private communications. One way to prevent leaks is to delete data periodically. DiCerbo says Khan Academy deletes chats after 365 days. Yes, but: The advantage of using chatbots is that they can remember and learn from previous conversations, so some users want to store more information than might be safe. Between the lines: AI is steamrolling into classrooms and colleges and privacy is just one on a long list of concerns these institutions must manage. Khan Academy's DiCerbo says AI adoption is moving faster than anything she's seen in her 20 years working in ed tech. Khan Academy expects to reach a million students with its AI-powered tutor Khanmigo that launched in 2023. Earlier this year the California State University system introduced ChatGPT Edu to more than 460,000 students and over 63,000 staff and faculty across its 23 campuses. Google just started offering its AI Pro plan for free to students over 18 for a year. What we're watching: Some ed tech providers are looking beyond OpenAI, Anthropic and Google and using services like AWS and Microsoft's Azure to keep student data separate from the model providers. Brisk Teaching, a classroom AI assistant, uses this approach to mitigate concerns that student data might be used to train new models — even though OpenAI and Google say that their education-focused models don't train on user data. Brisk Teaching founder Arman Jaffer told Axios that there's a lot of "lost trust" between schools and the big AI providers. "It's just easier for us to say Google is not touching your data because they could potentially use it to train the next version of their model," he said.