
Jacinta Price uncovers the truth behind 'First Nations' terminology
Indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price (pictured) declared that 'First Nations' is not even an Australian term before being told off by Penny Wong in parliament. The star Coalition politician was at the centre of a fiery row in the Senate last week after One Nation senators including Pauline Hanson turned their backs on the acknowledgement of country at the start of parliament.
Senator Price separately objected to the ceremonies as a person of Indigenous heritage, claiming they did little to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians and were a form of 'political point-scoring'. It prompted Senator Wong to urge the Coalition to 'respect' parliamentary traditions. 'I would hope that the Opposition would reflect on the words of their own leader in relation to welcomes to country,' the Labor Senate leader told the chamber. 'Decency and respect cost us nothing, but it goes a long way to building a sense of unity.'
Before being told off by Wong, Price launched a blistering attack on the term 'First Nations' - that has since gone viral on social media. 'First Nations isn't even Australian terminology, for crying out loud!' she told the chamber. 'It's been adopted from Canada, from America. It's just reinvention, which is actually belittling and watering down traditional culture and what it's really about.'
Price also doubled down on her stance about Welcome to Country ceremonies, claiming they were a 'reinvention' of Indigenous culture. 'Senator Hanson is correct to say that Welcome to Country is not traditional culture. It isn't. And what we do need to recognise is - and it is important for all of us, as leaders of this nation, to recognise - the reinvention of culture, which diminishes traditional culture,' she continued. 'For those who still live close to traditional culture, within cultural confines, their day-to-day lives are dictated by it.'
'They speak their language. They are often spoken about in very romanticised terms. And the use of acknowledgements really does absolutely nothing to improve their lives. To be quite honest, as a woman of Indigenous heritage but, first and foremost, as an Australian, I am absolutely done with the virtue signalling that takes place. I am of the belief that it is not necessary to have an acknowledgement, because we are all Australians. 'Every single one of us - including the Ngunnawal and the Ngambri - is Australian. We are here to serve all Australians equally in this country, not to praise or acknowledge one group above others. Truly, I don't think you really want to acknowledge my existence because of my indigeneity more than anybody else's. I am equal to you and to everybody else here and to everybody in this country.'
'But we can ignore traditional culture in this chamber because there are elements of it every single one of you across from here ignore, because it's detrimental to the most remote and marginalised communities. But if you speak up against it, if you mention it, you're painted as a racist or somebody who is a "coconut", or somebody who is a traitor. 'magine if we treated every single racial group in this manner in this country. It's horrendous.'
Price didn't mince her words on what she thought of the politicisation of Indigenous Australians due to their racial heritage. 'I'm sick to death of it as a woman, mother, soon to be grandmother and as an Australian of proud heritage, whether it's my convict ancestors or it's my Warlpiri ancestors, I'm proud of it all and we should all be,' she said. Price was quickly inundated with widespread support. 'Thank you for speaking up for ALL Australians, Jacinta,' conservative political lobbyist group Advance Australia posted.
A man added: 'Well said, we are all Australian irrespective of skin pigmentation, heritage, race or whether you believe in a deity or you don't. I hope this is replayed many, many times.' Another commented: 'Here's hoping that one day we can all be proud Australians and recognise past heritages and be thankful we live in an amazing country.'
The speech also reignited calls for Price to lead the Coalition. 'Future Prime Minister of Australia,' one Aussie commented. The senator's fiery speech came after Opposition Senate Leader Michaelia Cash leapt to her defence and accused Wong (pictured) of having 'sought to dismiss' Price's objection to the ceremonies. 'I will stand by and respect Senator Nampijinpa Price, who every day has lived and breathed reconciliation in this country - her father is white, her mother is black,' Cash said. 'Please don't ever come into this place again and pontificate to us like you've just done.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Forbes calls for change for parents in politics after decision to quit
Ms Forbes will not seek re-election in the Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch constituency next year, bringing to an end – for at least the next election cycle – one of the most promising political careers in Scotland. In a letter to First Minister John Swinney, Ms Forbes said she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Ms Forbes – who has a two-year-old daughter and three step-daughters – pushed the Scottish Parliament to be better for those with young families working in politics. The parliament was viewed as a more family-friendly version of the Westminster legislature, but recent years have seen a number of women step back, citing the pressures on young parents. Former Tory leader Ruth Davidson, former minister Aileen Campbell and MSPs Jenny Marra and Gail Ross were among those who were outspoken in their thinking for standing down at the 2021 election. 'I'm not the first and, unless anything changes, I'm unlikely to be the last,' Ms Forbes said on BBC Radio Scotland on Tuesday. 'So many parents know the pressures and the guilt of balancing all of this, and I'm totally in the same camp as them.' Ms Forbes said there was the added stress of one of the country's furthest north constituencies, meaning an 'eight hours return trip to my place of work' and sometimes 'a minimum three to four hours drive across the constituency before the day even begins'. 'There are some areas I think the Parliament could do more and do better,' the Deputy First Minister said. She pointed to the Holyrood creche – a service which was seen as a sign of the more family-friendly ethos – which is only available for three hours per day, three days a week. After careful thought over recess, I've decided not to seek re-election to @scotparl next year. I've written to the First Minister this morning 👇🏽 I will continue to serve the First Minister, the Government and my constituents to the best of my ability until May 2026. — Kate Forbes MSP (@_KateForbes) August 4, 2025 'I don't know anybody who only works three hours per day, so that doesn't make sense,' she said. 'I'm certainly not advocating for the job to be any less demanding or any less all-consuming, it has to be by its very nature of representing people. 'But if we can't even get some of the basic support right, then it will always be difficult for mums and dads.' Despite the decision announced on Monday, the Deputy First Minister did not completely close the door to a political return, saying 'maybe' she would consider such a move in 20 years. Since taking over as finance secretary in 2020 after the resignation of her predecessor Derek Mackay following a scandal involving messages he sent to a 16-year-old boy, Ms Forbes has been marked for leadership. She would ultimately lose the race for the SNP's top job after Nicola Sturgeon's resignation in 2023 in a contest marred by criticisms of her views on social issues such as abortion and gay marriage. Following the resignation of Humza Yousaf last year, Ms Forbes was handed the role of kingmaker, being the one to decide if the party would be forced to go through with a potentially damaging leadership contest, which she ultimately decided against in favour of a pact with First Minister John Swinney, becoming his deputy. The, sometimes ugly, criticisms levelled at the Deputy First Minister, she said, were 'in the past' as she continued to voice her support for the SNP and Scottish independence.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Al-Qaeda-trained Aussie David Hicks hit by major new blow just days before his 50th birthday
Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks - who was convicted of Al-Qaeda terror charges before they were overturned ten years ago - is facing a major health battle. Hicks converted to Islam as a teenager in 1999 and trained at Al-Qaeda terror camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan before he was handed over to the US military in 2001. The US branded him an enemy combatant and transferred him to the US Naval base in Cuba where he was held with other terror suspects for more than five years. He said he was tortured while being held there and only pleaded guilty to supporting terrorism because of his 'desperation for release from Guantanamo', his lawyer said. The former jackaroo was allowed to serve the remaining nine months of his seven-year suspended sentence in Australia in 2007, before the conviction was overturned in 2015. He has since kept a relatively low profile, but his father Terry Hicks has now revealed his son is facing a new crisis just days before his 50th birthday on Thursday. 'He's not doing well,' Mr Hicks told the Daily Mail at his home in Adelaide's northern suburbs, where he campaigned tirelessly for his son's freedom 20 years ago. 'He has heart problems [and] he can't get work.' Mr Hicks, seen this week with Hicks' stepmother, Bev, said his son still suffers psychological problems from his treatment at Guantanamo. Before converting to Islam, Hicks worked as a farmhand on outback cattle stations in the Northern Territory, Queensland and South Australia. The father of two initially travelled to Kosovo in the Balkans to join the Kosovo Liberation Army which triggered his religious conversion on his return to Adelaide. He then travelled to Pakistan in 1999 to study Islam, attended a terror training camp where he learnt to use military weapons, and subsequently crossed into Afghanistan. Once there, he reportedly attended several camps, including al-Qaeda's Al Farouk training camp, where he used the alias Muhammad Dawood. He denied any knowledge of connections between the camp and the terrorist group, insisting he did not know what al-Qaeda was at the time. But he did meet with group leader Osama Bin Laden, who claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks in New York, which killed 2,977 people in 2001. In letters to his parents between 1999 and 2001, revealed in the Adelaide Federal Magistrates Court in 2007, Hicks called Bin Laden a 'lovely' person. 'He's a lovely brother - the only reason the West calls him a... terrorist is because he got the money to take action,' he wrote. 'I am now very well trained for jihad in weapons, some serious like anti-aircraft missiles.' He was finally handed over to the US military in late 2001 by the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, who received a $5,000 bounty for surrendering him to the US, and he was sent to Guantanamo Bay. In a 2004 affidavit, Hicks alleged he was beaten while blindfolded and handcuffed, forced to take medication, sedated by injection without consent, struck while sedated, sexually assaulted, and deprived of sleep. He claimed he witnessed the use of attack dogs against other Guantanamo detainees. When his conviction was set aside by the US Court of Military Commission in 2015, Hicks recounted his time at the notorious prison camp from 2002 to 2007. 'It is just unfortunate that because of politics, I was subjected to five and a half years of physical and psychological torture that I will now live with always,' he said. He insisted that government should be responsible for his medical expenses, alleging his incarceration caused long-term health issues. 'It is due to the torture – being kept in freezing conditions, small rooms for years,' he said. Problems continued to plague Hicks after his release from Guantanamo and his return to Australia. It was widely reported that he severed contact with ex-partner Jodie Sparrow, from whom he separated in 1996, and his children, Bonnie and Terry But in a 2007 interview with Woman's Day, Ms Sparrow insisted she was 'mates' with her ex and said they 'would always be close... no matter what people want to think.' Daily Mail understands Hicks is now a grandfather, with both his children now parents, but public records show his son Terry does not uses his father's surname. Hicks' father said he was unsure whether his son remains in contact with Bonnie, Terry, or his grandchildren. 'I don't know if he sees them,' he admitted. Hicks briefly moved to Sydney where he married his girlfriend, human rights advocate Aloysia Brooks, in 2009, reportedly living in Abbotsford and working for a landscape gardening business. He returned to Adelaide when the marriage ended, and in 2017, an assault charge against a former partner in Craigmore was withdrawn at Elizabeth Magistrates Court. His father - who split from Hicks' mother Susan when he was nine - told the Daily Mail his son lives 'in Modbury somewhere' in Adelaide's north, but didn't have his address. He said Hicks 'has never spoken to the media and never will', although his son did give one press conference in 2015 when his sentence was overturned. In 2012, the US Court of Appeals found the 2006 law under which David was convicted could not be applied retrospectively. The US Court of Military Commission Review vacated his sentence and set aside his guilty plea on February 18, 2015.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The SNP has just lost their most effective candidate for independence
She says her decision not to stand for re-election next year is for domestic reasons and her desire to see more of her family. This means, sadly, in a Parliament not exactly stuffed with talent, there is no doubt that Kate Forbes will be much missed. Scotland's Deputy First Minister is one of the few talents – perhaps the only one – on that lacklustre SNP front bench. And if it really was a party with genuine ambitions and a determination to do the best for their country, it would have elected her in 2023 when she stood as a candidate for the vacancy caused by Nicola Sturgeon's resignation. That was the opportunity for the SNP to put Sturgeon's egotistical madness and her determination to become an international figure behind it and elect someone with a fresh outlook on the genuine priorities of Scottish people. Issues such as the appalling gap in educational standards between rich and poor Scots, the shocking NHS waiting times, and Europe's worst drug death record. But there wasn't really much of a chance of her party electing her. They knew she was the best candidate, with a stack of academic achievements and a genuine appeal to a wide cross-section of Scottish society. But as the voting system was announced, and after Sturgeon made it plain that she wanted her disciple Humza Yousaf as her successor, the die was cast. And just to rub salt in the wound, no sooner had Yousaf been sworn in as First Minister than he offered Forbes the post of rural affairs minister that she was quick to reject – it was a significant demotion from her the post as finance minister. But many SNP members had another – and to my mind disreputable – reason for withholding their support for Forbes becoming SNP leader and First Minister of Scotland: her religious beliefs. She is a member of the Free Church of Scotland. As a result, many SNP members rejected her views on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights. And she was further criticised for saying that having children outside of marriage was 'wrong'. However, she insisted that she would have been 'haunted' had she not answered questions about her religious beliefs. Her defeat by Yousaf saw his continuation of the disastrous Sturgeon policy agenda, but when he resigned she declined to contest the leadership, leaving the way clear for John Swinney to be elected unopposed. However, she accepted Swinney's offer as Deputy First Minister but while he tried to unpick Sturgeon's unpopular legacy, her presence – and perhaps even influence – on the national political stage appeared to diminish. At this stage we're left with the public explanation for her decision not to contest next year's Scottish Parliament election, but an intelligent politician such as she has shown herself to be would surely have been able to see clearly how the land lies with her party. It is essentially returning to the bare bones of its political agenda, and has decided to focus its campaign next year almost entirely on independence. As Ms Forbes will understand, there's nothing else for the nationalists to try and 'sell' to the voters; certainly not its education and NHS policies. And there appears to be very little support for breaking up Britain in this troubled world. As is often the case in Scottish politics, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, summed up the situation best. In offering Kate Forbes her best wishes she added: 'Kate Forbes was the future once – but now, like many of her counterparts in the SNP, she can see the writing on the wall. The truth is this is a tired government with no vision and no ideas.'