
Al-Qaeda-trained Aussie David Hicks hit by major new blow just days before his 50th birthday
Hicks converted to Islam as a teenager in 1999 and trained at Al-Qaeda terror camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan before he was handed over to the US military in 2001.
The US branded him an enemy combatant and transferred him to the US Naval base in Cuba where he was held with other terror suspects for more than five years.
He said he was tortured while being held there and only pleaded guilty to supporting terrorism because of his 'desperation for release from Guantanamo', his lawyer said.
The former jackaroo was allowed to serve the remaining nine months of his seven-year suspended sentence in Australia in 2007, before the conviction was overturned in 2015.
He has since kept a relatively low profile, but his father Terry Hicks has now revealed his son is facing a new crisis just days before his 50th birthday on Thursday.
'He's not doing well,' Mr Hicks told the Daily Mail at his home in Adelaide's northern suburbs, where he campaigned tirelessly for his son's freedom 20 years ago.
'He has heart problems [and] he can't get work.'
Mr Hicks, seen this week with Hicks' stepmother, Bev, said his son still suffers psychological problems from his treatment at Guantanamo.
Before converting to Islam, Hicks worked as a farmhand on outback cattle stations in the Northern Territory, Queensland and South Australia.
The father of two initially travelled to Kosovo in the Balkans to join the Kosovo Liberation Army which triggered his religious conversion on his return to Adelaide.
He then travelled to Pakistan in 1999 to study Islam, attended a terror training camp where he learnt to use military weapons, and subsequently crossed into Afghanistan.
Once there, he reportedly attended several camps, including al-Qaeda's Al Farouk training camp, where he used the alias Muhammad Dawood.
He denied any knowledge of connections between the camp and the terrorist group, insisting he did not know what al-Qaeda was at the time.
But he did meet with group leader Osama Bin Laden, who claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks in New York, which killed 2,977 people in 2001.
In letters to his parents between 1999 and 2001, revealed in the Adelaide Federal Magistrates Court in 2007, Hicks called Bin Laden a 'lovely' person.
'He's a lovely brother - the only reason the West calls him a... terrorist is because he got the money to take action,' he wrote.
'I am now very well trained for jihad in weapons, some serious like anti-aircraft missiles.'
He was finally handed over to the US military in late 2001 by the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, who received a $5,000 bounty for surrendering him to the US, and he was sent to Guantanamo Bay.
In a 2004 affidavit, Hicks alleged he was beaten while blindfolded and handcuffed, forced to take medication, sedated by injection without consent, struck while sedated, sexually assaulted, and deprived of sleep.
He claimed he witnessed the use of attack dogs against other Guantanamo detainees.
When his conviction was set aside by the US Court of Military Commission in 2015, Hicks recounted his time at the notorious prison camp from 2002 to 2007.
'It is just unfortunate that because of politics, I was subjected to five and a half years of physical and psychological torture that I will now live with always,' he said.
He insisted that government should be responsible for his medical expenses, alleging his incarceration caused long-term health issues.
'It is due to the torture – being kept in freezing conditions, small rooms for years,' he said.
Problems continued to plague Hicks after his release from Guantanamo and his return to Australia.
It was widely reported that he severed contact with ex-partner Jodie Sparrow, from whom he separated in 1996, and his children, Bonnie and Terry
But in a 2007 interview with Woman's Day, Ms Sparrow insisted she was 'mates' with her ex and said they 'would always be close... no matter what people want to think.'
Daily Mail understands Hicks is now a grandfather, with both his children now parents, but public records show his son Terry does not uses his father's surname.
Hicks' father said he was unsure whether his son remains in contact with Bonnie, Terry, or his grandchildren.
'I don't know if he sees them,' he admitted.
Hicks briefly moved to Sydney where he married his girlfriend, human rights advocate Aloysia Brooks, in 2009, reportedly living in Abbotsford and working for a landscape gardening business.
He returned to Adelaide when the marriage ended, and in 2017, an assault charge against a former partner in Craigmore was withdrawn at Elizabeth Magistrates Court.
His father - who split from Hicks' mother Susan when he was nine - told the Daily Mail his son lives 'in Modbury somewhere' in Adelaide's north, but didn't have his address.
He said Hicks 'has never spoken to the media and never will', although his son did give one press conference in 2015 when his sentence was overturned.
In 2012, the US Court of Appeals found the 2006 law under which David was convicted could not be applied retrospectively.
The US Court of Military Commission Review vacated his sentence and set aside his guilty plea on February 18, 2015.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The tree war on millionaires' row: Rose Bay locals blindsided by council decision that could affect house prices. LUCY MANLY reveals why it's happening - and which suburbs are next: 'Disgraceful'
For weeks, I've been hearing whispers of a scandal in Sydney 's most elite enclaves. No, Kristin Fisher and Dina Broadhurst haven't fallen out again.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Should big tech be allowed to mine Australians' text and data to train AI? The Productivity Commission is considering it
The Productivity Commission is examining whether technology firms should be exempted from copyright rules that stop companies from mining text and data to train artificial intelligence models. The PC, in its interim report into 'harnessing data and the digital economy', used copyright as a case study for how Australia's existing regulatory framework could be adapted to manage the risks of artificial intelligence. A key recommendation from the interim report was that the federal government should conduct a sweeping review of regulations to plug potential gaps that could be exploited by 'bad actors' using AI. Scott Farquhar, the co-founder of software company Atlassian, last week called for an 'urgent' overhaul of Australia's copyright rules, arguing they were out of step with other comparable countries. Farquhar said creating exemptions for text and data mining to train large language models 'could unlock billions of dollars of foreign investment into Australia'. That suggestion has been rejected by the Copyright Agency, a not-for-profit organisation that collects and distributes royalties to thousands of copyright holders. The agency has argued instead for the government to create a new compensation scheme for creators of content used by tech companies to train their AI models. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Stephen King, one of two commissioners leading the PC's inquiry into harnessing the opportunities of the digital economy, said: 'Copyright is a great example of where Australia needs to sit back and ask: 'Are our laws fit for purpose with AI?'' 'The obvious harm is that an AI company may use copyright materials without providing appropriate compensation. On the other side, we want the development of AI-specific tools that use that copyrighted material,' King said. 'It may be possible to say, can we approach AI the same way we have approached copyright in other ways, through copyright collections. Music is played everywhere, so we have set up collecting societies that are authorised under our competition laws, and they act on behalf of singers, songwriters and creators.' King said the PC was asking for feedback on other options, before a final recommendation by the end of the year. 'We have a fair dealing exemption that doesn't include text and data mining, maybe that should be an exemption – as long as AI companies are gaining legal copies and they have paid for it.' In its third of five thematic reports, the commission said artificial intelligence could resuscitate Australia's moribund productivity. PC modelling showed that even the most conservative estimate was that AI would deliver a $116bn boost to the economy over the next decade. King said that this translated into a $4,300 kicker to the average Australian's real wage in 10 years' time, and that the actual benefits could be much larger. The commission advised against creating an overarching AI-specific piece of legislation, and warned that clumsy or excessive regulation risked stifling the technology's potentially transformative benefits. That message is likely to be well received by the government, with Andrew Leigh, the assistant minister for productivity, backing this approach. But King said the commission was not arguing for a minimalist approach to AI regulation. 'It's not light-touch at all. What we are saying is that AI is going to make it easier, cheaper and faster for bad actors to engage in harmful conduct. But most of that harmful conduct is already illegal,' he said. 'Let's work out where the harms are and see whether they are covered by existing law. And if they are, let's make sure the regulators have the resources and powers to stop the bad actors.' The PC's interim report also backed changing privacy rules to incorporate an outcomes-based approach, rather than a 'box-ticking' exercise where businesses 'comply with the letter of the law but not the spirit of it'. The commission said the government 'should support new pathways to allow individuals and businesses to access and share data that relates to them'.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Mark Latham escapes censure motion for now – but faces NSW privileges committee
The independent NSW MP, Mark Latham, has been referred to the privileges committee over allegedly revealing privileged material but has avoided for now a censure in the state's legislative council. The NSW upper house voted on Tuesday night to refer Latham to the powerful privileges committee but delayed the condemnation motion until October when it expects to have the results of the privileges investigation. Labor's leader in the upper house, Penny Sharpe, had pushed for a censure motion but the opposition, Greens and some of the minor party members voted against the move, arguing members should wait for the results of the privileges inquiry. Two MLCs from the Shooters and Fishers party abstained, and the Marijuana party member, Jeremy Buckingham, voted with the government. The government lost the vote 22 to 16. Sharpe argued Latham, a former federal Labor leader and then One Nation MP, should be condemned over three specific incidents. This included that he allegedly breached privilege in relation to certain documents about the former police commissioner Karen Webb and investigations into gifts of gin that were produced on the basis that only parliamentarians could view them. Sharpe also called out Latham's 'problematic behaviour' of taking 'photographs of his colleagues at the chamber and sending them to a third party alongside derogatory remarks about their appearance'. She detailed Latham's use of parliamentary privilege, which protects MPs from defamation proceedings, to share the medical records of independent MP Alex Greenwich. The records had been part of a workplace sexual harassment and vilification claim that Greenwich won against Latham. 'The idea that a member would stand in this place and reveal private medical reports, no matter where they got them from, or how they're there, is a gross abuse of privilege as well,' Sharpe told parliament. Last month the Daily Telegraph published messages, reportedly sent by Latham to his former partner Nathalie Matthews, in which he allegedly shared photos of female colleagues and made disparaging comments about their appearance. During his response to the censure motion, Latham said of allegations that he breached parliamentary privilege relating to documents about the police commissioner's conduct: 'It's got nothing to do with national security, police techniques, policing methodology. 'There's nothing in it that warranted a non-publication order. It's about the integrity, the honesty of the police commissioner.' He also resurrected a 2015 sexual scandal that embroiled several ALP figures, and accused the state premier, Chris Minns, of double standards in his treatment of sexual allegations.