Should big tech be allowed to mine Australians' text and data to train AI? The Productivity Commission is considering it
The PC, in its interim report into 'harnessing data and the digital economy', used copyright as a case study for how Australia's existing regulatory framework could be adapted to manage the risks of artificial intelligence.
A key recommendation from the interim report was that the federal government should conduct a sweeping review of regulations to plug potential gaps that could be exploited by 'bad actors' using AI.
Scott Farquhar, the co-founder of software company Atlassian, last week called for an 'urgent' overhaul of Australia's copyright rules, arguing they were out of step with other comparable countries.
Farquhar said creating exemptions for text and data mining to train large language models 'could unlock billions of dollars of foreign investment into Australia'.
That suggestion has been rejected by the Copyright Agency, a not-for-profit organisation that collects and distributes royalties to thousands of copyright holders. The agency has argued instead for the government to create a new compensation scheme for creators of content used by tech companies to train their AI models.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Stephen King, one of two commissioners leading the PC's inquiry into harnessing the opportunities of the digital economy, said: 'Copyright is a great example of where Australia needs to sit back and ask: 'Are our laws fit for purpose with AI?''
'The obvious harm is that an AI company may use copyright materials without providing appropriate compensation. On the other side, we want the development of AI-specific tools that use that copyrighted material,' King said.
'It may be possible to say, can we approach AI the same way we have approached copyright in other ways, through copyright collections. Music is played everywhere, so we have set up collecting societies that are authorised under our competition laws, and they act on behalf of singers, songwriters and creators.'
King said the PC was asking for feedback on other options, before a final recommendation by the end of the year.
'We have a fair dealing exemption that doesn't include text and data mining, maybe that should be an exemption – as long as AI companies are gaining legal copies and they have paid for it.'
In its third of five thematic reports, the commission said artificial intelligence could resuscitate Australia's moribund productivity.
PC modelling showed that even the most conservative estimate was that AI would deliver a $116bn boost to the economy over the next decade.
King said that this translated into a $4,300 kicker to the average Australian's real wage in 10 years' time, and that the actual benefits could be much larger.
The commission advised against creating an overarching AI-specific piece of legislation, and warned that clumsy or excessive regulation risked stifling the technology's potentially transformative benefits.
That message is likely to be well received by the government, with Andrew Leigh, the assistant minister for productivity, backing this approach.
But King said the commission was not arguing for a minimalist approach to AI regulation.
'It's not light-touch at all. What we are saying is that AI is going to make it easier, cheaper and faster for bad actors to engage in harmful conduct. But most of that harmful conduct is already illegal,' he said.
'Let's work out where the harms are and see whether they are covered by existing law. And if they are, let's make sure the regulators have the resources and powers to stop the bad actors.'
The PC's interim report also backed changing privacy rules to incorporate an outcomes-based approach, rather than a 'box-ticking' exercise where businesses 'comply with the letter of the law but not the spirit of it'.
The commission said the government 'should support new pathways to allow individuals and businesses to access and share data that relates to them'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Rio Tinto says no economic incentive for green steel in Australia
MELBOURNE, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Rio Tinto ( opens new tab joined peer BHP ( opens new tab on Thursday to play down Australia's prospects of building out a "green iron" sector that would help decarbonise the steel industry because the country lacks the economic incentives to do so. Australia is the world's largest supplier of seaborne iron ore and has been striving to build a role as a reliable source of green metals. In February the government allocated A$1 billion ($652.4 million) to support the manufacture of green iron and its supply chains. Since Australia's iron ore is mostly too low-grade to be directly processed into steel with renewable energy, it needs an additional processing step. When this is undertaken with hydrogen made from renewable energy instead of coal, the product is called hydrogen direct reduced iron (DRI) or "green iron", a low-carbon base for making green steel. "Today I don't believe there is an economic incentive for anybody to move to a hydrogen DRI," Rio Tinto's chief technical officer Mark Davies said. The technology was unproven, and there were complications moving from existing processes using natural gas to hydrogen, he told a business lunch in Melbourne. "And doing it in Australia is expensive. It's an expensive place to build stuff," he said. Major miner BHP ( opens new tab said last month it was too costly for Australia to build a "green iron" industry, even after the country and China agreed to jointly work to decarbonise the steel supply chain, responsible for nearly a 10th of global emissions. A global carbon price of "a couple of hundred dollars" would be needed to create that incentive, Davies later told a press briefing. ($1 = 1.5328 Australian dollars)
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
SoftBank Group swings to profit in first quarter on market enthusiasm for tech stocks
TOKYO, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Japanese technology investor SoftBank Group (9984.T), opens new tab on Thursday booked a net profit of $2.87 billion in the first quarter, driven by gains among larger listed investments in its Vision Fund portfolio. The result will likely be welcomed by investors as SoftBank pursues its biggest spending spree since the launch of its Vision Funds in 2017 and 2019, this time making mammoth investments in artificial intelligence companies. Investors and analysts are awaiting updates on how these investments will be financed, the timeline for returns to materialise and whether assets will be sold to fund the new projects. Favourable market conditions for technology companies over the quarter raised valuations of SoftBank's array of startup stakes, potentially fuelling monetisation opportunities that can be directed toward newer investments. SoftBank's Vision Funds hold $45 billion worth of late-stage companies ready to list soon, up from $36 billion at the end of March. The group overall logged a net profit of 421.8 billion yen ($2.87 billion) for the April-June quarter. The result compared with a net loss of 174.3 billion yen for the same period a year earlier and the 127.6 billion yen average profit from three analyst estimates compiled by LSEG. The Vision Fund unit posted an investment gain of 726.8 billion yen ($4.94 billion), around half of which derived from a surge in the share price of South Korean e-commerce firm Coupang (CPNG.N), opens new tab over the quarter. SoftBank is leading a $40 billion funding round for ChatGPT maker OpenAI. SoftBank has until the end of the year to fund its $22.5 billion portion, although the remainder has been subscribed, according to a source familiar with the matter. It is also leading the financing for the Stargate project - a $500 billion scheme to develop data centres in the United States, part of its effort to position itself as the "organiser of the industry," founder Masayoshi Son said in June. SoftBank has yet to release details on what kinds of returns its financing of the Stargate project could generate. The extent of third-party investment will determine what other financing tools, such as bank loans and debt issuance, it may have to deploy. In July, SoftBank raised $4.8 billion by selling off a portion of its holding in T-Mobile (TMUS.O), opens new tab. However SoftBank's performance in exiting from investments and distributing profit has been patchy of late. The Vision Funds have made a cumulative investment gain of just $5 billion out of a total committed capital of $172.2 billion as of the end of June. ($1 = 147.0600 yen)
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fresh cost-of-living blow that every Aussie needs to know about
Australians could soon be paying a 15 per cent GST as a Teal MP argues an increase is necessary to help those worse off. The Goods and Services Tax has been kept at 10 per cent since it debuted in July 2000, with exemptions for fresh fruit and vegetables, meat, health and education. But Teal MP Kate Chaney, who represents the upmarket Perth seat of Curtin, has called for the GST to be raised to 15 per cent, with the existing exemptions removed. The GST proceeds are now distributed among the states and territories to help pay for things like transport infrastructure, schools and hospitals. But Chaney wants revenue from a higher consumption tax to fund a $3,300 rebate to every Australian adult, arguing this would benefit low-income earners. 'Under a progressive GST model, we could increase the rate of GST to 15 per cent and remove exemptions on food, education and health, bringing Australia in line with other OECD countries,' she said. 'But to ensure equity is maintained, the government could pay every Australian adult a $3,300 annual "basics rebate", which would effectively mean they pay no GST on their first $22,000 of expenses, making the lowest 60 per cent of income earners better off.' Chaney, whose father Michael Chaney is chairman of retail conglomerate Wesfarmers, cited Parliamentary Budget Office modelling to argue the GST, a regressive tax, would in fact help the poor if it funded compensation. 'PBO modelling shows that it is possible to broaden the GST base and increase the rate without shifting the burden disproportionately to lower-income earners, through a "basics rebate",' she said. 'In fact, the lowest 60 per cent of income earners could be better off under a progressive GST. 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive. 'Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers in June revealed he would be open-minded about expanding the base of the GST to raise more government revenue, ahead of this month's Economic Reform Roundtable. 'What I'm going to try and do - because I know the states will have a view on it, I'm going to try not to dismiss every idea that I know that people will bring to the roundtable,' he told the National Press Club in Canberra at the time. 'I suspect the states will have a view about the GST - it's not a view that I've been attracted to historically but I'm going to try not to get in the process of shooting ideas between now and the roundtable. 'One of the ways that I am going to be inclusive and respectful in the lead-up to this roundtable is I suspect people will raise that question.' Items like fresh fruit and vegetables, bread, cooking oil, meat and unflavoured milk were exempted from the 10 per cent GST under a political deal reached in 1999 between former Liberal prime minister John Howard's government and the Australian Democrats in the Senate. Labor had lost the 1998 election campaigning against the Coalition's proposed GST and voted against it in Parliament. Personal income taxes now make up more than half of federal government revenue, with Treasury expecting to collect $349.7billion from income taxes in 2025-26. This means working-age Australians are disproportionately carrying the tax burden, with Treasury only forecasting Budget deficits in coming years. 'Intergenerational inequity is built into our tax system - younger generations are facing the growing burden of funding an ageing population and will bear the cost of future interest payments to cover the structural deficit forecast for the next decade,' Chaney said. 'We have to have courageous conversations about other revenue sources to avoid handballing this problem to future generations.'
