logo
Sydney restaurant faces human rights complaint after temporarily denying entry to people wearing keffiyehs

Sydney restaurant faces human rights complaint after temporarily denying entry to people wearing keffiyehs

The Guardian12 hours ago
The Racial Justice Centre is preparing to file a group complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission after a Sydney restaurant denied dine-in service to people wearing Palestinian keffiyehs during a 20-minute period last weekend.
The legal centre will file the complaint to Australia's national anti-discrimination body on behalf of six Palestinian complainants, regarding an incident that took place on 3 August at Merivale-owned Jimmy's Falafel in the Sydney CBD after the Sydney Harbour Bridge march, first reported by the Sydney Morning Herald.
Guardian Australia has spoken to four people, not part of the complaint, who report being told they would be barred from eating inside at Jimmy's Falafel unless they removed their keffiyehs.
A man who wishes to be identified as Amir – not his real name – travelled from Queensland to Sydney to attend the pro-Palestine protest. Afterwards, Amir and his friend Hasan, who were both wearing Palestinian keffiyehs, went searching for food and stumbled across Jimmy's Falafel on George Street.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Amir said while they were asking a restaurant employee if a table was vacant, a security guard approached the pair and said their scarves could not be worn inside the venue and had to be removed if they wanted to dine in.
The security guard said the directive came from the restaurant manager, Amir said. 'We were quite shocked that this is happening to us, right in the centre of Sydney,' he said.
Amir, who said he saw other people also being turned away due to wearing keffiyehs, said the pair calmly left the venue.
Keffiyehs, traditional scarves worn across the Middle East, are often worn by people expressing support for Palestine.
A Merivale spokesperson said in a written statement that Jimmy's Falafel was patronised by many who participated in the Harbour Bridge protest march on 3 August, including 'many, many people wearing keffiyehs and hijabs'.
The statement said that a management decision was made at about 3.55pm 'that people carrying large flags and placards should not carry or display them within the Jimmy's Falafel venue', after instances of members of the public 'yelling obscenities and violent rhetoric' at Merivale venues on George Street, including comments such as 'death to the IDF', 'death to all Zionist pigs' and 'f***ing Zionist pigs and scum'.
'Jimmy's staff understood that decision as providing that persons wearing political garb and/or carrying flags and placards should be kindly asked to remove those items (place them in their bags) before entering,' the spokesperson said.
'This meant that for the period 3.55pm to 4.15pm, people wearing political items of clothing were politely asked to remove those items and place them in their bags before entering.'
Merivale CCTV footage, viewed by Guardian Australia, shows that during that 20-minute window, some patrons wearing keffiyehs left the venue or were turned away, while others removed them before entering or ordering takeaway.
The footage shows other diners wearing keffiyehs inside the venue during that period, as well as at other points during the day.
On the footage, which did not include audio, just before the start of the 20-minute period, protesters appear to yell into the venue.
'To be clear, at no time was anyone refused entry or discriminated against due to their political or religious affiliations. As you can imagine, it was a day of thousands of people attending the city. It was a challenging time for venue staff, and we of course have an obligation to their safety and comfort. Merivale is politically neutral and has no interest whatsoever in disabusing any patron of their religious or political views,' the spokesperson said.
'No Merivale venues including Jimmy's Falafel have policies on customers wearing keffiyehs or other scarves.'
Sharfah Mohamed, a lawyer at the Racial Justice Centre, said: 'Our position is that Merivale's conduct breaches the federal Racial Discrimination Act.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
In a written statement, Mohamed said that security personnel 'in all types of venues are required to respond to threats to safety on a case-by-case basis based on actual conduct'.
'As to neutrality, there is nothing neutral about banning the cultural garment of a specific racial or ethnic group,' Mohamed said.
Hasan, who requested his last name be withheld, said the security guard did not say why they were not allowed to wear the keffiyehs inside the venue. 'We were humiliated. I felt humiliated,' he said.
Hasan, who is Lebanese, said the keffiyeh resonates with Palestinians and is a symbol of 'hope and freedom'.
'We just wanted to become one with the Palestinian people and show solidarity with them,' he said.
Amir said he now fears wearing a keffiyeh in public or expressing his opinion about the conflict in the Middle East. 'I feel quite shocked, traumatised and humiliated,' he said.
Qamar Albashir said he was wearing a Moroccan scarf when his group of six people approached Jimmy's Falafel . He said the security guard told the group, which included three people wearing keffiyehs, they could not enter the venue wearing the scarves and would have to remove them to go inside.
'We were kind of dumbfounded. When [they] said we couldn't go in we ask why not, and the security guard said it was a private establishment. We were lost for words.'
'It felt really horrible. We felt further anguished because our kids were there with us.'
A fourth man, who requested anonymity, said he was also denied entry to Jimmy's Falafel on the afternoon of the march while wearing a Jordanian keffiyeh.
'We were told by the security guard that we wouldn't be allowed in because we were wearing scarves,' he said. 'We were in shock at first.'
The man said he was accompanied by his wife, who was wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh, and his friend, who was not wearing a scarf. He said the group observed two other groups, where some members were wearing Palestinian keffiyehs, who were denied entry on the same basis.
The man said his friend ordered takeaway food from the venue from the street for the group.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The bumper pay rise given to 'undervalued' NSW firefighters is revealed
The bumper pay rise given to 'undervalued' NSW firefighters is revealed

Daily Mail​

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The bumper pay rise given to 'undervalued' NSW firefighters is revealed

Thousands of firefighters have secured a lofty pay rise in a sign an industrial umpire is willing to favour workers in fiery labour disputes. NSW firefighters will receive a 14 per cent wage increase across three years, backdated to February 2024, the Industrial Relations Commission ruled. That was substantially above the nine per cent offered by the Labor government, which re-established the stand-alone commission in July 2024. 'The work of firefighters is currently significantly undervalued, due to historic or intrinsic factors,' the commission said. The Fire Brigade Employees' Union welcomed the decision as vindication firefighters' role extended to non-fire work, including search-and-rescue operations and road crash scenes. It had sought 17 per cent, claiming the state's almost 7000 firefighters 'had suffered wage suppression for a decade' under the previous coalition government. The deal includes a one-off bump of two per cent to account for cost-of-living pressures. Another one-off bump of three per cent recognises their competency in road crash rescue work, which the commission found was a 'core function'. Industrial relations expert Fiona MacDonald hoped the finding would discourage state governments from 'crying poor when it comes to ... pay increases for public sector workers'. 'If state governments genuinely consider pay claims, then unions won't need to go to the (commission),' the acting director of the Australia Institute's Centre for Future Work told AAP. But other analysts were not sure governments would change their tune about stretched finances or that unions could pencil in other wins. 'There is always a lottery element to any (commission) hearing,' University of Sydney professor John Buchanan said. 'Employers have argued that 'capacity to pay' is a key principle they believe should shape wage determination ... so I anticipate the NSW government, no matter what colour, will continue to use this argument.' He said unions would persist with collective bargaining and fall back on arbitration if that failed to deliver. Doctors, nurses and psychiatrists, who are all agitating for markedly higher pay from the government, are currently engaged in arbitration at the commission. Their respective unions have gone on strikes before, with psychiatrists threatening a mass exodus. Prof Buchanan said the 2.5 per cent wages cap by the previous coalition government created deep distortions in the labour market. One of the architects of that cap, shadow treasurer Damien Tudehope, criticised Labor for surrendering control of its budget. The commission had 'exercised its unshackled power' by rejecting the government's fiscal arguments, the opposition industrial relations spokesman said. Labor welcomed the commission's decision as delivering wage certainty for firefighters and recognising the work they did at road crash rescues. 'We were elected on a mandate to fix the recruitment and retention crisis in essential services and that is what we are doing,' Industrial Relations Minister Sophie Cotsis said.

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law
UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law

Reuters

time40 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law

Aug 15 (Reuters) - The U.N. human rights office said on Friday an Israeli plan to build to build thousands of new homes between an Israeli settlement in the West Bank and near East Jerusalem was illegal under international law, and would put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime. Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Thursday vowed to press on a long-delayed settlement project, saying the move would "bury" the idea of a Palestinian state. The U.N. rights office spokesperson said the plan would break the West Bank into isolated enclaves and that it was "a war crime for an occupying power to transfer its own civilian population into the territory it occupies". About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognised by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank. Most world powers say settlement expansion erodes the viability of a two-state solution by breaking up territory the Palestinians seek as part of a future independent state. The two-state plan envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel, which captured all three territories in the 1967 Middle East war. Israel cites historical and biblical ties to the area and says the settlements provide strategic depth and security and that the West Bank is "disputed" not "occupied".

Lawyer issues apology after using AI-generated fake quotes in murder case
Lawyer issues apology after using AI-generated fake quotes in murder case

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Lawyer issues apology after using AI-generated fake quotes in murder case

A senior Australian lawyer has issued an apology to a judge after court submissions in a murder case were found to contain fake quotes and non-existent legal judgments generated by artificial intelligence. The significant error occurred in the Supreme Court of Victoria, adding to a growing list of AI-related blunders impacting justice systems globally. Rishi Nathwani, a defence lawyer holding the prestigious title of King's Counsel, accepted "full responsibility" for the incorrect information submitted in the case involving a teenager charged with murder. Court documents, reviewed by The Associated Press on Friday, detailed the admission. Addressing Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, Mr Nathwani stated on behalf of the defence team: "We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred." The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment. 'At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday. 'The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice,' Elliott added. The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and non-existent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court. The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defense lawyers provide copies. The lawyers admitted the citations 'do not exist' and that the submission contained 'fictitious quotes,' court documents say. The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct. The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who didn't check their accuracy. The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI. 'It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said. The court documents do not identify the generative artificial intelligence system used by the lawyers. In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $5,000 fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim. Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments. Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he didn't realize that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store