
An ode to crying
These questions flashed through my mind as I saw Amanda Anisimova weep profusely on world television after her devastating loss in the Wimbledon final. There was no attempt to hold back or paste on a false smile. She sat there, in full view of the cameras, overwhelmed by emotion. Some thought it awkward or unsportsmanlike. I thought it was honest — and brave. It made me reflect not just on her tears, but on my own absence of them, and what society makes of both.
We have come to equate crying with weakness, oversensitivity, or a loss of control. Especially for men, tears are seen as something to suppress. 'Don't cry like a girl' was a line thrown around freely when I was growing up in the macho atmosphere of a boys-only boarding school. Older and hopefully wiser now, I see that it wasn't just a put-down for boys; it was also a quiet insult to girls.
Boys do cry
There is a lot of misogyny baked into our discomfort with crying. From an early age, boys are taught to bottle things up, while girls are shamed for being 'too sissy' or emotional. At home and in school, children are brought up to believe that composure equals strength and tears signal weakness or instability.
But crying is far more nuanced than we make it out to be. Grief is, of course, the most common trigger. The loss of someone we love can break us open. But people also cry out of frustration, anguish, and sheer exhaustion. I know someone who once cried for hours after missing an international flight — not because of the disruption itself, but because it came after months of stress. The missed flight was simply the tipping point.
And then there are tears of joy. I saw my brother, an otherwise stoic father, cry as he gave his daughter away in marriage. A young woman I know cried when she finally saw her name on the list after clearing the IAS exam in her third attempt. 'I didn't cry when I failed twice,' she told me. 'But I cried when I made it.' Sometimes, relief can be as overwhelming as sorrow.
We have seen many public figures cry. Barack Obama cried while addressing the nation after the Sandy Hook school shooting. After losing the Australian Open final to Nadal in 2009, Roger Federer, through copious tears, said, 'God, this is killing me.' Hem Barua choked up in Parliament while recounting the plight of flood victims in Assam. Rahul Dravid teared up during his farewell speech. Those tears didn't diminish them; they made them more relatable, more deeply human. They elevated them in our eyes. And yet, we continue to judge tears — especially in public and professional life. I once watched a colleague being gently chided by a senior officer after he choked up while recounting a tragic experience. 'You shouldn't get emotional in public,' the senior said. But why not? Why is authenticity unwelcome in spaces where empathy should matter most?
Science tells us that crying is therapeutic. Emotional tears contain stress hormones. Crying helps release tension, soothes the nervous system, and brings a sense of relief. That's why people often say, 'I feel lighter after a good cry.' In Japan, there are even 'crying clubs' where people gather to let it all out together — a practice called rui-katsu, or 'tear-seeking'. Crying isn't dysfunction. It's the body's way of healing.
Not everyone cries easily. Some, like me, feel deeply but express emotion differently. I believe that is perfectly okay. People vary in temperament, personality, and hormonal make-up. But we must stop believing that crying — or not crying — tells us anything definitive about a person's character. Some of the strongest people I know cry without hesitation. Some of the most emotionally closed have not cried in decades. What matters is whether we allow ourselves to feel fully.
We need to see tears not as a breakdown of control, but as a breakthrough of honesty. I have learned not to feel awkward when someone cries in front of me. I no longer rush to change the subject or offer sympathy saying, 'Oh, don't cry.' I let them cry because sometimes that is exactly what they need. We live in an age of pretentious appearances — curated social media, measured speeches, the pretence of always being in control. In such a world, tears are one of the last truly honest acts. They say, 'This matters.' Whether it's sorrow, pride, frustration, or joy, crying is an anchor to something real. It's a reaffirmation that we are human.
The writer is a former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
6 hours ago
- India.com
Meet IAS Tapasya Parihar, who failed in her first attempt, then cleared UPSC, became famous during her wedding as..., her AIR...
Success Story: Clearing the UPSC exam is considered a very big achievement. Every year, thousands of aspiring civil servants take this exam, which is one of the toughest exams in the country. This exam requires not only intelligence but also mental strength, hard work, and patience. Many candidates spend years preparing for this exam, yet success is not guaranteed. Who is Tapasya Parihar? Here, we will tell you about IAS Tapasya Parihar, who hails from Jova village of Narsinghpur district of Madhya Pradesh. Tapasya Parihar belongs to a very simple family. Tapasya's father, Vishwas Parihar, is a farmer. She came into the limelight due to an incident that occurred during her wedding. What happened during her wedding? During her wedding, she told her father at the time of 'kanyadaan' that she is not an object to be donated. Kanyadaan is a Hindu wedding ritual where the bride's father gives her away to the groom, symbolizing the transfer of responsibility. It's a symbolic donation, with the bride often seen as a precious gift. How has IAS Tapasya Parihar's journey been? Tapasya Parihar is an IAS officer of the UPSC Civil Service year 2017 batch. She cracked the UPSC exam with rank 23 and currently, she is the Additional Collector, Government of M.P., Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh. She did her schooling at Kendriya Vidyalaya, Narsinghpur. After this, she decided to study law. For this, she has obtained an LLB degree from the India Law Society Law School, Pune. Tapasya married IFS officer Garvit Gangwar in December 2021. During the wedding, she refused the ritual of Kanyadaan. She told her father that I am not a thing to be donated. This step of Tapasya was highly appreciated. What was Tapasya Parihar's UPSC preparation like? After studying law, Tapasya Parihar decided to take the UPSC exam. Even after taking coaching in the first attempt, she failed. After this, in the second attempt, she relied on self-study. This helped her a lot, and she appeared for the exam for the second time. This time, she cracked the civil service exam with a rank of 23, and she was selected for the post of IAS officer.


Scroll.in
10 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Ten emergency landings due to technical snags reported since January 2024: Centre
Ten incidents of aircraft making emergency landings due to technical snags have been reported since January 2024, the Ministry of Civil Aviation told Parliament on Monday. Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol also said that two incidents of turbulence were reported in the same period. In addition to these, an Air India aircraft 'declared mayday and eventually met with an accident' on June 12, said the minister. Air India's Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft, which was en route to London's Gatwick airport from Ahmedabad, had crashed just 33 seconds after taking off on June 12. There were 242 persons aboard the aircraft. One passenger survived with ' impact injuries '. Thirty-four persons were also killed on the ground after the plane crashed into the hostel building of the BJ Medical College and Hospital in Ahmedabad, according to Air India. This was said to be the world's worst aviation disaster in a decade. In his reply, Mohol also said that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation had conducted 171 regulatory audits between 2020 and June 2025. Structural audits of Delhi airport Replying to a question on the roof collapse incidents in June 2024 and May 2025, Mohol said structural audits at the Indira Gandhi International Airport in New Delhi found the terminals to be safe. One person was killed and several others injured when part of the roof at the airport's Terminal 1 collapsed amid heavy rain on June 28, 2024. The fallen canopy struck vehicles outside the terminal building. On May 25, a portion of the roof at the same terminal collapsed during heavy rainfall. A video shared on social media showed part of the terminal's tensile overhang giving way as water poured down and flooded the pavement below. At the time, the Delhi International Airport Limited had said that the incident took place because of extreme weather, adding that there was 'no structural compromise'. In his reply, Mohol said that the May incident did not involve a roof collapse but damage to a 'non-structural element'. 'A small portion of the tensile fabric (a non-structural element) in the forecourt area tore off due to an unusually high-intensity thunderstorm, accompanied by strong winds and unprecedented rainfall over a short duration,' he said. Mohol added that the Terminal 1 canopy was inspected by Cortex Construction Solutions and the results were validated by the Indian Institute of Technology-Banaras Hindu University. The structure has been found to be safe, he said. Structural audits of Terminals 2 and 3 were conducted by the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. They were also found to be safe, the minister said. He added that all airport operators have been directed to evaluate all structures before the onset of the monsoon season. At the Delhi airport, Terminal 1 handles domestic flights by IndiGo and SpiceJet, Terminal 2 also serves domestic passengers and Terminal 3 handles all international flights along with some domestic operations.


The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
An ode to crying
I don't tear up easily. I didn't cry when my parents died. There was sorrow and overwhelming grief, but the tears just never came. I didn't cry when I was publicly humiliated, or deeply hurt, or had a serious setback. I don't cry on occasions when most people do — at cremations, farewells, or after watching a gut-wrenching movie. Does that make me less human? These questions flashed through my mind as I saw Amanda Anisimova weep profusely on world television after her devastating loss in the Wimbledon final. There was no attempt to hold back or paste on a false smile. She sat there, in full view of the cameras, overwhelmed by emotion. Some thought it awkward or unsportsmanlike. I thought it was honest — and brave. It made me reflect not just on her tears, but on my own absence of them, and what society makes of both. We have come to equate crying with weakness, oversensitivity, or a loss of control. Especially for men, tears are seen as something to suppress. 'Don't cry like a girl' was a line thrown around freely when I was growing up in the macho atmosphere of a boys-only boarding school. Older and hopefully wiser now, I see that it wasn't just a put-down for boys; it was also a quiet insult to girls. Boys do cry There is a lot of misogyny baked into our discomfort with crying. From an early age, boys are taught to bottle things up, while girls are shamed for being 'too sissy' or emotional. At home and in school, children are brought up to believe that composure equals strength and tears signal weakness or instability. But crying is far more nuanced than we make it out to be. Grief is, of course, the most common trigger. The loss of someone we love can break us open. But people also cry out of frustration, anguish, and sheer exhaustion. I know someone who once cried for hours after missing an international flight — not because of the disruption itself, but because it came after months of stress. The missed flight was simply the tipping point. And then there are tears of joy. I saw my brother, an otherwise stoic father, cry as he gave his daughter away in marriage. A young woman I know cried when she finally saw her name on the list after clearing the IAS exam in her third attempt. 'I didn't cry when I failed twice,' she told me. 'But I cried when I made it.' Sometimes, relief can be as overwhelming as sorrow. We have seen many public figures cry. Barack Obama cried while addressing the nation after the Sandy Hook school shooting. After losing the Australian Open final to Nadal in 2009, Roger Federer, through copious tears, said, 'God, this is killing me.' Hem Barua choked up in Parliament while recounting the plight of flood victims in Assam. Rahul Dravid teared up during his farewell speech. Those tears didn't diminish them; they made them more relatable, more deeply human. They elevated them in our eyes. And yet, we continue to judge tears — especially in public and professional life. I once watched a colleague being gently chided by a senior officer after he choked up while recounting a tragic experience. 'You shouldn't get emotional in public,' the senior said. But why not? Why is authenticity unwelcome in spaces where empathy should matter most? Science tells us that crying is therapeutic. Emotional tears contain stress hormones. Crying helps release tension, soothes the nervous system, and brings a sense of relief. That's why people often say, 'I feel lighter after a good cry.' In Japan, there are even 'crying clubs' where people gather to let it all out together — a practice called rui-katsu, or 'tear-seeking'. Crying isn't dysfunction. It's the body's way of healing. Not everyone cries easily. Some, like me, feel deeply but express emotion differently. I believe that is perfectly okay. People vary in temperament, personality, and hormonal make-up. But we must stop believing that crying — or not crying — tells us anything definitive about a person's character. Some of the strongest people I know cry without hesitation. Some of the most emotionally closed have not cried in decades. What matters is whether we allow ourselves to feel fully. We need to see tears not as a breakdown of control, but as a breakthrough of honesty. I have learned not to feel awkward when someone cries in front of me. I no longer rush to change the subject or offer sympathy saying, 'Oh, don't cry.' I let them cry because sometimes that is exactly what they need. We live in an age of pretentious appearances — curated social media, measured speeches, the pretence of always being in control. In such a world, tears are one of the last truly honest acts. They say, 'This matters.' Whether it's sorrow, pride, frustration, or joy, crying is an anchor to something real. It's a reaffirmation that we are human. The writer is a former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India