Though Cong opposes ‘One Nation One Election' Bill, we gave opinion to Parl panel: Himachal CM
He said this at the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024, pertaining to the proposal of One Nation-One Election, held at Fagu.
Giving details, the chief minister said, 'The meeting was chaired by Member of Parliament PP Chaudhary. We were invited to share our personal and party's views on One Nation, One Election. The speaker, deputy speaker, and other stakeholders are also being called. As elected representatives, we believe it is our duty to participate in such democratic discussions.'
'Our stand is clear, we oppose One Nation, One Election. However, we gave inputs to strengthen democratic structures. We raised practical concerns what happens when a government collapses mid-term, or an MLA resigns? How will tenures align?' he said.
'If the proposal is to hold all elections in 2029, but our state elections are due in 2027, will those be deferred by two years? These are significant constitutional challenges that need thorough deliberation' Sukhu added while thanking the committee members for visiting Himachal and sharing the draft bill and scope of the proposal.
People want One Nation, One Election: Chaudhary
'People want One Nation, One Election , it's not just a political issue, it's a national issue,' said Bharatiya Janata Party MP PP Chaudhary.
'In every state we visit, civil society, scholars, Padma awardees, and even those in Congress-ruled states have shown overwhelming support to one Nation One election,' said Chaudhary, while adding, 'Separate elections mean separate voter lists, multiple deployments, school closures for polling, and repeated election expenditure.'
He said that the simultaneous elections were the norm until 1967, which changed only after 1970 due to early dissolution of assemblies. 'No political party can ignore the will of the people. If citizens demand it, even parties that oppose the idea may reconsider,' said Chaudhary.
One Nation, One Election would be significant for hill states: Thakur
Member of the committee and former Union minister Anurag Thakur said that One Nation, One Election would be significant for hill states like Himachal Pradesh.
'Simultaneous elections save time, money, and reduce disruption especially in hill states' said Anurag. 'The Joint Committee is rightly meeting political leaders, media, and intellectuals to gather diverse perspectives. Students and youth have shown great interest. If this bill becomes law, it can accelerate development and strengthen our democracy.' He said.
Basic structure of Constitution must not be altered: Pathnia
Himachal assembly speaker Kuldeep Singh Pathania said, 'The basic structure of constitution must not be altered. The Constitution already provides for five-year terms for both Parliament and state legislatures. But mid-term elections and breakdowns in governance have disrupted that structure. This committee is exploring whether we can return to that stability.'
People want elections held together: Jai Ram Thakur
Former chief minister and leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur said, 'The One Nation, One Election bill is a bold move. Political parties may have different opinion but the public sentiment is clear in favour of one nation one election.'
'Our party fully supports it. We believe it should be implemented as soon as possible,' added Jai Ram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
New Income Tax Bill gets Lok Sabha nod
The Lok Sabha approved the new income tax bill, eliminating alternate minimum tax on LLPs and allowing refund claims even without timely return filings. Replacing the 1961 Act, the bill simplifies language, redefines terms like 'tax year,' and incorporates select committee recommendations. It maintains loss carry forward provisions, tweaks MSME definitions, and reintroduces deductions for inter-corporate dividends. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Lok Sabha on Monday gave its nod to the new income tax bill , which does away with alternate minimum tax on limited liability partnership (LLP) firms and allows refund claims even if taxpayers do not file returns within the due Income Tax (NO.2) Bill, which will replace the Income Tax Act , 1961 from the next financial year, was introduced by Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman and passed in the Lok Sabha amid din without a debate. It will now go to Rajya Sabha for its approval. The bill cuts down wordage and chapters by almost half and presents the clauses in simpler and easier to understand does away with the confusing concepts of assessment year and previous year, replacing them with "tax year".The original Income Tax Bill, 2025, which was introduced in February, was withdrawn by the minister on Friday and the new bill incorporating "almost all recommendations" of the select committee, headed by parliamentarian Baijayant Panda, which had scrutinised the original bill, was bill has maintained status quo on loss carry forward provisions, exempted non-profit organisations from taxing anonymous donations received by purely religious trusts and tweaked the definition of MSMEs (micro, small and medium enterprises) in alignment with the MSME Act, which were part of the recommendations of the has also reintroduced deductions in respect of certain inter-corporate dividends for companies opting for concessional rate of taxes in line with the provisions of the existing Income-tax Act, 1961 and nil tax collected at source on Liberalised Remittance Scheme remittances for education purposes financed by any financial bill has added the term 'profession' alongside 'business' under electronic payment rules, which means professionals with income of more than ₹50 crore annually must use prescribed electronic modes of bill has also clearly defined deductions for commuted pension and gratuity received by family said some of the pain points have been removed."The revised Income-tax Bill, 2025 demonstrates the government's receptiveness to parliamentary recommendations, incorporating targeted amendments to enhance clarity, ease of compliance and consistency with existing legislation," said Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, partner, Nangia Andersen LLP."To give a few examples, the provisions of levying alternate minimum tax on LLPs has been done away with, the rigours placed on charitable trust have been removed, the provisions of transfer pricing and the definition of 'associated enterprise' to whom these provisions apply, have been relaxed," said Dinesh Kanabar, CEO, Dhruva Advisors.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
LS passes three bills with voice vote amid din
The Lok Sabha convened and passed key bills. Opposition protests over electoral roll revisions in Bihar occurred. The National Sports Governance Bill and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill were passed. Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya highlighted the sports bill's significance. The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, providing tax exemptions, was also passed swiftly. The House was adjourned after these legislative actions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: The Lok Sabha passed three bills, including the much-awaited National Sports Governance Bill , amid Opposition protests over the revision of electoral rolls in Lower House passed the National Sports Governance Bill and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill. The House witnessed sloganeering as soon as it assembled at 11 am on Monday. Speaker Om Birla conducted the Question Hour for about 20 minutes before adjourning the House till 2 the House reassembled after lunch, the Opposition benches were empty. The two sports bills were introduced for consideration and the National Sports Governance Bill, sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya said, "It is the single biggest reform in sports since independence. This bill will ensure accountability, justice and best governance in sports federations."Two MPs - TDP's Kesineni Shivnath and BJP's Ganesh Singh - participated in the discussion on the bill. The Opposition members returned to the house and started raising slogans in the well of the House. Amidst the din, the bills were passed by a voice vote following which the House was adjourned till 4 the House met again at 4 pm, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill that aims to provide tax exemptions to UPS subscribers. The bill was passed within five minutes and the House was adjourned for the day.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
New Income-Tax Bill restores alternate minimum tax relief for LLPs
In a relief for non-corporate taxpayers, the government on Monday corrected an earlier drafting error, reinstating relief from the alternate minimum tax (AMT) for partnership firms and limited liability partnerships (LLPs) under the revised Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025, presented in Parliament by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. The revised Bill, which incorporates almost all of the recommendations of the Select Committee chaired by Baijayant Panda, was passed by the Lok Sabha through a voice vote, without discussion. The House also approved the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which grants tax relief under the new Unified Pension Scheme, extends benefits to Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, and clarifies block assessment rules following tax searches. Both Bills now move to the Rajya Sabha for consideration and will become law upon receiving Presidential assent. AMT, levied at 18.5 per cent plus cess and surcharge for non-corporate taxpayers, is intended to ensure high earners cannot fully offset their tax liabilities through exemptions. LLPs with only long-term capital gains (LTCG) income are otherwise taxed at 12.5 per cent. The earlier version of the Bill had omitted a critical reference to Chapter VI-A deductions in the AMT provisions for LLPs. This would have exposed LLPs — including those earning solely LTCG taxed at 12.5 per cent — to the higher AMT rate of 18.5 per cent plus cess and surcharge. The revised draft restores this reference in Clause 206, ensuring AMT applies only when total income is reduced by such deductions, consistent with the original intent. While the Select Committee made more than 285 recommendations, it did not propose altering the AMT framework for LLPs as contained in the first version of the Income Tax Bill, introduced in February. According to the Bill's statement of objects and reasons, alongside the committee's proposals, the government incorporated stakeholder suggestions to convey the proposed legal meaning more accurately, including 'corrections in the nature of drafting, alignment of phrases, consequential changes and cross-referencing'. One significant Select Committee recommendation, however, has been dropped. This would have broadened transfer pricing scrutiny by allowing a company to be treated as an 'associated enterprise' if it exercised 'substantial influence' over another, even without meeting current shareholding or board control thresholds. The provision would have brought a larger set of inter-corporate transactions under transfer pricing rules, which are designed to ensure related-party dealings reflect market value and prevent profit shifting. Dinesh Kanabar, chief executive officer of Dhruva Advisors, said the earlier draft risked introducing subjectivity. 'The earlier Bill proposed that two 'enterprises' would be regarded as associated if at any time during the year there was common management or control, irrespective of the Act's specific definitions. It is now provided that only in specified circumstances will management and control be deemed common, and the test applies as at the end of the year. This removes subjectivity and the litigation that goes with it,' he said. The latest version of the Income Tax Bill also restores key tax benefits for charitable and religious trusts. It reinstates a provision that allows such entities to reinvest capital gains in new capital assets to claim exemption, as well as the option to apply unspent income in the immediately succeeding year without losing tax benefits. A senior Central Board of Direct Taxes official said: 'If a charitable or religious trust sells a capital asset – such as land, buildings, shares -- and makes a capital gain, it can avoid paying tax on that gain if it reinvests the proceeds in another capital asset for its charitable purposes. This treatment already existed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the new Bill retains the same rule.'
