logo
At least 1.2 million Afghans deported this year despite risks: UN

At least 1.2 million Afghans deported this year despite risks: UN

At least 1.2 million Afghans have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, the UN refugee agency said on Saturday, warning that repatriations on a massive scale have the potential to destabilise the fragile situation in Afghanistan.
Iran and Pakistan in 2023 launched separate campaigns to expel foreigners they said were living in the country illegally. They set deadlines and threatened them with deportation if they did not leave. The two governments deny targeting Afghans, who have fled their homeland to escape war, poverty or Taliban rule.
The UN High Commissioner for Refugees said that of the 1.2 million returning Afghans, more than half had come from Iran following a March 20 government deadline for them to leave voluntarily or face expulsion.
Iran has deported more than 366,000 Afghans this year, including refugees and people in refugee-like situations, according to the agency.
Iran's 12-day war with Israel has also driven departures. The highest number of returns was on June 26, when 36,100 Afghans crossed the border in one day.
'Afghan families are being uprooted once again, arriving with scant belongings, exhausted, hungry, scared about what awaits them in a country many of them have never even set foot in,' said Arafat Jamal, the UNHCR representative in the Afghan capital, Kabul.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Decoding Israel, Iran and China's collision of interests in the Middle East
Decoding Israel, Iran and China's collision of interests in the Middle East

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Decoding Israel, Iran and China's collision of interests in the Middle East

After President Donald Trump boasted that last weekend's US strikes had 'obliterated' Iran 's nuclear capabilities, the uneasy ceasefire he later announced between Israel and its arch-rival revealed a region fundamentally altered. Both the Israeli and Iranian governments have proclaimed victory, signalling a shared – if wary – interest in maintaining the truce, though fresh reports of missile salvoes continue to cast doubt on its durability. In separate briefings, Iranian and Israeli officials offered sharply contrasting accounts of the week's bombardments, yet neither side showed any appetite for a return to all-out warfare. Israel has established uncontested air superiority across the region, maintaining an open aerial corridor from Damascus to Tehran and, in under a week, dismantling Iran's anti-air defences and decapitating the leadership of its military and nuclear programmes. 02:37 Iran threatens to shut Strait of Hormuz after US bombs key nuclear sites Iran threatens to shut Strait of Hormuz after US bombs key nuclear sites Yet sustaining simultaneous military pressure from Gaza through Lebanon and Syria into Iran would stretch Israel's capabilities and political will beyond feasible limits. Meanwhile, the longevity of Iran's theocratic regime depends less on its ability to respond militarily than on the absence of a unified alternative. Competing factions remain fractured by divergent long-term objectives and lack the critical mass to mount a credible challenge to the existing power structure. Even if the ceasefire holds, the region's security architecture has been irrevocably altered. Iran now finds itself more isolated than at any point in recent memory, with only cyberattacks and the threat to choke off the Strait of Hormuz remaining as deterrents – or, in a more audacious gambit, coordinating with its Yemeni Houthi proxies to disrupt traffic through both the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb on the Red Sea. Neither scenario seems imminent, but both remain potent instruments in Tehran's diminishing arsenal. Both Iran and the Houthi militants possess extensive and varied mine warfare capabilities, from Soviet-era buoyant contact mines to modern, Chinese-manufactured, moored rocket-propelled mines capable of crippling the world's busiest commercial shipping corridors. Given that maritime demining is a lengthy process, reopening these vital sea lanes could take months. A view of an Iranian oil facility on Khark Island in the Persian Gulf. Photo: AFP/Getty Images/TNS

Japanese angered by Trump's Iran strike comparison to atomic bombings
Japanese angered by Trump's Iran strike comparison to atomic bombings

South China Morning Post

time9 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Japanese angered by Trump's Iran strike comparison to atomic bombings

Japanese leaders and survivors of the atomic bombings have denounced President Donald Trump 's comparison of the US strike on Iran 's nuclear facilities to the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, describing his remarks as deeply inappropriate and historically insensitive. Advertisement Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, Nagasaki Mayor Shiro Suzuki condemned Trump's comments, saying the use of nuclear weapons was 'unacceptable' no matter the circumstances – a lesson that should be self-evident from the devastating toll of the US bombing of his city on August 9, 1945. The initial explosion from the 'Fat Man' plutonium bomb killed as many as 80,000 people in Nagasaki, while many tens of thousands more died before the end of 1945 from radiation poisoning. Suzuki said he did not understand what Trump meant in his comments. If they were designed to justify the nuclear attacks on Japan , Nagasaki and its people would express 'profound regret', he added. Trump's comments, delivered during a joint press conference with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague on Wednesday, have drawn confusion and criticism for their ambiguity. Advertisement 'The damage to Iran's nuclear facilities is extremely serious. That attack ended the war. I don't want to use Hiroshima as an example. I don't want to use Nagasaki as an example. But essentially it's the same. It ended the war,' Trump said.

Why China may be keeping a close eye on Trump's Middle East moves
Why China may be keeping a close eye on Trump's Middle East moves

South China Morning Post

time9 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Why China may be keeping a close eye on Trump's Middle East moves

As the US gets more entangled in the Israel-Iran conflict , China is likely to be keeping a close watch and picking up some clues on American interventionism in regional disputes. According to one China watcher, Beijing may be a 'long-term beneficiary' of the American retreat from stable leadership, as Washington's strikes on Iran have revealed it to be an uncertain and unpredictable global power. More significantly, the conflict has revealed Washington's reluctance to engage in a prolonged war, offering the Chinese leadership clues on how the Trump administration might approach other flashpoints, including Taiwan. The US carried out air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend in an operation Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called a 'resounding success' that obliterated Iran's nuclear capabilities. It followed an intense exchange of fire between Israel and Iran that started on June 13 when Israel launched surprise air attacks on Iranian military and nuclear facilities. On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had been reached in the '12-day war' between the traditional adversaries. However, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday downplayed the impact of the US strikes, claiming that Tehran had delivered a 'slap to America's face' by striking a US airbase in Qatar over the weekend.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store