logo
Shares mixed, dollar struggles on Trumps chaotic tariffs

Shares mixed, dollar struggles on Trumps chaotic tariffs

Mint27-05-2025

SINGORE -Shares were mixed on Tuesday as U.S. President Donald Trump's postponement of his threatened 50% duties on European Union shipments reinforced the unpredictability of his trade policies and kept investor sentiment fragile.
Wall Street futures and FTSE futures were up sharply in the Asian session, following a holiday in the U.S. and the UK at the start of the week, though shares elsewhere reversed their short-lived rally.
Nasdaq futures and S&P 500 futures each rose 0.9%, while FTSE futures tacked on 0.87%, pointing to a strong open during the cash sessions later in the day following Trump's U-turn on his threat to impose 50% tariffs on imports from the EU next month, restoring a July 9 deadline.
However, MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan fell 0.55% and EUROSTOXX 50 futures eased 0.15%.
"While the delay in EU tariffs has provided a short-term boost to futures markets, underlying concerns about trade relations and upcoming economic indicators continue to weigh on investor sentiment," said Aaron Chwee, head of wealth advisory at OCBC.
A major focus for investors this week will be results from Nvidia on Wednesday, where the AI bellwether is expected to report a 65.9% jump in first-quarter revenue.
Speeches from a slew of Federal Reserve policymakers and Friday's U.S. core PCE price index are also due, which could provide clues on the outlook for U.S. rates.
In Asia, Japan's Nikkei was down 0.1%, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index eased 0.18%.
China's CSI300 blue-chip index fell 0.56%.
Yields on super-long Japanese government bonds fell early in the session, retreating from their all-time highs in the wake of last week's heavy selloff in the bonds. [JP/]
Bond yields, particularly on the long end, have surged around the world as concerns mount over growing fiscal deficits in advanced economies, led by the U.S. and Japan.
U.S. Treasury yields were steady on Tuesday, with the two-year yield last at 3.9787% and the benchmark 10-year yield at 4.4773%. [US/]
The dollar struggled to find its footing and was headed for a fifth straight month of declines against a basket of currencies, which would mark the longest such losing streak since 2017.
The euro hovered near a one-month high at $1.1379, while the yen was steady at 142.84 per dollar.
Trump's flip-flops on tariffs and concerns over the worsening U.S. deficit outlook have undermined sentiment towards U.S. assets and in turn been a drag on the dollar.
"A U.S. dollar regime change could be in the making in the long term after it appears to have peaked recently," said David Meier, an economist at Julius Baer.
"Erratic U.S. policymaking, the tense fiscal situation, and large external indebtedness, against the backdrop of the twin deficit, suggest that a weaker USD is the route of least resistance."
And as the dollar loses some of its safe-haven appeal, investors have instead sought alternatives such as gold, sending prices to record highs this year.
Gold last traded 0.3% lower at $3,331.79 an ounce. [GOL/]
Elsewhere, oil prices eased on Tuesday as investors weighed the possibility of an OPEC decision to further increase its crude oil output at a meeting later this week.
Brent crude futures declined 0.22% to $64.60 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude fell 0.33% to $61.33 per barrel.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sensex, Nifty open a tad lower amid consolidation phase
Sensex, Nifty open a tad lower amid consolidation phase

Hans India

time31 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Sensex, Nifty open a tad lower amid consolidation phase

Mumbai: Indian equity indices opened a tad lower on Tuesday as heavyweights like L&T and Bajaj Finance were trading in the red. At 9:24 am, Sensex was down 152 points or 0.19 per cent at 81,221.39 and Nifty was down 36.40 points or 0.16 per cent at 24,680.40. Buying was seen in the midcap and smallcap stocks. Nifty midcap 100 index was up 167.85 points or 0.29 per cent at 57,943.40 and Nifty smallcap 100 index was up 107.85 points or 0.60 per cent at 18,202.05. On the Sectoral front, auto, PSU Bank, pharma, metal, realty, media were major gainers. Financial services, FMCG and energy and pvt bank were major losers. According to analysts, after a flat opening, Nifty can find support at 24,700 followed by 24,600 and 24,500. On the higher side, 24,800 can be an immediate resistance, followed by 24,900 and 25,000. In the Sensex pack, Eternal (Zomato), Tata Steel, M&M, IndusInd Bank, Tata Motors and Asian Paints were major gainers. L&T, Bajaj Finance, Bharti Airtel, HUL, ICICI Bank, Axis Bank, Maruti Suzuki were major losers. Most of the Asian markets were trading in the green. Tokyo, Shanghai, Jakarta and Hong Kong were top contributors. Analysts said that during a consolidation phase, where the market moves within a range, buy on dips is the ideal strategy. 'And this strategy is working well now. With a lot of uncertainty in geopolitics, tariffs and trade the market will continue to remain volatile. Therefore, investors may persist with the strategy of buying on dips," said VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments Limited. Meanwhile, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) extended their selling for a second consecutive session on June 2 as they sold equities worth Rs 2,589 crore, while domestic institutional investors (DIIs) extended their buying on the tenth day as they bought equities of Rs 5,313 crore on the same day.

US rejects India's challenge to aluminium, steel tariffs at WTO
US rejects India's challenge to aluminium, steel tariffs at WTO

Scroll.in

time31 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

US rejects India's challenge to aluminium, steel tariffs at WTO

The United States has rejected India's notice to the World Trade Organization proposing retaliatory tariffs after Washington increased the import duties on aluminium and steel to 25%, The Indian Express reported on Tuesday. The US argued that it had imposed the tariffs on the grounds of national security and claimed there were procedural errors in India's case. In a note sent to the World Trade Organization on May 23, the US stated that India had wrongly treated the tariffs on aluminium and steel as safeguard measures, the newspaper reported. Washington said that it had imposed the levies under section 232 of the US law, which allows such measures if imports are considered a threat to national security. In response to the challenge made by India, the US told the World Trade Organization that it 'will not discuss the section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure', reported The Indian Express. The US also claimed that India had committed procedural errors by not acknowledging Washington's offer to discuss the tariffs in a communication dated April 16. 'Accordingly, India has not complied with the obligations under the Agreement on Safeguards, the agreement that it mistakenly contends applies to the tariffs in question,' the newspaper quoted the US as having said. On May 9, India notified the World Trade Organization that it may impose retaliatory tariffs on the US after Washington increased the import duties on aluminium and steel to 25%. The Donald Trump administration had first imposed higher tariffs on aluminium and steel imports in 2018. This was modified in February to impose duties of 25% on imports of the two metals. The measures took effect in March. Washington also removed country-specific and product-specific exemptions that several countries had managed to negotiate. On Friday, US President Donald Trump announced that his administration will double the tariffs on steel to 50%. While Washington has claimed that the increased tariffs had been taken in the interest of national security and were not safeguard measures, New Delhi argued that the actions were safeguard measures. 'The measures have not been notified by the United States to the WTO, but are, in essence, safeguard measures,' The Hindu had quoted India as having communicated to the international organisation in May. 'India maintains that the measures taken by the United States are not consistent with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards.' India argued that it had the right to impose retaliatory tariffs as the US had not held consultations, as are mandatory under the Agreement on Safeguards. India's levies were to take effect a month from the date it notified the World Trade Organization. New Delhi said that the measures it was proposing would be in the form of suspending concessions on select products from the US. This effectively meant an increase in tariffs on the products. The Indian reciprocal tariffs could be imposed on imports worth $7.6 billion from the United States, which would lead to a duty collection of $1.9 billion, The Hindu had quoted the communication as saying.

Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, says no uranium enrichment
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, says no uranium enrichment

Business Standard

time40 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, says no uranium enrichment

President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment programme as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the US, have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. "Under our potential Agreement WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!" Trump wrote on social media. Addressing the seeming contradiction, a White House official said Trump was speaking the "cold, hard truth." The official said the terms the US gave the Iranians were "very tough" and would make it impossible for them to obtain a nuclear bomb. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The US and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials, including Witkoff and Trump himself, have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by a US official, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity and withdrew the US from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the UN nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. "President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. "Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media." The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the Administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbours. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programmes. "This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal," Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store