Scotland's deficit grew by £5.1bn, Government estimate shows
For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.2 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.6% of the country's GDP.
The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland.
Minus £26,188,000
Scotland's net fiscal balance in 2024-25 Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland
The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.'
Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion.
Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24.
'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border.
He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels.
Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said voters north of the border will expect 'better outcomes' from higher levels per person of public spending (Ben Whitley/PA)
'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average.
'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.'
Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'.
She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure.
'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.'
She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'.
Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours Shona Robison, Scottish Finance Secretary
Arguing the figures highlight the 'limit' of devolved powers, Ms Robison said while the Scottish Government is responsible for more than 60% of public expenditure north of the border, it only controls 'around 30% of revenue'.
The Finance Secretary told journalists: 'As an independent Scotland we would have the powers to make different choices, different budgetary results, to build a stronger economy and enable Scotland to be a fairer, wealthier and greener country.'
She pointed to Ireland, saying GDP there had grown 12.5% over the last year, with a budget surplus of 24 billion euros (£20.7 billion) in 2024.
Ms Robison hailed that as an example of 'what a small independent country, one of our nearest neighbours, is able to do with the full powers of independence'.
She said: 'What we want, through the powers of independence, is to be able to make our own decisions.
'If you look at Ireland and what they have been able to do with the powers they have, it's like night and day compared to the economic conditions of the UK economy or the Scottish economy.
'Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours, whether it is Ireland, or some of our Scandinavian neighbours.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
35 minutes ago
- Daily Record
We won't splash Lennon Miller cash, but it will stabilise the club, says Motherwell boss
Jens Berthel Askou says the club record fee from Udinese will be used sensibly Motherwell boss Jens Berthel Askou says he won't be splashing the cash from Lennon Miller's £5m move to Udinese – but it will help to stabilise the club. Miller, 18, moved to the Serie A club for a club record fee, on a five-year deal, and while Askou wants to strengthen his squad, he's not going to splash money about carelessly. On Miller's life-changing move, Askou said: 'The big headline is it's a fantastic deal for Motherwell FC and everybody who's involved in the club, the supporters, everyone who has played a part in his development, his pathway. 'Obviously for Motherwell in the future it will also benefit us, and it's a fantastic deal for Lennon himself, and also for Scottish football to send one of its most promising talents into a very good and competitive league. 'We are really happy on his behalf, and on everyone's behalf, who is a part of Motherwell FC. 'In the short time I've been here I've seen a very intelligent football player, who is also very composed and relaxed and good at dealing with pressure, and I expect him to do really well there. 'Coming to Italy there is a bit of adapting to the language, the style and a higher level, but I think he will adapt really well. 'I'm excited on his behalf, and I think we should be, all of us, and it's going to be really interesting to see him grow. He's still very young. 'I'm quite convinced that he's got a very bright future ahead of him at Udinese, and he will be able to take the next step as a football player.' Askou says there will be aspects of the Fir Park club that will be strengthened with the cash, and they'll future-proof themselves. He said: 'We still have a few things to do [with the squad], we've been open about that, but we're not going to name specific positions. 'We're doing our best and things are moving on in the right direction, and we're still working within our framework and budget, and driving this club forward, sustainably. 'When you make a big deal like we've done now, it's not going to be splashed, it's going to be benefiting Motherwell, a little bit short-term, but in general on the long-term, so we can produce the next Lennon Miller in the future and we'll be able to be more competitive as a club and keep progressing. 'We're not going to risk the club and the balance within the club, and the structure, because we've been in the Premiership for many years and we want to keep doing what we do. 'But we've taken some steps to modernising the club, within the framework that we have, and we're not going to risk that by over-spending and taking quick decisions. 'We're doing things at the right speed and tempo, so that we have a good and healthy club in months, years and decades to come. 'I'm not going to expose how we approach that [transfer fee], but there's a good and healthy plan, which I back up completely, how to get the best out of the possibilities it has given the club, both in short and long-term. 'We're not going to change our approach to the way we drive the football club, from a financial point of view, but it gives us some stability and opportunities to maybe think of some of the long-term investments we know we need to do, and maybe speed that process up a little bit, which is very positive.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow Chamber of Commerce back O2 ABC site plans
The plans, approved by Glasgow City Council on June 17, are for a nine-storey block of student flats that would include a ground-floor food hall. We reported last month that Scottish Government ministers have intervened in the controversial development on Glasgow's Sauchiehall Street, and will now make the final decision on whether it can go ahead. Now, as part of the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division's case, the Chief Executive of the Chamber of Commerce has given his support to the plans. The plans were approved by the council last month (Image: Vita Group) READ MORE: Scottish Government intervene in Glasgow O2 ABC site plans READ MORE: Government called on to intervene in Glasgow O2 ABC plans In a letter submitted to the case, Chief Exec Stuart Patrick, said: "I am writing on behalf of the Glasgow Chamber of Commerce to reiterate our strong support for the above planning application, which has now been called in by Scottish Ministers. "We believe this development, comprising purpose-built student accommodation and a foodhall at 292-332 Sauchiehall Street, remains vital to the regeneration and future prosperity of Glasgow city centre. "Glasgow Chamber of Commerce has served as the voice of business in the city since 1783. "Our mission is to support our members, promote Glasgow as a competitive business location, and foster sustainable economic growth locally and beyond. "We continue to advocate for developments that address pressing urban challenges while unlocking long-term economic and social value. "This proposal achieves both. "By expanding student accommodation capacity, the development responds to the significant shortfall that threatens the growth ambitions of Glasgow's universities and places undue strain on the private rental sector. "The project also advances Glasgow City Council's long-standing goal of repopulating the city centre. "The combination of new residents, vibrant public space, and a dynamic foodhall will reinvigorate a currently derelict site, left vacant since the 2018 Glasgow School of Art fire, and generate renewed footfall for surrounding businesses. "The Chamber believes that this development will act as a catalyst for further investment and regeneration along Sauchiehall Street and the wider city centre. "It presents a well-considered opportunity to enhance Glasgow's urban offering and cultural vibrancy in a way that benefits students, local communities, and the business ecosystem alike. "In light of its strategic importance and wide-ranging benefits, we urge Scottish Ministers to support this application and enable delivery of a high-quality, transformative project for Glasgow." The site was ravaged by fire in 2014 and 2018 (Image: Newsquest) READ MORE: Glasgow heritage groups slam approval of O2 ABC site plans The appeal case comes after a motion submitted by Labour MSP Paul Sweeney. The motion highlights concerns that the development would obstruct key vistas to and from the adjacent, 'internationally significant', Category A-listed Mackintosh Building at the Glasgow School of Art, as well as from the nearby Category A-listed Centre for Contemporary Arts. In a notice published by the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) last month, stakeholders were informed that SNP ministers had taken control of the decision on the future of the half-demolished O2 ABC site 'in view of the proposed development's potential impact on the nationally important Category A-listed Glasgow School of Art'. Glasgow's heritage groups welcomed the news that they were intervening after previously slamming the council's decision to approve the plans. The Art School say the plans put the Mack's rebuild 'significantly at risk' (Image: Newsquest/Colin Mearns) The Glasgow School of Art has repeatedly slammed the plans, stating that the approval "places their commitment to deliver the faithful reinstatement of the Mackintosh Building as a fully utilised purpose-designed art school at significant risk." A row erupted between the Art School and the owners of the O2 ABC over the plans for the site. The owners of the fire-ravaged Sauchiehall Street building hit out at the Art School over their objections to new plans for the derelict site. A document shared with the Glasgow Times said that the Glasgow School of Art (GSoA) haven't been engaging in discussions and that they're 'acting almost like authoritarian-like dictators rather than neighbours'.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The National's latest journalistic mishap
Well, well, well. Back to Scotland's self-identifying 'newspaper', which has planted itself at the centre of a row over the delisting of a gender critical book from a national library exhibition. Women's rights campaigners flagged concerns after The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht – a selection of gender critical essays – was removed from the National Library of Scotland's Dear Library exhibition, after having been previously selected. The Times ran the initial story, titled 'censorship row as library bans gender-critical book'. The National then took it upon themselves to claim this wasn't true – insisting the National Library had 'debunked' accusations of censorship. But Scotland's only pro-independence newspaper doesn't appear to have examined the facts all that thoroughly – and has even been accused of defamation over its piece. Crikey! For the institution's Dear Library display, the public had been asked to nominate books that had helped shape their lives. A selection of these would then be included in a ten-month exhibition celebrating the library's centenary. The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht received twice as many nominations required to guarantee inclusion in the display, and its selection was assessed using equality, diversity and inclusion criteria, according to emails seen via Freedom of Information requests. Internal memos outline why the book was to be included in the display: multiple people put it forward, it was to be one of 200 books 'not being platformed or elevated above others' and that the removal of the book from the exhibition list would prompt 'an accusation of censorship'. Consequently an email was circulated that confirmed The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht was to be included in the exhibition. But not everyone was willing to accept this reasoning. The library's internal staff LGBT network mounted a campaign to remove the gender-critical tome from the selection. In one email, a staff member queried whether 'a non-fiction work advocating for racist, homophobic or other discriminatory and exclusionary viewpoints' would have passed vetting and been selected for the curated display. Some even claimed that the book 'essentially promotes hate speech to a particular'. Pressure piled on Amina Shah, the national librarian, who eventually caved in to the outrage. For its part, the National Library of Scotland said in a statement that while 523 books had been nominated, only 200 could be displayed, adding: 'Anyone can visit our reading rooms and access this book as well as the 200 other titles that were not selected for display.' The National was quick to jump on accusations of censorship by the book's authors, Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn – and even released a video in which one of their reporters attempted a fact check: You may have heard that a gender critical book has been banned from an exhibition by the National Library of Scotland. Well, it hasn't. It's not true… Editors have claimed their book is being excluded after pressure from staff. They've called it censorship… They said the book was singled out by staff, who they say had threatened to disrupt the exhibition if it was included. But here's the truth. Their book is one of 200 others not to have been selected for the exhibition. The book is in the National Library. Anyone can read it. It's just not in a showcase celebrating Scotland's literary milestones, which is a curated selection, not an open mic. It seems to have escaped the attention of the paper's sharpest minds that the book, er, was initially included before being subsequently removed due to pressure – with there being email evidence to back the development up. Hunter Blackburn has claimed the journal's video is defamatory – effectively accused the book's authors of lying – while Dalgety has urged the newspaper to apologise. Never let the facts get in the way of a good story, eh?
