
Zohran Mamdani shakes up directionless Democrats
'And where I am from, I like the heat,' he says, smiling. He speaks with a strong Indian accent even though he has been living in the city for decades. He lives in Jersey and commutes to the city to work. We chat for a while about the day's big events: he hope the
Israel-Iran
ceasefire will hold and believes that
Donald Trump
is sincere in his hatred for war.
But he rolls his eyes and shakes his head at the mention of Zohran Mamdani's electrifying New York City Democratic Party
mayoral primary victory
the night before. 'I cannot understand why all of these people come here from the East if they do not want to enjoy capitalism,' he says.
Mamdani, he predicts, would be a disaster if elected as mayor and would catapult the city back to the folkloric deprivations of the 1970s – the ghettos, the crime-stalked nights, the blackouts, the streets lined with uncollected rubbish. As it turns out, in his paean to capitalism, he is echoing the words of New York's biggest landlord.
READ MORE
'You want to have leadership that speaks to what New York is,' Scott Rechler told the New York Times. 'It's the capital of capitalism.'
[
This man could be just what the American left needs
Opens in new window
]
The scale of Mamdani's win over the returning patriarchal figure of Andrew Cuomo – who conceded defeat less than an hour after the polls closed on a broiling Tuesday night – has terrified the captains of industry and commerce. The late-night conservative talkshows forecast a future of New York entrepreneurs and wealth creators fleeing a city run by a socialist – or, as Trump has labelled Mamdani, 'a communist lunatic'.
Cuomo's numbers were so disheartening that he has yet to confirm his intention to continue against Mamdani as an independent in the November vote.
New York political affiliations are 6:1 Democratic. Mike Bloomberg was the last Republican mayor, and he threw his financial heft behind Cuomo's underwhelming campaign. By Wednesday, the Wall Steet Journal headline read: 'Wall Street panics over prospect of a socialist running New York City.'
New York city mayor Eric Adams formally announces his re-election campaign. Photograph: Hilary Swift/New York Times
They needed a saviour. But who could that blue-caped hero be? A familiar face, it turned out. Barely had the floor been swept after Mamdani's Tuesday night victory party at a rooftop bar in Long Island City than current mayor Eric Adams was charting the next phase of a wily political career.
After meeting business leaders, he officially announced his campaign as an independent. In 2022 Adams was inaugurated as a Democratic mayor but his popularity plummeted after he was indicted on bribery and campaign finances charges, which were quashed by the Trump administration. Adams had dismissed Mamdani as a 'snake-oil salesman' at the beginning of the campaign, prompting the memorable New York Post headline 'Scamdani'.
[
Eric Adams, the swaggering, 'weird' mayor of New York, is the first to face indictment in the office's 360-year history
Opens in new window
]
Adams has laid out the blueprint for the narrative behind his bid to return to office for a second term after a mayoral race that will intensify once the summer distractions of the Mets and Yankees are over with.
To Adams, Mamdani is a princeling: a privileged son of academics voicing socialistic rhetoric and promising to cure the struggles of which he knows nothing. A Mamdani mayorship would, he warned, see a defunding of the city's police force and a rise in crime – and fear – among the 4.6 million subway users in the city's five boroughs.
Free bus transport, childcare costs, rent control and a vision of city-owned price-controlled grocery stores featured strong in the Mamdani manifesto, which has propelled him towards the Democratic candidacy. He says corporate tax hikes and a tax raise for the wealthy will meet the costs of the policies. He has also vowed to end Adams's practice of co-operation with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) raids to deport immigrants.
Crime will rise, Adams warned. The money will leave the city.
'Most troubling is his calls to give everything away free. Nothing is more troubling when people are struggling [than making] promises that can't be lived up to.'
Adams possesses a blue-collar triumph-over-adversity life-story, flipping a childhood of extreme poverty in late 1960s Bushwick and juvenile delinquency into a 20-year career in the police force followed by a political life where he navigated his way through the ranks with guile and persistence. His pitch will be that he has lived the struggles and life experience that Mamdani is purporting to champion. He will also stoke the fears of anti-Semitism that Mamdani has persistently rejected, arguing that he is pro-Palestinian.
'I think the Jewish community should be concerned,' he said this week. 'It is problematic when you have a socialist who is displaying anti-Semitic views to be able to run and be elected in New York City.'
This hits hard.
— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee)
The Maga right has responded to Mamdani's triumph with predictable performative alarmism. Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted a digitally altered image of the Statue of Liberty shrouded in a black burka with the caption 'This hit hard'. Meanwhile, Tennessee Republican congressman Andy Ogle posted a copy of the letter he sent to attorney general Pam Bondi on Thursday requesting that Mamdani be investigated to establish if he should be subject to denaturalisation proceedings on the grounds that he may have procured US citizenship by 'concealment of material support for terrorism'.
Mamdani has, during the course of a campaign for which he was a rank outsider just months ago, spoken of the racism he has faced since declaring himself in a field of 11 candidates.
'I get messages which say the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim. I get threats on my life, and on the people that I love, and I try not to talk about it. Because the function of racism, as Toni Morrison said, is distraction. My focus has always been on making this a city that is affordable, on making this a city that New Yorkers can see themselves in. And it takes a toll.
'Because this is a city that every single person deserves to be in, a city we all belong to and the thing that makes me proudest in this campaign is that the strength of our movement is built on our ability to have built something across Jewish and Muslim New Yorkers; across New Yorkers of all faiths, all backgrounds and all boroughs.
'Anti-Semitism is such a real issue in the city. And it has been hard to see it weaponised by candidates who do not seem to have any sincere interest in tackling [it] but rather in using it as a pretext to make political points.'
Zohran Mamdani celebrates with his wife, Rama Duwaji, at a Democratic primary night gathering in New York on Tuesday. Photograph: Shuran Huang/New York Times
In short, the November race will be riveting and personal and deeply unpleasant. And Mamdani's sudden emergence into the national spotlight, redolent of
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
's shock 2018 midterm win over Joe Crowley, presents the addled party with a new dilemma. Nimble and persuasive and inspiring as Mamdani's campaign was, he still earned just 430,000 votes. It's a mere 10th of the city's population. He will need to build on that if he is topple the Adams-led resistance to change.
And there are cross-party concerns that Mamdani simply does not have the experience to run the mayor's office having entered politics just four years ago.
Against that, his campaign, wedded to a clear vision and ideology based around the concerns of ordinary city workers, has cast in sharp contrasting illumination the muddled, directionless present of the Democratic Party as a whole. New York party grandees Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries both congratulated the 33-year-old on his win but have not formally endorsed him. Ocasio-Cortez supported him early and vocally. And a significant city show of support was offered on Wednesday by congressman Jerrold Nadler, whose constituency includes the influential and heavily Jewish Upper West Side of Manhattan.
Nadler compared Mamdani's breakthrough as comparable to Barack Obama's day-star rise in 2008. 'Voters in New York City demanded change and, with Zohran's triumph we have a direct repudiation of Donald Trump's tax cuts and authoritarianism,' he said.
Nadler's support will help to assuage doubts among the city's Jewish community. Primary election maps depicted Cuomo's successes in Manhattan as being limited to the Upper West and Upper East sides of the city, as well as the Bronx and the outer reaches of Queens. If Cuomo decides to bow out, Adams will seek to build on those boroughs.
But a recent Marist poll showed Mamdani, despite his brandishing of Binyamin Netanyahu as a 'war criminal' during the campaign, had garnered 20 per cent support among Jewish New Yorkers intending to vote and now, Nadler has vowed to work with the candidate and with 'all New Yorkers to fight against all bigotry and hate.'
An epic political autumn awaits New York.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
European leaders to discuss potential security guarantees for Ukraine with Donald Trump
The leaders of Ukraine and several other European states will discuss potential future security guarantees for the war-torn country with US president Donald Trump on Monday. The meeting follows a summit held in Alaska on Friday between Mr Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin, and claims by a White House envoy that Russia has dropped its opposition to the West providing Nato-style defence pledges to Kyiv. Steve Witkoff said: 'We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato.' The Article 5 clause of Nato's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence, the notion that an attack on a single member is considered an attack on them all. READ MORE He told US television on Sunday that this is a 'game changing decision' and 'the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that'. He did not provide details of what was discussed. There are concerns among Ukraine's supporters that Volodymyr Zelenskiy could face significant pressure in Washington on Monday, given his February talks with Mr Trump in the Oval Office descended into a shouting match . However, this time he is expected to be accompanied in Washington by the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, the UK and Finland, along with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen . Mr Trump's relations with European leaders can be prickly, and it is notable that the group includes several who he reportedly likes: Italy's Giorgia Meloni , Britain's Keir Starmer , Finland's Alexander Stubb and Mr Rutte of Nato. [ The Irish Times view on the Trump-Putin summit: a shameful day in Alaska Opens in new window ] European leaders who make up the 'coalition of the willing' on Sunday agreed Russia would face more sanctions and wider economic measures if it does not stop its bombardment of Ukraine. Speaking after the virtual conference, which was co-chaired by Mr Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron , Mr Zelenskiy said: 'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine.' 'We need security to work in practice like Article 5 of Nato,' he said. Mr Zelenskiy said he also considers EU accession to be 'part of the security guarantees'. Taoiseach Micheál Martin, who also participated in Sunday's conference, said Ukraine needs 'strong, credible, long-term security guarantees', which means EU membership and sustained support from Europe and the US. [ Ukraine has right to make decisions on its territory, says Taoiseach after Trump comments Opens in new window ] Meanwhile, US secretary of state Marco Rubio said there will 'have to be some security guarantees for Ukraine' because 'if this war were to end, they have to make sure this never happens again'. [ Trump pressing Ukraine for a quick deal after failed summit is a clear triumph for Putin Opens in new window ] 'For there (to) be a peace, the Russian side is going to have to accept that Ukraine is a sovereign country that has a right to defend itself and has a right to enter into alliances with other countries to defend itself,' he added. 'What guarantees are built in there that are enforceable, that's what we'll be talking about over the next few days.' Russia's core demands include Ukraine's handover of five regions, agreement to abandon its bid to join Nato and acceptance of other limits on its sovereignty. Kyiv says any such deal would amount to capitulation. The Kremlin has previously rejected the prospect of western peacekeepers overseeing a deal to end the war. The Alaska summit was widely seen as a victory for Mr Putin, because Mr Trump scrapped a threat to impose more heavy sanctions on Russia and dropped demands for an immediate ceasefire in favour of Moscow's call for an overarching agreement to end the war. After the summit, which was lauded by the Kremlin, Mr Trump publicly urged Kyiv to 'make a deal' while reportedly telling Mr Zelenskiy that Russia was demanding the full withdrawal of Ukraine's forces from its Donetsk and Luhansk regions.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Trump-Putin summit: a shameful day in Alaska
Ideology and personal idiosyncrasy play a large part in the dynamics of the Trump administration, alongside the urge to create spectacle and dominate the news cycle. That was all on display during Friday's Trump-Putin summit in Alaska. But another recurring theme was also glaringly obvious: the US president's submissive sycophancy towards autocrats in general and the Russian leader in particular. The aftermath has left Ukraine facing the prospect of a peace plan that looks very like capitulation. The day after the meeting, Trump broke with Kyiv and its European allies by backing Putin's proposal for a sweeping settlement based on Ukraine ceding territory it still controls. That is not a path to peace but the validation of conquest. Before the meeting, Trump had insisted a ceasefire was his urgent priority. That stance has been abandoned. He now believes a rapid deal is possible if Ukraine hands over the remainder of the Donbas, including areas not occupied by Russian troops. In exchange, Putin has offered a ceasefire along current battle lines and a written promise never to strike Ukraine or Europe again. History offers ample evidence of the hollowness of such promises. Only days ago, Trump was threatening new economic penalties should Putin walk away from Alaska without a deal. Those threats have now been shelved. Once again, the US has moved at Putin's pace, not its own. READ MORE European leaders have been scrambling to adjust to the new reality. France, Germany and the UK reaffirmed their stance that there could be no discussion of peace until the killing stops. Privately, officials expressed disbelief at Trump's claim that 'all' had agreed to leapfrog a ceasefire. Volodymyr Zelenskiy was excluded from the Anchorage talks, watching from afar as Trump indulged Putin's maximalist demands. European leaders including Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz, Keir Starmer and Ursula von der Leyen will now join Zelenskiy for Monday's meeting with Trump in Washington. Their task is clear but daunting: to re-anchor American policy in the shared Western strategy that Trump has just casually discarded. Their efforts will be especially focused on clarifying the vague and deeply unsatisfactory statements on security guarantees that have emanated from Washington over the past 48 hours. Trump's bowing of the knee to Putin undermines Western unity, weakens Ukraine's negotiating hand and signals to Moscow that aggression yields rewards. That is not diplomacy in the service of peace. It is theatre in the service of vanity. The cost will not be measured in news headlines but in Ukrainian lives and in the further erosion of trust between the US and its allies. What unfolded in Alaska was not statesmanship. It was appeasement.

The Journal
8 hours ago
- The Journal
'You can restore children's melodic laughter': Melania Trump sends letter to Vladimir Putin
FIRST LADY MELANIA Trump has written Russian President Vladimir Putin a letter imploring him to 'serve humanity himself' and urging him to restore peace to Ukraine – without mentioning the country. In her letter, which her husband US President Donald Trump then posted to his social media platform Truth Social, the former model and mother of one wrote: 'as parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope'. She said that every child shares the same 'quiet dreams in their heart', no matter the location they are born to, and dream of love and safety. 'Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded,' the First Lady wrote. Advertisement 'A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology. 'Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them — a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter.' Donald Trump / Truth Social Donald Trump / Truth Social / Truth Social She added that in 'protecting the innocence of these children', Putin will serve both Russia and humanity itself. 'Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. 'It is time,' she concluded the letter. Related Reads Trump and Putin end meeting in Alaska with no deal on Ukraine but insist 'progress' was made The 55-year-old has largely evaded the spotlight since her husband assumed the role of President earlier this year for the second time. Her letter follows her husband's summit with the Russian President in Alaska on Friday, in which the two engaged in talks regarding the war in Ukraine, but ultimately left the US state having come to no agreement. Donald Trump is to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy tomorrow in the White House, after he initially faced criticism for meeting with the Russian leader without Zelenskyy present. European leaders will join Zelenskyy in Washington , which he will be returning to six months on from his solo visit in February that ended in sharp words and international discourse. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal