
Zohran Mamdani shakes up directionless Democrats
The man says he usually goes for walks on his lunch hour in Manhattan but on a furiously hot Wednesday it would be foolhardy, so he is sitting on a wall shaded by trees at the Columbus Circle entrance to Central Park.
'And where I am from, I like the heat,' he says, smiling. He speaks with a strong Indian accent even though he has been living in the city for decades. He lives in Jersey and commutes to the city to work. We chat for a while about the day's big events: he hope the
Israel-Iran
ceasefire will hold and believes that
Donald Trump
is sincere in his hatred for war.
But he rolls his eyes and shakes his head at the mention of Zohran Mamdani's electrifying New York City Democratic Party
mayoral primary victory
the night before. 'I cannot understand why all of these people come here from the East if they do not want to enjoy capitalism,' he says.
Mamdani, he predicts, would be a disaster if elected as mayor and would catapult the city back to the folkloric deprivations of the 1970s – the ghettos, the crime-stalked nights, the blackouts, the streets lined with uncollected rubbish. As it turns out, in his paean to capitalism, he is echoing the words of New York's biggest landlord.
READ MORE
'You want to have leadership that speaks to what New York is,' Scott Rechler told the New York Times. 'It's the capital of capitalism.'
[
This man could be just what the American left needs
Opens in new window
]
The scale of Mamdani's win over the returning patriarchal figure of Andrew Cuomo – who conceded defeat less than an hour after the polls closed on a broiling Tuesday night – has terrified the captains of industry and commerce. The late-night conservative talkshows forecast a future of New York entrepreneurs and wealth creators fleeing a city run by a socialist – or, as Trump has labelled Mamdani, 'a communist lunatic'.
Cuomo's numbers were so disheartening that he has yet to confirm his intention to continue against Mamdani as an independent in the November vote.
New York political affiliations are 6:1 Democratic. Mike Bloomberg was the last Republican mayor, and he threw his financial heft behind Cuomo's underwhelming campaign. By Wednesday, the Wall Steet Journal headline read: 'Wall Street panics over prospect of a socialist running New York City.'
New York city mayor Eric Adams formally announces his re-election campaign. Photograph: Hilary Swift/New York Times
They needed a saviour. But who could that blue-caped hero be? A familiar face, it turned out. Barely had the floor been swept after Mamdani's Tuesday night victory party at a rooftop bar in Long Island City than current mayor Eric Adams was charting the next phase of a wily political career.
After meeting business leaders, he officially announced his campaign as an independent. In 2022 Adams was inaugurated as a Democratic mayor but his popularity plummeted after he was indicted on bribery and campaign finances charges, which were quashed by the Trump administration. Adams had dismissed Mamdani as a 'snake-oil salesman' at the beginning of the campaign, prompting the memorable New York Post headline 'Scamdani'.
[
Eric Adams, the swaggering, 'weird' mayor of New York, is the first to face indictment in the office's 360-year history
Opens in new window
]
Adams has laid out the blueprint for the narrative behind his bid to return to office for a second term after a mayoral race that will intensify once the summer distractions of the Mets and Yankees are over with.
To Adams, Mamdani is a princeling: a privileged son of academics voicing socialistic rhetoric and promising to cure the struggles of which he knows nothing. A Mamdani mayorship would, he warned, see a defunding of the city's police force and a rise in crime – and fear – among the 4.6 million subway users in the city's five boroughs.
Free bus transport, childcare costs, rent control and a vision of city-owned price-controlled grocery stores featured strong in the Mamdani manifesto, which has propelled him towards the Democratic candidacy. He says corporate tax hikes and a tax raise for the wealthy will meet the costs of the policies. He has also vowed to end Adams's practice of co-operation with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) raids to deport immigrants.
Crime will rise, Adams warned. The money will leave the city.
'Most troubling is his calls to give everything away free. Nothing is more troubling when people are struggling [than making] promises that can't be lived up to.'
Adams possesses a blue-collar triumph-over-adversity life-story, flipping a childhood of extreme poverty in late 1960s Bushwick and juvenile delinquency into a 20-year career in the police force followed by a political life where he navigated his way through the ranks with guile and persistence. His pitch will be that he has lived the struggles and life experience that Mamdani is purporting to champion. He will also stoke the fears of anti-Semitism that Mamdani has persistently rejected, arguing that he is pro-Palestinian.
'I think the Jewish community should be concerned,' he said this week. 'It is problematic when you have a socialist who is displaying anti-Semitic views to be able to run and be elected in New York City.'
This hits hard.
— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee)
The Maga right has responded to Mamdani's triumph with predictable performative alarmism. Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted a digitally altered image of the Statue of Liberty shrouded in a black burka with the caption 'This hit hard'. Meanwhile, Tennessee Republican congressman Andy Ogle posted a copy of the letter he sent to attorney general Pam Bondi on Thursday requesting that Mamdani be investigated to establish if he should be subject to denaturalisation proceedings on the grounds that he may have procured US citizenship by 'concealment of material support for terrorism'.
Mamdani has, during the course of a campaign for which he was a rank outsider just months ago, spoken of the racism he has faced since declaring himself in a field of 11 candidates.
'I get messages which say the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim. I get threats on my life, and on the people that I love, and I try not to talk about it. Because the function of racism, as Toni Morrison said, is distraction. My focus has always been on making this a city that is affordable, on making this a city that New Yorkers can see themselves in. And it takes a toll.
'Because this is a city that every single person deserves to be in, a city we all belong to and the thing that makes me proudest in this campaign is that the strength of our movement is built on our ability to have built something across Jewish and Muslim New Yorkers; across New Yorkers of all faiths, all backgrounds and all boroughs.
'Anti-Semitism is such a real issue in the city. And it has been hard to see it weaponised by candidates who do not seem to have any sincere interest in tackling [it] but rather in using it as a pretext to make political points.'
Zohran Mamdani celebrates with his wife, Rama Duwaji, at a Democratic primary night gathering in New York on Tuesday. Photograph: Shuran Huang/New York Times
In short, the November race will be riveting and personal and deeply unpleasant. And Mamdani's sudden emergence into the national spotlight, redolent of
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
's shock 2018 midterm win over Joe Crowley, presents the addled party with a new dilemma. Nimble and persuasive and inspiring as Mamdani's campaign was, he still earned just 430,000 votes. It's a mere 10th of the city's population. He will need to build on that if he is topple the Adams-led resistance to change.
And there are cross-party concerns that Mamdani simply does not have the experience to run the mayor's office having entered politics just four years ago.
Against that, his campaign, wedded to a clear vision and ideology based around the concerns of ordinary city workers, has cast in sharp contrasting illumination the muddled, directionless present of the Democratic Party as a whole. New York party grandees Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries both congratulated the 33-year-old on his win but have not formally endorsed him. Ocasio-Cortez supported him early and vocally. And a significant city show of support was offered on Wednesday by congressman Jerrold Nadler, whose constituency includes the influential and heavily Jewish Upper West Side of Manhattan.
Nadler compared Mamdani's breakthrough as comparable to Barack Obama's day-star rise in 2008. 'Voters in New York City demanded change and, with Zohran's triumph we have a direct repudiation of Donald Trump's tax cuts and authoritarianism,' he said.
Nadler's support will help to assuage doubts among the city's Jewish community. Primary election maps depicted Cuomo's successes in Manhattan as being limited to the Upper West and Upper East sides of the city, as well as the Bronx and the outer reaches of Queens. If Cuomo decides to bow out, Adams will seek to build on those boroughs.
But a recent Marist poll showed Mamdani, despite his brandishing of Binyamin Netanyahu as a 'war criminal' during the campaign, had garnered 20 per cent support among Jewish New Yorkers intending to vote and now, Nadler has vowed to work with the candidate and with 'all New Yorkers to fight against all bigotry and hate.'
An epic political autumn awaits New York.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Netanyahu asks court to suspend corruption trial so he can focus on possible Gaza ceasefire
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has said efforts are being made with the US to follow the military victory over Iran with a regional diplomatic initiative to end the war in Gaza and expand regional peace agreements. Mr Netanyahu said: 'We've been working on it energetically. Along with releasing our hostages and defeating Hamas , there is an opportunity, a window of opportunity has opened, and it can't be missed. Not even a single day can be wasted.' Mr Netanyahu asked the Tel Aviv district court to suspend proceedings in his corruption trial for two weeks so that he can devote more time to a possible ceasefire deal. The court rejected the request. US president Donald Trump , in a bizarre social media post, recently called for the trial to end, writing: 'Bibi Netanyahu's trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State.' READ MORE Mr Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust – all of which he denies. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. He has pleaded not guilty. Mr Trump's message appeared to be linked to a wider push for regional peace and an effort to prepare public opinion in Israel for a move to pardon Mr Netanyahu. There was speculation in the Israeli media that the initiative for Mr Trump's message may have come from the prime minister's office. Opposition politicians and legal experts have criticised Mr Trump's comments as a blatant interference in Israel's internal affairs, but coalition members are considering the promotion of a Bill to cancel the trial. US officials have spoken in recent days of progress in efforts to reach a Gaza ceasefire, noting that the defeat of Iran, the main backer of Hamas, has put extra pressure on the militant group. Senior Trump administration officials have urged Israel to send its negotiation team to Cairo next week, but Israeli officials have indicated such a move was premature. [ Two tribes: How Israel and Iran became enemies Opens in new window ] Israel is not willing to commit to an end to the war and Hamas refuses to disarm and agree that its leaders will leave Gaza as part of any deal. According to the Yisrael Hayom newspaper, as part of the emerging US plan to end the war, new countries including Saudi Arabia and Syria would join the Abraham Accords – the series of normalisation that Mr Trump's administration negotiated between Israel and some Gulf countries during his first term. Oman, Qatar and Indonesia have also been mentioned as states that may join the Abraham Accords if the conflict ends. As part of the deal, Israel would be required to commit to supporting a future Palestinian state. According to the plan, after Hamas leaders are exiled, four Arab states, including the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, would be tasked with jointly governing Gaza and supervising reconstruction efforts. Gazans wishing to emigrate would be absorbed by several unnamed countries, even though no country has expressed a willingness to absorb Gaza residents. Gazans reacted angrily in February when Mr Trump suggested the US could develop Gaza and force Palestinians to go elsewhere. The plan drew global condemnation with Palestinians, Arab nations and the UN saying it would amount to ethnic cleansing. The war began when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7th, 2023, killing nearly 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 others hostage into Gaza. [ Why have oil prices not soared in wake of Israel and US bombing Iran? ] In response, Israel launched a military campaign that has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians, according to health authorities in Gaza. A large majority of people in Israel want the conflict to end. In the last month 20 soldiers have been killed. A poll on Friday showed that 59 per cent of Israelis support ending the war in a deal that would bring back all 50 remaining hostages, of whom 20 are believed to be alive.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails ‘giant win' as supreme court rules on his birthright citizenship order
The US Supreme Court agreed on Friday to allow president Donald Trump to end birthright citizenship in some parts of the country, even as legal challenges to the constitutionality of the move proceed in other regions. The 6:3 decision, which was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and split along ideological lines, is a major victory for Mr Trump, and may allow the reshaping, even temporarily, of how citizenship is granted in the US. The order will not go into effect for 30 days, the justices said in their opinion, allowing its legality to be contested further. Mr Trump has hailed the ruling a 'giant win' and is due to hold a news conference at the White House shortly. READ MORE 'GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social. The justices also did not address the underlying constitutionality of the president's order to curtail birthright citizenship, potentially leaving that issue for another day. The court's ruling appeared to upend the ability of single federal judges to freeze policies across the country, a powerful tool that has been used frequently in recent years to block policies instituted by Democratic and Republican administrations. Justices across the ideological spectrum had been critical of these so-called nationwide injunctions, arguing they encouraged judge-shopping and improperly circumvented the political process by allowing one judge to halt a policy nationwide. The surprise decision means that an executive order signed by Mr Trump ending the practice of extending citizenship to the children of unauthorised immigrants born in the US would be set to take effect in 30 days in the 28 states that have not challenged the measure. The details of how the policy would be implemented were not immediately clear. The ability of a single federal judge in one part of the country to pause a policy nationwide has been a major stumbling block for Mr Trump. These so-called nationwide injunctions are controversial judicial tools, and have prompted intense debate over their legality. Federal trial judges have consistently ruled against the Trump administration, stymieing efforts to withhold funds from schools with diversity programs, to relocate transgender women in federal prisons and to remove deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan migrants. The case before the justices arose from an executive order signed by Mr Trump on January 20th, the first day of his second term, that appeared to upend the principle known as birthright citizenship, which has been part of the American constitution for more than 150 years. The announcement prompted immediate legal challenges from 22 Democratic-led states, immigrant advocacy organisations and pregnant women concerned their children might not automatically be granted citizenship. Within days, a federal judge in Seattle temporarily blocked the executive order. 'I've been on the bench for four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,' the Seattle judge said, calling Mr Trump's order 'blatantly unconstitutional.' Federal judges in Maryland and Massachusetts also issued orders pausing the policy. All three judges extended their orders to the entire country, even to states that had not brought legal challenges. On March 13th, the Trump administration filed an emergency application asking the justices to weigh whether such nationwide injunctions were legal. The Supreme Court has never issued a ruling that squarely addresses nationwide injunctions. But justices across the ideological spectrum have expressed skepticism over them. In an unusual move, the justices announced that they would hear oral arguments on the emergency application. — The New York Times / Reuters


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Another chaotic week in Trumpland as Nato summit navigates ‘daddy' issues
Story of the Week Last weekend's US bombing of Iran set in motion yet another hectic week of president Donald Trump 's second term in office. Trump has insisted there has been 'total obliteration' of Iran's nuclear sites. However, his administration was furious later in the week at media reports based on a leaked preliminary intelligence assessment that suggested Tehran's nuclear weapons programme may only have been delayed by a matter of months by the strikes. Trump, meanwhile, claimed the strikes 'ended' the war between Israel and Iran , saying: 'If we didn't take [out the nuclear facilities], they would be fighting right now.' READ MORE Before the leaked assessment Trump had announced a ceasefire between the two countries, though also expressed his frustration at early violations of it, saying that Iran and Israel 'have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing'. Those remarks came as he departed for a Nato summit in the Netherlands, where Nato secretary general Mark Rutte perhaps won the accolade of most cringeworthy moment of the year. Referring to Trump's use of a swear word in relation to Israel and Iran, Rutte said: 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language.' The summit saw Trump secure a win with the pledge by members of the alliance to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of gross domestic product, after his claims for years that European countries were not pulling their weight in this regard. Iran later disputed a claim made by Trump at the Nato summit that nuclear talks would resume next week and that the two sides 'may' sign an agreement. Aside from all that, in an update on his 'liberation day' tariffs Trump said on Thursday that the US and China had signed a trade deal , though he provided no details on what it contained. In Brussels, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said that the European Union is preparing for the possibility that it may not be able to come to a 'satisfactory agreement' with the US in ongoing tariff negotiations . Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris has been warning this week that time is ticking on getting a deal with the US, with Trump's temporary reduction of tariffs on the EU due to run out in less than two weeks. But even this deadline is uncertain, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters on Thursday: 'Perhaps it could be extended, but that's a decision for the president to make.' Another quiet week in Trumpland so. Bust-up There was a heated Dáil clash between Fine Gael leader Simon Harris and Sinn Féin TD Pearse Doherty on Thursday over the Government's plans for a revamp of the historic GPO complex on O'Connell Street. The revamp is to include cultural, retail and office elements. The GPO was of course one of the main locations of fighting during the 1916 Rising. Mr Doherty suggested the public was 'outraged by the Government's plan to turn the GPO into mainly shopping units and offices'. He asked: 'What have Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil got against the heroic men and women of 1916?' He said: 'What will we have? Abrakebabra and Starbucks, is it?' Doherty said the GPO was where the 1916 rebels 'defended the Republic'. Harris hit back, saying: 'It is a Republic that your party worked to undermine. They collected the killers of Det Garda Jerry McCabe from the gates of a prison. Do not dare present yourself as a defender of the Republic.' He also said that 'there are gardaí in their graves' because of the IRA. Things got shouty as the debate boiled over. That's all very well but does any of this affect me? Are you a student who wants to travel to the US on a J1 visa in future? Be prepared to list all social media usernames or handles for every platform you have used from the last five years on the visa application form for vetting purposes . The US State Department is 'committed to protecting our nation and our citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process', the US embassy in Dublin said in a statement, adding: 'A US visa is a privilege, not a right.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin condemned the new requirements as 'excessive' and said that they would cause 'fear and anxiety' among young people. On Wednesday in the Dáil Labour leader Ivana Bacik held up a unflattering meme picture of US vice-president JD Vance, saying that a Norwegian tourist was sent home upon arrival at Newark airport for having the image in his phone. She asked Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan what he could do to 'reassure young people here who hope to travel to the US on a J1 visa but are fearful of this treatment?' His response: 'There is very little I can do about the US immigration system.' He described the measures introduced by the US as 'regrettable'. Banana Skin It is around four months until the presidential election but if you were to look at the field of candidates all you would see is tumbleweed blowing around. Yes, businessman Peter Casey – who ran unsuccessfully as an Independent in 2018 – has suggested he wants to run, and controversial MMA fighter Conor McGregor has indicated the same. But candidates need the signatures of 20 Oireachtas members or the backing of four councils to get on the ballot paper - so people going it alone without a party face an uphill battle to enter the race. Certainly do not expect McGregor on the ballot paper later this year. None of the big three parties - Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin - have named a candidate. Fine Gael does seem to be the closest to getting the ball rolling, with nominations opening next month. Fine Gael MEP Seán Kelly has been mulling over a run in recent months and has been asked about his intentions by reporters this week. He's still thinking about it, but did suggest he 'could do a lot' as president while stopping short of declaring . His party colleague Mairead McGuinness has also been tipped as a possible candidate but is yet to confirm her intentions. Independent Senator Frances Black – whose name has been widely mentioned as a candidate that left-wing parties could get behind - more or less ruled herself out as a candidate during the week. And on Friday Liveline presenter Joe Duffy – who is today hanging up the mic and retiring after 37 years at RTÉ – poured cold water on suggestions that he might run. He told RTÉ Radio's Morning Ireland he 'can see the Áras from Claddagh Green', adding: 'I'd say that's the closest I'd ever get to it.' He said he had not been asked by anyone to run, adding that he will 'not lose the run of myself'. He said: 'There's some great names having been mentioned so far.' So why the lack of candidates in the field? Part of the reason could well be the bruising nature of presidential campaigns, where candidates' personal records rather than political policies have been the focus of intense scrutiny by the media and rivals. Kelly said 'very fine people' had been 'destroyed' during the last two elections, while Black has said the campaigns can be a 'bloodbath'. A presidential run is a risky proposition. Winners and Losers Winners: This week it is 33-year-old New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who stormed to victory in the Democratic Party's primaries vanquishing former governor Andrew Cuomo. As our US Correspondent Keith Duggan writes, the victory of the 'democratic socialist' has terrified the captains of industry and commerce. It remains to be seen if he will take Gracie Mansion – the mayor's residence - from the incumbent Eric Adams, who is running as an independent in the mayoral election this November. Losers: House hunters and first-time buyers. First there was the news that the average price of a second-hand home in Dublin has pushed past the €600,000 barrier . Then Savills estate agents warned that homes in Dublin are now beyond the reach of first-time buyers using the Government's Help-to-Buy scheme . The bottom rung on the property ladder is looking more and more out of reach. The Big Read Political Editor Pat Leahy – who has been covering the EU summit in Brussels in recent days – has a piece on how Ireland and Europe must navigate the new world that Trump is creating. Hear Here EU watches on as Trump changes the world Listen | 41:42 Europe Correspondent Jack Power joins Pat Leahy and Jack Horgan-Jones to discuss monumental events in the Middle East. The podcast also looks at the EU's struggle to assert influence on the global stage as it headed into a major summit, and finally the Irish Government's awkward stance on the Occupied Territories Bill.