logo
Senate version of 'big beautiful' bill calls for $6,000 senior 'bonus'

Senate version of 'big beautiful' bill calls for $6,000 senior 'bonus'

CNBC4 hours ago

The Senate version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a temporary enhanced deduction for seniors ages 65 and up. The House of Representatives also proposed such a tax break in its text, calling it a "bonus."
Notably, the Senate is calling for a deduction of up to $6,000 per qualifying individual. The House included a $4,000 deduction.
The senior "bonus" is in lieu of the elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits that President Donald Trump pitched on the campaign trail. The Republicans' tax bill is being done through reconciliation, a process that generally prohibits changes to Social Security.
The White House has said the proposed deduction is a "historic tax break" for seniors.
The full deduction amount would be available to individuals with up to $75,000 in modified adjusted gross income, and $150,000 if married and filing jointly.
More from Personal Finance:'SALT' deduction in limbo as Senate Republicans unveil tax planHow Senate GOP 'no tax on tips' proposal differs from House plan Senate tax bill includes $1,000 baby bonus in 'Trump accounts'
Notably, the Senate version calls for a faster 6% phase-out rate for incomes above those thresholds, compared to the House version's 4% phase-out rate, according to Alex Durante, senior economist at the Tax Foundation.
The faster phase-out means the full $6,000 benefit is lost more quickly, said Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. For people who would be eligible for the full proposed senior deduction, the Senate's $6,000 version is more generous, he said.
"It really depends on where you are on the income distribution," Gleckman said, with middle-income taxpayers poised to benefit most.
In the House version, the proposed senior deduction would be available to taxpayers whether they take the standard deduction or itemize their tax returns. There are not many taxpayers in the income ranges for the deduction who itemize their returns, Gleckman said.
To qualify for the break, all individual taxpayers and spouses, if filing jointly, would need to have Social Security numbers.
The temporary senior deduction would be in place for tax years 2025 through 2028.
The House of Representatives passed its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on May 22. Both chambers will have to agree on the changes before it is sent to Trump's to sign.
"I think it's pretty clear, since this was in both bills, that there's going to be a version of a senior deduction," Durante said.
Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits would have been a more expensive provision, he said.
Tax-free Social Security benefits would have benefited higher-income people most, according to Gleckman.
Currently, Social Security benefits are taxed based on a formula known as combined income — the sum of adjusted gross income, nontaxable interest and half of Social Security benefits.
Up to 85% of Social Security benefits are taxed for single taxpayers with combined income above $34,000 and joint filers with more than $44,000. Meanwhile, up to 50% of benefits are taxed for individuals with $25,000 to $34,000 in combined income and for couples with between $32,000 and $44,000.
In contrast, the proposed senior "bonus" would not benefit high-income taxpayers and instead focuses on middle-income taxpayers with incomes less than $75,000 if single or $150,000 if married.
"It's better because it helps the people who need the help more," Gleckman said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration ending LGBTQ suicide hotline in July
Trump administration ending LGBTQ suicide hotline in July

UPI

time7 minutes ago

  • UPI

Trump administration ending LGBTQ suicide hotline in July

Supporters of the LGBTQ community march to the U.S. Capitol on June 8. A specialized suicide lifeline for the LGBTQ community is ending on July 17. Photo by Leigh Vogel/UPI | License Photo June 18 (UPI) -- The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline no longer will offer a specialized service for LGBTQ callers as of July 17. The Trump administration issued a stop-work order to the non-profit Trevor Project, which has operated the specialized 988 LGBTQ suicide lifeline since 2022, the New York Times reported. Officials with the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration confirmed the stop-work order calls for the hotline to cease operation on July 17. Suicide prevention services remain available, but there no longer will be a "Press 3 option" for LGBTQ callers. "Everyone who contacts the 988 Lifeline will continue to receive access to skilled, caring, culturally competent crisis counselors who can help with suicidal, substance misuse, or mental health crises or any other kind of emotional distress," SAMHSA officials said in a prepared statement. Trevor Project Chief Executive Officer Jaymes Black said the end of the specialized hotline is very bad for the LGBTQ community. "This is devastating, to say the least," Black told The Hill. "Suicide prevention is about people, not politics." He called the specialized hotline a "bipartisan, evidence-based service that has effectively supported a high-risk group of young people through their darkest moments is incomprehensible." The LGBTQ suicide prevention service was established in 2022 to address the needs of respective callers, many of whom "experience distinct mental health issues," the New York Times reported. Such issues include discrimination and rejection by family members, which contributes to high suicide rates within the LGBTQ community. SAMHSA officials said the Press 3 service option received $29.7 million in federal funding for the 2023 fiscal year and $33 million for each of the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. The specialized hotline's entire 2025 budget was spent as of June, and no more funding is coming, according to SAMHSA. The suicide prevention hotline will get the same $520 million in funding for the 2026 fiscal year as it did for 2025, Office of Management and Budget spokeswoman Rachel Cauley told NBC News. The budget won't "grant taxpayer money to a chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counselors' without consent or knowledge of their parents," Cauley said. The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline was established in 2005, and President Donald Trump in 2020 signed legislation establishing the specialized service for LGBTQ callers. The specialized service received about 1.3 million calls, texts and online chat messages since 2022, according to SAMHSA. It also received an average of 2,100 contacts every day in February.

A divided Congress mulls war powers as Trump considers strike in Iran
A divided Congress mulls war powers as Trump considers strike in Iran

USA Today

time8 minutes ago

  • USA Today

A divided Congress mulls war powers as Trump considers strike in Iran

A divided Congress mulls war powers as Trump considers strike in Iran Authorizing foreign wars is the job of U.S. lawmakers, but recent presidents have stretched their own powers to engage in global conflicts. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump teases possible strike on Iran but says it's not too late for deal "I may do it. I may not do it." President Trump teased a possible strike on Iran but also said it is not too late to negotiate. WASHINGTON – Lawmakers in the House and Senate are divided on how and whether to act on President Donald Trump's suggestion that he may authorize a U.S. strike on Iran amid missile attacks between Iran and Israel. Congress is the only branch of government that has the power to declare war, according to the U.S. Constitution, but presidents have stretched their own powers to engage in foreign conflicts in recent decades because the president can authorize strikes in defensive cases. As Israel and Iran trade blows in an escalating aerial war, Israel is aiming to take out Iran's nuclear facilities with the possibility of the U.S. military's help. Trump said on June 18 his decision is imminent and that he wasn't concerned about upsetting parts of his core MAGA political base that are publicly warning against the United States being entangled in another foreign conflict. Trump first ran for president in 2016 as an ardent critic of the war in Iraq. Once in the White House, he ordered a drone strike on an Iranian military commander, Qassem Soleimani, without telling Congress. Former President Barack Obama argued George W. Bush-era war authorizations from the early 2000s covered drone strikes in Yemen. And former President Bill Clinton conducted missile strikes in Sudan and Afghanistan in 1998 without explicit Congressional approval. Some lawmakers of both parties say they want a say in whether the U.S. gets involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel, which began on June 13 when Israel struck Iran. Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, D-California, introduced a resolution to block U.S. involvement in the conflict without Congressional approval. "This is not our war," Massie wrote on X. "Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution." Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, introduced a similar measure in the Senate. Both the resolutions in the House and Senate are privileged, which means the chambers will be forced to vote on them as soon as next week, Kaine said. "It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States," Kaine said in a statement. "I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict." But support for the resolutions may not fall neatly along party lines. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pennsylvania, has said he will vote against Kaine's push because he wants to ensure Trump can destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities. And Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, said the Constitution is "pretty clear" that the president can't take the country to war without Congressional approval. "You can't have a president just beginning a war on his own," Paul said. "So if that decision should be made, he should come to Congress and ask for permission." However, many Republicans in the Senate say Trump is well within his rights to move unilaterally for a single strike. "A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorization," said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. "To engage in sustained hostility, to engage in continued warfare, does require congressional coming to the floor.' Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, told CBS News on June 15 that "the worst possible outcome" would be the survival of the Iranian nuclear program. Destroying it through diplomacy would be preferred, he said. But "if diplomacy is not successful, and we left with the option of force, I would urge President Trump to go all in to make sure that when this operation is over, there's nothing left standing in Iran regarding their nuclear program," he said. "If that means providing bombs, provide bombs... If it means flying with Israel, fly with Israel." Others are keeping their powder dry until Trump makes his plan clear. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, told reporters on June 17 that Trump is "perfectly within his right to do what he's done so far." Asked whether he would consider allowing a War Powers resolution to come to the floor to authorize force in the case it's needed, Thune said: "We're getting the cart ahead of the horse here." "Clearly if this thing were to extend for some period of time there could be a more fulsome discussion about what the role of Congress should be, and whether or not we need to take action," Thune said. "Right now, let's hope and pray for the best outcome, the best solution. In my view, that would be Iran coming to the negotiating table and agreeing to end their nuclear program."

Watch live: Fed Chair Jerome Powell holds press conference after interest rate decision
Watch live: Fed Chair Jerome Powell holds press conference after interest rate decision

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Watch live: Fed Chair Jerome Powell holds press conference after interest rate decision

Fed Chair Jerome Powell is speaking with reporters after the Federal Reserve's June 18 decision to hold interest rates steady, as expected. Investors and analysts are looking for any indications on the Fed's path for the rest of 2025. The meeting also featured the latest release of the Fed's "dot plot," a chart that shows each Fed official's prediction about the direction of the central bank's benchmark interest rate. This chart is updated quarterly, and the last version came out in March. The dot plot showed most officials still expect two rate cuts by the end of 2025. Powell is likely to add context to how economic uncertainty tied to President Trump's tariffs and the geopolitical conflict in the Middle East have affected the Fed's outlook. See more on the Fed's decision. Watch the press conference live above. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store