Governor Evers won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin
Gov. Tony Evers announced Thursday that he will not seek a third term in 2026.
This will create the first open race for governor in the battleground state in 16 years.
It will be Wisconsin's highest profile race next year, as Democrats also angle to take control of the Legislature thanks to redrawn election maps that are friendlier to the party.
MADISON, Wis. - Wisconsin's Democratic governor, Tony Evers, announced Thursday that he will not seek a third term in 2026, creating the first open race for governor in the battleground state in 16 years.
It will be Wisconsin's highest profile race next year, as Democrats also angle to take control of the Legislature thanks to redrawn election maps that are friendlier to the party. They are also targeting two congressional districts as Democrats nationwide try to retake the House.
The Legislature has been under Republican control since 2011, and some Democrats had hoped that Evers, 73, would run for a third term to give him a chance to potentially work with a Democratic-controlled one.
Evers often clashes with Republicans
The backstory
Evers has drawn the ire of President Donald Trump's administration, and his tenure has been marked by his often contentious relationship with the Legislature.
Before Evers even took office, Republicans convened a lame-duck session to pass a package of laws to weaken his power.
Evers angered Republicans during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 when he ordered schools and nonessential businesses to close, issued a statewide mask mandate and tried, unsuccessfully, to delay the state's April presidential primary.
Republicans broke with tradition to reject 21 Evers appointees. They also blocked many of his proposals, including expanding Medicare, legalizing marijuana and spending more on child care, K-12 schools and higher education.
Evers used his broad veto powers to stop Republicans from enacting a wide range of conservative priorities, including making voting requirements more strict, expanding gun rights, growing the private school voucher program and making abortions more difficult to obtain.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
But Evers did work with Republicans to pass the most recent state budget, which included $1.5 billion in tax cuts prioritized by the GOP and more funding for both K-12 special education and the University of Wisconsin. Evers also worked with Republicans to keep the Brewers in Milwaukee and funnel more money to local governments.
Evers pushed for the redrawing of Wisconsin's legislative boundary lines, which the state Supreme Court ordered after liberal justices gained a majority in 2023.
The maps drawn by Republicans, which had been in place for more than a decade, were widely regarded as among the most gerrymandered in the country. The new maps drawn by Evers are more favorable to Democrats and helped them pick up seats in last November's election. Democrats are optimistic that they can win control of at least one legislative chamber next year.
Evers waited until after he signed the state budget before making his retirement announcement.
"Would I win if I ran a sixth time? Of course. No question about that. But whether I'd win or not has never been part of my calculus about running again," Evers said in a video he posted on X. "For five decades, my family has sacrificed to give me the gift of service. They're my world. And I owe it to them to focus on doing all the things we enjoy and love doing together.
"It's why, Wisconsin, I'm announcing that I will not be running for a third term. I'm so humbled to be your governor. This is the best job I've ever had. And folks, we are not done yet."
Evers still has 17 months left in his term.
Possible candidates
Dig deeper
The open race is sure to attract several Democratic and Republican candidates. Democrats mentioned as potential candidates include Attorney General Josh Kaul, Lt. Gov. Sarah Rodriguez, state Sen. Kelda Roys, Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski, Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson and Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley.
Washington County Executive Josh Schoemann and suburban Milwaukee businessman Bill Berrien are running as Republicans. Others, including U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany and state Senate President Mary Felzkowski, are considering it.
The last open race for governor was in 2010, when Democratic incumbent Jim Doyle, similar to Evers, opted not to seek a third term. Republican Scott Walker won that year and served two terms before Evers defeated him in 2018.
The only Wisconsin governor to be elected to a third four-year term was Republican Tommy Thompson, who served from 1986 to 2001. He resigned midway through his fourth term.
Evers won his first race by just over 1 percentage point in 2018. He won reelection by just over 3 points in 2022.
Before being elected governor, Evers worked for 10 years as state superintendent of education after a career as a teacher and school administrator.
The folksy governor
What we know
Evers positioned himself as a folksy governor who would sprinkle the occasional mild swear word into his comments and other Midwestern colloquialisms such as "holy mackerel" and "folks." His mild-mannered demeanor stood in stark contrast to Trump and other political firebrands.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
"I think he is the most quintessential Wisconsin politician I've ever seen," said Democratic U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan, who has been in elected office since 1991.
After winning reelection in 2022, Evers noted that he is frequently described as boring, but said: "As it turns out, boring wins."
Back to the budget
Dig deeper
Just Wednesday, a number of liberal state lawmakers, teachers unions and community leaders wrote an open letter to Wisconsin.
It didn't use the governor's name, but it targeted the governor. They criticized him over the budget that he signed earlier this month.
"I'm deeply appreciative that Gov. Evers stepped aside, and made some room for some other folks," State Rep. Ryan Clancy (D-Milwaukee) said. "Right now, I'm at a conference for educators, where people have been really crushed with the last few budgets that Evers and his administration have put forward. They have been terrible for public education."
Evers said the budget gave the largest increase to special education reimbursement rates in state history and the largest increase to the UW System in two decades.
The Source
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Evansville City Councilor Mary Allen launches bid for seat in Congress: 'Why not me?'
EVANSVILLE — Mary Allen is trying to pull off one of the hardest feats in American politics — but that didn't matter to the roughly 250 people who came to Wesselman Park on Wednesday to help launch her campaign for Congress. To them, the at-large member of Evansville City Council offers the best hope 8th District Democrats have to deal a blow to Republican President Donald Trump and help usher in a Democratic House majority. Allen didn't mention Trump's name or the name of the Republican who holds the congressional seat she is seeking, Mark Messmer, in her seven-minute speech. Allen rejects the notion that by running for Messmer's seat she is asking voters to fire him and hire her instead, "I want to tell people why they should vote for me," Allen told the Courier & Press this week. "I'm not telling people why they should fire Mark Messmer. I want people to know and believe in me and why they should hire me." Allen, who was elected to the City Council in 2023, did offer reasons for her new campaign during her announcement speech. They hinted at the frustration of a Democrat confronting the reality of a Republican Congress and White House. "Looking at the national landscape, I was tired of feeling helpless and hopeless," she said. "And I don't know if any of you all can relate to that." The crowd responded with hearty agreement and applause. "And I thought, 'Why not me?'" Allen continued. "Why not? And even more so, 'If not now, then when?'" Elsewhere in her announcement speech, Allen alluded to a need for "new voices in Congress who are willing to make decisions that truly represent the people of the 8th District." More: Messmer makes it official: He will seek re-election to Congress But that was as close as she came to articulating a case against Messmer, who would have a lot of advantages in a general election. The 21-county 8th District, which stretches all the way from southern Posey County up the Illinois-Indiana border to the top of Fountain County, is solidly Republican. Messmer also has the benefits of incumbency — contributions from political action committees, the ability to send taxpayer-funded mailers that tout his accomplishments and the power to help constituents by sorting out their problems with government agencies. A majority member of the House Committee on Agriculture, House Armed Services Committee and House Committee on Education and Workforce, Messmer also has the unqualified support of Trump, who won the 8th District in the 2024 election with 67% of the vote. And then there's money. Money in a congressional race is very much to the point. Messmer's campaign reports having $427,302 cash on-hand as of June 30 with $8,250 in debt, according to the Federal Election Commission. Allen had a little more than $3,400 in her City Council campaign account as of January. Allen's community service has been her emphasis Against Messmer's advantages, Allen plans to sell herself to voters as a hand-on servant to her community, something she says is "at the heart of" her life. A resident of Downtown Evansville, Allen is the owner/operator of small business Sixth and Zero. The business's website gives a glimpse of where Allen's passions lie. "SIXTH is a nod to the original Sixth Street Soapery in Evansville, IN where we first began creating pure and natural skincare and body products to help you be kinder to yourself (because you are lovely)," it states. "As we learned more about the goodness of nature and being kinder to the planet, we started to expand and carry more products to help us all live more sustainably, thus the ZERO for zero waste. Or as we like to say, zero-ish. Because it's simply about taking our next step to waste less, live more, right?" More: Sources: Democratic Evansville City Council member will run for Congress Allen is the founder of the Haynie's Corner Art District Association and served alongside her husband for a decade in a nonprofit urban ministry. She chairs the board of the Evansville Urban Enterprise Zone, where she says she works to revitalize distressed neighborhoods. She's a member of Rotary International, whose motto, she noted Wednesday, is Service Above Self. Allen recalled the day she decided to create a parent-teacher organization to support the then-newly established New Tech Institute High School in 2010. "(One of her three daughters) was in the first class at New Tech Institute," she said. "When she first started going there, there was no parent-teacher organization. It was literally a freshman class of new students, new teachers, a new principal into this new program and type of school." Allen remembered wondering, "How can we pull everybody together to support one another?" "Just always looking for ways to gather people around a cause, to garner support and just to create a positive environment and change," she told the Courier & Press. Will a positive campaign be enough? Matthew Hanka, a political scientist at the University of Southern Indiana, said it won't be enough for Allen to run a positive campaign that doesn't sharpen the distinctions between her and Messmer. Allen faces the daunting prospects of raising millions of dollars in campaign cash, appealing to people in parts of the 8th District that bear no resemblance to her base in Downtown Evansville and convincing scores of voters who went with Messmer in 2024 to change their minds, Hanka said. And Hanka said he hasn't seen a sign as yet that a national wave of support for Democrats in 2026 is building, Allen will have to artfully blend a rationale for ousting Messmer with positive information about herself, the USI political scientist said. It's a narrow ledge to walk. "You've got to present something and yes, it might be perceived as criticisms or could even be (perceived as) potential attacks, but you're making your case," he said. "Often times you're making your case by saying, 'This is what my opponent isn't doing and here's what I would do.' "If she doesn't mention Messmer at all by name, she runs the risk of it being hard to kind of pinpoint what she's going to do." What happened the last time 8th District Democrats ousted a GOP congressman? It was 19 years ago that Democrats last won the 8th District congressional seat by unseating a Republican congressman. That year, Vanderburgh County Sheriff Brad Ellsworth defeated Rep. John Hostettler, then a 12-year veteran of Congress. Ellsworth ran a positive campaign — but he didn't shy away from criticizing Hostettler. Hurricane Katrina, which killed at least 1,833 people and ravaged Gulf Coast cities in 2005, was a focal point. Hostettler voted against a $51.8 billion Katrina relief package in 2005, saying he wasn't against aid but preferred smaller amounts and greater oversight. Almost $52 billion was a budget-busting figure and an invitation to fraud, the Republican congressman said. But Ellsworth told the Courier & Press he couldn't fathom why Hostettler would vote no. "These are Americans on our soil that are dying," the Democrat said. "You buck up and do what you have to do." Ellsworth also said, among other things, that Hostettler had been ineffective against a surge of illegal immigrants since his election in 1994. He accused Hostettler's campaign of accepting "dirty special interest money" and said the Republican congressman had stopped listening to voters. But Ellsworth had money. If Allen can't raise several million dollars, Hanka said, she won't be able to get her message out. And even then, the right framing of her differences with Messmer will be critical, he said. "This is somebody who's going to motivate and inspire a lot of people," Hanka said of Allen. "But that alone, when you're trying to convince a blood-red (Republican) district that 'Hey, I'm the person,' there has to be more to bring to it." For her part, Allen envisions earning victory with hard work. "We're going to connect with voters in all 21 counties in person at community events, public forums and door-to-door," she said Wednesday. "Through mailboxes to inboxes, we're going to remind our neighbors that they're not alone — and I say 'we,' because it's going to take all of us." This article originally appeared on Evansville Courier & Press: Evansville's Mary Allen announces she's running for Congress Solve the daily Crossword
Politico
10 minutes ago
- Politico
Blue State Republicans Helped Win the House Majority. The Redistricting Wars May End Their Careers.
Trump's move may well work. Even if California's new map wipes out five Republicans and shores up some Democratic seats there, more than neutralizing GOP gains in Texas, the president can likely rely on additional red states such as Ohio, Missouri and Indiana to salute him and overhaul their congressional boundaries to squeeze out the few Democrats left in their delegations. And this is to say nothing of how many more majority-minority districts in red states could be wiped out should the Supreme Court effectively gut the Voting Rights Act before next year's elections. Such an endgame will surely wind up in a series of state and federal courts, transforming the early going of the midterms into as much a legal fight as a political one. It would make for a mess. And it wouldn't stop with 2026. New York, for example, is constrained by its voter-approved independent redistricting commission and can't undo the commission and redraw its House maps until the 2028 election. But why would Democrats in Albany not do so if Trump effectively muscles a House majority into existence next year via a series of red states upending their own maps? If New York Democrats do pursue such a redraw, it will likely doom the most politically vulnerable House Republicans still left there after the midterms. Which gets to the cold reality for GOP lawmakers in California and New York: The very Republicans who helped deliver their party's congressional majority by winning in the two mega-states in 2020 and 2022 could be collateral damage to Trump's gambit. That includes House veterans such as Reps. Darrell Issa and Ken Calvert, both of California, but also younger, promising Republican lawmakers such as Kiley, 40, and Rep. Mike Lawler (N.Y.), 38. 'This creates a situation where you're going to lose blue state members, which over the long haul are critical to keeping the majority,' Lawler told me. It's all, Lawler said, 'mutually assured destruction once people go full throttle.' The redistricting threat is especially cruel to Lawler, who was already eager to avoid yet another tough race in his Hudson Valley district by running for governor next year. But Trump made clear he preferred Rep. Elise Stefanik, a born-again MAGA disciple, as the standard-bearer even though running a Trump acolyte statewide may only ensure Stefanik ends next year where she started this year: hoping for a Trump cabinet appointment.
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Redistricting, Ethics, and the Fight for Democratic Legitimacy
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In the United States, we've increasingly come to accept congressional district boundaries as fixed, even natural. But they are not. They are human decisions—shaped by ideology, partisanship, and, all too often, exclusion. These lines don't just organize votes; they determine whose voices matter and whose are diminished. When I was a teenager growing up in a small Texas town, I experienced how those lines play out in practice. My mother and I entered a building marked as a voting center, only to encounter cold reception and vague signage. The atmosphere conveyed what the maps didn't: we didn't belong. After being redirected—wrong party, wrong place—it took nearly 90 minutes and a detour to a small church across town before we could finally cast our votes. The lesson was clear: maps are choices, and behind those choices are values. Those values cut to the heart of government ethics: Are we fellow Americans with differing opinions, or adversaries to obstruct at all costs? The Founding Fathers envisioned a voting system based on fair representation, but it was Ida B. Wells who captured the essence of democratic reform: "The way to right wrongs is to turn the light of truth upon them." This principle reflects a core tenet of democratic ethics: legitimate government requires not just the promise of fair representation, but the courage to expose and correct systems that deny it. The Voting Rights Act of 1965—designed to protect communities of color from voter suppression and ensure meaningful political participation—represented a crucial step toward realizing this promise. It established that electoral systems must not just appear neutral—they must produce fair outcomes. Today's redistricting process often violates these foundational principles. Political scientist Thomas E. Mann has observed that "partisan the responsiveness of democratic institutions." Rather than ensuring democratic representation, it frequently serves partisan advantage. Recent analysis from the Brennan Center suggests gerrymandering produced an estimated 16-seat shift toward Republicans in 2024. This represents a fundamental ethical failure: those in power choosing their voters, rather than voters choosing their leaders. The current system creates perverse incentives in numerous ways. Winner-take-all districts maximize partisan gain. Legislative control over map-drawing, weak legal safeguards, and non-standard redistricting between censuses all enable strategic manipulation. Recent events in Texas and California illustrate how redistricting has become a national arms race, and government ethics have been the first casualty. Texas' ongoing mid-decade redistricting push—despite previous court rulings and a Justice Department declaring multiple of its redistricting proposals unconstitutional—represents an unprecedented escalation. In response, California Governor Gavin Newsom has threatened to take back authority from the state's independent commission, framing it as fighting fire with fire: if Texas abandons ethical norms to grab power, California will do the same to defend its interests. This "eye for an eye" logic is understandable—why should one party unilaterally disarm while the other weaponizes redistricting? Newsom's threat represents a rational response to asymmetric warfare, where ethical behavior becomes a strategic disadvantage. Yet this escalation reveals how quickly democratic norms can unravel when institutional safeguards fail to constrain bad actors. The pressure has intensified as the Trump administration publicly demanded that Texas lawmakers pursue this mid-decade strategy to gain five additional seats. KERRVILLE, TEXAS - JULY 11: President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott hold hands during a round table event at the Hill Country Youth Event Center to discuss last week's flash flooding on July... KERRVILLE, TEXAS - JULY 11: President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott hold hands during a round table event at the Hill Country Youth Event Center to discuss last week's flash flooding on July 11, 2025 in Kerrville, Texas. MoreThis escalation raises fundamental questions about government ethics. Should redistricting follow established processes for the sake of procedural fairness, or does partisan advantage justify breaking norms? How do we maintain public trust and democratic legitimacy when the rules change mid-game? And what happens when ethical guardrails are abandoned in the pursuit of political power? European democracies often avoid these ethical dilemmas through institutional design. Many feature multi-member districts with proportional representation that remove incentives to gerrymander, independent commissions that remove direct political control from map-drawing, and legal frameworks that prioritize representational fairness over partisan advantage. Some U.S. states have begun imitating these models. California and Michigan, for instance, have adopted independent redistricting commissions that remove direct legislative control, while states like Texas maintain legislative authority backed by partisan boards. Recent research demonstrates that redistricting reforms—particularly those reducing partisan influence—can significantly improve electoral competitiveness and reduce representational bias, supporting democratic legitimacy. As political theorist Iris Marion Young emphasizes, democratic inclusion is a fundamental ethical requirement in governance. When redistricting decisions exclude or dilute representation from certain populations, democratic legitimacy itself is compromised. That day in Texas, my mother and I just wanted to vote—to be seen, heard, and counted. That's what most Americans want. But if we are serious about democracy, we must be serious about how we draw the lines that shape it. The current redistricting crisis isn't just about Texas or California. It's about whether American democracy will be ethical, inclusive, and representative. The choices we make about redistricting reflect deeper choices about our democratic values: Do we believe in fair representation, or do we accept that power justifies manipulation of the system? Ethics in government isn't just about avoiding scandal—it's about creating institutions that serve all people, not just the powerful few. The lines we draw today will determine whether future generations inherit a democracy worthy of the name. Davina Hurt is the director of government ethics with Santa Clara University's Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. She previously served the City of Belmont, CA, in multiple leadership roles including mayor, vice mayor, city councilmember, and commissioner. She currently serves as a Commissioner on the California Water Commission, shaping water policy for a climate-resilient future. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
