Opec: will continue to invest in fossil fuel production amid growing energy transition momentum: Sec-gen
KUALA LUMPUR: The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) will continue to invest in fossil fuel production, despite the growing momentum behind sustainability initiatives and the global energy transition.
Opec secretary-general Haitham Al Ghais said the organisation advocates a more balanced investment strategy to safeguard the stability of energy security and affordability.
'Sometimes we get carried away talking about net zero and energy transition. At Opec, we believe in a balanced approach. We must transition and address climate change, but not at the expense of energy security or affordability.
'One of the key factors we consistently stress is the importance of continued investment, as this is a long-lead-time and capital-intensive industry,' he said at a panel session titled 'Enabling Asia's Future Energy Ecosystem' at Energy Asia 2025 here today.
Haitham emphasised that Opec is not opposed to renewable energy, although it is often perceived as being at odds with it.
'We do not dismiss renewables. On the contrary, many Opec members are embracing renewable energies. However, we recognise that renewables alone will not suffice. That is why our approach to the energy transitions must be multipath.
'There is no single pathway. We need all sources of energy and technology to complement and support one another, especially those that can help reduce emissions,' he said.
According to Haitham, the oil industry requires a staggering US$17.4 trillion (RM73.7 trillion) in investment, or around US$640 billion annually.
'Today, oil still represents 30% of the global energy mix. When combined with gas, this figure rises to about 56% to 57%. In terms of volume, we are seeing oil demand hit a new record each year. This year, we are forecasting oil demand to exceed 104 million barrels a day,' he added. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
What's not happening to Middle East crude supply matters more
IT'S often more important in times of heightened tensions in the Middle East to focus more on what is not happening, rather than fixating on the dramatic headlines of tit-for-tat air and missile strikes between Israel and Iran. From a crude oil market perspective, this means focusing on the fact that so far not one barrel of crude oil supply has been lost, and furthermore it is in the interests of all involved parties that this remains the case. Crude oil prices rose again in early trade in Asia yesterday, with global benchmark Brent futures gaining 2.1 per cent to trade at US$75.76 a barrel. This built upon the seven per cent leap on June 13, which saw Brent rise to the highest in nearly five months as Israel launched a series of drone and air strikes that killed top Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists and damaged nuclear facilities. But it's worth noting that the reaction of physical oil prices in the Middle East was more measured than that in the paper market. The price of Dubai swaps, which is a contract settled against physical prices of Dubai crude, rose 5.8 per cent on June 13 to end at US$71.03 a barrel. The gain of US$3.86 a barrel for Dubai swaps contrasts with the US$4.87 jump for Brent contracts. This smaller gain for physical oil is perhaps a sign that traders and refiners are slightly less concerned about a supply interruption than the paper investors in Brent. Even though physical oil prices rose less than paper contracts, both still recorded strong increases. These are a rational response to the escalating conflict, especially since it shows little sign of cooling off, with Israeli attacks and Iranian missile barrages continuing. But for oil markets, the key is whether the risks of attacks on Iran's crude production and export infrastructure, and of Iran attempting to block the Strait of Hormuz, are realistic or imminent. The narrow Hormuz channel between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, and the Indian Ocean beyond that, carry about a fifth of the world's daily oil consumption of up to 20 million barrels per day. It is the route that Opec members Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Iraq and Iran use for the bulk of their crude and product exports, and there are few viable alternatives. However, it is also worth noting that in all the past conflicts that have afflicted the Middle East, the strait has never yet been blocked, although there have been instances when Iran has boarded and detained tankers. It could also be argued that the best option for Iran is to keep the market thinking about the risks to shipping through Hormuz while actually doing nothing to close the waterway. But what would happen should Iran seek what could be termed a nuclear option and attempt to close the waterway? This would stop Iran, as well as the other countries, from exporting any crude, and would almost certainly draw in other powers into the conflict. The United States would potentially act to keep the waterway open, and Iran would also sacrifice whatever goodwill it has among its Gulf neighbours, as well as with China, the only major buyer of Iran's sanctioned oil. China doesn't engage in loudspeaker diplomacy but that doesn't mean it isn't making its views known to both sides in the conflict, and Beijing will be keen to see a rapid de-escalation. The US does tend to make its views known publicly, although these are often somewhat confused given President Donald Trump's habit of speaking off the cuff and contradicting his own senior officials. But the message from Washington also seems fairly clear in that they will help Israel defend itself and only enter the conflict if Teheran directly attacks US personnel or interests. Israel has also limited itself to attacking only domestic Iranian energy infrastructure, such as refineries and storage tanks, measures that aim to make life more difficult for Iranians but not to harm crude production and exports. This is not to minimise the risks to crude supply in the Middle East, but is rather to recognise that even dramatic situations have in the past led to limited supply disruptions and tensions do eventually ease.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
1,300 shops gutted in devastating fire in India's Kolkata
NEW DELHI: At least 1,300 shops were gutted in a devastating fire Monday at a marketplace in the eastern Indian city of Kolkata, officials said, reported Xinhua. However, no loss of life or injuries have been reported in the blaze. The fire broke out early Monday in the 150-year-old Khidirpur market of Kolkata, the capital city of West Bengal. Following the fire, authorities rushed 20 fire tenders to the spot to bring the blaze under control and prevent it from spreading to adjacent areas. A senior fire service official said the blaze in the market spread rapidly due to the densely congested area. The presence of highly flammable materials such as gunny sacks, edible oil, and butter in nearby warehouses intensified the flames, the official said. Police have registered a case to ascertain the cause of the fire. However, a short circuit is suspected to have triggered the fire. –BERNAMA
Malaysia Sun
an hour ago
- Malaysia Sun
Protectionism must not be allowed to derail green transition, energy security
KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 (Xinhua) -- Protectionism and geopolitical tensions must not be allowed to threaten the transition to green technologies and energy security, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said here on Monday. Considering the long-term nature of these challenges, efforts to provide security against such disruptions must be a top priority to ensure the stability of the global economy and the continuation of human growth and development, Anwar said in his keynote address at the Energy Asia 2025 conference. "Geopolitical tensions, retaliatory tariffs, and disrupted supply chains have fueled uncertainty; eroding the predictability, reliability and stability that global trade and economic systems once offered," he said. "This fragility is perhaps most evident in the energy and climate domain. Rather than fostering collaboration, we are witnessing polarizing policy shifts driven by strategic competition, even as energy security remains out of reach for many," he said. As part of efforts to build resilience against such disruptions, Anwar suggested a clear and coherent financial architecture that inspires investor confidence and mobilizes greater capital flows into renewable energy projects across Southeast Asia, as well as upgrading electricity grids, which will pave the way for an accelerated adoption of green technologies. "This is critical, given that in 2023, Southeast Asia attracted only 2 percent of global clean energy spending -- a stark contrast for a region endowed with immense potential in renewable energy: wind in Vietnam, hydropower in Laos, solar in Malaysia and geothermal energy in Indonesia," he said. "At the recent ASEAN Summit, we took a significant step forward by accelerating the ASEAN Power Grid (APG) initiative through an enhanced memorandum of agreement and the establishment of a dedicated APG financing facility network. This will enhance cross-border funding flows and bring us closer to a truly integrated regional energy market," he explained. Anwar also noted the progress that Malaysia has made as chair of ASEAN in putting dialogue and multilateralism first and building strong ties with major energy exporters in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), noting the successful inaugural ASEAN-GCC-China summit last month. "Here in Asia, we hold fast to the belief that diplomacy prevails over autocracy, and healthy competition can coexist with mutually-beneficial outcomes," he added. The conference gathers representatives from 38 industries across more than 60 countries and regions under the theme "Delivering Asia's Energy Transition," bringing together policymakers, industry leaders and energy professionals to align strategies and pragmatic solutions that meet the unique challenges and opportunities of developing and emerging economies.
