Senior public servants to highlight concerns over AI
Delegates will gather in Portlaoise today to discuss a range of motions put forward by the union's more than 4,000 managers across 50 branches in the civil service, and in the commercial and non-commercial State sectors.
Issues to be debated include AI, carers' leave, career progression, and flexible and remote working.
Artificial intelligence
A number of resolutions put forward by delegates will highlight the need for greater management of AI in the workplace and the protection of human decision-making in the public and civil services.
One motion calls for the civil and public service to ensure "that human decision-making and performance assessment are retained as exclusively reserved functions of human actors".
Members will also call for a multi-union approach to AI and for the AHCPS to seek commitments from relevant departments to review the governance structure and, more specifically, the operations of AI within departments that have introduced its operation.
Yesterday, the Government published new guidelines for responsible AI usage by the public sector.
"Like in many workplaces, AI is already playing a positive role in the civil and public sector, but as the technology develops it's critical that there continues to be strong guidelines and guidance in place," said AHCPS General Secretary Ciaran Rohan.
"Not only are there issues of confidentiality, bias and transparency to consider, but we would also have concerns about any reliance on 'algorithms' to inform decision making," he added.
Remote working
The protection of blended working and work from home policies will also be discussed at the AHCPS conference.
Delegates will raise concerns about reductions in blended working and working from home, which is "often driven by ideology rather than information or data".
Members will call on the association to strongly defend blended working practices in the public and civil services.
The conference will also hear that any changes to the Civil Service Blended Working Policy Framework must be subject to full consultation and agreement with civil service unions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Tourism in Ireland at a 'tipping point', warns ITIC
The Irish Tourism Industry Confederation (ITIC) is calling for the lifting of the Dublin Airport passenger cap, increased Government spending, as well as the restoration of the 9% hospitality VAT rate in order to boost tourism in the country, which it said is at a "tipping point". In its Budget submission, the ITIC warns of "double-digit" declines in tourists coming to Ireland and that the country is overdependent on US visitors. In order to address this, the confederation - which represents 20,000 tourism and hospitality businesses - wants to see annual Government spending on tourism services increased by €90 million to around €340 million. This funding, it said, would support a market diversification strategy to reduce the reliance on American tourists. In addition, the ITIC not only wants the restoration of the 9% hospitality VAT rate, but also said it should be extended to visitor attractions and adventure operators. In relation to the passenger cap at Dublin Airport, the organisation notes that 70% of the tourist economy is dependent on international visitors. The cap limits the number of passengers travelling through the airport terminals to 32 million per year. The ITIC is calling for this limit, which is included in the Programme for Government, to be lifted and said this "should happen in tandem with supporting the regional state airports of Cork and Shannon". ITIC Chief Executive Eoghan O'Mara Walsh said that "with unprecedented geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty, now is the time for Government to control the controllables and focus on domestic home-grown sectors. "Tourism is the largest indigenous industry and biggest regional employer, and needs to be supported in October's budget. "The case for investment in tourism is indisputable with a return on investment unparalleled by other sectors," he added.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Blame farmers not supermarkets for the rising price of food
Next time you find yourself standing at the supermarket checkout wondering how the handful of items in your basket could possibly cost €50 it should be of some comfort to know that the Government has had a look at the issue and concluded there is nothing untoward going on. It seems that the great supermarket price gouging furore of last May and June is a ball of smoke. Under considerable pressure from the Opposition about 'out of control' food prices the Government asked the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) to revisit an analysis of competition in the grocery sector carried out in 2023. The CCPC released its update last Thursday and the message is very much along the lines of nothing to see here. There is no denying that prices have gone up dramatically but the culprits, according to the CCPC, are not fat-cat supermarket bosses. If anything, the State agency comes perilously close to saying the supermarkets have shielded us from the price increases being demanded by that most cherished of Irish social classes, the farmers. No one is saying that competition in the grocery sector is not all that it could be. The five large supermarket chains – Dunnes Stores , Tesco , SuperValu , Lidl and Aldi – have increased their combined market shares slightly to 93 per cent from 91 per cent over the past few years but this varies from month to month according to the CCPC. READ MORE Their current shares are Dunnes Stores (23.6 per cent), Tesco (23.3 per cent), SuperValu (20.2 per cent), Lidl (14 per cent), and Aldi (11.8 per cent). The important issue, according the CCPC is market concentration, which is a measure of a participant's ability to exercise market power and to lower competition. The review found that market concentration in Ireland is decreasing and is currently 1,735 on something called the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). A market with a HHI score of less than 1,500 is considered competitive, a HHI between 1,500 and 2,500 shows moderate levels of competition and concentration. Competition is increasing, they argue, with Aldi, Lidl and Tesco all publicly committed to opening new stores and the continued investment in own brands by all the players. You may not be feeling it but according to the CCPC: 'Overall, the grocery retail sector demonstrates positive signs of competitive dynamics with new products and services and a strong level of competition on price including aggressive marketing to consumers on price offers.' It notes that while we have experienced a 27 per cent increase in prices from 2021 up to June 2025 this is well below the European Union average, which has risen by 35 per cent over the same period. They also note that Ireland's rate of grocery price inflation has been below the EU average for 15 of the past 16 years (every year since the 2008 financial crisis apart from 2024). 'Overall, the high-level inflation figures do not suggest any significant market problems in the Irish grocery retail sector. If anything, the evidence suggests that Irish consumers have experienced significant price benefits compared to European counterparts,' concludes the CCPC. It's not quite 'stop your whinging, you don't know how good you have it', but it's close. It is certainly not what the Government was expecting or wanted to hear. Neither is the assertion that supermarkets are to be lauded for keeping prices down in the face of demands from food producers. 'There is a strong argument to suggest that this benefit [lower than average price inflation] has been influenced by the increased competition in the grocery retail sector discussed above,' the consumer watchdog ventures. The CCPC doesn't get into why farmers are pushing up their prices by more than their costs but the answer is probably the same reason any business would: because they can in a high-inflation environment The CCPC sees two broad reasons for why food prices are going up. The first is simply that Ireland is an expensive place. They cite structural factors in the Irish economy such as higher wages, geographic location and higher costs in construction, legal services and insurance, which push up prices here. The second reason is that food producers are increasing their margins. 'We can see that up until 2024, agricultural output prices largely tracked agricultural input prices. But in the very recent period, agricultural output prices have shown a strong increase compared to agricultural input prices,' according to the CCPC. It notes that agricultural output prices rose by 19.3 per cent during 2024, well above the EU average of 2.6 per cent for the same period. The CCPC doesn't get into why farmers are pushing up their prices by more than their costs but the answer is probably the same reason any business would: because they can in a high-inflation environment. There is another argument about what constitutes sustainable and fair margins in Irish farming but that is not much use to the Government. Politically, it is one thing scapegoating large supermarket chains for the rise in the price of groceries and associated public annoyance. It's another thing altogether blaming farmers.
Irish Examiner
14 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Finally, a large-scale anti-war protest in Israel
An estimated 100,000 Israelis took to the streets of Tel Aviv last Saturday night to protest against the Israeli Government's announcement to intensify and prolong the war on Gaza. This was the largest and most raucous anti-government demonstration in months. The anger was palpable; it was probably the first demonstration that I can recall that had a decidedly anti-war sentiment. For many months, smaller demonstrations have been held every Saturday evening across the country. Whilst these protests have always had an anti-government message, their focus remained squarely on the fate of remaining hostages held in Gaza. Explicit anti-war messages at the mainstream weekly demos have remained muted – up until now. Saturday night's demonstration felt different. This was arguably the first large-scale anti-war demonstration in Israel since the conflict began almost two years ago. The government's announcement to expand the war came after a 10-hour cabinet meeting last Thursday, indicating, unusually for this government, some real cabinet dissent. Netanyahu, in a press conference on Sunday evening, doubled down on that commitment. Israeli activists take part in a protest last month in Tel Aviv against the war in the Gaza Strip. Many demonstrators believe that Netanyahu's motivation to expand military operations is fuelled by nothing more than a cynical desire for political self-preservation. File photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg In language reminiscent of the infamous quote of the Vietnam War, 'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it', Netanyahu on Sunday spoke in English, without any hint of irony, 'We do not want to occupy Gaza but free Gaza'. This is after 22 months of relentless Israeli assault that has already killed over 60,000 Palestinians, including 18,000 children. Netanyahu's announcement to intensify the war on Gaza, including a plan to occupy and 'evacuate' Gaza city, has shocked but not surprised Israelis. Details of the military plan remain unclear. Initial local media reports over the weekend suggested that the plan included a full evacuation of Gaza City, to be completed by October 7, the second anniversary of the Hamas massacre. Recent polls suggest that more than 70% of Israelis want the war to end now. Presumably, an even higher percentage are opposed to any intensification of fighting that puts at risk not just the lives of the remaining hostages but also the lives of thousands of young Israeli soldiers who are now tasked with the unenviable job of ethnic cleansing. The IDF's (Israeli Defense Forces) Eyal Zamir has let it be known publicly that he is opposed to Netanyahu's ground plan for logistical reasons, arguing, like almost everybody else here, that the expansion of the war as outlined by the government puts the lives of soldiers and hostages at risk. Zamir's very public opposition has provoked accusations of treason from Netanyahu's son Yair, who has not been shy of weighing in with politically provocative outbursts since the war began. The political mood in the country has grown increasingly tense in the past 72 hours, with calls from both the family of the hostages and opposition leaders for a national strike later this week. Many political pundits in Israel, however, are genuinely scratching their heads as to the motivation behind Netanyahu's decision. Most are asking, why now? And why such a brazen and provocative call for an intensification of war, that has generated fierce condemnation from leaders across the globe, flies in the face of the majority of Israeli public opinion and is resolutely opposed by the Israeli military itself. If we take Netanyahu at his word, the war plans are simply a 'proposal for defeating Hamas'. If we do not take him at his word - and many Israeli political pundits say we shouldn't - the announcement is a ploy for Netanyahu to prolong the war, to ensure his short-term political survival. Israeli activists take part in a protest last month in Tel Aviv against the war in the Gaza Strip. The political mood in the country has grown increasingly tense in the past 72 hours. File photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg Any proposal to end the war that doesn't include a commitment to full Israeli occupation, ethnic cleansing, or expulsion, the argument goes, will not satisfy his far-right messianic coalition partners. The so-called never-ending war is designed to stave off the collapse of the government. Some have argued that the announcement is nothing more than a negotiation tactic to force Hamas to make concessions in the negotiations to end the war. There is a fourth and altogether darker interpretation. This is the opinion that none of this is being forced upon Netanyahu by political expediency, but instead driven by a deliberate, pre-planned strategic goal to eventually expel two million Palestinians from Gaza. This was the opinion of Aluf Benn, editor of Haaretz newspaper, the Israeli paper of record, just last week. The few demonstrators I spoke to on Saturday night were unanimous that Netanyahu's motivation to expand military operations was fuelled by nothing more than a cynical desire for political self-preservation. 'He [Netanyahu] cares nothing about the hostages, everything he does is for himself,' said Yoav. 'We need to get rid of this 'crime minister 'before more hostages die,' Yael added. Netanyahu has been indicted for corruption. His trial has been dragging on for years. Posters with his face behind bars with the caption 'Crime Minister' have been visible at all demonstrations for two years now. Lior was visibly angry. 'What are we fighting for? What are our soldiers dying for? Nothing, absolutely all a lie.' Israeli activists take part in a protest last month in Tel Aviv against the war in the Gaza Strip. Recent polls suggest that more than 70% of Israelis want the war to end now. File photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg 'We are killing children every day – it has to stop,' said Taly, one of the few people I spoke to who first raised the plight of Palestinian civilians. Her voice remains a minority. A little reported poll from the Israel Democracy Institute this weekend revealed that 78% of Jewish Israelis think that 'given the circumstances of the fighting in Gaza, Israel is making efforts to avoid causing suffering to the Palestinian population there'. A perhaps shockingly naive or wilfully ignorant viewpoint, indicative that many of the demonstrators on Saturday continue to either turn a blind eye to the reality what their state has done in the past 22 months of war. Many observers, I am sure both inside and outside Israel, would agree however, whatever the motivation of the demonstrators, any protest by ordinary Israelis that brings 100,000 of its citizens onto the streets to call for an immediate end to the war on Gaza should be welcomed by all.
