My case is an example of misuse of ED, says Shivakumar
"My case itself is proof of the ED being misused politically. They filed a case against me, sent me to Tihar Jail, and eventually the case was dropped," he said. The Deputy CM urged the ED to introspect and examine whether it is succumbing to political pressure. Referring to the MUDA case, he said, "Once a 'B' report was submitted, there was no question of further appeal. That is probably why the Supreme Court made such observations."
Shivakumar questioned why ED cases were being filed only against Congress leaders. "Why are there no ED cases against BJP leaders? Why are only Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Robert Vadra and other Congress leaders targeted? Has everyone who joined the BJP suddenly become pure? Isn't this the BJP's washing machine?" he asked. Shivakumar's remarks follow the Supreme Court's dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by the ED in the MUDA (Mysuru Urban Development Authority) land allotment case involving Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's wife Parvathi B M and Congress MLA Byrathi Suresh.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump delivers a steady stream of wins for his conservative Christian base
In his first half-year in office — amid his tariff campaign, government-slashing moves and immigration crackdown — President Donald Trump has also repeatedly delivered for conservative Christians, who form the bedrock of his Republican support. While he has made overtures to Jewish, Muslim and other religious groups, his Christian supporters have been among his most high-profile surrogates and appointees. The Trump administration has green-lit political endorsements from the pulpit and encouraged religion in the federal workplace. Trump has established faith-focused entities with numerous influential Christian appointees. He's energised supporters with assaults on cultural and academic targets long seen as liberal bastions. His administration and his Supreme Court appointees have expanded areas for religious exemptions and expression in the public square. "We're bringing back religion in our country," Trump contended at a Rose Garden event on the National Day of Prayer in May. His faith adviser, pastor Paula White-Cain, proclaimed that in his administration, faith "has been brought back to where it always belongs, and that is centre." Critics say he's eroding the separation of church and state. "The ones celebrating this are the ones leaning toward this Christian nationalist bent, this ideology that Christians should have dominion over the United States government," said the Rev. Shannon Fleck, executive director of Faithful America, a progressive Christian group. "A president with a true Christian agenda would be most concerned with uplifting those in our country who have been cast aside," she said. "The most vulnerable among us are not billionaires. Those most vulnerable among us are not these manipulators of Christianity that are seeking nothing but power."
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Imperative for police to investigate': Supreme Court pulls up UP Police for not probing complaint of witness in Lakhimpur Kheri violence case
The Supreme Court Thursday pulled up the Uttar Pradesh Police for not reaching out to a witness who was allegedly threatened not to depose in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, in which former BJP Union minister Ajay Mishra's son Ashish Mishra is one of the accused. In January, the witness approached the Supreme Court, claiming that someone had threatened him not to depose in the trial. The apex court on March 24 allowed the witness to give a complaint to the police and said that it should be investigated dispassionately. On Thursday, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the complainant in the case, told a bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh that though the complaint was given, no FIR was registered. 'He was given liberty to make (a) complaint with authorities… We made a complaint in writing on June 20, pointing out that he was called by a person and given (an) inducement of Rs 1 lakh…threatened that if he deposed, he will face dire consequences… Despite this, no FIR till date, Bhushan submitted. He added that this was in violation of the judgement in the Lalita Kumari case, according to which an FIR has to be registered within a week of the complaint. Appearing for the state of Uttar Pradesh, Senior Additional Advocate General Garima Prashad submitted that the superintendent of police (SP) had called the complainant, but he did not appear. Justice Kant, however, said, 'Where a complaint is received, which prima facie discloses a cognisable offence, and if you find that for reasons unknown to you, the complainant is not coming forward…what's wrong if your police officer goes there and finds out?' The state counsel agreed to do so and said, 'We will do that.' 'In case the complainant has been reluctant in coming forward in support of his complaint, some senior police officer can be deputed to visit the complainant to verify if (a) complaint has been made by him. If such contents are acknowledged, it is imperative for (the) police to investigate. Necessary consequences must follow,' the bench said. The court also asked the Lucknow SP to file an affidavit after verification of the complaint. Bhushan said if the police found any truth in the complaint, the court must cancel the bail of Ashish Mishra, who is accused of mowing down farmers protesting against the now-scrapped farm laws at Lakhimpur on October 3, 2021. Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, who appeared for Ashish Mishra, opposed this, saying the allegations were being made without any proof. He pointed out that out of the 208 witnesses, the prosecution dropped 20 witnesses, and of those remaining, 20 key witnesses have been examined so far. Dave added that though the trial court is hearing the case thrice a month, 'nobody turns up'. On the day of the violence, a convoy of vehicles, including one belonging to Ajay Mishra, allegedly ran over four protesting farmers in Lakhimpur Kheri. In the ensuing clash, two BJP workers, the driver of one of the vehicles, and a journalist were also killed. Ashish Mishra was arrested within six days. The Allahabad High Court initially granted him bail in the case, but the Supreme Court set aside the high court order after the kin of some of the deceased approached it. The matter was remanded back to the high court, which, after rehearing, dismissed the bail plea. Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted him interim bail in the case on January 25, 2023. This was extended from time to time and made absolute on July 22, 2024.
India Today
4 minutes ago
- India Today
Dharmasthala case: Supreme Court to hear plea against removal of media gag order
The Supreme Court on Friday will hear a plea challenging the Karnataka High Court's recent decision to strike down a media gag order in the Dharmasthala mass burials petition has been filed by Harshendra Kumar D, the Secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple Institution, who moved the apex court seeking an urgent listing of the the Supreme Court agreed today to hear the case tomorrow, the matter has not yet appeared in the cause list for The Karnataka High Court, last Friday, quashed a lower court's media gag, calling it an 'unconstitutional restraint on free speech.' Justice M Nagaprasanna said the public's right to know cannot be curtailed, especially in a case involving alleged institutional failures and potential criminal gag order had earlier barred 338 individuals and entities, including the YouTube channel Kudle Rampage, from publishing or broadcasting any content related to the Rampage challenged the injunction, leading to the High Court verdict. The court observed that the ex-parte order by the trial court amounted to a 'chilling effect' on journalism and struck at the heart of public A Velan, who represented the petitioners, called the ruling 'a powerful affirmation' that the law cannot be used to shield institutions from scrutiny. 'This is not about defamation; it is about transparency,' Velan said. 'This victory ensures the story will not be buried.'On the ground in Dharmasthala, the investigation continues. The Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the case has so far recovered 100 bone fragments from multiple sites. Karnataka Police have confirmed the presence of three poisonous substances in skeletal remains recovered from two of the eleven excavated sites in SIT is taking the alleged whistleblower to various spots for excavation. The Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) is examining the skeletal remains and soil samples. Excavation at spot 11A has concluded, and fieldwork will follow before continuing at spot 13.- EndsTune In IN THIS STORY#Karnataka
