Libyan University students: Elections are needed urgently
Students from Bent Bayya, Western Mountain, Gharyan, Ain Zara, Azzawya, Abu Salim, Tripoli Center, Sabratha, Zintan, Qasr Ben Ghashir, Sirt, Al-Bayda, Hay Andlus, Sebha, Benghazi, Murzuq, Al-Khums, Al-Araban, and Kabo joined the discussion, with many favouring the first option, which suggests holding near simultaneous presidential and parliamentary elections. over others to avoid perpetuating division.
Participants said it was essential that the military be unified and divisive instituons be institutions to avoiding reproducing the status quo. They highlighted a lack of trust and said that corruption was a significant obstacle to securing fair elections. Others added that cultural components are often marginalized politically in Libya, making the reality of inclusive elections unlikely.
'The second option, holding legislative elections first, is a continuation of a vicious cycle that we have tried twice and which has not succeeded since 2011,' said one participant. 'We need presidential elections.'
Others agreed saying they feared a repeat of the 2014 scenario when a parliament was elected that rejected a peaceful transfer of power and added that the first option avoided the prolongation of transitional periods.
'The people's current priority is to expedite the dismantling of existing institutions,' another participant said, arguing in favour of the Advisory Committee's fourth option, under which a political dialogue forum would be convened to establish a constituent assembly that would establish an interim government. 'National reconciliation is being used to make money by those in power. The fourth option is the best option for the roadmap.'
Other participants highlighted that there must be agreement on a clear constitutional basis before moving forward with elections – the Advisory Committee's third option – saying democracy could not be built in the current distorted situation.
'The lack of legitimacy is the greatest challenge,' said another participant. 'Therefore, a clear and binding date must be set, under the supervision of UNSMIL, allowing everyone to participate in the elections without excluding any party for any reason, and ensuring the voice of the people is heard."
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TAG 91.1
an hour ago
- TAG 91.1
UAE's Union for Human Rights rejects Port Sudan Authority's allegations
The UAE-based Union Association for Human Rights (UAHR) on Thursday expressed its "deep regret and dismay" regarding the statement issued by what it referred to as the "so-called 'Port Sudan Authority'" which contained "baseless allegations and unfounded claims against the United Arab Emirates." The UAHR said the content of this statement is a "blatant attempt to mislead public opinion and distract attention from well-documented and grave violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law - including war crimes against civilians - as reported by the United Nations and the Independent UN Fact-Finding Mission on Sudan." The UAHR emphasised that the repetition of these false accusations against the UAE - a key player in regional and international efforts to reach an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in Sudan and to provide humanitarian support to the Sudanese people - will only exacerbate the crisis and prolong the humanitarian suffering. The organisation added that the UAE has provided over AED 16.12 billion (equivalent to 4.5 per cent of its total foreign aid) in support of the Sudanese people. These contributions have surged to unprecedented levels since 2023 due to the intensifying conflict. The UAHR also referenced the UNICEF statement issued on Tuesday, which described the Sudanese crisis as 'the world's largest humanitarian crisis, threatening the lives of children and families.' The UAHR further emphasised the importance of respecting the rules of international law, which remain the only viable framework for achieving peace and stability in Sudan. Finally, the UAHR called on the international community, the United Nations system, and all relevant stakeholders to intensify efforts to protect civilians without discrimination, ensure serious and effective accountability for perpetrators of grave violations, and prevent impunity as a necessary condition for justice. It urged collective action to end the Sudanese crisis and fulfill the aspirations of the Sudanese people for security, dignity, development, and just and comprehensive peace.
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
UAHR rejects Port Sudan's allegations, calls on international community to intensify its efforts to protect civilians, end impunity
7 Aug 2025 17:38 ABU DHABI (WAM)The Union Association for Human Rights (UAHR) has expressed its deep regret and dismay regarding the statement issued by the so-called "Port Sudan Authority" on August 4, 2025, which contained baseless allegations and unfounded claims against the United Arab a statement released today, the UAHR affirmed that the content of this statement is a blatant attempt to mislead public opinion and distract attention from well-documented and grave violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law — including war crimes against civilians — as reported by the United Nations and the Independent UN Fact-Finding Mission on UAHR emphasised that the repetition of these false accusations against the UAE — a key player in regional and international efforts to reach an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in Sudan and to provide humanitarian support to the Sudanese people— will only exacerbate the crisis and prolong the humanitarian this context, the UAHR reminded that the UAE has provided over AED 16.12 billion (equivalent to 4.5% of its total foreign aid) in support of the Sudanese people. These contributions have surged to unprecedented levels since 2023 due to the intensifying UAHR also referenced the UNICEF statement issued on August 5, 2025, which described the Sudanese crisis as 'the world's largest humanitarian crisis, threatening the lives of children and families.' In light of this, the UAHR reaffirmed its outright rejection of using statements as tools to justify violations or evade legal and moral responsibilities — foremost among them the protection of civilians and the cessation of systematic violations that perpetuate cycles of violence and obstruct the prospects of sustainable UAHR further emphasised the importance of respecting the rules of international law, which remain the only viable framework for achieving peace and stability in Sudan. Finally, the UAHR reiterated its full support for the statement issued by the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs and called on the international community, the United Nations system, and all relevant stakeholders to intensify efforts to protect civilians without discrimination, ensure serious and effective accountability for perpetrators of grave violations, and prevent impunity as a necessary condition for justice. It urged collective action to end the Sudanese crisis and fulfill the aspirations of the Sudanese people for security, dignity, development, and just and comprehensive peace.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why Gaza's genocide ranks among the gravest horrors of human history
A prevalent fallacy is to view modern brutal policies as less severe than previous atrocities that have scarred human history, including the horrors of the Second World War. The core of this fallacy lies in neutralising the element of time, and overlooking the evolution of deterrents and constraints designed to prevent the recurrence of past monstrosities. These constraints are not limited to the development of global values-based and legal frameworks, nor to the growth of a general ethical conscience across humanity, regardless of the degree to which such standards are upheld. They also include the fact that many of today's crimes are exposed in real time through pervasive media coverage, making concealment far more difficult than in the past, when empires, states and armies could sweep grave offences under the rug. Some early signals of the Nazi extermination programme were publicly apparent via racist and inflammatory rhetoric, coercive legislative and procedural measures, and horrifying policies of persecution and deportation to concentration camps. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Yet many of these horrors remained hidden behind fortified walls until the Nazi regime collapsed, revealing the terrifying atrocities committed under the deceitful slogan mounted above the gates of Auschwitz: 'Arbeit macht frei' ('Work sets you free'). A few decades prior, Germany committed acts of genocide in Africa - horrors that remain largely unknown even today, despite belated official recognition by the German state. During the genocide against the Herero and Nama peoples in the early 20th century in what is now Namibia, German colonisers killed tens of thousands. In stark contrast to the historical veil over such atrocities, Israel's current slaughter in the Gaza Strip is being transmitted live from the field through screens and networks, despite Israel's ban on global media entering the territory. Savage violations In this narrow stretch of land, human lives and dignity are being savagely violated in an era that has seen the elevation of international law and human rights principles, alongside the development of the United Nations and other global mechanisms for accountability, most notably the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court. Were the atrocities of the past to be reactivated in the present day, they might find no more advanced or horrifying mode of execution than Israel's genocidal programme in the Gaza Strip, which continues under the gaze of the entire world. Indeed, they could derive an operational blueprint from the systematic policies and practices of Israeli war leaders, and the propaganda narratives they use to justify each fresh atrocity. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Likewise, if the horrors unfolding today in Gaza had occurred during previous eras, they would likely have reached even more monstrous scales, liberated from modern constraints and spared the need for the elaborate justifications required in the 21st century. Today, any atrocity systematically committed by a modern regime, such as the Israeli army's programme of occupation and extermination against the Palestinian people, must be classified among the gravest horrors in human history - for these crimes are committed despite the existence of multiple deterrents. One must then ask: how would Israel's actions look unshackled from modern constraints, enjoying the same unchecked impunity granted to empires, states, regimes and armies of times gone by? These atrocities are coming today in full colour, broadcast live from the field of carnage, moment by moment It is essential to highlight this reality in order to fully grasp the immense dangers posed by Israel's programme of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Such ghastly atrocities - mass killing, total destruction, starvation as a method of warfare, impoverishment, humiliation, and biological and environmental warfare - are not confined to the past, appearing solely in black-and-white footage, as some might assume. These atrocities are coming today in full colour, broadcast live from the field of carnage, moment by moment. Their harrowing details unfold relentlessly before the world's eyes, committed by a modern state through its administrative institutions and a contemporary army, as politicians adorned in silk ties ascend to podiums, justifying these crimes and blaming the victims. Another danger of neutralising the element of time lies in forgetting that the atrocities of the first half of the 20th century were primarily carried out amid two world wars - cataclysmic events that reduced the modern world to ashes and killed tens of millions of people across cities reduced to rubble and smoke. The genocide in Gaza, by contrast, is unfolding in a context where modern warfare has been shaped to justify the use of force and mass destruction, and to minimise civilian bloodshed. Race against time To fully grasp the severity of Israel's crimes - committed with western-supplied weaponry and technologies - it is crucial to consider the scale of killing, destruction, displacement and starvation relative to the exceptionally small geographic area of Gaza, which is home to around two million Palestinians. During nearly two years of genocide, the Israeli army has killed or wounded hundreds of thousands of people, some of whom have become permanently disabled. The United Nations and its humanitarian agencies have warned that the Israeli military is killing the equivalent of an entire classroom of children in Gaza every single day, without any international power stepping in to stop it. The direct civilian death toll has already soared to more than 61,000 people, around half of whom are children and women - and it continues to rise unrelentingly, with vast swathes of residential neighbourhoods wiped off the map. Factoring in indirect casualties - deaths from lack of medicine and healthcare, or because of spoiled food and a toxic environment - would raise these figures to even more horrifying levels. Israel's genocide is the terminal stage of a settler-colony in crisis Read More » The Israeli leadership is fully aware that it has been allowed to perpetrate these atrocities despite the ethical and legal constraints of the modern era, under the watch of international institutions and courts. It has thus resumed the ethnic cleansing campaign that it started three-quarters of a century ago with the Nakba in 1948. Israel is now racing against time to enforce a definitive outcome in Gaza and the occupied West Bank through various means. Aware of its dilemma amid the constraints of the current era - including an unprecedented and growing chorus of dissent among western leaders - it seeks to circumvent all of this by reinforcing the notion of 'Israeli exceptionalism', a status that has long granted it license to override the international system and its conventions. It does so by invoking a fabricated dual identity of the 'exceptional victim', allegedly entitled to commit crimes that others may not; and by selectively interpreting sacred texts, misrepresenting them as a genocidal manual immune to modern treaties and obligations. In a further attempt to bypass the element of time, the Israeli leadership constantly reminds Americans and Europeans of the war crimes committed by their own states in decades past - a cheap trick aimed at silencing criticism, while simultaneously suggesting that the evolved colonial experiment in Palestine remains forever linked to the western context that first implanted it in this land. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
