Amit Chavda takes charge as GPCC chief, Tushar Chaudhary as CLP leader
'It won't work if we just leave from here taking the sankalp (oath). We have to reach every house in Gujarat, listen to people's problems, come out on the streets and then reach Parliament, fighting for their rights. To fulfil people's hope for a change in 2027, in Gujarat, we will not hesitate coming out on the streets, fighting for their rights,' Chavda said in his address at the Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan in Ahmedabad in the presence of senior Congress leaders, including state Congress in-charge Mukul Wasnik, former presidents Shaktisinh Gohil and Jagdish Thakor, party Lok Sabha MP Geniben Thakor, former Leader of Opposition Sukhram Rathva.
This is the second time that Chavda, a five-time MLA from Anklav in Anand district, is taking charge as the GPCC president — a position he had held from 2018 to 2021. Later in 2023, he was appointed as the Leader of the CLP.
Pointing at the low strength of Congress MLAs in the Gujarat Assembly, Chaudhary highlighted how he has to face 170 members with just 12 members in the Assembly. He, however, named each of the members and said they are capable of taking on the 170 BJP MLAs
.'If any issue arises related to Saurashtra, Vimal Chudasama will raise his voice in the House. When it comes to tribal issues, Anant Patel and Kanti Kharadi will take on that. Imran Khedawala will highlight matters affecting minority communities. Jignesh Mevani will continue to challenge the government over its 'insensitive' actions. Kirit Patel, who is like an academician, knows his subject very well when it comes to discussions on any Bill in the House and Shailesh Parmar, like always, will take on the government on law and financial issues and question the government's accountability, forcing it to enforce the rules.'
Meanwhile, Chavda stated that despite taking charge at a 'difficult and challenging time', he would make sure it does not affect Congress workers. 'Wearing this crown of thorns, I will ensure these thorns do not hurt my workers, those who have given me this responsibility with the hope of defeating the BJP in 2027,' he added.
He also highlighted issues of employment among the youth, expensive education, fixed pay and contractual hiring, farmers' distress, apart from ones faced by small and medium traders, alleging that land mafia, mining mafia, education mafia, health mafia are running loose in Gujarat and corruption is seeped deep in the government where its own ministers have high stakes.
'Let us take the sankalp (oath) to eradicate all these from Gujarat and hoist the Congress flag in Gandhinagar in 2027. This is not only an oath to bring Congress as the ruling party but to end exploitation of people of Gujarat at the hands of BJP, to give them a respectable, safe and secure life,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Rahul looks back at where he faltered: Didn't protect OBCs because I couldn't understand their issues at the time
A day after he said that the Congress 'fell short' of understanding issues faced by the OBCs and that 'opened up the space' for the BJP, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Friday said that he didn't protect the OBC community's interests earlier in his political career as the issues faced by them are complex and not easily visible. Addressing a Bhagidari Nyay Sammelan of OBCs at the Talkatora Stadium in Delhi, Gandhi said that while he should score well on issues related to Tribals, Dalits, minorities and women, he couldn't understand the problems of OBCs and admitted that he didn't do enough for the community. He also said that he will be working 'double' on this front from now on. 'Since 2004, I have been in politics. Twenty-one years have passed. When I look back, and in a way, analyse myself – where I did the right thing and where I lacked – I see a couple of big issues. I worked on the Land Acquisition Bill, MGNREGA, Right to Food, Tribal Bill… These things I did well. I feel I should get good marks on issues of Tribals, Dalits, minorities, women… When I look back, I see one thing clearly. I lacked on one thing, made a mistake – what was it? The Congress and I made a mistake. I should have protected the OBC section; I didn't. The reason for this was that I didn't understand your issues at the time,' he said. Gandhi said that around a decade ago, he 'could see the problems faced by Dalits' – 'it was clear and I understood it'. 'Untouchability is their history,' he said. Talking of Tribals, Gandhi said, 'It is easy to understand issues of Tribals – jungle (forest), jal (water), zameen (land) are right there for you to see.' 'But the OBC issues are hidden, and not easy to see. My regret is that if I knew your history and issues, I would have got the caste census done then. And it is my mistake and not the Congress's. The good thing is that if I had got the caste census done then, it wouldn't have been as good as it will be now,' he said. Gandhi said that the Telangana caste survey is like a 'tsunami' and that its 'aftershock' will be felt soon. 'The way the tsunami came… The earthquake that led to the tsunami wasn't seen. It was under the sea… When the tsunami came, its impact was felt 2-3 hours later. The same has happened in Telangana,' he said.
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC extends relief for Rahul Gandhi in Veer Savarkar defamation case
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday extended its order staying the summons issued to Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case related to his alleged derogatory remarks about freedom fighter Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. In November 2022, during his Bharat Jodo Yatra, Rahul Gandhi made defamatory remarks against Savarkar at a rally in Maharashtra's Akola. A Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih deferred the scheduled hearing for four weeks after a letter seeking adjournment was submitted in the matter. In the meantime, the Justice Datta-led Bench ordered extension of the interim relief originally granted to Rahul Gandhi on April 25. Further, it asked the complainant, advocate Nripendra Pandey, to file his reply within two weeks and granted liberty to Rahul Gandhi to file a rejoinder affidavit, if any, within two weeks thereafter. In an earlier hearing, the apex court had cautioned Rahul Gandhi against making 'irresponsible statements', specifically asking him not to speak anything against freedom fighters. The Supreme Court had warned that if the Congress leader made any such comments in the future, it would initiate "suo motu" action against him. 'Let's be clear, any further statement and we will take suo moto! We will not allow you to speak anything about our freedom fighters. They have given us freedom, and this is how we treat them?' said the Justice Datta-led bench as it dealt with Rahul Gandhi's petition to quash a 2022 defamation case filed against him. After senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Rahul Gandhi, gave an oral undertaking that the Congress leader would refrain from making such comments in future, the apex court had passed an interim order staying the order of the lower court summoning him to face trial for the offences under Sections 153-A and 505 of the now-repealed Indian Penal Code (IPC). Before this, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court had declined to exercise its inherent powers in favour of Rahul Gandhi, who had sought the quashing of the entire legal proceedings. A single-judge Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, in its order passed on April 4, said that Rahul Gandhi had the statutory remedy of filing a revision against the order of the trial court. Under the IPC, 1860, Section 153-A addressed the offence of 'promoting enmity between different groups based on religion, race, caste, etc.," and Section 505 dealt with 'statements conducing to public mischief".
NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
Rahul's 'Masterly Inaction' Can Cost Congress More Than Just Karnataka
Away from the din in parliament, the Congress in faraway Karnataka is struggling to get its act together. As the November 2025 'deadline' of an in-house power-sharing formula is inching closer, the grand old party insiders fear a repeat of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Punjab in Karnataka. Between 2018 and 2023, the Congress lost power in these states due to the infighting. Madhya Pradesh was the first to go after Jyotiraditya Scindia revolted and defected to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 2020. By the time assembly polls were held in Punjab in 2022 and subsequently in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh in 2023, the rivalries of Captain Amarinder Singh-Navjot Singh Sidhu, Ashok Gehlot-Sachin Pilot and Bhupesh Baghel-TS Singhdeo had become so intense that no amount of welfare-ism and good governance could salvage the situation. What was worse was that Sonia-Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge remained hapless spectators. Why Removing Siddaramaiah Is Not Easy At Bengaluru's Vidhana Soudha, the big question doing the rounds is, will Rahul Gandhi, representing the political leadership of the Congress, enforce a change of guard? Would he be able to bench Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and bring in DK Shivakumar? When Karnataka gave the Congress a handsome verdict in May 2023, Rahul had hammered out a compromise between an eager and restless state party chief, Shivakumar, with Siddaramaiah promising to protect his interest at a future date. Rahul was perhaps hoping for the party's better performance in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and a central role for Siddaramaiah. Nothing of this sort happened. The challenges confronting Rahul Gandhi in Karnataka till November 2025 are manifold. While he, Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi bat for Shivakumar, removing Siddaramaiah is not easy. Rahul, having taken up the cause of the backwards classes in reservations and census, cannot afford to remove a backward-class Chief Minister and have three upper-caste Chief Ministers - Sukhwinder Singh Sukku in Himachal Pradesh, Revanth Reddy in Telangana, and Shivakumar in Karnataka. The Kharge Awkwardness The Gandhis have an additional burden in Mallikarjun Kharge. The 88th president of the All India Congress Committee (AICC) is keen to throw his hat in the ring, offering himself as a replacement for Siddaramaiah. In Kharge's scheme of things, a backward-class Chief Minister getting replaced by a Dalit would not create any hiccups. Privately, Kharge has often narrated his story of how, thrice, he came close to becoming the Chief Minister of Karnataka but lost the race to the likes of Siddaramaiah, SM Krishna and Dharam Singh. Conventional wisdom says Rahul, Sonia and Priyanka would be least interested in sending Kharge to Bengaluru. But the Kharge camp is still optimistic. It may be worth noting that when it comes to Karnataka's political affairs, Kharge consciously sticks to the 'high-command-to-decide' refrain - as if to stress that he is not part of the 'high command'. In any case, party leaders familiar with Karnataka affairs don't feel Kharge would make the cut. All in all, the problem of retaining or replacing Siddaramaiah remains. Shivakumar is not in the mood to wait till 2028 and perhaps sit for another five years in the opposition to become a chief ministerial face in 2033. In fact, he has been getting constant feelers from those claiming to represent the ruling Delhi durbar. Nonetheless, as of now, to Shivakumar's credit and Congress's relief, the prospects of pulling a Scindia are not on his mind, for now. Betting On Bihar All eyes are on the Bihar assembly outcome. If the mahagathbandan edges out NDA-Nitish Kumar, Rahul, having somewhat proved himself, will have greater chances of manoeuvring and perhaps breathing easily on the plank of social justice. A poor Opposition showing, on the other hand, will set uncertainty in motion not only in Karnataka but in Himachal Pradesh and perhaps in Jharkhand, too, where the Congress is part of the ruling coalition led by the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha's (JMM) Hemant Soren. A section of the Congress blames Rahul Gandhi for creating much of the confusion in the selection of chief ministers way back in December 2018, when he was the AICC chief and the party had won Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh assembly polls. The Chhattisgarh Fiasco In 2018 Rahul had then tried to act as a 'democrat', but, in the process, ended up annoying many. In Madhya Pradesh, his childhood friend Jyotiraditya felt let down when Rahul went by a headcount (that was a strategic coming together of MLAs loyal to Digvijaya Singh and Kamal Nath) instead of projecting a young face. Jyotiraditya defected after 15 months, bringing down the Kamal Nath government. The selection of a chief ministerial candidate for Chhattisgarh had proved to be the trickiest. Rahul had four contenders for the post. Singhdeo was a suave and experienced hand, but his feudal background stood against the former Sarguja ruler. Tamaradhwaj Sahu, the then lone Lok Sabha Congress MP from Durg, was AICC pointsman PL Punia's favourite, and was at the last minute fielded in the state assembly polls to win the influential Sahu samaj votes. Then there were the resourceful and worldly-wise Charan Das Mahant, a former Union Minister, and Chhattisgarh Congress unit chief Bhupesh Baghel. Ghosts Of A Rebellion On December 13, 2020, Singhdeo, Sahu, Baghel and Mahant were summoned to Delhi and given an audience with Rahul Gandhi. The latter hugged them and tried to hammer out a consensus. Over the next three hours, Sahu was almost declared the next Chief Minister of the tribal-dominated state, till a rebellion blew up right into Rahul's face. Almost speaking in unison, the three regional satraps refused to work under Sahu, declining to be ministers. Rahul panicked, and consequently, another round of consultation followed. This time, Singhdeo emerged as a favourite - till Sahu threatened to revolt. Motilal Vora was brought into the negotiations. When the deadlock failed, Sonia's trusted aide and AICC treasurer, Ahmed Patel, intervened. Patel backed Baghel, and to Rahul's astonishment, everyone almost came around. It is said that when Baghel's name was cleared, Rahul or someone on his behalf whispered that Singhdeo would be considered to complete the second half of the chief ministership. Today, both Vora and Patel are no more, and Rahul is no longer the AICC chief. But in Raipur, TS Singhdeo kept pressing his aspirations till the party got voted out. If Rahul opts for masterly inaction, the prospects of a repeat of Madhya Pradesh cannot be ruled out. In the long run, a replication of Punjab, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh is almost a certainty. Clearly, Rahul is running out of time and options.
