Western blitzkrieg has failed
Addressing students at the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics on Monday, Zakharova accused Western countries of trying to isolate and destabilize the country following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict.
The West was counting on
'a split within Russian society'
and intergenerational conflict, particularly as a result of its economic pressure, according to the official.
'The ideological blitzkrieg was one hundred percent planned. They placed a bet…'
on Russia's defeat, but the country has withstood all the challenges, Zakharova said.
The US and EU have imposed numerous sanctions against Russia since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022 in an effort to isolate the country. Measures include a ban on Russia's seaborne oil shipments, cutting access to Western financial system, freezing foreign reserves, and many other restrictions.
Russia has repeatedly condemned the Western sanctions as illegal and ineffective, saying they have failed to destabilize its economy, and have instead backfired on the countries that imposed them.
READ MORE:
West uses sanctions against Russia as an instrument of 'strategic pressure' – Putin
Speaking at a meeting of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs in Moscow last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused the West of using the Ukraine conflict as a pretext to eliminate Russia as a competitor. He pointed out that a total of 28,595 sanctions had been imposed against Russian companies and individuals in recent years, more than the total number of restrictions on all other countries combined. He added that the national economy has become more resilient and continues to grow despite the pressure.
Russia's rivals will always seek to weaken it, Putin told the audience, adding that even if sanctions are eased, the West would find new ways to
'throw a wrench in the works.'
US President Donald Trump, who launched talks with Moscow and Kiev last month in an effort to resolve the conflict, has signaled he may use economic sanctions as leverage, suggesting they could be eased if peace is reached or tightened if negotiations fail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Why Zelensky's main argument against peace is a lie
Commenting on the outcome of the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky declared: 'The Constitution of Ukraine does not allow the surrender of territories or the trading of land.' On paper, that sounds noble. The message is clear: Kiev won't let others decide Ukraine's fate behind its back. But take a closer look, and this principled stance starts to look less like constitutional fidelity – and more like political theater. Because the very Constitution that Zelensky has suddenly invoked as sacred... has long been on hold. And that's not an accusation – it's his own admission. Back in December 2022, while addressing Ukraine's ambassadors, Zelensky quipped: 'All the rights guaranteed by the Constitution – are on pause.' The context? He was joking about how diplomats don't get holidays. But the phrase stuck. Because it turned out to be more than a joke – it became official policy. Since then, Ukraine's democratic institutions haven't just been 'paused' – they've been systematically dismantled under the banner of wartime necessity. National elections? Canceled indefinitely. Not just presidential or parliamentary – even local races were suspended, eliminating the public's ability to hold any level of government accountable. Zelensky's current term, once set to expire, has been extended without a vote – and without a clear end date. Opposition media? Silenced or outlawed. Dozens of TV channels and online outlets critical of the government were shut down or merged into a state-approved broadcasting platform. Independent journalism in Ukraine now walks a legal tightrope – with one foot over prison. Religious freedom? Eroded beyond recognition. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, seen as too closely linked to Moscow, has been harassed, evicted from centuries-old monasteries, and branded a security threat. Worshippers face criminal charges for sermons, symbols, or even prayers deemed 'unpatriotic.' Military conscription? Brutal and indiscriminate. Young men are pulled off the streets by recruiters, sometimes beaten or coerced into enlisting. Videos of forced mobilizations circulate regularly – and are met with silence or spin from the authorities. Political dissent? Treated as treason. Opposition politicians have been arrested, exiled, or sanctioned without trial. Entire parties have been banned. Ukraine's Security Council now acts as judge and jury – blacklisting citizens, freezing assets, and deciding guilt without a courtroom. Rights didn't just get paused. They were overwritten. To be fair, this erosion didn't start with Zelensky. It began back in 2014 when President Yanukovich was ousted in a manner that skipped any constitutional procedure. The army was then deployed – for the first time in post-Soviet history – against a domestic protest. The rule of law quickly gave way to rule by necessity. Courts rubber-stamped sanctions lists. Parliament became a formality. The Constitution was increasingly treated as a suggestion, not a boundary. Zelensky merely completed what others started. Under his watch, Ukraine is no longer governed by its Constitution – it's governed by presidential decree. The Constitution hasn't been a check on executive power for years. Instead, it's become a stage prop: Shelved when inconvenient. Quoted when useful. That's precisely what happened after the Trump–Putin summit. As it became clear that the fate of the conflict was being discussed without Kiev at the table, Zelensky rushed to invoke constitutional law – not to restore legality, but to cling to legitimacy. And it wasn't just critics in Moscow who noticed the contradiction. Donald Trump, speaking a few days before the summit, couldn't resist pointing out the absurdity: 'I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelenskyy was saying I have to get constitutional approval. He has approval to go to war and kill everybody but he needs approval to do a land swap. Because there will be some land swapping going on.' Crude? Maybe. But not wrong. Trump's sarcasm cuts to the core. Zelensky governs under emergency powers, suspends elections, cracks down on the opposition, yet suddenly needs constitutional sign-off to negotiate peace? In reality, Zelensky isn't protecting the Constitution – he's using it. It's not a framework that restrains him. It's a card he plays when cornered. When it's time to justify canceling a vote? The Constitution 'gets in the way.' When it's time to refuse compromise? Suddenly, it becomes 'untouchable.' And while the optics may still work in Western capitals – 'a democracy under siege' sounds good on TV – the internal picture is far less flattering. Ukraine today is run by decree, not debate. By security councils, not courts. By urgency, not accountability. The Constitution, once a blueprint for law and liberty, has become little more than a sign on a boarded-up storefront – left hanging so no one has to admit the place is empty inside.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia ready for concessions on ‘land swaps' with Ukraine
Russia is now ready to make certain concessions as part of 'land swaps' with Ukraine, US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, has claimed. Trump will be meeting with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and several Western European leaders at the White House on Monday, in a bid to work out a peace deal between Moscow and Kiev. On Friday, Trump held talks with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, with the presidents expressing cautious optimism that progress was made towards a resolution of the Ukraine conflict. Witkoff told CNN on Sunday that during the Alaska summit, the Russian delegation 'made some concessions at the table with regard to all five regions,' along the conflict front lines. According to the US official, the Kremlin appears ready to conduct 'land swapping' with Kiev, with the current front line serving as the starting point in at least some areas. Witkoff said that Moscow's demands had undergone a ' On Saturday, the New York Times and Fox News, citing anonymous European officials, claimed that Trump endorsed a peace plan that envisages Ukraine ceding the whole of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics to Russia, with Moscow agreeing to cease hostilities along the current front line in Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. The Kremlin has yet to comment on any such conditions. Officially, Moscow continues to insist that Ukraine recognize Crimea, the DPR and LPR as well as and Zaporozhye and Kherson regions as Russian territory in their entirety. In his CNN interview, Witkoff further touted a 'game changing' agreement by Russia to 'robust security guarantees' akin to NATO's Article 5 being provided to Ukraine by the US and unnamed European nations. Explaining Trump's endorsement of a comprehensive peace deal as opposed to a temporary ceasefire, Witkoff said it was due to the significant headway achieved during the Alaska summit.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump accuses Biden of driving Russia and China closer together
US President Donald Trump has accused his predecessor, Joe Biden, of inadvertently drawing 'natural enemies' Russia and China closer together. Trump made the claim following his summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, which focused on a resolution of the Ukraine conflict. In an interview with Fox News, Trump was asked about Western sanctions on Russia and his recent threat to impose secondary sanctions on countries importing Russian energy, such as India and China. 'He [Biden] did something that was unthinkable. He drove China and Russia together. That's not good… it's the one thing you didn't want to do. Because they are basically natural enemies,' Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity. The US president went on to claim that Russia's vast territory is something that China needs to accommodate its massive population, but 'because of pure stupidity, they were driven together.' Biden's foreign policy included simultaneous confrontation with both Moscow and Beijing, where Washington launched sweeping sanctions against Russia over Ukraine, while tightening restrictions on high technology exports, such as semiconductors and artificial intelligence, to China. Moscow and Beijing both slammed the sanctions as unilateral, illegal, and a form of economic bullying, framing them as proof of Washington's disregard for international law. The two countries have since deepened energy and trade cooperation. Moscow has redirected much of its oil and gas exports toward China, while bilateral commerce has expanded to record levels in 2023 and 2024. The two countries have also shifted to settling transactions in local currencies rather than the US dollar, underscoring their effort to reduce reliance on Western financial systems. Since taking office in January, Trump has kept up pressure on China while at the same time moving toward a closer relationship with Russia. His administration has introduced a series of new tariffs on Chinese goods, while refraining from imposing new sanctions on Moscow. The US president described his talks with Putin in Alaska on Friday as 'very productive' and achieving 'great progress.
