
Gauteng govt set to make second payment of e-toll debt on Monday
The e-toll system was scrapped in 2024, after the National Treasury agreed to cover 70% of the debt, while the province took responsibility for the remaining 30%.
The total debt owed by the Gauteng government amounted to R15.9 billion, including accrued interest.
Finance MEC Lebogang Maile held a media briefing in Johannesburg on Sunday to provide an update on the repayment of the e-toll debt.
In September 2024, the Gauteng government made its first payment of R3.8 billion towards settling its e-toll debt.
READ: Gauteng govt makes first payment to settle e-toll debt
With the province set to make a second payment of R3.3 billion on Monday, the total amount paid will rise to over R7.1 billion.
Maile said this reflects the province's commitment to honouring its side of the deal.
"In the budget speech in March of 2024, the Gauteng provincial government announced that as part of the province's arrangement to service the debt, a provision for honouring this commitment would be pencilled into the 2024 fiscal framework. Since making this announcement in the said budget speech, we have maintained the necessary fiscal discipline to ensure adherence to this commitment."
The e-toll debt is to be repaid in five equal annual instalments.
Besides the R3.3 billion payment to the South African National Roads Agency (SANRAL), the Gauteng government will also allocate an additional R2 billion for freeway upgrades.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Gupta Compound in Saxonworld sold for over R30 million
JOHANNESBURG - The notorious Gupta compound in Saxonwold has been sold. Business Rescue Practitioners accepted an offer of R34 million. This sale follows just three weeks after the compound went under the hammer with one of the houses selling at significantly lower price. The house, known as Property 3, which once served as staff quarters, sold for just R3.3-million which was a decrease from its original amount of R5-million. The Gupta brothers, Rajesh, Atul and Ajay who once called the compound home, were identified as central figures in South Africa's state capture. They remain fugitives after fleeing the country in 2016.


Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Billboard battle intensifies as outdoor ad industry accuses Sanral of defying court order
The outdoor advertising industry has hit back at the South African National Roads Agency's accusation that all billboards along the R21 in Ekurhuleni are illegal. The dispute over hundreds of allegedly illegal billboards along the R21 between Joburg and OR Tambo International Airport has escalated. The outdoor advertising industry is now accusing the South African National Roads Agency (Sanral) of disregarding a court case, misleading the public and unfairly tarnishing the reputation of legitimate businesses that contribute significantly to the City of Ekurhuleni's coffers. A recent Daily Maverick exposé revealed Sanral's position that not a single billboard along the freeway is legal – a claim the agency continues to stand by. However, Angelo Tandy, chairperson of Out of Home Media South Africa (OHMSA), the industry's umbrella body, says Sanral has no jurisdiction over the boards since they fall within Ekurhuleni's boundaries. He bases this claim on a recent court case, HMKL 3 Investments (Pty) Ltd v Sanral, in which the North Gauteng High Court found that Sanral's authority did not extend into municipal urban areas governed by their own advertising bylaws. 'The judgment made clear that where municipalities have promulgated advertising bylaws, Sanral's powers fall away,' said Tandy. 'The court found that Sanral's Section 50 regulations do not apply in urban areas with municipal control and Sanral's appeal was never successful.' In that case, HMKL had sought an urgent interdict to stop Sanral from erecting a toll gantry on the N1 that would block visibility of its billboards. Sanral argued that the boards were illegal under the National Roads Act. But the court ruled that since the signs fell within the City of Tshwane's jurisdiction, Sanral had no regulatory power. Yet Ekurhuleni itself, which in July 2025 issued a deadline for the billboard owners to regularise by 4 August, confirmed that most billboards within its boundaries are illegal, including those on private property erected without permission. The City further confirmed that no outdoor media operators had complied with the deadline or the requirements, and the City would proceed with issuing notices to those owners whose billboards remain unregularised. Systemic challenges Beyond jurisdictional disputes, the industry is battling broader systemic challenges, says Tandy. Applications for billboard permits are reportedly stuck in bureaucratic limbo for years, despite clear bylaws meant to streamline the process. 'This contradicts the spirit and letter of outdoor advertising legislation and stymies legitimate business.' Transformation remains another sore point. 'New entrants into the OOH advertising sector face disproportionate barriers, from inefficient public administration to a lack of municipal support,' he said. Some policy proposals, he added, are 'draconian' and threaten to undermine rather than support transformation goals. OHMSA also took aim at the City of Ekurhuleni's recent clampdown on billboards, in particular, a high-profile campaign by the mayoral committee member for development planning and real estate, Nomadlozi Nkosi, who, they claim, 'defaced' three allegedly illegal boards with red stickers in July. 'We are concerned with the process,' said Tandy. 'There was no transparency or fairness. OHMSA was not consulted, despite being a key stakeholder in the sector.' He stressed that proper consultation could have led to a resolution, as has occurred in other metros. 'Instead, OHMSA has been consistently excluded from discussions on tariffs, bylaw amendments and other vital matters.' Nevertheless, OHMSA says it remains open to engagement. 'We are committed to working with government and municipalities to drive transformation in line with national empowerment policies,' Tandy said. 'We want to support SMMEs and build strong, collaborative relationships across the sector.' Other industry players have come on board to argue that court rulings have consistently limited Sanral's reach in urban areas. David Malherbe, an industry representative, is demanding an apology from the roads agency. 'Where a municipality had promulgated regulations in an urban area of control, Sanral does not have authority to regulate. So they must explain why they issue press releases claiming every single sign on the R21 freeway is illegal when they very well know they have no standing over the regulating of such signs. 'Unless they can provide court evidence showing that this judgment was overturned, then their comments may be considered defamatory and damaging to both operators and advertisers and they should apologise,' he said. He added that alleged corruption within the municipality's planning department had further complicated matters. Sanral, City resolute Sanral, however, is standing firm, saying the court case has no bearing on the Sanral Act. It argues that until a Constitutional Court ruling says otherwise, it retains enforcement powers and will act accordingly, including issuing removal notices, seeking interdicts and recovering costs from noncompliant billboard owners, arguing that its authority remains intact. Sanral spokesperson Lwando Mahlasela said: 'There is no high court decision declaring sections 48 or 50 of the Sanral Act unconstitutional or invalid. Until such time, the Act stands and applicants cannot ignore it merely because they hold municipal approval.' Sections 48 and 50 give the agency sweeping powers over infrastructure and advertising related to national roads, prohibiting any unauthorised structures or advertisements visible from these routes, even within urban areas, he added. Sanral maintains that many billboards are structurally unsound, obstruct road signs and endanger motorists. 'They compromise visibility and road safety, and deprive both Sanral and municipalities of rightful revenue,' Mahlasela added. Rent for a high-visibility sign along a national road can reportedly reach R400,000, with Sanral and municipalities expecting a 20% revenue share from advertisers, money which seldom reaches the City's or Sanral's coffers. City of Ekurhuleni spokesperson Zweli Dlamini said the deadline of 4 August given by the mayoral committee member had come and gone and 'as of now, no billboard operators have fully complied with the requirements'. 'The industry is currently in the process of compiling and submitting its renewal applications. Engagements with relevant stakeholders are ongoing,' he added. 'The City will proceed with issuing notices to operators whose billboards remain unregulated. These notices will require the operators to either bring their billboards into compliance or remove them, in line with applicable regulations.' DM


The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Pick n Pay the new major 'bank' taking over South Africa
From FNB to Absa, TymeBank to Standard Bank, and now Capitec, Pick n Pay continues to unite South Africa's leading banks under one roof, giving customers unmatched convenience when managing their money while they shop. With the addition of Capitec cash deposits at Pick n Pay tills, now empowers all banked customers to deposit cash, withdraw funds, and transfer money instantly at the checkout, making Pick n Pay the most accessible banking point in retail. Already South Africa's retailer with the most accessible in-store banking footprint, that now spans over 11 financial institutions nationwide, Pick n Pay's growing network ensures that millions of customers can access secure, affordable, and convenient financial services without making a separate trip to the bank. The compatible banks include: African Bank Albaraka Bank Bidvest Bank Capitec Bank Discovery Bank FNB Grindrod Bank Nedbank TymeBank Sasfin Bank Standard Bank Customers can now conveniently take care of their banking at the checkout, with no need for a separate trip or to queue at a bank or automated teller machine (ATM). Deposits are secure and reflect in the customer's account within minutes. The simplicity of the process requires no app, special onboarding process, or bank account, making Pick n Pay's cashpoint banking solution one of the most accessible in the country. 'We are proud to offer the most inclusive retail banking solution in South Africa,' says Deven Moodley, Executive Head of Pick n Pay's value-added services, financial services, and mobile division. 'By integrating an expanded banking offering into the retail experience, we're helping customers save time and reduce transport costs, while providing essential financial services that are safe and convenient.' Pick n Pay's partnerships simultaneously benefits the customer and banks, as the South African banking landscape is undergoing a transformation. Over the past five years, the number of ATMs operated by four South African banks declined by 8 345. Due to of the high maintenance costs, security, and limited reach of ATMs, banks are turning to strategic partnerships with retailers like Pick n Pay to expand their footprint more cost-effectively. This shift translates to numerous customer advantages, such as extended service hours, accessible locations, and the ability to bank during their everyday shopping routines. Over and above an improved customer experience, communities benefit from greater financial inclusion and reduced reliance on informal cash systems. With one of the lowest flat fees for store-to-store money transfers in the country, Pick n Pay has made this affordable banking option available at over 1 400 stores nationwide. However, the convenience does come at a cost. While Pick n Pay does not charge any additional fees when using tillpoints to do banking, the different banks do carry charges. For FNB, while withdrawals at tillpoints carry no charge up to R2 000 per month, this moves up to R2.00 after that point. Deposits carry a flat fee of R19.95. For Capitec customers, deposits are charged at R1.40 per R100 deposited – the same as depositing cash at ATMs. Bank Withdrawals Deposits FNB R2.00 R19.95 Capitec R2.00 R1.40 / R100 Absa Free N/A (CashSend) Nedbank R2.00 R2.00 (Boxer only) Standard Bank Free R19.95 To find out how to bank while you shop, visit Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.