logo
Gigabit Internet: Is It Worth Splurging for a Faster Internet Plan?

Gigabit Internet: Is It Worth Splurging for a Faster Internet Plan?

CNET24-05-2025
Having fast, reliable home internet is important, whether you're using it for remote work, streaming, school or browsing. But that doesn't mean that you always need to opt for the fastest speeds available. You might not actually need the 1,000Mbps speed your internet provider is advertising as "the best deal". Plus, gigabit plans are usually on the more expensive side of home internet. Read on to find out how to determine if gigabit internet is worth the price.
What is gigabit internet?
Let's start at the beginning: Digital information is measured in bits, and a megabit is 1,000,000 bits. Your internet speeds are measured in bits per second or, more commonly today, megabits per second. That unit measures how much data is processed over a network in a second. 1,000Mbps is equal to 1 gigabit per second, or Gbps.
The more megabits or gigabits per second your internet connection can accommodate, the better performance you can expect when streaming video or playing online games without lag or glitches, at least up to a point. You can still experience interruptions with a gigabit plan depending on a number of factors like your Wi-Fi setup, the layout of your home and the number of heavy internet users in the house. But we'll get into that later.
How much speed do you really need?
To evaluate whether or not you need a gigabit tier, first consider how much speed your household consumes each month. Do you notice a lot of lag, buffering and interruption? If you've already rundown the list of slow Wi-Fi solutions and found your speeds still lacking, you might need to upgrade. But sometimes the fix can be a small one, like moving your router to a central, raised location in the house. If you have a plan with a data cap, are you hitting your limit early in the month? Most ISPs offer apps that allow you to monitor your data usage, regardless of whether you have a data cap. If you're using a lot of data month over month and noticing slowdowns, you could potentially use a speed upgrade.
Next, take stock of how many smart devices and internet users are in your household. You can consult our internet speed guide and the FCC's household broadband guide for more in-depth tips on evaluating how much speed you'll need, but the recommendation for the heaviest internet usage (like streaming in high-quality video, using Zoom, or downloading files) requires only 25Mbps per action. A good rule of thumb is that if you have more than four heavy internet users in the house at a time (think gamers, streamers, remote workers or students), an upgrade to a gigabit tier could make sense. Otherwise, you'll be paying for speeds you won't use.
Locating local internet providers
Cable versus fiber gigabit internet
Two types of internet connections can legitimately deliver consistent gigabit-speed internet: cable and fiber. Moreover, fiber internet is the broadband gold standard since it offers lightning-fast connections and symmetrical download and upload speeds, giving you the fastest internet possible. It's more reliable than cable and less prone to being affected by peak usage times or congestion.
Cable internet provides connection through the same coaxial cables providers use for TV services, so it's frequently bundled with TV packages. It's more reliable than satellite internet and offers faster download speeds, too. But unlike fiber, cable internet's upload speeds are significantly slower than its download speeds. So, if you're sending emails or video chatting, you might experience some delay.
Which providers offer gigabit internet?
Most national internet service providers offer gigabit plans. There's a mix of fiber and cable providers that can offer speeds up to a gigabit, with most fiber providers, like AT&T and Google Fiber, offering speeds up to a gigabit and much faster. Unfortunately, fiber internet access is still pretty limited, with an overall 46% availability, according to the latest data from the Federal Communications Commission. Spectrum, Astound Broadband and others offer gigabit plans over cable connections and are much more widely available than fiber providers. Notably, although Verizon 5G claims to offer speeds up to 1,000Mbps, only a select lucky handful of customers will see those speeds. Besides Starry, Verizon 5G Home Internet is the only other major 5G home internet provider to offer gigabit speeds.
Although it's possible we'll see multi-gigabit speeds from Starlink in the future, satellite ISPs and DSL internet providers do not offer gigabit speeds. Here are some of the major ISPs in the country that offer gigabit speeds.
Source: CNET analysis of provider data.
A gigabit plan typically costs between $60 and $80 per month with the average cost of the most broadly available plans compiled above coming to $65 monthly. Multi-gigabit plans can run between $70 to $100 or more monthly. For instance, Xfinity and Ziply Fiber offer 10 gig plans for $300 per month, and Google Fiber offers an 8 gig plan that costs $150 monthly.
Generally, faster plans offer the lowest price per Mbps, a metric we often use to decipher whether an internet plan is cost-efficient. For instance, the cost per Mbps for Xfinity's $300 per month 10 gig plan is just 3 cents. Meanwhile, Xfinity's much more widely-used 300Mbps plan costs $35 monthly, which comes out to 12 cents per Mbps. That doesn't mean paying $300 monthly for 10,000Mbps is the better deal in this scenario. Unless you're operating a business that needs that kind of speed, you'll be better off with a slower plan.
Xfinity spokesperson Joel Shadle told CNET there's more to value than speed: "While it's important to get enough speed, maybe even more, value extends beyond that. Reliability is almost more important than speed in an internet plan."
Why do I not have the exact speeds promised on a gigabit plan?
The fine print shows the 1 gig plan from Verizon features download speeds up to 940Mbps.
Verizon Fios
Verizon Fios, Verizon's fiber internet brand, offers a 1 gig plan for $90 per month but notes -- in the small print underneath -- that it maxes out at 940Mbps for downloads and 880Mbps for uploads. AT&T's 5 gig plan features speeds up to 4.7Gbps. This is common for ISPs, as many 'gigabit' plans, especially ones that run on a cable connection, actually offer speeds lower than 1,000Mbps. So what gives?
It's complicated, but it boils down to the fact that networking protocols and equipment consume a lot of that bandwidth. Think of it as networking overhead. And the specific equipment, like a modem or router, that connects the internet to your laptop or phone also determines the speed you'll get. For example, California-based provider Sonic Internet advertises speeds up to 10,000Mbps for just $50 monthly. But unless you have a compatible Wi-Fi 7 router, you won't get those speeds.
Plus, if you connect to your router wirelessly via Wi-Fi, your speeds will almost always be slower than they would otherwise be with a wired Ethernet connection. This is why providers often list speeds 'up to" a certain threshold. For most of us, the difference between one gig and 940Mbps should be imperceptible. Check out our top picks for the best routers.
AT&T offers a 5 gig plan with download speeds up to 4.7Gbps noted in the fine print.
AT&T
Given this, when CNET reviews ISPs, we may refer to ISP plan names but use exact numbers when listing connection speeds. If a "gigabit" plan promises speeds only up to 940Mbps, we take that into account in our analyses and make it clear in our descriptions.
Learn more about how we test ISPs.
Is gigabit internet worth the cost?
Some gigabit internet plans are quite pricey, sometimes costing hundreds of dollars per month. And there's no point in paying for extra speed you don't need or can't use due to network hardware or other limitations. If you're an internet power user who processes large video files or plays cutting-edge online games, a gigabit plan might be worth the cost, but only if other internet users are in the house with you. For most households, less than a gig of speed should suffice and save you hundreds of dollars per year. According to the latest data from OpenVault, the average household only uses around 564Mbps in download speeds a month.
Guidelines from the FCC state that a connection delivering between 100 and 500Mbps is enough for one to two people to run videoconferencing, streaming and online gaming applications simultaneously. Many providers offer 300Mbps plans starting around $50 per month, though sometimes even lower. Plans that deliver between 500 and 1,000Mbps, which typically cost between $70 and $100 per month, will allow three or more people to use videoconferencing, streaming and online gaming simultaneously. These are only guidelines and internet speed, service and performance will vary -- sometimes dramatically -- depending on connection type, equipment, provider and address. Only the most hardcore users have a rationale for paying for anything over a gig of speed.
'Most people don't really need it," says CNET writer and resident internet service expert Joe Supan. He points out that symmetrical download and upload speeds might be a reason to pay for a fiber connection, since having a higher upload speed will translate to less performance lag when sharing large files. 'If you do have multiple people working from home, having a higher upload speed might be worth going up to that gig tier,' he says. That noted, you can get symmetrical speeds from any fiber connection and without upgrading to gig speed.
Gigabit internet FAQ
Is gigabit internet enough for my household?
According to the FCC, a connection that delivers 100 to 500Mbps should be enough for two people to run videoconferencing, streaming and online gaming. Moreover, OpenVault's Q3 2024 report highlights that the average American household uses 564Mbps downstream and 31Mbps upstream. In other words, if you can access gigabit speeds (940 to 1,000Mbps), that should be more than enough for your household.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

D-Wave Quantum Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
D-Wave Quantum Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

D-Wave Quantum Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags

D-Wave Quantum (NYSE:QBTS) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$3.10m (up 42% from 2Q 2024). Net loss: US$167.3m (loss widened by US$149.6m from 2Q 2024). US$0.55 loss per share (further deteriorated from US$0.10 loss in 2Q 2024). This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period D-Wave Quantum Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 22%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates significantly. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 36% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 13% growth forecast for the Software industry in the US. Performance of the American Software industry. The company's shares are up 3.2% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Don't forget that there may still be risks. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for D-Wave Quantum (1 is concerning) you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

AMD's RX 9060 seems unnecessary, but it's exactly what gamers need
AMD's RX 9060 seems unnecessary, but it's exactly what gamers need

Digital Trends

time26 minutes ago

  • Digital Trends

AMD's RX 9060 seems unnecessary, but it's exactly what gamers need

AMD has just quietly updated its graphics card lineup, but this one is in no danger of competing against some of the best GPUs. The latest arrival, dubbed the AMD Radeon RX 9060, feels a little unnecessary when compared to existing GPUs — but hear me out. Although the spec changes are subtle, I believe that the RX 9060 could be exactly what we need right now. And yes, that's still true even if you're looking for a more high-end GPU. Here's what the RX 9060 non-XT brings to the table, and why I think it could be good news regardless of how powerful it is. What are the specs of the RX 9060 non-XT? The reason why the RX 9060 non-XT might seem unnecessary is that it's extremely similar to the XT version of the card. However, unsurprisingly, it is a little bit worse. Recommended Videos AMD has shared the official specs of the RX 9060 without any fanfare — the card simply received a product page on AMD's official website. Thanks to that, we have a full overview of its specs and can compare it to the two RX 9060 XTs. The RX 9060 sports 28 RDNA 4 compute units (CUs), which means 1,792 streaming processors (SPs) and 64 TOPs. Meanwhile, both the 8GB and the 18GB RTX 9060 XTs offer 32 CUs for a total of 2,048 SPs. This is quite a downgrade, but it's not the only difference. All three cards sport the same 8GB of VRAM across a 128-bit memory bus, and all three are GDDR6. However, the RX 9060 non-XT uses slower memory modules clocked at 18Gbps. As a result, it'll offer a measly 288GB/s of bandwidth. The cut-down specs result in lower power requirements, though: The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 watts, while the better counterparts are at 150W and 182W. All in all, we're looking at a pretty budget-oriented GPU — one that many enthusiast gamers might turn their nose up at. It's not going to breeze through Cyberpunk 2077 on max settings, that's for sure. But will it be worth buying? Well, we still don't know a few key aspects. We still don't know the most important thing Before we can fully decide whether the RX 9060 will be a worthwhile pick, we'll need to know its most important spec — well, kind of. As AMD hasn't made any announcements about this new GPU, we don't know when it'll launch, where, or at what price. I'm less bothered about the where and when; it's the pricing that concerns me. With specs such as these, the RX 9060 will have a few noteworthy rivals. AMD's RX 9060 XT 8GB isn't much of an interesting offering when the RX 9060 XT 16GB exists. Meanwhile, the RX 9060 will be even worse, putting it in a losing position against cards from the same generation. Intel's Arc B580 will likely continue to be a similar, or better, alternative. It's my favorite GPU this year, and if you can score it near the $249 MSRP, it's an undeniable value pick. Nvidia's got plenty of horses in this particular race, too, although they're all a lot pricier than I imagine the RX 9060 is going to end up being. The RTX 5060 starts at $299 (and is actually readily available at that price, which is rare considering the current state of GPU pricing); the RTX 5060 Ti comes in two memory variants and can be bought for anywhere from $379 to $450. Nvidia also has the recent RTX 5050, which falls far behind the rest of the range due to the addition of GDDR6 memory. I suspect that the RX 9060 might be targeting the RX 5050 in performance, but the RTX 5060 could be an option, too. With such a saturated market and so many GPUs to choose from, the RX 9060 will need competitive pricing to stand out from the crowd. This could be a good thing As a standalone GPU, the RX 9060 won't blow you away — at least I don't believe so. However, as a part of a larger puzzle, it could help. Most of the GPUs around the same caliber are all selling near MSRP right now, which means that AMD will be facing some serious competition — not just from rivals Intel and Nvidia, but also from its own range. As a result, the RX 9060 is unlikely to fly off the shelves, but this could spell good news for its pricing. Nvidia priced the RTX 5050 at $249, and it can be picked up for as much. If AMD aims for a similar price point — perhaps even $239 — that'd be ideal. We'd finally have something closer to a true budget-friendly GPU available for gamers, with what I expect to be alright 1080p performance at under $250. Above $250, the GPU frankly doesn't make a lot of sense, with the RTX 5060 available for $299. Assuming that AMD aims to be competitive here, the RX 9060 could be more than just a budget GPU. It could be a cheap GPU. Given the current state of things, that's exactly what the market needs, and I'm all for it. This is one of those GPUs where the price will truly decide its fate, and I'm really hoping that we'll get a solid value GPU instead of something overpriced.

Breakfast With ChatGPT: Three Workers, One Morning, A Different AI Story
Breakfast With ChatGPT: Three Workers, One Morning, A Different AI Story

Gizmodo

time26 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Breakfast With ChatGPT: Three Workers, One Morning, A Different AI Story

I came to Cleveland, Ohio, for the 50th anniversary of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) convention. I expected the hallways to be buzzing with conversations about AI, and they were, but not in the way I'd hoped. For the first two days, the phrase I heard most from my fellow journalists was 'we must protect ourselves.' In session after session, the consensus was that AI is a danger, a threat, an enemy coming to replace us. Then I had breakfast at Betts, the restaurant in my hotel, and a single conversation with my waiter gave me another perspective on the AI revolution. As he brought me the bill, I asked Kevin Knestrick, 49, if he used AI. Haunted by the fearful rhetoric from the convention, I expected him to either rebuff me or launch into an anti-AI tirade. 'Not really,' he replied cautiously, then paused. 'Actually,' he continued, 'I used it for the first time when we changed the menu. I took a picture and uploaded it to ChatGPT and asked it to copy the text and prepare a message for a colleague. It saved me so much time.' As he relaxed, he called over a younger colleague, Jamie Sargent, 31, and he introduced me a bit later to another younger colleague of his, Dawud Hamzah, 37. 'You should talk to these guys,' he said. 'They use it a lot more.' He was right. It quickly became clear that for Hamzah and Sargent, ChatGPT is a part of their daily lives. They don't see it as a threat. For Hamzah, a bartender at Betts and a youth motivational speaker who founded his own empowerment association, H.Y.P.E. (Helping You Produce Excellence), ChatGPT has effectively replaced Google. 'I use it to build solid, well-structured PowerPoint presentations for my speaking engagements with students,' he told me. But its use extends far beyond his professional life. It's his trip planner, health advisor, and personal coach. 'I just used it for my lady's birthday,' he said. 'I said, 'I want something relaxing that has vegan friendly foods.' It gave me a whole itinerary, a phenomenal itinerary.' When back problems flared up, he turned to the chatbot for help. 'I asked it to give me specific home workouts and mobility exercises to relieve pressure from a degenerating disc in my back. And it did.' Did it work? 'Oh yeah!' he responded. Sargent, a former special education teacher, has been using ChatGPT since it launched in late 2022. He used it to generate baseline lesson plans, saving him hours of work which he could then devote to tailoring the content to each of his students' individual needs. 'I saved about an hour's worth of time writing a lesson plan,' he said. I asked him if it felt like cheating. 'No, because I would have done the same thing it did. It just did it faster than I can.' He dismisses the idea that teachers shouldn't use it. 'I'd say, that's nonsense. We spend so many hours outside of the classroom working on our own stuff. If we can make it faster, the better.' Like Hamzah, Sargent is also an avid travel planner, using ChatGPT to map out complex international vacations. 'My brother and I planned a trip to Italy from Milan to Florence to Naples, and it basically showed us the map of taking a train from here to here, gave us good restaurants to go to, and then it told us how much it was going to cost.' Both men hold a pragmatic view of AI's future. They believe jobs will be lost, but that it's on individuals to adapt. 'If you don't learn, develop, and adjust, you'll fail, because it's not going to stop,' Hamzah insisted. Sargent agreed, adding that the key is to focus on what makes you human. 'I'm part of the experience, whereas AI is not part of that experience. Find a way to differentiate yourself from AI and make yourself valuable.' Kevin, who first introduced me to the group, represents a different demographic's journey into AI. His use was born of pure necessity. 'I was in a time crunch to get this menu to the printer,' he recalled. The AI solved his problem in seconds. That single, surprisingly effective interaction transformed him from a non-user into a curious convert. 'Now I'm much more open to any problem I have. I'm just going to ask it now,' he told me. His regret over missing out on the Bitcoin boom has also made him wonder if AI could be a tool to help 'the little guy' get an edge in investing. 'I guess I'm from the generation where all the Wall Street fat cats make money, while us little people just get crushed,' he said. 'How do we not be the little guy anymore?' Their manager, Curtis Helser, 56, was also introduced to ChatGPT by his wife about a year ago. He uses it to refine important work emails, making them shorter and more professional. He isn't afraid of it, seeing it as a tool that can be used for good or ill, just like a car. And he's not worried about his job. 'You have to be in the building,' he said with a laugh. 'Kissing babies, shaking hands, that kind of stuff.' I was stunned. At the restaurant, AI wasn't a terrifying enemy; it was a useful, if imperfect, assistant. The younger employees had fully embraced it, while the older generation was more cautious but still open, integrating it into their lives at their own pace. They see the current panic as a movie they've seen before, recalling the fears that accompanied the rise of the personal computer. The contrast with my colleagues at the journalism convention was stark. Perhaps those of us whose jobs are built on creating and controlling information see AI as an existential threat, while those in the service of people see it as just another tool to get the job done. The real AI revolution, I realized, wasn't happening in the headlines or the panicked convention halls. It was happening quietly, in conversations like this, one practical problem at a time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store