
Assisted dying could soon become legal in France. This MP was the driving force
The previous two weeks had been intense for the MP representing Charente-Maritime. He served as the lead rapporteur for two bills, on one palliative care and one on assisted dying, examined by the Assemblée Nationale. His three-day stubble showed that he had let himself enjoy a rare "day off" on Sunday, before tackling the final sprint leading up to the bills' votes in the Assemblée, on Tuesday. It was like a leg in the middle of a long marathon – one that was far from over – to defend assisted dying, a cause he has championed for years, despite all the obstacles in his path.
His longstanding advocacy and his role in the two bills on end-of-life care, which were both adopted by the Assemblée Nationale on Tuesday, made him a central figure during the debates. The discussions took place in a calm atmosphere, despite aid in dying being a divisive issue. The lead rapporteur welcomed the serenity, contrasting it to "the violence of the exchanges" around the same-sex marriage law, in 2013, and the Veil law on decriminalizing abortion, in 1975. "This Assemblée will be able to have a collective pride for having managed to, for the first time in history, conduct a [debate on a] major societal issue in a calm way," said Falorni, with his trademark smile.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
6 days ago
- LeMonde
French Constitutional Council strikes down return of banned pesticide
France's top constitutional authority ruled, on Thursday, August 7, that a move to allow the reintroduction of a pesticide harmful to the environment was unconstitutional. The so-called "Duplomb law" sparked public anger for permitting the renewed use of acetamiprid – a chemical known to be toxic to bees and other creatures, but which some European farmers have come to rely on. A student-led petition against the bill garnered more than two million signatures after lawmakers adopted it on July 8, with the bill's critics saying it had been rushed through a divided lower house of parliament without a proper debate. The Constitutional Council said, in its ruling, that a provision in the bill allowing exemptions to the ban of products containing neonicotinoid chemicals, such as acetamiprid, would violate France's environmental charter, which has constitutional legal status. The legislature undermined "the right to live in a balanced and healthy environment" enshrined in the charter, the council said. "Neonicotinoids have an impact on biodiversity, in particular on pollinating insects and birds, as well as consequences for water and soil quality, and pose risks to human health," the council said. Macron will enact the law and respect the ruling In 2020, the council granted a temporary exemption to the ban, limited to the beet sector and seed coating. However, the ruling said this measure did not go into enough detail about how long the pesticides could be used, how they would be applied, or which crops they would affect. The Constitutional Council also approved two other measures in the law: one allowing for the construction of water storage for agricultural purposes, and another raising thresholds at which pig and poultry farms require prior authorisation. French President Emmanuel Macron took "note" of the ruling, his office said on Thursday. The president will enact the law as soon as possible in a form that takes the ruling into account, the Elysée said. A contentious chemical Banned in France since 2018, acetamiprid remains legal in the European Union, and proponents said that some French farmers needed it to help them compete economically. The insecticide is particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who say that they have no alternative against pests and face unfair competition. However, a petition on the website of France's Assemblée Nationale, which garnered more than 2.1 million signatures, called the measure a "frontal attack on public health." Beekeepers have described the chemical as "a bee killer," and its possible effects on humans are also a source of concern, though its risk remains unclear in the absence of large-scale studies. For some opponents, frustration stretched beyond environmental and health concerns to exasperation over the country's political deadlock. In late June, before the law's passage, several thousand demonstrators – including farmers, environmental organisations and scientists – rallied across France calling for the bill to be withdrawn.

LeMonde
6 days ago
- LeMonde
Success of French anti-pesticide petition revives interest in the political tool
The 2.1 million people who signed the petition calling for the repeal of the "Duplomb law" are closely watching for the decision of France's Constitutional Council, expected on Thursday, August 7. This contentious piece of legislation was intended to "remove obstacles to the practice of the farming profession." Rarely has a petition sparked such enthusiasm in France. On July 10, two days after the final adoption of the legislation, Eléonore Pattery, a student unknown to the general public, published a statement on a platform of the Assemblée Nationale denouncing a law passed with no debate at first reading in the chamber, and which has mobilized the scientific community against it. Among the controversial points, the legislation allows for the conditional reintroduction of acetamiprid, a pesticide banned in France since 2020. Four weeks later, the petition has become the second most signed in French history – second only to "L'Affaire du siècle" ("The Case of the Century"), which gathered 2.3 million signatures on in 2018 to support a lawsuit against the French state for climate inaction – and the first on a platform where identities are verified.

LeMonde
30-07-2025
- LeMonde
French Culture Minister Rachida Dati's dangerous game
Rachida Dati wants to become the next mayor of Paris. It is her obsession. The more obstacles she faces, the more France's culture minister embraces transgression. On Monday, July 28, she announced she would run for the Assemblée Nationale's open seat in Paris's 2 nd constituency, without waiting for the decision of the conservative Les Républicains (LR) party, which chose to nominate Michel Barnier. It was an unelegant snub of the former prime minister under whom she served last year, reigniting the French right's old poison of division. It is hard to say whether she is still a member of LR or has now joined President Emmanuel Macron's camp. The former protégée of Nicolas Sarkozy now works for herself, and herself alone. Among the many adversaries she likes to make, Dati also counts judges. On Tuesday, July 22, she was ordered to stand criminal trial on charges of corruption and influence peddling, over suspicions that she engaged in illegal lobbying in the European Parliament on behalf of Carlos Ghosn, the former head of Renault-Nissan, in exchange for €900,000 in fees. Dati counterattacked in pure Sarkozy style. Criticizing what she called a "procedure marred by incidents," she tried to put the prosecutor for financial crimes, Jean-François Bohnert, in an awkward position with the office over which he has authority. Prime Minister François Bayrou had to remind her of what she should not have pretended to ignore: Respect for the judicial institution is "a state duty." Protected by the president and supported by the current justice minister, Gérald Darmanin, Dati has no fans on the left. But she is also divisive within the right, the government, the president's party and other groups in the governing bloc. To some, she is an electoral asset not to be overlooked; to others, a dangerous firebrand ready to exploit every populist sentiment of the time: distrust of judges, the media, the elites, the "system." If passed, the "Paris-Lyon-Marseille" law modifying the methods of electing mayors in the three cities, currently under review in Parliament, would allow her to limit the influence of local power brokers who have opposed her rise in Paris ever since she established herself as mayor of the 7 th arrondissement. The free rein she has managed to carve out for herself by being both popular and disruptive is undeniable, but there are limits that must not be crossed. There is a whiff of Trumpism in the way Dati fights her political battles: there is only one truth, her own; threats against those who dare to question her, such as against the journalist Patrick Cohen on June 18 on the television show C à vous; heavy artillery against the judiciary. A year ahead of the 2027 presidential campaign, next March's municipal elections will provide an important indication of the tone of the political debate, especially as much of the right and far right now also target the judiciary and the rule of law. Banned from running for office for five years following her conviction of embezzlement, far-right leader Marine Le Pen has just stated that, in the event of new snap legislative elections, she would still stand as a candidate, intending to rely on her electoral base to put maximum pressure on the electoral judge and the Constitutional Council. In the past, such a statement would have sparked an outcry, but that is no longer the case today.