NFL fans hoping Taylor Swift manifests Super Bowl wins for their teams: 'Math is mathin'
Taylor Swift is set to make her debut appearance on the "New Heights" podcast, which is co-hosted by her boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, and his brother Jason Kelce. It's the first time Swift will be the featured guest on the podcast, which started in September 2022.
The news of her appearance sent the internet (and Swifties) into a spiral, as Jason Kelce proclaimed, Swift is "the most requested guest in the history of shows." The highly anticipated podcast episode is set to air at 7 p.m. Aug. 13.
However, things got more shocking when the pop superstar confirmed the release of her new album "The Life of a Showgirl" on a "New Heights" podcast teaser released at 12:12 a.m. ET Aug. 12. In the video, Swift pulled out a blurred-out album cover for her new project, stating, "This is my brand-new album, 'The Life of a Showgirl.'"
"If you told me two years ago this was gonna happen, I would've laughed," one person posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, alongside a photo of Swift and Kelce during the podcast.
Another user also tweeted, "The concept of ('New Heights') interns knowing about ts12 before us. This is not the word of the lord."
NFL fans making Taylor Swift's new album about their team
The Enquirer reacted to the TS12 news, specifically to its color being orange, by finding all the Easter eggs that prove Swift is manifesting a Cincinnati Bengals Super Bowl win.
You can watch the video in the Instagram post above or in the video at the top of the page.
Fans had plenty of reactions to our staff's logic, with one Instagram user saying, "I did all the girl math again…adds up," and another writing, "100% an invisible string tying us to those Super Bowl rings."
The Bengals' official account also commented on TikTok: "The math is mathin'."
There were, of course, some haters, though. "Wow you just made me hate all taylor swift fans," one person wrote, while someone else said, "Just saying it's also the Cleveland browns (main) color... Travis is from Cleveland heights."
Here are more NFL fan reactions to Swift's upcoming album (and her "New Heights" appearance) below.
See how NFL fans, Swifties reacted to Taylor Swift's upcoming 'New Heights' appearance
What time does the 'New Heights' Taylor Swift episode release?
Date: Wednesday, Aug. 13.
Time: 7 p.m. ET.
Stream: YouTube.
Those hoping to watch the Kelces and Swift on the "New Heights" podcast can do so at 7 p.m. ET Wednesday. The episode will drop on YouTube, which will contain a full video feed of the podcast episode.
"New Heights" also has a YouTube membership plan, which comes with bonus content and costs either $1.99 or $3.99 per month, depending on the level. Users can add the membership by selecting the "join" button on the show's YouTube page.
Where to watch 'New Heights' podcast
YouTube will be the only platform on which fans of Kelce and Swift will be able to see them interact on video. However, numerous podcast platforms will also carry the episode, allowing Swifties to listen to the entire episode.
Below are some of the listening options for fans:
Apple Podcasts.
Amazon Music.
Audible.
Spotify.
Wondery.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: NFL fans hoping Taylor Swift manifests Super Bowl wins for their teams
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Needham Maintains Buy Rating on The Walt Disney Company (DIS) Stock
The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) is one of the Reddit Stocks with the Highest Upside Potential. On August 7, Laura Martin from Needham maintained a 'Buy' rating on the company's stock, with a price objective of $125.00. The analyst's rating is backed by several positive developments for The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) in Q3 2025. Notably, the company's diluted EPS rose to $2.92 from $1.43 in Q3 2024, and adjusted EPS went up by 16% for Q3 2025 to $1.61 from $1.39 in Q3 2024. A packed theater of moviegoers watching a blockbuster film produced by the entertainment company. Furthermore, The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS)'s direct-to-consumer segment demonstrated profitability with an operating income of $346 million. The company's Experiences segment saw operating income of $2.5 billion, reflecting a rise of $294 million compared to Q3 2024. The operating income in the quarter demonstrates a ~$40 million benefit from the timing of the Easter holiday, and a ~$30 million impact from pre-opening expenses at Disney Cruise Line. Despite the concerns, the positive financial performance and strategic initiatives, like asset swap involving ESPN and the NFL Network, as well as the timely launch of ESPN's flagship service, supported the analyst's rating. Diamond Hill Capital, an investment management company, released its Q1 2025 investor letter. Here is what the fund said: 'Other top Q2 contributors included The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS), Ferguson Enterprises and Capital One Financial. Diversified media and entertainment company Walt Disney benefited from easing macroeconomic concerns, primarily in its parks division, which is particularly sensitive to the economic backdrop.' While we acknowledge the potential of DIS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Times
9 minutes ago
- New York Times
Don't Be a Loser, Gen X Baby
Pour out a Zima for Gen X-ers, who will never end up running the world. This was the theme of a Wall Street Journal article recently about corporations that are skipping over the Slacker generation — those of us born between 1965 and 1980 — and promoting millennials instead to C.E.O. As The Journal put it, presumably channeling the anxieties of one of the paper's frustrated editors: 'As they enter what is usually the prime, C-suite career stage, more businesses are retaining their aging leaders or skipping a generation in search of the next ones.' I was born in 1976, and my reaction to this news was, in Gen X parlance, whatever, man. The disappointment some X-ers feel about this is indicative of an inherent contradiction: They did not trust institutions, empty ambitions and rampant consumerism when they were young, but still feel let down when, as middle-aged adults, the system has not delivered the professional success and extreme run-up of home equity that boomers have accrued. This is especially true of X-ers who happen to be white and male and C.E.O.-shaped. And it's a bummer! In theory, these X-ers were well aware that their parents were probably going to be better off than they themselves would ever be and couldn't decide whether to be angry about it pre-emptively or to just slackerishly opt out of the corporate and political structures that led to it altogether. The Canadian writer Douglas Coupland, who popularized the term 'Generation X' with his 1991 novel of that name, had a character in it named Dag, who puts it thus: 'I don't know … whether I feel more that I want to punish some aging crock for frittering away my world or whether I'm just upset that the world has gotten too big — way beyond our capacity to tell stories about it, and so all we're stuck with are those blips and chunks and snippets on bumpers.' Mr. Coupland has an entire chapter titled 'Our Parents Had More.' And you know what? They did. Education was cheaper, cities were less gentrified and corporations at least put on a show of being loyal to their employees. Many of us aging Gen X-ers work in the gig economy, piecing together several jobs and hoping our potential income isn't undermined by the post-human, tech-oligarch-enriching promises of A.I. As a result, many of us are now background players in the grand narratives we imagined for ourselves. In the words of the iconic X-er band Pavement, we've 'been chosen as an extra in the movie adaptation of the sequel to your life.' These circumstances have turned some of us into self-pitying whiners. (Maybe we always have been: Cue Beck whining, 'I'm a loser, baby.') I've heard so many X-ers complain incessantly about younger generations. First, millennials, but now Gen Z-ers, are accused of not wanting to do any work, being too sensitive, not wanting to pay their dues. But boomers looked down on us, too, and I'm not sure our failure to remember that can be exclusively explained by the brain cells we killed by disregarding Nancy Reagan's 'Just Say No' campaign, or by the perimenopausal brain fog some of us are experiencing. The younger generations are not lazier; they're just more skeptical of institutions than we are. They can already see that they may not be better off than our generation. And the fact that they think John Hughes movies are more creepy than cute does not mean that they're prudes or sensitive little snowflakes. The inability to accept this may explain why so many Gen X-ers voted for Donald Trump. If they view him as anti-establishment, he validates their need to feel that they're being subversive. If you see a post that used generative A.I. to make Mr. Trump look like a U.F.C. fighter or Rambo, I'll bet you a bottle of Boone's Farm Strawberry Hill that it was made by a Gen X-er. Mr. Trump is more Beavis or Butt-Head than John Kennedy or Franklin Roosevelt, and that appeals in the sense that he annoys the responsible grown-ups, which X-ers have loved doing since 'Ferris Bueller's Day Off.' And mostly, he gives them a story that says: Yes, you were lied to, and that's why your life sucks, dude. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
Sydney Sweeney rocks blue jeans as she breaks social media silence after American Eagle ad controversy
Sydney Sweeney made a denim-clad return to social media three weeks after the release of her controversial American Eagle "Good Jeans" ad campaign. On Friday, the 27-year-old actress, who has not publicly commented on the ad or its mixed reception, shared a carousel of photos on Instagram in which she was seen rocking a pair of oversized blue jeans and a white lace-front crop top while spending a night out at a bar with friends. "duval diaries." Sweeney wrote in the caption. In one photo, Sweeney was seen kicking her leg up as she posed with a group of friends, who also wore denim or blue and white ensembles. Sweeney and a friend appeared to be performing karaoke as they stood back to back on a stage while holding microphones in another snap. In another image, Sweeney was seen holding a tray of drinks while surrounded by a group of friends as they beamed at the camera. Other snaps featured "The White Lotus" actress dancing with her friends at the crowded venue. American Eagle debuted their ad campaign titled "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans" last month, which received a divided response on social media. Some dubbed the campaign "tone-deaf" due to alleged racial undertones, others have praised Sweeney for killing "woke" advertising. In a promo video posted to the brand's Instagram, Sweeney was seen walking toward an AE billboard featuring her and the tagline "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Genes." Sweeney crossed out "Genes" and replaced it with "Jeans" before walking away. In a second ad, Sweeney was seen laying down and fastening her jeans while saying, "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color." The camera then panned up to her blue eyes, and she said "My jeans are blue." The ad's detractors have suggested that it has shades of "eugenics" and "White supremacy." According to Salon, the term "great genes" was historically used to "celebrate whiteness, thinness and attractiveness." American Eagle released a statement on its social media on Aug. 1, which read, "'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone." While speaking with Fox News Digital, Reputation Management Consultants CEO Eric Schiffer explained how controversy could potentially turbocharge the actress' career along with her net worth. "The AE firestorm shoved Sweeney into toxic culture-war crosshairs — exactly where attention monetizes fastest," he said. "Backlash may spook a few 'safe' brands, but risk-tolerant studios will ruthlessly overpay for her heat. "American Eagle's denim blitz could jam an outrage cocktail of $5 million more in Sweeney's wallet before Labor Day. The viral jeans spot is a ruthless napalm-grade cash cannon — every click fires fresh royalty checks at her $40 million pile. Critics rant, but controversy drives denim sales — she's riding a volatile tornado straight to the bank." Schiffer also explained that the backlash the actress has received could lead to an influx of career opportunities for her. "Outrage addicts labeled the ad 'eugenics' but Hollywood execs smell radioactive buzz and cast her faster," he said. "Hollywood forgives denim puns; it rewards controversial cash." Schiffer continued, "She proved she can take heat and directors love an actress with fierce armor. Her blend of bombshell and backlash is near lethal catnip for producers. Hollywood loves a polarizing star with a merciless marketing punch that sells." However, PR expert Steve Honig voiced his opinion that the backlash was unlikely to affect Sweeney's career. "Regardless of which side you are on, the ads have undeniably gotten the actress, and the company, more attention and publicity than they have ever had. Judging by the public's split opinion, I don't think this will have much, if any, impact on Sweeney's career or upcoming projects," he said. "She is a popular, up-and-coming talent with a bright future ahead of her." Honig went on to cite other ad campaigns that saw great success by courting controversy. "Historically, ads for jeans have been provocative," he noted. "Look back to Calvin Klein's advertising campaign in the early 1980s featuring Brooke Shields; there was a lot of criticism about how a 15-year-old girl was being portrayed. The ads turned out to have a positive result for both Klein and Shields, and in many ways put the actress/model on the map." Honig continued, "As far as the Sweeney ads being too sexual or aimed at 'male gazing,' I would point to the highly successful Pepsi ad campaign with Cindy Crawford, which was recently rebooted. Gloria Vanderbilt's advertising campaign was all about her name being on a woman's backside." "The bottom line here is that American Eagle decided to push the envelope in much the same way Klein and Vanderbilt did," he added. "Like it or not, the campaign is sparking discussion and getting a lot of notice, which is likely what they set out to do."
