Ford's Raptors Won't Go Electric or PHEV Anytime Soon, Insiders Say
Ford offers some excellent electrified powertrains (and one full electric one, too) across its vast pickup lineup, but one place you don't see electrification taking place yet is in the off-road Raptor lineup. Don't expect it to happen anytime soon, either. A recent report from Australia's Carsales delves into the timing of an electric Raptor, suggesting it'll happen one day — but that day is aways off.
'Inevitable at some time in the future that there will be electrified offerings [of Raptor] … but we're still working through what that means,' Ford's head of the International Markets Group Kay Hart said.
Keep in mind that Hart speaks for all sorts of Ford's international markets, but the U.S. is not under that umbrella; the Raptor sold in those markets is the Ranger Raptor, though, a truck now sold here in the United States. Hart says the Raptor will continue to deliver better and more refined internal combustion engines in the short term, but puts no timeframe on when electrification might begin.
How Ford might go about injecting electrification into Raptor models on the road to full electrification is another open question. Justin Capicchiano, Ford Performance, SVE program manager, spoke about the downsides of a plug-in hybrid.
'A straightforward PHEV is probably not going to let you deliver what you want to do,' Capicchiano told Carsales. 'You have to put that battery somewhere, and the logical position is going to be somewhere out the back, and that's going to impact your off-road capability.'
It's not as though Ford's Raptor models are prime examples of Colin Chapman's maxim of simplify and add lightness, but adding on poundage without performance is an additional worry. 'Any battery-based system, you are looking at what the performance is like when the battery gets degraded,' Capicchiano said. 'Does it overcome the weight of the battery when the battery gets depleted?'
The large batteries and electric motors that make up a plug-in hybrid system add huge amounts of weight to cars – just ask the latest BMW M5. And once you run dry of electric power, you're lugging around a huge battery, hurting both performance and efficiency. That doesn't rule out the path of a traditional hybrid like the F-150 PowerBoost, however; while it doesn't offer the electric-only driving range a PHEV provides, the weight penalty is much less from its smaller battery.
For now, at least, we're happy to continue pounding around in the sand with Ford's V6- and V8-powered Raptors for as long as Ford lets us.
You Might Also Like
You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox
Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners
The Man Who Signs Every Car
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney warns that ‘foreign threats' mean Canada needs to move faster
There is a need for speed. That's the message from Prime Minister Mark Carney as he convenes the premiers Sunday in Saskatoon. Carney told the Federation of Canadian Municipalities in Ottawa on Friday that he wants to work with the provinces to fast-track the building of housing on a massive scale in Canada as well as accelerating 'nation-building' projects and streamlining environmental assessments. Without mentioning U.S. President Donald Trump's name, the prime minister prompted laughter from mayors when he underscored the importance of Canada moving quickly to make its economy more resilient. 'In face of foreign threats — no prize for guessing what I'm saying, I'm trying to learn some diplomacy from the King,' he said, referring to King Charles, who delivered Monday's throne speech, 'a core priority of this government is to build projects of national significance, projects that reinforce our country's resilience, projects that connect Canada, projects that partner with Indigenous Peoples, that diversify our trading partners and create a more sustainable future for all.' Carney cited potential projects like the long-discussed high-speed rail line between Windsor and Quebec City, upgrades to ports and other infrastructure as key to diversifying Canada's trading relationships and reducing its reliance on the U.S. 'We will move from delay to delivery, ensuring that the Canadian government becomes a catalyst for, not an impediment to, nation building projects that will supercharge growth in communities both large and small,' he said. That was music to the ears of Premier Doug Ford, who would like to expedite the Ring of Fire mining project in northern Ontario and new nuclear reactors, among other big-ticket priorities. 'He wants to work collaboratively,' Ford said of Carney, noting that was not always the case with former prime minister Justin Trudeau. 'The previous government and previous prime minister didn't show enough love, in my opinion, to Alberta and Saskatchewan. We have to be a united country,' said the Ontarian, who chairs the Council of the Federation. 'I believe (Carney) is creating that environment of making sure that we build large national infrastructure projects,' he said, expressing hope the prime minister will revisit Trudeau's Impact Assessment Act that limits pipeline construction and is unpopular in Alberta and Saskatchewan. 'As long as you have Bill C-69 it's like five steps forward, 10 steps backwards. We should all be in agreement right across the country, you can't move forward as long as you have Bill C-69.' Ford's comments at Queen's Park come as his Progressive Conservative government is in the midst of pushing through its controversial Bill 5 that would limit environmental assessments and create 'special economic zones' exempt from many municipal and provincial rules to speed up infrastructure projects. Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler said last-minute government amendments aimed at easing Indigenous That has raised concerns from some Indigenous leaders that First Nation treaty rights are being violated, which could lead to protests. 'I had a great meeting with Chief (Abram) Benedict last week when I had him over to the house. This isn't about hurting First Nations. This is about giving them an opportunity,' Ford said of the Ontario Regional Chief. 'We're always going to respect treaty rights. We're always going to have duty to consult but let's look across the country,' he said. 'Forget political stripes. We have ... NDP Premier (David) Eby (in British Columbia) saying we have to move on this. We have a Liberal government (in Ottawa) that's saying it's ridiculous it takes 15 years (to approve a mine). Either make changes or you fall behind and you get destroyed by the rest of the world that will eat our lunch.' Carney suggested in an interview earlier this week with David Cochrane on CBC Power and Politics that he is prepared to release a list of projects that would be fast-tracked after the summit. Ahead of the meeting, Quebec Premier François Legault told reporters he believes the federal government should help foot the bill for Quebec's planned expansion of hydroelectrical developments in Labrador. Already several First Nations leaders have suggested they want a greater say in what developments get the green light. Carney's governing agenda, laid out in the throne speech Tuesday pledged that Ottawa would work with Indigenous groups. 'As Canada moves forward with nation-building projects, the government will always be firmly guided by the principle of free, prior, and informed consent,' it said, echoing the principle enshrined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Natan Obed, leader of the national group representing Inuit people, the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said in an interview that Ottawa's requirement to consult, work with and obtain the consent of Inuit communities is 'baked into' the modern-day treaties that govern the relationship between the federal government and the Inuit. He has appealed to Carney to include Indigenous leaders in talks with the premiers in Saskatoon. 'We recognize as Inuit that there will be issues that first ministers will need to discuss with the Canadian prime minister' that deal with their particular concerns, but he said 'there are shared interests, and there's shared governance and we have to be a part of these conversations that will lead to decisions that are made on behalf of all Canadians.'
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Shopping for a 2025 Toyota Sequoia? Here's What Experts Say You Should Look at Instead
The 2025 Toyota Sequoia challenges full-size, three-row SUVs from GM, Ford, Jeep, and Nissan, offering similar size and width. Unlike its rivals, it's powered by a 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V-6 gas/electric hybrid engine that sends 437 horsepower and 583 pound-feet of torque through a 10-speed automatic transmission to the rear wheels or all four. The EPA rates the Sequoia at a combined 22 mpg with rear-wheel drive or 20 mpg with all-wheel drive. Towing is rated at 9,520 pounds, while payload is rated at 1,410 to 1,730 pounds, depending on trim and driveline. The new Tow Tech Package, available on all grades, includes Trailer Backup Guide and a Straight Path Assist. A wireless trailer camera system is another new option, and its ground clearance is 8.6 inches. With a face and mechanicals borrowed from the full-size Toyota Tundra pickup, the Sequoia comes equipped with a solid-axle rear suspension that limits third-row room and results in less than 12 cubic feet of cargo space. Thankfully, passenger volume is better at 157 cubic feet. Top trims get standard massaging seats for 2025, enhancing their opulence in what is presumably a mainstream vehicle. A 14-inch infotainment touchscreen comes with standard wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility on all but the base SR5. Piloting the Sequoia reveals light steering that makes herding it into a lane a constant chore, yet the Hybrid's instant torque helps alleviate the V-6's turbo lag, and it sounds like a V8. There's definitely more than enough power to make quick work of any driving chore, but you might wonder if there are better options. It's hard to top the Chevrolet Tahoe when it comes to full-size, mainstream SUVs. For 2025, there's a new 11-inch digital instrument cluster and a 17.7-inch infotainment touchscreen with Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, a Wi-Fi hotspot, and a wireless smartphone charger. But one thing is unchanged: the Tahoe is far roomier than the Toyota, with 176 cubic feet of passenger space, including its surprisingly sizeable third row, along with an unstinting 26 cubic feet of cargo space. The payload ranges from 1,870 to 2,280 pounds and it sports 8 inches of ground clearance. There's a choice of a 355-horsepower 5.3-liter V8, a 420-horsepower 6.2-liter V8, and a 305-horsepower turbocharged 3.0-liter diesel. Opting for the larger V8 requires premium fuel, but the smaller V8 doesn't. The EPA rates the combined fuel economy of the Tahoe at 17 mpg with the small V8, 16 mpg with the large V8, and 24 mpg with the diesel. A 10-speed automatic transmission is standard with either rear- or all-wheel drive. Towing is rated at 8,400 pounds, which is lower than its rivals. GM's Magnetic Ride Control suspension is optional and delivers a comfortable ride without undue body motion. While no full-size SUV is truly nimble, this is an easy one to maneuver once accustomed to its size. There's more than sufficient power, too, making for a very satisfying full-size SUV. While nearly as large as the Chevrolet and more sizable than the Toyota, the 2025 Ford Expedition provides 172 cubic feet of passenger room and 22 cubic feet of cargo volume. Payload ranges from 1,575 pounds to 1,758 pounds. Its instrument panel features a massive 24-inch horizontal display that houses both the instrument cluster and the infotainment system, the latter of which is accessible through its 13.2-inch touchscreen mounted close to the driver on the center console. It integrates wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Google software, and a 4G Wi-Fi hotspot. Motivating the Ford Expedition is a twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V6 and 10-speed automatic transmission with rear- or four-wheel drive that makes 400 horsepower. Not enough? You can choose a high-output 440-horsepower V6, as well. EPA fuel economy is rated at 19 mpg with rear-drive, and 18 mpg with four-wheel drive. Towing is rated up to 9,600 pounds, while ground clearance is 8.7 inches. This Ford feels far faster than its competition, although it's not as pleasing to drive as its leviathan Detroit rivals. It nearly matches the Jeep for towing, but lacks the engine choices of the Chevrolet or the indulgent detailing of the Jeep or Nissan. Still, its speed and handsome, conservative good looks may be all that matters. Four inches wider than the Ford yet just as long, the Nissan Armada is based on the Nissan Patrol, a similar model sold in the rest of the world. Its handsome, square-jawed exterior design encapsulates a cabin with 162 cubic feet of passenger space and 20 cubic feet of cargo volume. That trails its Detroit competitors, but still tops the Toyota. However, its payload capacity is competitive, ranging from 1,444 to 1,846 pounds, and it offers 9.6 to 11.6 cubic feet of ground clearance, depending on the trim level. The Armada comes with dual 12.3-inch screens for the driver and infotainment systems, although they're two inches larger on upper trims. Wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and wireless charging come standard on all but the base models. Last year's V-8 has been replaced by a 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V6 that generates 425 horsepower and 516 pound-feet of torque, 25 horsepower and 103 pound-feet more than last year's V8. The EPA rates the Armada at 16-18 mpg, depending on the trim, on premium unleaded fuel. A nine-speed automatic transmission comes with rear-wheel or all-wheel drive, and towing is rated at 8,500 pounds. That's less than the Toyota or Ford, but comparable to the Chevrolet. A new off-road package features 20-inch all-terrain tires, a locking rear differential, skid plates, tow hooks, hill descent control, an electronic air suspension, and selectable drive modes. The suspension is tuned for off-road comfort, which brings out body lean while cornering. Steering is nicely weighted, and pricier models provide a luxury experience in mainstream couture. Of the SUVs here, none surpass the 2025 Jeep Wagoneer's size. At 215 inches long, its cabin provides a massive 179 cubic feet of passenger space and 26 cubic feet of cargo space. Yet somehow, it doesn't drive as large as it is. A 3.0-liter Hurricane twin-turbo inline six-cylinder powerplant and 8-speed automatic transmission come standard with a choice of three available 4×4 systems. Towing is rated at 10,000 pounds, depending on the axle ratio. EPA fuel economy is rated at 20 mpg with rear-wheel drive and 19 mpg with all-wheel drive using regular unleaded. A fully independent suspension is standard, something not true of others here. A Quadra-lift air suspension with semi-active damping and a solid or hollow stabilizer bar is optional. Ground clearance is 8.3 inches with the standard suspension and 10 inches with the air suspension. The Wagoneer returns a surprisingly refined experience with ideally weighted steering and a supple, comforting ride. It can be fitted with a blizzard of screens, including a 10.3-inch digital instrument cluster, a 10.1-inch infotainment touchscreen, and an optional 10.3-inch touchscreen for the front-seat passenger. As you'd expect, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, SiriusXM, Amazon FireTV, Alexa, and a 4G Wi-Fi hotspot are standard. The Chevrolet is easily the best choice here, unless you need more muscle for towing. Then, we'd opt for the Jeep, which also offers the most spacious cabin. The biggest surprise is the Nissan, which is far more competitive than you'd expect, but its premium fuel requirement is cause for concern. The Ford proves less captivating, despite its muscle. The Toyota's hybrid driveline is impressive, and its towing capacity is strong, but its spaciousness is noticeably lacking compared to its rivals. Which one is best for you? Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
How U.S. Battery Innovations Could Transform EVs, Homes and the Power Grid
Your smartphone, electric car and home solar array all share a hidden truth: the humble lithium‑ion battery powering them was first commercialized in 1991. Today, three decades later, the U.S. still relies heavily on this vintage chemistry. But a quiet energy revolution is underway that will drive longer EV road trips from Los Angeles to San Francisco, slash home storage costs, and cut reliance on contentious cobalt and nickel supply chains. Nearly every device you own, from your iPhone in Manhattan to your Tesla parked in Palo Alto, uses lithium‑ion cells. This workhorse chemistry delivers high energy density in a compact package, but its road map has begun to bump against real‑world limits: Range ceilings: Most American EVs top out around 300–350 miles per charge, still shy of that California coast‑to‑coast dream. Safety headaches: Flammable liquid electrolytes have prompted high‑profile recalls by major automakers after thermal‑runaway concerns: Over 60% of the world's cobalt and 70% of nickel come from geopolitically sensitive regions that can involve labor and environmental issues. Think of first‑generation lithium‑ion like the Ford Model T: revolutionary in its day, but ready for a homegrown reinvention. Under the bipartisan Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Department of Energy aims to drive battery pack costs below $80 per kWh by 2025. Meanwhile, the DOE's Battery500 Consortium brings together Argonne National Lab, Ford, GM and Solid Power to push solid‑state energy density past 500 Wh/kg. States like California (with its Self‑Generation Incentive Program) and New York (via NY Green Bank) are offering rebates on stationary storage, while utilities such as PG&E and NextEra Energy are piloting grid‑scale sodium‑ion and flow batteries. These incentives, paired with swelling U.S. venture investment-over $5 billion in 2023 for battery startups-are rewiring America's cleantech landscape. Below are the five battery families poised to reshape U.S. energy, from EV showrooms in Detroit to solar farms in Texas. 1. Solid‑State Batteries: The 500-Mile EV Game Changer How they work: Replace liquid electrolytes with a solid ceramic or polymer-think of it as an unbreakable ionic highway. Why it matters for Americans: 500‑mile EV range: Ford and BMW collaborations with Solid Power aim to hit this milestone by 2027, letting a single charge carry you from Denver to No more Tesla battery‑fire headlines-solid electrolytes don't fuel thermal DOE tests show over 1,200 full cycles with minimal capacity loss-translating to 10+ years in daily service. Challenges: Scaling to gigafactory volumes remains a multibillion‑dollar hurdle. Expect U.S. pilot production lines by 2025 and limited consumer SUVs by 2030. 2. Lithium‑Sulfur: Lightweight, Low-Cost, and Made in America How they work: Swap pricey metal oxide cathodes for abundant sulfur, slashing pack weight and cost. American edge: Sulfur is a byproduct of U.S. oil refining, costing under $0.05 per kg. Key perks: Up to 500 Wh/kg theoretical energy density-fueling lighter drones for NOAA weather projects and next‑gen eVTOL cost: Potential factory costs as low as $60/kWh. Hurdle: Polysulfide shuttling degrades cycle life-startups like Lyten (HQ: Menlo Park) and Sion Power (Chandler, AZ) are deploying graphene coatings to stabilize cathodes, targeting pilot production by 2027. 3. Sodium‑Ion Batteries: Cheap, Abundant, and Perfect for Home Storage How they work: Replace lithium with sodium in the same "rocking‑chair" format-no exotic supply chains required. U.S. relevance: Sodium is over 10,000 times more abundant than lithium, with vast deposits in Gulf Coast salt flats and across the western U.S. Pros: Cost: Sodium-ion packs could drop below $70/kWh by 2026, undercutting even lithium-ion on reliability: Performs well down to –4 °F, making it a strong candidate for northern grid storage and winter life: Lab data and projections suggest 3,000–5,000 cycles, rivalling or exceeding lithium-ion durability. Use cases: Ideal for stationary home and community storage, as well as micro-mobility like e‑bikes and scooters. Catching up fast: While current sodium-ion energy density remains lower (110–140 Wh/kg), CATL projects next-gen cells reaching 200 Wh/kg by 2027, putting them on par with lithium-ion. Lab results also suggest cycle life of 3,000–5,000 cycles, making sodium-ion viable not just for home storage and scooters, but potentially for urban EVs and commercial fleets. 4. Aluminum‑Ion: Ultra-Fast Charging for Phones and Tools How they work: Anodic aluminum sheets cycle ions through novel cathode structures and ionic liquids. American R&D: Oak Ridge National Lab and Argonne prototypes show full charges in under 10 minutes. Benefits: Fast charging: Down from hours to minutes for smartphones and power Aluminum is the most recycled metal in the U.S.-no toxic extraction. Roadblocks: Lab cells still struggle to maintain 500+ cycles. Commercial rollout likely 2030+, pending DOE's SCALE‑UP funding rounds. 5. Zinc‑Air: Reliable Backup Power for Hurricanes and Grid Outages How they work: Zinc oxidizes at the anode while ambient oxygen reacts at the cathode-like a fuel cell that never runs out of air. Why Texas and Florida care: $50/kWh system costs are within reach for community backup during hurricane-driven blackouts.10‑day storage capability keeps critical services online when solar or wind dips. Limitation: Slow recharge time-best suited for primary backup or flow‑style refueling at centralized hubs. Powerwall vs. sodium‑ion: A Tesla Powerwall 2 lists around $11,500 ($430/kWh installed) today. Early sodium‑ion systems from GridScale Energy (Austin) are targeting $300/kWh installed by 2026-over 30% costs: The average price of a new EV in the U.S. hovers around $55,000. If solid‑state reduces battery pack costs by 15%, automakers could drop sticker prices by $8,000 or boost range by 100 miles without raising pilot: Florida Power & Light's zinc‑air trial aims for 1 MW, 10 MWh systems to handle hurricane season peak loads, at an estimated $200/kWh installed-half the cost of lithium‑ion backups. Why Battery Tech Is Key to America's Energy Security and Affordability Your wallet: U.S. DOE targets and IRA credits could cut your home battery costs in half by 2030. One of the leading reasons for NOT buying an EV in the US is concern over car price which is largely determined by battery security: Fewer imports of cobalt and nickel mean stronger supply chains and less price commute: Imagine your EV reliably hitting 600 miles on a charge-no more range anxiety on I‑95 or Route 66. No single battery chemistry will rule. Instead, expect a U.S. portfolio approach: Luxury EVs: Solid‑state batteries for flagship models from Tesla, Ford and mobility: Sodium‑ion for entry‑level EVs, e‑bikes and scooters in urban cores like New York or Los electronics: Aluminum‑ion and improved lithium‑ion for phones, laptops and power tools that recharge in resilience: Zinc‑air and next‑gen flow batteries giving states their own backup independence. American automakers, utilities and labs are investing tens of billion annually to lead this charge. The real competition isn't just technical-it's about reshoring manufacturing, training a new workforce, and securing U.S. leadership in the energy transition. Q: When can I buy these locally? Sodium‑ion home/storage: Available via regional installers by 2025– EVs: Limited pilot fleets from 2027–2030; mass‑market rollout by packs: Aerospace and specialty drone use in early 2030s. Q: Will lithium‑ion stick around? Absolutely. Existing plants in Nevada and Ohio will keep cranking out improved lithium‑ion for phones, laptops and lower‑range EVs through the 2030s, with incremental gains in lifetime and safety. Q: How about recycling? U.S. firms like Li‑Cycle (Toronto HQ, U.S. plants in Rochester and Gilbert) and Redwood Materials (Nevada) are scaling up facilities to recover over 95% of metals from spent cells, while new chemistries with fewer toxic metals streamline processing. Better batteries are not science fiction; they're being engineered today in American labs, factories and testbeds. Over the next decade, advances in solid‑state, sodium‑ion, lithium‑sulfur, aluminum‑ion and zinc‑air will reshape how we power cars, phones and the grid. The question for U.S. consumers isn't if these breakthroughs will arrive, but which one will change your life. And it might just be Made in America. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
