Man arrested for allegedly keying Tesla in New Haven
Connor Perreault, 36, of New Haven, was charged with criminal mischief in the second degree. Perreault was also an employee at Gateway Community College, police said.
Avon man accused of drawing swastika on a Tesla
Police said the car was vandalized on March 5 while parked in the Temple Street Garage. Cameras on the Tesla captured still images of Perreault, according to authorities
The driver and passenger sides of the car were keyed. The damages are estimated between $500 to $2,000 in damages, according to police.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brawls, racism and cocaine: Lawsuit reveals life inside Tesla plant where Musk was directly involved with HR decisions
Working conditions at Tesla's manufacturing plant in Fremont, California, have allegedly gone from bad to worse, with sexual assaults aboard company shuttle buses, drug and alcohol use onsite, all-out brawls breaking out between employees and 'prevalent' bigotry – including widespread use of the N-word, a bombshell lawsuit reveals. In a 159-page federal lawsuit filed Thursday and obtained first by The Independent, Ozell Murray, a former Fresno police officer in charge of security at the 22,000-person factory, claims he and his team 'routinely' seized cocaine and fentanyl onsite, confiscated guns discovered in the building, investigated 'acts of sexual deviance' on Tesla grounds, and, at regular intervals, 'pulled employees off the manufacturing line and sent them home for being alcohol-intoxicated and high on drugs.' Those who reported the issues were fired over bogus charges or forced to resign, according to Murray's complaint, to which several of his ex-colleagues signed on as co-defendants. 'Healthy profits have always been more important to the Company than a healthy working environment,' the complaint alleges. 'For Tesla, more bodies on the manufacturing line meant more vehicles flying out the factory door – no matter how unclean the hands were that were assembling those cars.' Tesla's Model Y, Model S, Model 3 and Model X lines are manufactured in Fremont. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Tesla in 2023 over allegations of unbridled racism at its Fremont plant. This spring, Tesla settled a lawsuit brought by a Black employee at the Fremont facility who accused a manager of greeting her by saying, 'Welcome to the plantation,' and, 'Welcome to the slave house.' A Tesla spokesperson did not respond on Friday to a request for comment. The complaint against Tesla, which was brought by Murray and former Tesla HR execs Linda Peloquin, Adam Chow, Tiara Paulino, Sharnique Martin and Gregory Vass, says Tesla CEO, and erstwhile presidential 'First Buddy.' Elon Musk – presently America's least-likable public figure, according to Gallup – was personally involved in many of the Fremont factory's hiring and firing decisions. 'Musk was a frequent visitor to the facility—and not just for high-level photo opportunities, but to take a hands-on approach to managing, directing, and facilitating resolution of the manufacturing and workforce issues at the plant,' the complaint states. 'Musk would frequently visit the plant and conduct issue-resolution meetings with actual line employees, not just upper management bureaucrats. Musk would hold – meetings with line-level employees from every function of the plant – from the manufacturing line to operations to HR – and issue directives right then and there to resolve the issues employees raised.' The complaint goes on to describe a significant portion of the carmaker's 'hastily-hired and poorly-vetted' workforce in Fremont as 'blatant racists and misogynists.' 'Many who have worked there have likened the workplace to the Jim Crow South; an environment in which Black employees and brown-skinned workers are besieged with constant racial abuse, stereotyping, and hostility – including with repeated use of inarguably the most brutal and degrading racial slur in the history of humanity: N****r,' according to the complaint. '... Black Tesla employees have reported regularly encountering nooses on desks and other equipment as well as seeing the word 'N****r' graffitied on walls, in bathroom stalls, elevators – even on new Tesla vehicles rolling off the production line.' The complaint filed by Murray and his former coworkers alleges that the 'use of the 'N-word' was prevalent' at Fremont. In late 2021, one of Murray's direct reports, a Black security officer who was also a former cop, 'was victimized when a Tesla employee called her a n****r,' the complaint states. 'Murray's colleague was so distressed by the incident and the impunity with which the word was used toward her… that she had to take a medical leave from work to recover from the trauma,' according to the complaint. 'Yet, instead of offering encouragement, Murray's supervisor… counseled him that Murray should be informing all new Black security personnel that the use of the 'N-word' was simply engrained [sic] in the culture at Tesla and, so, Murray should only be bringing aboard that are willing to accept and acquiesce to the prevalence of that word in the workplace.' In another incident indicative of the 'racial tension and toxicity' at Tesla's Fremont plant, the complaint says a Black assembly-line employee working on a vehicle called out a warning after he spotted a coworker about to do something that could potentially damage the car. According to the complaint, the coworker, who was white, 'responded by angrily yelling back, 'Do you want to hang by a tree?'' Supervisors were also known to abuse Tesla's 'zero tolerance' policy at the time for drug and alcohol use on the job, the complaint goes on. It says that if a higher-up suspected an employee was under the influence, they could report the person to security and Murray or someone from his team would then escort them off the premises 'without question.' However, in 'many instances,' the supposedly intoxicated employee did not appear that way to the security officer tasked with removing them, according to the complaint. 'As it turned out, many supervisors and managers were merely using the policy as a means to retaliate against their subordinates – and, in particular, when a line employee had turned down the supervisor or manager's sexual advances,' the complaint states. 'Or, when the manager or supervisor wanted to retaliate against someone because of their race or ethnicity. Or, when the manager or supervisor wanted to retaliate against someone because of a complaint an employee had lodged against them.' Yet, the complaint claims incidents such as these were swept under the rug by one specific Tesla manager who had 'an irrational fixation on fostering the delusion that the environment and culture at Tesla is one of tolerance and innovation, rather than racism and retaliation.' Because of sky-high demand for Tesla vehicles at the time, if a violent or racist Tesla employee were to actually get fired for cause, they were regularly 'loopholed' back in via a temp agency, according to the complaint. This, the filing says, allowed them to bypass the usual background check, and 'oftentimes' meant an employee who had been previously victimized 'had to actually resume working with their attacker and tormentor.' One loopholed employee who had been let go for workplace violence returned to Fremont and promptly attacked another colleague, the complaint states. For his part, the complaint says Murray 'was outspoken' with Tesla management about safety and security concerns in Fremont. For that, he wound up 'summarily fired under the pretextual guise of 'poor performance,'' even though he had never once been disciplined and was promoted five times in his six years with Tesla. Murray's co-defendants all endured similar experiences, being drummed off the payroll for supposed 'poor performance,' according to the complaint. Each of them had brought up serious concerns about issues at Tesla, or had investigated and substantiated employee wrongdoing, and were subsequently 'outright fired' for doing so, or resigned before they could be terminated, the complaint alleges. None had ever received any negative performance reviews, according to the complaint. Murray and his co-defendants are suing Tesla on five causes of action, including retaliation, wrongful termination and failure to prevent unlawful discrimination. They are seeking compensatory damages, emotional distress damages, punitive damages and exemplary damages to be determined by a jury, plus attorneys' fees and court costs.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
"This Will Open the Floodgates": Tesla In Trouble as Jury Orders It to Pay $329 Million After Autopilot Death
Tesla just got handed one of its biggest legal blows yet — one that could have seismic implications for its future operations. On Friday, a Miami jury ruled that the Elon Musk-owned automaker's Autopilot driver assistance software was partially at fault for a horrendous collision that killed a 22-year-old woman in 2019 and severely injured her boyfriend. In total, the jury ordered Tesla to pay $329 million to the surviving family of the victims, Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo, including $200 million in punitive damages and $129 million in compensatory damages. It was not considered to be primarily at fault: the driver of the Tesla Model S involved in the crash, George McGee, was found to bear 66 percent of the blame for the crash. Tesla shoulders the remaining 33 percent. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, counsel for the plaintiffs, said in statement on Friday, as quoted by CNBC. "Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology, putting everyday Americans like Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo in harm's way." The tragic incident took place while McGee was driving his Tesla while Enhanced Autopilot was enabled. When he bent down to pick up his phone after dropping it, the Model S careened through an intersection at nearly 60 miles per hour and smashed into a parked SUV, which Benavides and Angulo were standing behind. Benavides died at the scene, and Angulo survived with horrific injuries. While on the witness stand, McGee said he believed Autopilot would protect him and brake on its own to prevent a crash. Schreiber accused Tesla of running a "misinformation campaign" that vastly overstated Autopilot's capabilities, per the New York Times. "I feel like we were experimented on," Angulo told NBC6 South Florida in 2023, "and this technology was out on the road before it was safe." The ruling could drastically impact Tesla's autonomous vehicle efforts — which it's been increasingly leaning into as its sales falter — and perhaps reshape the self-driving landscape at large. These are enormous damages, and the prospect of being on the hook anytime the experimental software kills or injures a bystander could dampen investor enthusiasm for the tech. It also comes at a critical moment for Tesla, which launched a limited robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June, and expanded its driverless fleet this week to San Francisco. Musk is hoping that a pivot to robotaxis could rake in the company trillions of dollars. Prior to the launch, he estimated that Tesla could have a million robotaxis on American roads by the end of 2026. In light of the ruling, that's a lot expensive legal liabilities waiting to happen. "This will open the floodgates," Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the lawsuit, told the Associated Press after the ruling. "It will embolden a lot of people to come to court." This may have been a long time coming for Tesla. Its self-driving software — which are actually driver assistance features, regardless of their overconfident brand names — have been involved in multiple deadly crashes. The automaker has frequently been criticized for exaggerating how autonomously its cars can operate and has been repeatedly investigated by federal regulators and sued by state authorities. Tesla says it will be appealing the decision. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," the company said in a statement. More on Tesla: Tesla Rolling Out Robotaxis With Human Drivers in the Driver's Seat, Defeating the Purpose of a Robotaxi Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police investigating incident where cyclist seemingly knocked into traffic by motorcyclist in Nanaimo, B.C.
Police in Nanaimo, B.C. say they are continuing to investigate a collision caught on video that appears to show a passing motorcyclist knocking a 78-year-old cyclist into oncoming traffic. The incident happened on the night of Aug. 2 at the intersection of Granite Park Road and Departure Bay Road. Dash cam footage from a nearby vehicle, a Tesla driven by Harlunn Anderson, shows a motorcyclist reach out toward the biker, who then tumbles across the opposite lane and onto the sidewalk. Anderson said traffic in the area was moving slowly because the road was in an area between two school zones. "If we were going any faster, there would have been a head-on collision," he told CHEK News. The cyclist sustained minor injuries, including a swollen cheek and scrapes, but did not want to call 911 or go to hospital, according to Anderson. "He had, like, a golf ball-sized goose egg on his cheek. It was cut open. His arm was bleeding, and there were a couple other people that stopped [to help]." Const. Sherri Wade, media relations officer with Nanaimo RCMP, said the video sparked a flood of tips from the public. Callers recognized the motorcycles seen in the footage and directed officers to a nearby residence. On Aug. 3, Wade said, an officer was at that home when a man approached and said, "Can I tell you what happened?" The man told police he had reached out to touch the cyclist's shoulder to avoid a collision and did not realize the cyclist had fallen until seeing the video online. Nanaimo RCMP says he had also called police earlier that day to explain what happened and provide his contact information. "We don't know yet whether it was intentional or whether it was one person letting another person know, 'I'm behind you and I'm going to go pass'," the constable said. She said the investigation is ongoing and no charges have been laid so far. Updated rules Wade, an experienced cyclist herself, said she has never been tapped by another person while riding and described the encounter as "unusual." She added that cyclists should use designated bike lanes where available, but if none exist, "we are to ride defensively so that other drivers can see us." Wade said drivers should take extra care around vulnerable road users, no matter how "frustrating" it might feel. WATCH | Study supports laws that allow cyclists to yield at stop signs: Colleen Sparks, executive director of Capital Bike, a non-profit advocacy group, said touching a cyclist while passing "might cause even the strongest cyclist to react and potentially lead to a loss of balance." "Touching someone riding a bike when passing could lead to an accident that is life altering for the rider," Sparks added. "We have to wonder what the motorcyclist was thinking." ICBC says drivers in B.C. are required to give cyclists at least one metre of space when passing on roads with speed limits of 50 km/h or less, and 1.5 metres on faster roads. Under B.C.'s new rules, which were introduced in June 2024, drivers must keep at least one metre away when passing vulnerable road users on roads with speed limits of 50 km/h or less, and 1.5 metres on faster roads. Vulnerable road users include cyclists, pedestrians, motorcyclists and people using mobility devices.
