Russia thanks US for its help during WWII
Russia is grateful to the US for its support during the Second World War via the Lend-Lease program, however, the Soviet Union would have beaten Nazi Germany anyway, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday.
The remarks came ahead of the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory over the Nazis in May and amid a thaw in relations between Moscow and Washington.
'Can we say that we couldn't have prevailed without Lend-Lease? No, we can't. We would have prevailed, and we would have emerged victorious regardless. We would have survived on nothing but the earth, but we would have won. That said, they did help us, and we should value and remember that,' Peskov told an education forum in Moscow on Wednesday.
The Kremlin previously disputed a claim by US President Donald Trump who had said in January that Russia 'helped us [the US]' win WWII.
Lend-Lease was a US government program during World War II under which Washington provided its allies with combat supplies, equipment, food, and strategic raw materials.
The Soviet Union received aid worth the equivalent of about $200 billion in today's money, Peskov said. He noted, however, that the assistance was not free. Russia, as the successor state to the USSR, fulfilled its financial obligations related to the Lend-Lease program under President Vladimir Putin in 2006, the spokesman added.
In 2022, then US President Joe Biden signed another Lend-Lease Act to support Ukraine in its conflict with Russia; however, the document was largely symbolic and was never used. Washington instead relied on other funding mechanisms like the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, funneling roughly $174 billion of military, humanitarian, and financial aid to Kiev.
Trump has adopted a different approach, focusing on conditional support for Ukraine by leveraging aid for political and economic concessions. In March, he temporarily halted all military aid to pressure Kiev into peace negotiations with Moscow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kremlin names reason for new offensive inside Ukraine
Russia's recent advance into Ukraine's Dnepropetrovsk Region is part of the push by Moscow to establish a 'buffer zone' on the front line, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. On Sunday, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that the 90th Armored Division had reached the western border of the Donetsk People's Republic and continued its offensive into the neighboring territory. The next day, it reported new territorial gains in the area, without providing details. On Monday, Peskov confirmed that the recent advance was aimed at establishing a 'buffer zone' on the front line. 'It is one of the goals, of course, but if we talk about the nuances of the military actions themselves, then your questions should be addressed to the Defense Ministry,' the spokesman said. The intention to create a 'buffer zone' was announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin late last month. He delivered his remarks amid recurring Ukrainian drone and artillery strikes targeting civilians in Donbass, as well as Kursk, Belgorod, and Bryansk regions. Following his comments, the Russian military also reported advances in Ukraine's Sumy Region along the border. The Times has described the news of Russia's advance into Dnepropetrovsk Region as 'a significant symbolic and strategic blow' for Ukraine. Meanwhile, Russian Senator Andrey Klishas said that Russia had started 'an active phase of denazification' in the region. It comes on the heels of two rounds of direct Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul. Moscow insists that a lasting peace settlement can only be reached once Kiev recognizes Crimea, the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, and Kherson and Zaporozhye Regions as part of Russia while committing to neutrality. Kiev has consistently refused to consider any territorial concessions.
Russia Today
17 hours ago
- Russia Today
US silent on Russia's missile moratorium proposal
The US has so far ignored Moscow's call to impose limits on its deployment of intermediate-range missiles, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said. Speaking at the Future Forum 2050 on Monday, Lavrov stated that Washington had not responded to an offer Putin had made to establish reciprocal moratoriums after the collapse of the Cold War-era Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. 'It's already clear they will not react to our call, in the absence of the treaty, to establish two parallel, non-interlinked moratoriums,' he said. The INF Treaty, signed in 1987 by the US and the Soviet Union, banned land-based ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. Washington withdrew from the deal in 2019, citing alleged violations by Moscow. Russia has denied the claims, accusing the US of developing the banned missiles, but pledged not to deploy such systems unless the US did so first. Last year, the US announced that it would field the multipurpose Standard Missile-6 (SM-6), the Tomahawk land-attack cruise missile, and a hypersonic weapon that is still in development in 'episodic deployments' in Germany starting in 2026. The two systems would have been banned by the INF Treaty, assuming they were deployed on land. Meanwhile, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov signaled that Russia would not be constrained by any limitations if it ends its self-imposed moratorium. 'One way or another, Russia will have to respond to NATO's expansionist and aggressive actions,' he explained. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov also noted that Moscow would soon be forced to walk back its current policy. 'Russia's restraint in the post-INF period was not appreciated by the US and its allies and was not met with reciprocity,' he said. 'We have openly and directly stated that the unilateral moratorium is approaching its logical end.' He also rebuked the US for an apparent reluctance to alter its course. 'We do not see any fundamental change, let alone reversal, in US plans to forward-deploy ground-based intermediate and shorter-range missiles in various regions,' he said. 'On the contrary, practical steps taken by the US military have convinced us that such activity will only intensify.'
Russia Today
7 days ago
- Russia Today
Kremlin comments on Ukraine talks
Expecting immediate breakthroughs in peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine would be 'incorrect,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. His remarks come after the second round of revived negotiations between Moscow and Kiev was held in Istanbul on Monday. After the talks, both sides announced that they had agreed to conduct the largest prisoner exchange to date and indicated that direct contact would continue. The two delegations also exchanged draft memorandums outlining a roadmap towards an eventual peace deal. Commenting on the talks, Peskov emphasized on Tuesday that the 'issue of regulation is extremely complex and consists of a large number of nuances.' 'The project of the memorandum we submitted to the Ukrainian side contains many provisions, including multi variability, all aimed at eliminating the root causes of this conflict and moving towards a sustainable resolution trajectory,' the spokesman said. Peskov stressed that given the complexities of the negotiations, it would be 'incorrect to expect any immediate solutions or breakthroughs here.' However, he noted that certain agreements have nevertheless been reached, including a new prisoner swap. The spokesman stated that Russia is now expecting Ukraine's response to the memorandum that was submitted on Monday. Moscow's memorandum, which was made public after the negotiations, contains a number of demands, including Ukrainian neutrality, international recognition of Russia's new territories, and military restrictions for Kiev. Specifically, it demands that Kiev withdraw all troops from the regions that have joined Russia – Crimea, the Donbass republics, and Kherson and Zaporozhye regions – while formally recognizing these areas as Russian territory. Ukraine must also enshrine neutrality and non-nuclear status, withdraw from conflicting international treaties, disband nationalist armed groups, and limit its military capabilities. The proposal also requires Ukraine to ensure rights for Russian-speaking citizens, make Russian an official language, end religious persecution, ban Nazi and nationalist organizations, and lift sanctions on Russia. According to the proposal, a final peace treaty between Moscow and Kiev can only be signed after elections are held in Ukraine and endorsed by a legally binding UN Security Council resolution.
