Other Nations Also Enrich Uranium – So Why Is Only Iran A Global Villain?
Then there is Iran. Same process. Same science. But a global firestorm. Warnings from Washington. Airstrikes from Israel. Sanctions. Suspicion. Why?
Let's break it down.
Same Process, Different Perception
Enrichment means increasing the concentration of Uranium-235. Natural uranium holds just 0.7% of it. Power reactors need around 3-5%. Nuclear bombs need more than 90%.
Countries like Argentina and Japan keep enrichment under 5%. No surprises. No secrets. Always under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) watch.
Iran did not stop at 5%. It went to 60%. That is far above energy needs. Just a step away from weapons-grade material. The United Nations' nuclear energy watchdog, IAEA, has flagged it repeatedly. It says Iran holds more than 400 kg of 60% enriched uranium that is enough for making 10 nuclear bombs.
'Secrecy' Fuels Suspicion
Iran's nuclear journey has allegedly not been transparent. In 2009, a hidden facility at Fordow was revealed, not by Tehran but by Western intelligence. Before that, the AMAD project (an Iranian scientific project with the aim of developing nuclear weapons) quietly explored weaponisation until 2003.
And now, IAEA inspectors are routinely denied access. In 2025, for the first time in two decades, the IAEA formally declared Iran in breach of its obligations.
Compare that with Brazil, the Netherlands or Japan. Their programmes stay open and cooperative. No secret bunkers. No hidden centrifuges.
The Regional Firetrap
Iran sits in a volatile neighbourhood – Israel, Saudi Arabia and U.S. bases in the Gulf nations. Tensions always near the surface.
Iranian leaders have issued fiery statements against Israel. Some called for its destruction. That changes how the world views Tehran's nuclear work.
Israel does not take chances. It launched airstrikes in 2025 on Iranian nuclear sites – Natanz, Fordow and more. The United States supported it. The message was loud and clear – Iran's nuclear rise will not be tolerated.
None of the other uranium-enriching countries face such hostility from their neighbours. No threats. No attacks. No regional war risk.
Technology Through 'Backdoor'
Iran allegedly did not always develop its nuclear tech legally. It reportedly tapped into the A.Q. Khan network from Pakistan and bought parts from shady vendors in Europe. That purported history still haunts it.
Other nations built their systems through public and internationally accepted channels. No smuggling, no cover-ups.
JCPOA Gamble, Its Collapse
In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with six global powers. It agreed to limit enrichment, reduce stockpiles and allow inspections. In return, it got sanctions relief.
Then in 2018, President Donald Trump pulled the United States out. Sanctions returned. Iran responded by allegedly ramping up enrichment again. By 2025, its uranium stockpile was reportedly 22 times higher than JCPOA limits.
The agreement collapsed. The trust shattered.
Symbol of Sovereignty or Defiance?
For Iran, its nuclear programme is a matter of national pride. A stand against what it sees as Western domination. Its leaders say enrichment is a right and a matter of dignity.
But to Washington and Tel Aviv, it looks like defiance, a threat and a potential path to the bomb.
Japan does not speak this language, nor does Brazil. Their enrichment is a utility. Iran's is a political statement.
Double Standard?
There is one. Israel reportedly holds nuclear weapons. It never signed the NPT. It faces no sanctions.
Iran signed the treaty. It faces the scrutiny, the airstrikes and the economic chokehold.
Still, Iran's own behavior – secrecy, enrichment levels and regional aggression (as alleged) – keeps fueling the fire.
The World Watches
IAEA continues to raise red flags. Sanctions tighten. Talks stall.
And yet, other nations with enrichment programmes continue uninterrupted. Argentina refines. The Netherlands develops. Japan innovates. But the spotlight never turns their way.
Only Iran stands at the centre of this nuclear storm. Enriching uranium, but also enriching suspicion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
US trade talks: Trump makes big tariff statement again, puts ball firmly in India's court
India and the United States are in a race against time. With days to go, officials from both countries are scrambling to seal a Bilateral Trade Agreement before the 9 July cut-off. The deal, if done, could spare both sides a steep tariff spike. US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) reaffirmed that India-US will soon strike a trade deal with "much less tariffs", allowing both countries to compete. President Donald Trump remains confident. Speaking to reporters, he said, "I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal. It is going to be a deal where we are able to go in and compete. Right now, India does not accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we are going to have a deal for much less tariffs." India and the US have been negotiating over a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) before the critical July 9 deadline of the 90-day pause on tariff escalations. Meanwhile, India has adopted a firmer stance on agricultural matters as high-stakes trade negotiations with the United States reach a pivotal moment, government sources said on Monday. Farm front lines But backroom talks in Washington are tense. India's delegation, led by Chief Negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, has extended its stay in a bid to close the gaps. Agriculture is the hardest nut to crack. Live Events One senior government source said bluntly, 'There is no question of conceding on dairy. That's a red line.' India's dairy sector supports over 80 million people. For Delhi, opening it up is politically unthinkable. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar underlined the stakes. 'We are in the middle, hopefully more than the middle, of a very intricate trade negotiation. Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion,' he told Newsweek. But he warned, 'There will have to be give and take.' Battles over beans and barriers Washington wants more. It is pressing India to slash duties on apples, nuts and genetically modified crops. The bigger goal is to tap India's massive farm market to trim a $45 billion trade gap. Richard Rossow at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies said, 'There are two real challenges to concluding an initial agreement. First on the list is US access to the Indian market for basic agriculture products. India will need to protect its basic agriculture sector for economic and political reasons.' The second headache? Non-tariff barriers. India's Quality Control Orders — more than 700 rules covering imports — block low-grade goods and push local manufacturing. Suman Berry at Niti Aayog called them a 'malign intervention' that drives up costs for small businesses. What's at stake No one wants a tariff war. If talks collapse, the suspended 26% levy snaps back. That would hit Indian exporters and American firms alike. Already, India's baseline 10% tariff remains. Trump's team is clear: if India holds firm on farm barriers, the US may look elsewhere. Still, there is hope for a middle path. Ajay Srivastava of Global Trade Research Initiative said, 'The next seven days could determine whether India and the US settle for a limited 'mini-deal' or walk away from the negotiating table — at least for now.' Mini-deal or bust? The likely outcome, experts say, is a slimmed-down pact. India could offer tariff cuts on cars, industrial goods and select farm products like almonds or ethanol. The US may push Delhi to buy oil, aircraft or ease rules for big retailers like Amazon and Walmart. Mr Rossow recalled how the original vision was clearer: 'The two leaders [Trump and Modi] laid out a simple concept in their first summit this year. The US would focus on manufactured goods that are capital-intensive, while India would focus on items that are labour-intensive.' Behind the immediate scramble is a bigger goal. Both sides want to lift trade from $191 billion now to $500 billion by 2030. Phase one aims to finish by autumn next year. But that dream rests on this week. If talks fail, tariffs bite. If they succeed, companies on both sides get a break. For now, all eyes are on Washington. Time is short, stakes high — and the farm fields of India have never loomed larger in a global trade deal. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
India.com
22 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump: Israel Agrees To 60-Day Gaza Ceasefire; Urges Hamas To Accept Deal
United States President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) said that Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalise a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. Trump cautioned Hamas against rejecting the ceasefire deal, warning that "it will not get better -- it will only get worse." Qatar and Egypt, who, according to Trump, "worked very hard to help bring Peace", will deliver the final proposal. He also stated that negotiations to end the war would continue during the proposed ceasefire period. "My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better -- IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social. The announcement came less than a week before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's scheduled visit to the United States on July 7. Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes have continued across Gaza. On Monday, Israel launched at least 50 aerial strikes, with a significant focus on eastern Gaza City, following forced evacuation warnings issued by the Israeli military, according to Al Jazeera. Citing medical sources, Al Jazeera reported that Israeli forces killed at least 68 Palestinians in Gaza on Sunday, including 47 in Gaza City and the northern areas of the territory. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, the ongoing war has so far claimed at least 56,500 lives and wounded 133,419 people. In comparison, around 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the October 7 attacks, during which more than 200 individuals were taken captive.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran's SCATHING Ultimatum To Israel; Warns Of ‘Most Brutal Last War To Wipe Out' Tel Aviv
/ Jul 02, 2025, 07:05AM IST An anonymous Iranian official warned that the next war with Israel will be Tehran's last - and Israel's total destruction. Claiming massive missile capabilities and public support, Iran threatened to launch hundreds of strikes daily if war resumes. The chilling threat comes after Israel's unprecedented attack on Iranian nuclear sites and rising regional tensions.
