logo
North Korea says 'no reason' for talks with South

North Korea says 'no reason' for talks with South

Time of India6 days ago
Leader Kim Jong Un's powerful sister
SEOUL: North Korea has no interest in pursuing dialogue with the south, leader
Kim Jong Un
's powerful sister said Monday, dismissing a new president in Seoul who has vowed to mend ties.
Since his election in June, south Korean president Lee Jae Myung has broken with his predecessor's hawkish tone on the north and halted loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts along the border, begun in response to a barrage of trash-filled north Korean balloons.
North Korea has ended its own propaganda broadcasts, which had boomed strange and eerie noises into the south.
But such gestures do not mean Seoul should expect a thawing of icy ties, Kim Yo Jong said in an English dispatch carried by the north's official Korean Central News Agency on Monday.
"If the ROK... expected that it could reverse all the results it had made with a few sentimental words, nothing is more serious miscalculation than it," she said, referring to south Korea by its official name.
"We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither the reason to meet nor the issue to be discussed with the ROK," she added.
"The DPRK-ROK relations have irreversibly gone beyond the time zone of the concept of homogeneous," she said, using the north's official acronym.
Seoul said Kim's statement, Pyongyang's first reaction to Lee's overture, "reaffirms the high level of mistrust between the two due to years of hostile policies".
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Indonesia: Unsold Sofas at Bargain Prices (Prices May Surprise You)
Sofas | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
"We take this as a sign that the north is closely monitoring the Lee administration's North Korea policy," Unification Ministry Spokesman Koo Byung-sam said at a press briefing.
Hong Min, a senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, told AFP that Kim's statement underscored Pyongyang's entrenched anti-south stance.
"It declares that its hostile perception towards the south has become irreversible," he said.
The two countries technically remain atL war because the 1950-53 Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty.
The United States, a key security ally of south Korea, keeps around 28,000 troops in the south to help it defend attacks from the nuclear-armed north.
The south's Lee has said he would seek talks with the north without preconditions, following a deep freeze under his predecessor when relations plummeted to their worst level in years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariff reset: From Canada to Laos, even dealmakers face higher costs as legal fight brews; US allies & rivals hit with steep import taxes
Trump's tariff reset: From Canada to Laos, even dealmakers face higher costs as legal fight brews; US allies & rivals hit with steep import taxes

Time of India

time4 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's tariff reset: From Canada to Laos, even dealmakers face higher costs as legal fight brews; US allies & rivals hit with steep import taxes

US President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariff regime, set to take effect August 7, has triggered a wave of economic disruption across the globe, from low-income nations like Laos and Algeria to wealthy trade partners such as Canada and Switzerland. Under the new policy, countries face steep new import duties unless they agree to revised trade terms with the US. Trump has framed the plan as a campaign for "fairness" under the slogan of "Liberation Day," invoking a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency and bypass Congress. But legal and economic blowback is mounting, with US courts weighing challenges and allies questioning Washington's reliability, AP reported. 'Everybody's a loser': Experts flag fallout "In many respects, everybody's a loser here," said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at New York Law School. "The U.S. consumer's a big loser," added Alan Wolff, a former WTO deputy director-general and trade official. Even countries that struck deals to reduce their tariff exposure are still facing steeper import duties than before. The UK agreed to raise tariffs on its exports to the US from 1.3% to 10%, despite the US running a trade surplus with it for nearly two decades. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo The EU and Japan accepted 15% tariffs, lower than the threatened rates but still significantly higher than last year's levels. Steep tariffs for those resisting Trump's demands Nations that refused to negotiate fared far worse. Laos and Algeria, despite low per capita incomes, now face tariffs of 40% and 30% respectively. Brazil was slapped with a 50% levy, reportedly over its treatment of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Canada drew a 35% tariff, tied in part to its position on Palestinian statehood. Even Switzerland, which did not reach an agreement, was hit with a 39% import tax, exceeding the originally announced 31%. "The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington to make a deal," said Wolff, now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Legal battle escalates as costs rise for US consumers Five US businesses and 12 states have filed lawsuits against the new tariffs, arguing that Trump overstepped his authority. In May, the US Court of International Trade sided with plaintiffs, blocking the tariffs, though collections continue during the appeal process. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that US businesses and consumers are absorbing most of the cost. Companies including Walmart, Nike, Best Buy and Procter & Gamble have all raised prices in response. "This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those with lower incomes," said Appleton. "Your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to go up." According to Yale University's Budget Lab, the average US tariff has jumped from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3%, the highest since 1934. The lab estimates this will cost the average US household $2,400 annually. Winners still end up paying more Even countries that reached deals to avoid Trump's harshest penalties are still absorbing high tariffs. Taiwan saw its rate lowered from 32% to 20%, and Angola's from 32% to 15% — but both were paying less than 2% before the new policy. Lesotho, one of the poorest nations affected, saw its tariff reduced from 50% to 15%, though economists say the damage may already be done. "He [Trump] wants to do it because he found an undervalued franchise -- not because the market says you need to do a deal," said Wolff, referring to Trump's transactional approach to global trade. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025

Palestine statehood: More countries back two-state solution - what's keeping the dream a dream?
Palestine statehood: More countries back two-state solution - what's keeping the dream a dream?

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Palestine statehood: More countries back two-state solution - what's keeping the dream a dream?

Palestinians carry sacks of flour taken from a humanitarian aid convoy en route to Gaza City, in the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip. (Pic credit: AP) First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada: three of America's closest Western allies have recently voiced support for the idea of a Palestinian state, adding significant political heft to a movement already endorsed by more than 140 countries. On paper, it sounds like a diplomatic shift. In reality, the goal of Palestinian statehood may be further away than ever. Why now? The recent declarations by France, Britain, and Canada stem from several motives: Frustration with Israel's actions, especially in Gaza, where images of starving Palestinians have outraged many in the West. Domestic political pressure, as citizens and lawmakers demand their governments take a stand. A desire to reinvigorate peace efforts long stalled in the region. Meanwhile, Palestinians have welcomed these moves as a major boost for their cause, but Israel has rejected them outright, calling recognition of a Palestinian state tantamount to "rewarding terrorism." Where does the US stand? These announcements have left the US looking increasingly isolated in its steadfast support for Israel. US President Trump, who has aspirations for a Middle East peace legacy, has grown frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — especially over starvation in Gaza, which Netanyahu denies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo Trump wants Saudi Arabia to normalise ties with Israel as part of expanding the Abraham Accords, but Riyadh has made it clear: there will be no normalisation without an irreversible path to Palestinian statehood. What's stopping it? A lot. Here's why the dream of a Palestinian state remains just that — a dream: 1. No partner in power Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flat-out rejects a two-state solution. He has described the idea of a Palestinian state as a "launch pad to annihilate Israel." Even if Netanyahu were to waver, hardline ministers in his coalition have threatened to collapse the government over any hint of compromise. 2. Palestinian leadership vacuum On the Palestinian side, things aren't any more stable. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is seen as weak and out of touch. Meanwhile, Hamas, which controls Gaza, is internationally designated as a terrorist group. So even if a state were created, who would run it? Who could actually deliver peace? 3. The geography just doesn't work anymore The borders discussed in the 1990s Oslo Accords, based on 1967 lines with minor land swaps, are now more fantasy than framework. Massive Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank has carved up Palestinian territory into disconnected fragments. A contiguous, functioning Palestinian state under these conditions is nearly impossible. Can Israel accept a Palestinian state? The short answer: Not under Netanyahu's government. Netanyahu has declared that a Palestinian state would serve as a 'launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Even more extreme members of his coalition openly oppose any Palestinian sovereignty and have threatened to collapse the government if Netanyahu shows signs of compromise. Some cabinet members have even suggested starving Palestinians in Gaza rather than negotiating. What does it all mean? Recognition by France, the UK, and Canada is largely symbolic without Israel's agreement. In fact, it could even entrench Netanyahu further, allowing him to rally his base against what he will frame as unfair outside pressure. But at the same time, Israel's growing international isolation — especially among its traditional Western allies — could build pressure on leaders like Trump to reconsider their unwavering support, potentially reshaping the diplomatic landscape. The harsh reality Despite global calls, a Palestinian state faces more roadblocks now than in past decades. If anything, the conflict and entrenched positions have made it harder to imagine such a state ever existing — let alone thriving. The dream of Palestinian statehood continues to inspire hope — and trigger fierce debates. But right now, it's a dream suspended in diplomatic limbo, with no clear path, no consensus, and no timeline. The louder the world speaks, the more distant the solution seems.

Myanmar junta air strike on ruby mine hub kills 13
Myanmar junta air strike on ruby mine hub kills 13

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Myanmar junta air strike on ruby mine hub kills 13

Representative image YANGON: A Myanmar junta air strike on a rebel-occupied ruby mining hub killed 13 people on Saturday, according to a resident and a spokesperson for an armed opposition group. Civil war has consumed Myanmar since the military seized power in a 2021 coup, sparking resistance from pro-democracy guerrillas who found common cause with long-active ethnic armed groups. Their scattered forces initially struggled to make headway, but a combined offensive starting in late 2023 seized swathes of territory, including the town of Mogok -- the centre of the ruby trade. Myanmar is rich in precious stones and rare earth elements coveted by all factions and sold off, mostly to neighbouring China, to boost war chests. A junta spokesperson could not be reached for comment. However, a local who declined to be named for security reasons said the strike took place around 08:15 am (0145 GMT), killing seven instantly, with six dying later of their wounds. He said among the dead were a Buddhist monk collecting alms and a father and son who were riding the same motorbike. "A car passing through the area was hit, too," he added. "Seven people were wounded, including the driver." A spokeswoman for the Ta'ang National Liberation Army, which has occupied Mogok since last summer, matched that death toll, but gave a figure of 14 wounded. "It was in the morning time when the airstrike hit a public area," said spokeswoman Lway Yay Oo. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like We Have No Words For Dog The Bounty Hunter's Transformation Cash Roadster Undo "There were a lot of people walking in the street, therefore a lot of people were killed." The military was initially backfooted by the rebels' combined offensive, but has enacted conscription to boost its ranks. Its troops recently retook several key settlements in central Myanmar, including the gold mining hub of Thabeikkyin, which it seized late last month after a year-long battle. The junta on Thursday ended the state of emergency it had declared after toppling the government of Aung San Suu Kyi more than four years ago, and has touted elections in December as an off-ramp for the conflict. However, with Suu Kyi still jailed, opposition groups, including ousted lawmakers, are boycotting the poll. A UN expert in June described the exercise as a "fraud" designed to legitimise the junta's continued rule.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store