Grooming gangs review to be unveiled as PM's inquiry plan gets mixed reaction
The rapid national audit looking at the scale of grooming gangs across the country was first announced in January as part of a series of measures to tackle the issue.
Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), led by Prof Jay, found institutional failings and tens of thousands of victims across England and Wales.
On Monday, a No 10 spokesman did not say how much the inquiry would cost and the timeframe, saying the Home Secretary would set out details in the afternoon.
The spokesman said: 'It will be a full statutory inquiry. What this inquiry will do is build on the work carried out by Alexis Jay and her independent inquiry to child sexual abuse, but look specifically at how young girls were failed so badly by different agencies on a local level, strengthening the commitment we made at the start of this year to carry out locally led inquiries.'
The Home Office has also said the National Crime Agency (NCA) will carry out a nationwide operation targeting people who have sexually exploited children, and follow up on more than 800 cold cases.
According to the Home Office, the NCA will work in partnership with police forces to investigate cases that 'were not progressed through the criminal justice system' in the past.
Meanwhile, the Times reported the review by Baroness Casey is expected to explicitly link the grooming gang issue to men of Pakistani origin and say that people were ignored for the fear of racism.
The BBC also understands one of the review's recommendations is expected to order police forces in England to improve their data collection on ethnicity around child sexual abuse and exploitation cases.
The MP for Rotherham said she was initially reluctant about another 'grooming gangs' inquiry but supported it after listening to the public.
Sarah Champion told the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4: 'The thought of having another filled me with horror, and I was reluctant, but when I realised the overwhelming public concern, there's a real sense justice has not been handed out fairly and there has been a cover-up and intense frustration that there are still victims and survivors who haven't received justice.'
She added that the biggest failing was that 'no-one has joined the dots up' when it came to grooming gangs of a Pakistani heritage.
'Are there any links between those different groups and gangs? Personally, I think it's highly likely that there will be,' she said.
However Nazir Afzal, who was chief crown prosecutor for the North West from 2011 to 2015, told the Today programme he had 'pragmatic doubts' about the new national inquiry.
'Only criminal investigations can bring real accountability. That's what needs to happen. Not just for those who offended, but also those who stood by and didn't do what they were meant to do,' he said.
'Unfortunately my experience with national inquiries is that they take forever and don't deliver accountability.'
The Casey review comes after a row on the issue was ignited earlier this year, when Sir Keir became embroiled in a row with tech billionaire Elon Musk over calls for a national investigation.
In January, the Prime Minister hit out at politicians 'calling for inquiries because they want to jump on the bandwagon of the far right' but, on Sunday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said Sir Keir had been focused on 'victims' rather than 'grandstanding'.
A children's charity has said that the Government must not wait until the end of the inquiry to implement the recommendations from existing reports such as IICSA.
Lynn Perry, chief executive of Barnardo's, said: 'Children and survivors of abuse have already been waiting many years for action, so it's vital the Government doesn't wait for the outcome of this new inquiry to implement recommendations from previous ones.
'That includes upskilling social workers and other professionals to spot the signs of abuse, as well as investing in vital support services to help children experiencing life-changing consequences of abuse and to keep them safe from further harm.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The realists have left the building – now the SNP really is in trouble
By my reckoning ,there are only three competent SNP MSPs at the moment: Forbes, Michelle Thompson and Fergus Ewing. The latter is not even an SNP MSP anymore and will be standing as an independent next time - good for him. The other two will both be gone. Competence matters, experience outside Parliament matters, understanding that wealth generation must come before more spending matters. Alex Salmond had a grasp of economics and knew he had to draw from across the traditional political spectrum in order to succeed, and he nearly did. Sturgeon in contrast was a political pygmy. She thought wealth creators' sole purpose was to provide more money for her to spend. Instead of governing well for us all, hugely divisive social policies were endlessly pursed and now look rather daft. She quickly fades in the rear-view mirror. Yousaf is a chapter best skipped over and now we have Swinney. He has hit upon a brilliant new strategy: do as little as possible then you are less likely to annoy people or muck things up. What it is not is a strategy to inspire or really take things forward. Forbes understood that in order to make a success of independence - and that's the point, just getting it is no achievement at all - there would have to be a decisive majority of Scots in favour. Forget 51/49, more like 2 to 1 and in order to achieve that the Scottish Parliament would need to show over perhaps over 20 or 30 years it was clearly governing Scotland well and demonstrably better than the rest of the UK. Over the last nearly 20 years, successive SNP governments have failed to hit that target. Read more More economic trouble is coming. And there's only one escape route | The Herald It's time to cast aside prejudice and go for the cash Can anyone truly say the Scottish Parliament been a great success? I can't Without Forbes they won't even try. The SNP look to Stephen Flynn, a man of no achievement or experience outside politics, as a beacon of hope when actually they would lead the SNP and unfortunately the rest of us, onto the rocks. People often go into politics with good motives - to change things for the better. Unfortunately, within the ranks of SNP MSPs this essentially means only one thing: spend more money. Despite the Scottish Government's wailing that Scotland is hard done by, the truth is that we have a generous financial settlement as part of the UK. There is no Westminster-imposed austerity as the SNP would have us believe. Added to this, we pay higher taxes than the rest of the UK which the SNP thinks provides more money but in reality provides none as higher earners switch their residence and economic activity elsewhere. We like the fact that we have a lot of public servants when in truth we should try to manage with as few as possible. We pay them more than they would get in the rest of the UK and pretend this extra spending is "investment". We agree with the unions that civil servants can work from home and should move towards a four-day week with no loss of pay. Humza Yousaf (Image: Newsquest) We pay more in benefits. We don't require those who receive benefits to have regular face-to-face meetings to make sure they are still entitled to those benefits and help them improve their position - we just hand out the money - because we are nicer. The job of government is not to be nice but to be effective. How well a government is doing depends not on its inputs in terms of people and cash but on its outputs in terms of what is achieves for its citizens at a sensible cost to taxpayers. Effective government is not about failing to take on the unions and so building farcically large ferries. Nor is it preening about the number of wind turbines we have but being dead against new nuclear power which as well as creating thousands of jobs will keep the lights on during a cold still winter's night. Insisting that students won't have to pay for higher education but at the same time not providing the funds to our universities to enable them to compete in the longer term against those in England and elsewhere. That's not smart either. The fiscal position in the UK is bad and it's worse in Scotland. More challenging demographics, less economic growth, spending rising faster. The Scottish Government is not the proprietor of a sweetie shop, it needs to make hard choices in order to restrain spending and promote growth. So far it has shown no will to do either. With the departure of its few economic realists, it would be dangerous to hold your breath for improvement.
Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Hundreds to risk arrest at protest against Palestine Action terror ban
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The Home Secretary has been clear that the proscription of Palestine Action is not about Palestine, nor does it affect the freedom to protest on Palestinian rights. It only applies to the specific and narrow organisation whose activities do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across the country who continue to exercise their fundamental rights to protest on different issues.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Portugal's top court blocks bill restricting immigration
LISBON, Aug 9 (Reuters) - Portugal's Constitutional Court has blocked a bill approved by the right-wing parliamentary majority that was designed to limit the inflow of immigrants, citing obstacles it creates for family members in joining immigrants legally resident in Portugal. Immediately after late Friday's decision, President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa sent the bill back to parliament, which is on recess until September. Last month, the president told the court to check the document for potential infringements of the principles of equality, proportionality and legal security. The bill illustrates the rightward shift in politics in much of Europe, as governments try to fend off the rise of the far-right by being tougher on immigration. The bill would have made hundreds of thousands of migrants legally resident in Portugal wait for two years before they could request permission for immediate family members to join them. Only highly-skilled workers and investors with special residence permits would be exempt. The court ruled that the bill was "likely to lead to the separation of family members" of foreign citizens legally resident in Portugal, which it said would be a "violation of the rights enshrined in the constitution". Last year, the government scrapped a programme that allowed migrants entering Portugal on a tourist visa or waiver to stay and get residence permits if they find work. Immigrants from the Community of Portuguese Language Countries still enjoy most such privileges but the bill would impose the requirement of a long-term work or residence visa that they would need to apply for in the country of origin. Parliament approved the bill on July 16 with support from the centre-right ruling coalition and far-right Chega party, which emerged as the second-largest parliamentary force in a May general election. Left-wing opposition parties have criticised the government for what they call an inhumane bill, and for allowing Chega to impose its anti-immigration agenda on the minority administration. The government denies such accusations, arguing that immigration inflows require better controls, and has already said it intends to adjust the bill to the court's objections.
