More Afrikaners take up Trump's resettlement offer, thousands of applications being processed
The second batch of Afrikaner refugees arrived in the US on Friday. Pictured are US President Donald Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, during a meeting which aimed to clear misinformation about genocide claims.
Image: Jim WATSON / AFP
About 8000 applications have been made by Afrikaners to the US embassy to resettle in that country.
The Afrikaners are taking up President Donald Trump's offer to resettle them amidst false claims of white genocide and persecution in South Africa.
Another small batch of Afrikaners arrived in the US on Friday after an initial group of 49 left the country last month. Trump issued an executive order in February where Washington cited the Expropriation Act 13 of 2024 as one that enables the persecution of Afrikaners.
Solidarity's Jaco Kleynhans said the second group departed on a commercial flight on Thursday that landed in Atlanta in the US on Friday.
'It is a smaller group, including children. Several more groups will fly to the USA over the next few weeks. The US Embassy in Pretoria, in collaboration with the State Department in Washington DC, is currently processing 8,000 applications, and we expect many more Afrikaner refugees to travel to the USA over the next few months.
"They are settling in states across the USA, but particularly southern states such as Texas, North and South Carolina, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska,' Kleynhans said.
Reports indicate that the US embassy in South Africa is aware that 'refugees continue to arrive in the United States from South Africa on commercial flights as part of the Afrikaner resettlement programme's ongoing operations'.
Solidarity said it has helped some people understand the application process better and referred them to the right people at the US embassy. They have also assisted the US government in determining the criteria for Afrikaner refugee status.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'Our primary focus is not refugee status for Afrikaners, but rather to find ways to ensure a free, safe, and prosperous future for Afrikaners in South Africa. We remain 100% convinced that South Africa can and must create a home for all its people,' Kleynhans said.
He added that at least 20% of Afrikaners have already left the country 'because if they stayed, they would have been unemployed'.
Kleynhans said he was campaigning in at least ten countries to increase international pressure on the SA government in the run-up to the G20 summit.
On criticism that this refugee path is politically motivated, Kleynhans said: 'The American refugee programs are paid for by American taxpayers and it is outrageous that international organisations and foreign groups think they can dictate to the Trump administration who should be eligible for refugee status. If Americans disagree with Trump on this, they can elect a different president in three years."
Kallie Kriel, AfriForum's CEO, said he did not know the Afrikaners who were leaving because they applied directly to the US embassy.
'Our view is not to condemn people (who are) leaving, but rather to condemn the circumstances in the country that have led to this, such as hateful chants, like 'Kill the Boer'," he said.
Kriel added that matters were compounded by the government, including the president and courts, which failed to condemn the chant.
He acknowledged that everyone in the country has challenges, but said Afrikaners felt threatened by the open call for such violence with the 'Kill the Boer' chant.
'No community should be targeted through calls for violence. Also taking away the future of young people who now have to go into the labour market, but then are discriminated against based on their skin colour.
'We want to address that, and that is why we are vocal, because we want to make sure that South Africa truly belongs to all who live in it,' Kriel said.
Professor Siphamandla Zondi, a political analyst from the University of Johannesburg, said the US's welcoming of the second batch of white Afrikaners should not surprise anyone, especially in the absence of a change of US policy.
'We should expect more and more poor Afrikaners to take advantage of this to get a free pass to the US in search of basic jobs, which ordinarily would prove difficult to get visas for,' Zondi said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
7 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
MK Party's bid to challenge outcome of 2024 elections postponed
JOHANNESBURG - Proceedings in the Electoral Court will not go ahead on Tuesday in the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party's application challenging the outcome of the 2024 national and provincial elections. The specialist court was scheduled to hear the matter on Tuesday, but the matter has been postponed at the request of the official opposition. This after the party filed a notice to appeal the judgment of the court in an earlier interlocutory application, which dismissed its application to have the court order the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) to provide it with access to documents it used before pronouncing on the results of the watershed elections. Over a year has passed since South Africans headed to the polls, and the MK Party argues that the system experienced significant downtime and exhibited grave inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the reported results, undermining the constitutional requirement for free and fair elections. It also wants President Cyril Ramaphosa to declare a new election date within 90 days from which an order may be made. But the main application has stalled as the party continues its bid to appeal a judgment of the Electoral Court, which dismissed its application to have the IEC relinquish some documents which the party feels would be key in advancing its case. The IEC, however, said it had handed over the documents requested by the party. A new date for the hearing is yet to be determined. ALSO READ: DA: MK Party hasn't provided evidence to back claims of election vote rigging
The South African
15 minutes ago
- The South African
Are second batch of refugees ONLY white South Africans?
A second batch of South African 'refugees' has arrived in the US under President Donald Trump's resettlement programme. The offer is open to all 'racial minorities' in South Africa, including Afrikaners, who believe they have been persecuted. But do the numbers reflect that? According to reports, a second batch of 'refugees' arrived in the US last week. The group consists of nine white South Africans and their families. Jaco Kleynhans, of the Afrikaner rights group Solidarity Movement, claimed that the group travelled on a commercial flight. While it's not clear if other races will be included in the group, there has been speculation that many Afrikaners will be part of the programme. Kleynhans told the media: 'Several more groups will fly to the USA over the next few weeks. The US Embassy in Pretoria, in collaboration with the State Department in Washington DC, is currently processing 8,000 applications. And we expect many more Afrikaner refugees to travel to the USA over the next few months. 'They are settling in states across the USA, but particularly southern states such as Texas, North and South Carolina, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska.' He continued: 'Our primary focus is not refugee status for Afrikaners. But rather to find ways to ensure a free, safe, and prosperous future for Afrikaners in South Africa. We remain 100% convinced that South Africa can and must create a home for all its people.' While many Afrikaners and white South Africans have seemingly been prioritised in the group, other smaller communities are also welcome to apply for refugee status in the US. Last month, the US Embassy issued a statement detailing the resettlement programme, which was extended to 'racial minorities' in South Africa. Despite initially being targeted at Afrikaner farmers and white people, US authorities have since included coloured, Indian, and 'mixed-race' South Africans. Applicants must prove that they are 'persecuted' South Africans who are victims of 'racial discrimination'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African web
Eyewitness News
19 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Why critical thinking is a collective responsibility in an age of disinformation
Jamil F. Khan 3 June 2025 | 8:10 Fake news Donald Trump United States (US) Picture: Pexels As a resource, knowledge has been fought over for almost as long as humans have existed and those fights have had lasting consequences for how we understand our world and what we believe to be the facts of human life. Though the knowledge being produced during any social period should always be held up to scrutiny, there are, by now, certain well-established and proven facts about how the world works. This knowledge, we have mostly agreed on and therefore co-constructed, giving everyone a role and responsibility in producing knowledge. The element of trust has, however, been unfortunately abused throughout history, leading many to a skepticism about whether we can trust what we claim to know. It is important to acknowledge how the trust of Black, Indigenous and other racially minoritised people, queer people, women and people with disabilities have been harmed and killed by institutions of knowledge in the name of science. What is known as science is also subject to the politics of power, which has decided who gets remembered and credited, and who gets forgotten and erased. The field of modern gynaecology was honed through non-consensual, unanaesthetised surgeries on enslaved Black women by J. Marrion Sims. The Tuskegee Experiment killed over 100 Black men between 1932 and 1972, through a study that wanted to observe the effects of syphilis if left untreated. The scientists led participants to believe that they would receive free medical care, while not informing them of their diagnosis and never telling the men that they would never be treated. In South Africa, a secret chemical and biological warfare project was executed during apartheid with the expertise of scientists, such as Wouter Basson, who has been dubbed 'Dr Death' in popular discourse. These are but a few of the crimes committed in the name of science, particularly during times when the circulation and transmission of knowledge were so militantly guarded. Access to knowledge has always been a site of struggle, and though there have been betrayals, the general public has never been passive about it. The current internet era we are in, where knowledge is so vastly available, presents us with a privilege but also a responsibility. We are accessing, sharing and questioning knowledge under the unique conditions of this era, which is what should inform our fight for its preservation. Although there has always been a necessary struggle to encourage the uptake of new knowledge, through further research and observation, societies have worked with knowledge in pursuit of some form of truth – an element of sense-making that has come increasingly under threat in unprecedented ways. To know what is true and what is not is often at the heart of our scuffles with knowledge. However, our doubts should not lead us to reject knowledge but inspire us to participate in producing more of it. That we have been betrayed before should not lead us to reject the truth-tellers in our society. Beyond the knowledge of natural sciences, we have also always looked to the thinkers, philosophers, healers, artists, singers, and poets to tell us about the experience of humanity. We have always looked to the special ways that words, sounds and images have revealed truths about our experiences that connect us to each other. We have engaged with talent as a conduit for knowledge. What we know about the world and how it feels has sometimes been located in the tone of a vocalist we love. We have so many forms of knowledge available to us that we engage with all the time and through that engagement, we modify and circulate it. We are living in a dangerous time, in which AI has the potential to completely rewrite reality. Fake news spreads so quickly and easily. Historical photographs are reconstructed to change their narrative, and the president of the USA can present false images of a purported white genocide in South Africa without fact-checking them first. This is a consequence of a collective rejection of truth and a persecution of truth-tellers. Be they whistleblowers exposing corruption, musicians calling out a genocide, or critical scholars examining the history of gender, we all have a hand in protecting the truth. We know the truth when we hear it, even if we don't want to. We also know when our beliefs encourage the suffering of others, and that when we cling to such beliefs, we are betraying humanity. While the pursuit of knowledge is commendable, we must also interrogate the purposes of the knowledge we pursue. When we reject existing knowledge and rubbish its facts, and thereby simply create knowledge that is not in consultation with existing knowledge, we create disinformation – another burden of our time amplified through the immediacy of social media. Related to this, we must also acknowledge that what we know is not separated from our political motivations and the beliefs we have inherited from our various social contexts. So, when we endorse knowledge that furthers the persecution of others and reject knowledge that challenges the foundations of our privileges, we are answerable to our biases, which trouble our relationship with truth. Everyone wants to feel heard, respected and valued for what they know. Those who have come to be recognised in this way have often earned such acclaim through the labour of their struggles with knowledge and their willingness to rethink things when new information comes to mind. It is true, though, that some came to be recognised this way through deceit and theft, but what these people have in common is a place in the fight for preserving knowledge, which all of us have. I can only hope that people who want to work with knowledge do it to improve lives and ease suffering for those most marginalised. Whatever the motivation, what knowledge requires of us is to earn it through the labour of critical thought. We have a collective task to do the work of shaping knowledge, and not rejecting it, for the benefit of all of us, past, present and future. Jamil F. Khan is an author, doctoral critical diversity scholar, and research fellow at the Johannesburg Institute for Advanced Study.
