Fact check: Could Trump's trade tariffs pay off the US deficit?
During a July 20 interview on CBS's Face the Nation, Lutnick told host Margaret Brennan that the US is collecting close to $30bn a month in tariffs. 'You got to remember – this is going to pay off our deficit. This is going to make America stronger,' he said.
But the maths falls short.
Multiplying the most recent month of US tariff collections by a full decade would not cover the 10-year costs of President Donald Trump's new tax-and-spending legislation, much less all federal deficits during that decade. The current tariffs are slated to increase on August 1, including levies ranging from 20 percent to 40 percent for 21 countries, based on what the Trump administration has said.
An analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) – Congress's nonpartisan number-crunching arm – also projects that 10 years of tariff revenue increases under Trump will not pay for the added deficits from his bill or the cumulative deficits over the next decade. The projected added deficit from the bill is $3.4 trillion, on top of the existing projected deficit over the next decade of $21.8 trillion.
'I can't envision a scenario where the tariff revenues eliminate the deficit,' said Steve Ellis, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a group that tracks the federal budget.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment for this story.
How much is the US collecting from Trump tariffs?
The federal government has been taking in higher tariff revenues under Trump's more aggressive tariff policies. Currently, the tariffs are a baseline 10 percent for all countries, plus additional tariffs on some products such as steel. Economists say consumers will ultimately swallow much of the tariff increases.
Federal tariff revenue tracked by the Penn-Wharton Budget Model shows that, up to July 11, the federal government had collected about $100bn in tariffs so far this year. During the same period in 2024, before Trump took office, the federal government had collected less than $48bn in tariff revenue.
In June 2025, the most recent monthly data available, the federal government took in $27bn in tariffs, according to the Treasury Department. A year earlier, that figure was $6bn. That's an increase of $21bn a month because of Trump's trade policies.
If the government were to continue collecting tariff revenue at the June 2025 pace for a full decade – 120 months – that would produce $2.52 trillion in tariff revenue.
That is in the ballpark of what the CBO published in June. Taking into account the potential economic shrinkage from higher tariffs, such as higher consumer prices, CBO projected that the boost in tariff revenue would reduce total federal deficits by $2.8 trillion over 10 years.
How does this tariff revenue compare with the federal deficit?
Without adding in the deficits from the bill Trump just signed, CBO's baseline projection for the cumulative deficits over the next 10 years is almost $21.8 trillion. That is about seven times the size of the CBO's projected tariff revenues over the same period.
And the projected tariff revenue under Trump would not fully cover the added deficits just from the 'megabill' Trump signed. According to CBO estimates, the law Trump signed on July 4 will raise deficits by $3.4 trillion beyond their previous trajectory over the next 10 years, which exceeds CBO's tariff revenue projection.
There is uncertainty about how much tariff revenue Trump's policies will generate, because he has frequently announced and then paused higher tariffs.
'It is hard to know what the end game is,' Ellis said. 'Is it high tariffs to generate revenue, which would reduce economic activity, or is it to rebalance the trade and eventually lower tariffs', and thus their revenue?
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a fiscally hawkish group, has noted that Trump's tariff policies have been challenged in court, and the initial ruling by the Court of International Trade went against the administration.
If the initial ruling is upheld on appeal, then Trump would lose his power to unilaterally enact many of the tariffs he has been imposing, and the new tariff revenues now being generated would largely dry up.
And even if Trump's tariff powers are upheld on appeal, Trump's successor could reverse them by executive order, meaning any tariff revenues would cover the next four years, not the next 10 years.
Our ruling
Lutnick said tariffs are 'going to pay off our deficit'.
Trump's on-again, off-again pattern for implementing tariffs makes estimates tricky. But two projections show that the Trump administration's tariff revenues would not cover the next 10 years of projected deficits.
The CBO said it expects tariff revenues to reach $2.8 trillion over the next 10 years, while a back-of-the-envelope calculation based on the tariffs collected in June 2025 would reach $2.52 trillion.
Both sums are only a fraction of the nearly $22 trillion in cumulative deficits projected over the next 10 years.
We rate the statement False.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
an hour ago
- Qatar Tribune
Asian shares mixed after China-US talks end without trade deal
Agencies Shares in Asia were mixed on Wednesday after the U.S. and China ended their latest round of trade talks without a deal. U.S, futures edged higher while oil prices slipped. Beijing's top trade official said China and the United States agreed during two days of talks in Stockholm, Sweden, to work on extending an Aug. 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on each other. The U.S. side said an extension was discussed, but not decided on. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the American team would head back to Washington and 'talk to the president about whether that's something that he wants to do.' A Friday deadline is looming for many of Trump's proposed tariffs on other countries. Several highly anticipated economic reports are also on the way, including the latest monthly update on the job market. 'Markets had been floating on a cloud of trade optimism — first Japan, then the EU — but the sugar high is wearing off. Now, with U.S.-China talks dragging on in Stockholm, there's a growing sense that the momentum is stalling,' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index shed 0.1.2% to 25,213.15, while the Shanghai Composite index gained 0.2% to 3,616.30. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index fell less than 0.1% to 40,654.70. Gains for electronics companies were offset by losses for major exporters like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 climbed 0.6% to 8,756.40 and in South Korea, the Kospi gained 0.7% to 3,254,47. Taiwan's Taiex rose 1.1%. In India, the Sensex added 0.3%.On Tuesday, U.S. stock indexes edged back from their record levels as a busy week for Wall Street picked up momentum. The S&P 500 fell 0.3% to 6,370.86, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 0.5% to 44,632.99. The Nasdaq composite was down 0.4% at 21,098.29. SoFi Technologies jumped 7.4%, but Merck dropped 2.2% and UPS sank 9.2% following a torrent of profit reports from big U.S. companies. They're among the hundreds of companies telling investors this week how much they made during the spring, including nearly a third of the stocks in the S&P 500 index. UnitedHealth Group dropped 5.8% after reporting a profit for the spring that fell short of analysts' expectations. It also gave a forecast for profit over all of 2025 that investors found disappointing. The health care giant said it expected to earn at least $16 per share, when analysts were looking for something close to $20, according to FactSet.
Qatar Tribune
an hour ago
- Qatar Tribune
US, China end ‘constructive' trade talks, Trump to decide on truce
Agencies U.S. and Chinese officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce on Tuesday as they wrapped up two days of what both sides described as 'constructive' talks in Stockholm – aimed at defusing an escalating trade war between the world's two biggest economies that threatens global growth. No major breakthroughs were announced, and U.S. officials said it was up to President Donald Trump to decide whether to extend a trade truce that expires on Aug. 12 or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digit figures. But U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent tamped down any expectation of Trump rejecting the extension. 'The meetings were very constructive,' Bessent told reporters after the meetings wrapped up. 'It's just that we haven't given the signoff.' As Trump returned to Washington after visiting Scotland, where he inked a trade deal with the European Union, he said Bessent had just briefed him on the China talks. 'He felt very good about the meeting, better than he felt yesterday,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. After months of threatening high tariffs on trading partners, Trump has secured trade pacts with the EU, Japan, Indonesia and others, but China's powerhouse economy and grip on global rare earth flows make these talks particularly complex. Both sides in May walked back from imposing triple-digit tariffs on each other in what would have amounted to a bilateral trade embargo. But global supply chains and financial markets could face renewed turmoil without an agreement. Bessent told reporters he expects to meet with Trump on Wednesday after both have returned to Washington, and the president would have the final say on any extension. Another 90-day extension is one option, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer added. 'We had constructive meetings for sure, to go back with the positive report. But the extension of the pause, he'll decide,' Greer said after talks at Rosenbad, the Swedish prime minister's office in central Stockholm. Bessent said there would likely be another meeting between U.S. and Chinese officials in about 90 days, and the agreements on the flow of Chinese rare earths were becoming more refined after previous talks in Geneva and London. 'There was good personal interaction being built up, good, mutual respect. I think we understand their agenda much better,' he said. Underlining the stakes, the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday raised its global growth forecast but flagged a potential rebound in tariff rates as a major risk. China's top trade negotiator Li Chenggang said both sides fully recognized the importance of maintaining a stable and sound economic and trade relationship. 'The Chinese and U.S. economic and trade teams will maintain active communication, exchange views on economic and trade issues in a timely manner, and continue to promote the stable and healthy development of bilateral economic and trade relations,' said Li. The talks could pave the way for a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later in the year, though Trump denied going out of his way to seek one and U.S. officials said the topic was not discussed. Aboard Air Force One, Trump said he thinks he will meet with Xi before the end of the year, though he did not elaborate. The Stockholm meetings also included a lengthy discussion on the U.S. and Chinese economies, with Greer and Bessent emphasizing the need for China to shift away from a state-led, export-driven manufacturing economy to one powered by increased consumer demand, which would help U.S. exports. 'Cooperation between China and the United States will benefit both sides, while if they fight, both will be hurt,' according to a readout of the meetings from China's Xinhua News Agency. 'Stable, healthy and sustainable economic and trade relations between China and the United States are not only conducive to achieving their respective development goals, but also conducive to promoting the development and stability of the world economy.' The Stockholm talks follow Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S. and a deal with Japan. That agreement has brought a measure of relief to the EU but also frustration and anger, with France denouncing the deal as a 'submission' and Germany, Europe's largest economy, warning of 'significant' damage.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's tariffs forge ‘feeling of big betrayal' in Canada's manufacturing
Krysten Lawton, 53, works in health and safety at Ford Motor Company of Canada's engine plant in Windsor, Ontario — mere blocks from the Detroit River — where she has worked for 30 years. Lawton is a fourth-generation auto worker in Windsor, an industrial hub abutting Canada's US border near Detroit. Her great-grandfather, both grandfathers and her father all worked for Ford, which employs her, her husband and their oldest son. 'These are really good-paying jobs,' Lawton says of the factory, where she currently works in health and safety. 'This is life-changing for people to work here.' Windsor employs more people in manufacturing jobs than in any other sector — 19 percent of its workforce. Those workers and employers in Canada's industrial heartland are now rattled by tariff threats. In March, United States President Donald Trump imposed 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminium, and weeks later, the same on automobiles. In June, he doubled steel and aluminium duties. And now, he is threatening to tax copper at 50 percent starting Friday. That's Trump's deadline for Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney to reach a deal or face 35 percent tariffs on all goods deemed not compliant with the 2020 US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), atop previous duties. Last Friday, Trump threw cold water on Canadians' hopes for reprieve. 'Canada could be one where they'll just pay tariffs,' Trump said. 'It's not really a negotiation.' Facing the same deadline, the European Union agreed on Sunday to accept 15 percent duties on most European exports. US and Canadian manufacturers, long interconnected, are bracing for the worst — as are industry-dependent communities. 'Volatility continues to be the new certainty,' said Alex Greco, senior director of manufacturing at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. Loss of confidence Trump's first tariffs had Lawton's coworkers 'all on edge', she says. Her plant makes engines for factories in the US states of Kentucky, Ohio and Michigan, with some components sourced globally. 'It definitely has real human impact,' she said, 'especially in our region … the manufacturing hub of all Canada.' Canadian manufacturers employ 1.7 million people, exceeding one-tenth of the country's gross domestic product, and last year exported to the US 356 billion Canadian dollars ($257bn US) of goods they produced, with 530,000 manufacturing jobs directly tied to exports. Passenger vehicles and parts made up 62 billion Canadian dollars ($45bn) of that, exceeding 30,000 direct export-dependent jobs. Canada exported 13 billion Canadian dollars ($9bn) of domestically manufactured aluminium — representing nearly 10,000 jobs — and 8.4 billion Canadian dollars ($6bn) of steel and iron, nearly 6,000 jobs. Trump's volatile approach 'just creates a chill on overall investment', Greco said, 'eroding confidence in cross-border supply chains', freezing many companies' expansion plans. Official data lags on job impacts. But thousands have already been laid off across the automotive and metals industries this year. Canada's gross domestic product (GDP) fell in April, mostly in manufacturing, a 'significant impact already', said Centre for Future Work director and economist Jim Stanford. 'The tariffs themselves, and probably more importantly the uncertainty around the tariffs, is definitely hitting home,' he said. Trump's tariff whims have sparked anxiety amongst workers, employers and voters — just 11 percent of whom believe Trump negotiates in 'good faith'. But despite layoffs and slowdowns, the damage could be worse, said Catherine Connelly, head of McMaster University's Centre for Research on Employment and Work. Without mass layoffs or inflationary changes, employment is actually up, she noted. 'We're in the stage of anything can happen,' said the business professor in Hamilton, Ontario. 'But it's starting to look like we're going to have some kind of tariffs. 'No business has ever wanted anything like this.' Auto sector 'going to hurt' if tariffs stay Car factories by the Michigan-Ontario border are increasingly entangled since the 1965 Canada-US Auto Pact. 'We had 60 years of integration,' said McGill University economics lecturer Julian Vikan Karaguesian, who worked in Canada's finance ministry on trade issues, including in Canada's US embassy. 'If these tariffs are sustained, it's going to hurt.' John D'Agnolo, chair of Unifor's Auto Industry Council, notes that workers are fretting — especially younger ones with less seniority protections and rising expenses. 'It's a scary thing,' the longtime Ford employee and unionist said. 'They're worried. 'They've got to make sure they can take care of their families.' Industry slowdowns would 'ripple' across auto-dependent regions, Greco said. 'Companies will have to make very tough decisions,' he said. 'There's still a threat of, potentially, a recession.' A silver lining, experts say, is exemptions for North American-made parts. 'In theory, the US tariff on cars is supposed to make an adjustment for US-made content in the car,' said Stanford. 'But in practice … industry are just scratching their heads.' 'Cascading impacts' Even for USMCA-compliant auto parts, tariffs on raw metals for cars will have 'cascading impacts', Greco said. One-quarter of imported US steel is Canadian, and over half of its imported aluminium. In Ontario, 'the heart' of Canada's metal industry, one region hosts one-third of the provincial sector's workforce. The peninsula around Hamilton, Canada's 'steel capital', employs nearly 12,000 people in metal manufacturing. 'Hamiltonians in particular are concerned about steel; it's a huge industry,' said Connelly. 'The companies, they're extraordinarily resilient. 'But nobody ever thought that something like this would ever happen. It's certainly quite a shock.' The United Steelworkers represent tens of thousands of metalworkers. Its national union director for Canada, Marty Warren, warns that 'a whole lot is at stake' for members, who produce products 'from when you're born to caskets for your last day'. Tariffs have many of his members fearful for their futures in 'great-paying jobs' that 'support communities'. 'It's definitely set off some panic,' he noted. 'There's fear throughout the membership: 'Should I be saving my money for darker times?'' On July 16, Carney imposed his own steel tariffs on several countries, to 'ensure Canadian steel producers are more competitive'. Unions want the Canadian prime minister to do more to protect domestic industries. 'Because at the end of the day,' Warren quipped, 'what's a nation without a domestic steel industry?' Labour movement divided One thorn for Canada's highly unionised manufacturing sector: Some US labour leaders back Trump's 'America First' economic agenda. The United Auto Workers head endorsed 'bringing back American jobs'. 'Are we shocked by it?' asked D'Agnolo. 'Of course we are, because we work well together.' Ford employee Lawton is less diplomatic, calling pro-tariff leaders 'chameleons' for their shifting stances on Trump. 'Within the unions, you have people that will support him one day and … against him the next,' she said. 'It actually would impact the US much greater than it would impact us. Lawton sneers at the idea that US jobs went to Canada, where Ford opened a plant in 1905. 'We have never taken any American jobs,' she said. 'But when you hear it over and over and over again, you start to believe it.' Trump harnessed 'a feeling of big betrayal' among blue-collar Americans after decades of declining manufacturing, argues Karaguesian. 'It's not clear he'll be able to tariff his way back to America being a big manufacturer,' he said. 'Shortcuts rarely work.' 'You have to be able to bounce' Karaguesian worked under Carney in Canada's finance department before he headed the Bank of Canada. He sees Carney as 'very clever economically and politically and strategically', even though 'he's been dealt a very hard hand of cards'. Carney will have to compromise, but not at any cost. 'If we want to remain a sovereign nation,' Karaguesian said, 'we will have to draw a line in the sand.' A poll found two-thirds of Canadians want Carney to 'take a hard approach, refusing difficult concessions'. In auto-dependent Windsor, Lawton calls manufacturing 'a roller coaster'. 'Buying my first house, thinking about starting a family, and then bang — you get a layoff,' she recalled. She worries most for young workers. To weather manufacturing's storms, she urges her kids to diversify their skills, and not depend on one income source. She'd give Carney similar advice. 'You have to be able to bounce,' she said. 'Automotive is not something that I wish for my boys because of the roller coaster ride. 'I tell them all the time, 'You got to save your pennies, man, because you just don't know.''
